CA Unified Communications Monitor vs InfluxDB comparison

Broadcom and InfluxData are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #89, while InfluxData is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.2. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to InfluxData’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of InfluxData users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

2,046 Views
1,412 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

InfluxDB

Read 21 InfluxDB reviews

6,057 Views
1,696 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

InfluxDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and InfluxDB are two products competing in the network monitoring and time-series database solutions space. In terms of versatility and broad feature set, InfluxDB appears to have an advantage, especially when focusing on data analytics and storage, making it worth its cost when compared to CA Unified Communications Monitor.

Features:CA Unified Communications Monitor offers real-time analysis, traffic flow visibility, and network performance diagnostics tailored for communication systems. InfluxDB provides high scalability, open-source flexibility, and efficient handling of time-series data, suitable for various applications beyond just monitoring.

Room for Improvement:CA Unified Communications Monitor could improve its flexibility in terms of integration options, scalability beyond communication systems, and support for cloud-based environments. InfluxDB might benefit from enhancing its user interface, reducing initial setup complexity, and expanding documentation for enterprise environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:CA Unified Communications Monitor is designed for specific infrastructures with dedicated support for communication networks. InfluxDB offers extensive deployment options, supporting cloud-based systems, and has broad community and enterprise support, ideal for flexible integration.

Pricing and ROI:CA Unified Communications Monitor aligns its pricing model with its specialized surveillance solutions, providing worthwhile ROI for applicable use cases. InfluxDB, despite higher setup costs, is seen as delivering substantial ROI through its extensive data handling and analytics capabilities, often deemed worth the investment for comprehensive analytical solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. InfluxDB Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. InfluxDB

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

89th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

60th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (3rd)

InfluxDB

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

13th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Relational Databases (1st), Open Source Databases (7th), NoSQL Databases (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of InfluxDB is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
InfluxDB	0.5%
CA Unified Communications Monitor	0.5%
Other	99.0%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

Time series data has been managed efficiently for IoT sensors but reporting still needs improvement

How InfluxDB can be improved is relevant since for Energy Box, we face certain issues. We have customers worldwide, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe, but when we expanded to China two years ago, they indicated that they do not support the cloud version there. Our application is built on the cloud, which required us to create a separate application for Azure China, which was painful for us. The second issue involves frequent version changes. For example, we started with version one, transitioned to version two, and I heard they are considering InfluxDB version three, reverting to earlier practices. InfluxDB should improve without completely changing its approach. Now we have to redo our work for InfluxDB version three. Regarding needed improvements, the documentation is sufficient, but pricing presents a challenge. InfluxDB has standard pricing, which is acceptable for large companies. However, for startups in our position, they should provide special discounts so everyone can utilize it. The pricing should adapt as companies grow, which is a reasonable expectation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For us, it's very key to know the voice quality of the total solution, which is based on many components across many domains."

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"The user interface is well-designed and easy to use. It provides a clear overview of the data, making it simple to understand the information at hand."

"I recommend going with the cloud version of InfluxDB, as it's very cheap and effective."

"Because of reduced downtime, we benefit greatly from receiving alerts in advance."

"The platform operates very quickly. It is easy to configure, connect, and query and integrates seamlessly with Grafana."

"This product has been working well and it is serving our purpose, so I can recommend it to others."

"The most valuable features of InfluxDB are the documentation and performance, and the good plugins metrics in the ecosystem."

"InfluxDB positively impacts my organization because I have optimized my database storage, and by using powerful queries, I am able to find my data logs efficiently and also manage logging."

"Overall, InfluxDB delivered excellent performance, stability, and simplicity for telemetry-driven use cases."

More InfluxDB pros

Cons

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved, specifically the user experience."

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"InfluxDB is generally stable, but we've encountered issues with the configuration file in our ticket stack. For instance, a mistake in one of the metrics out of a hundred KPIs can disrupt data collection for all KPIs. This happens because the agent stops working if there's an issue with any configuration part. To address this, it is essential to ensure that all configurations are part of the agent's EXE file when provided. This makes it easier to package the agent for server installation and ensures all KPIs are available from the server. Additionally, the agent cannot encrypt and decrypt passwords for authentication, which can be problematic when monitoring URLs or requiring authentication tokens. This requires additional scripting and can prolong service restart times."

"I chose an 8 out of 10 because there is room for improvement, such as regarding backups and enhanced security through other types of authentication or encrypted data in TLS."

"In terms of features that I would like to see or have, in the community version, some features are not available. I would like to have clustering and authentication in the community version."

"One area for improvement is the querying language. InfluxDB deprecated FluxQL, which was intuitive since developers are already familiar with standard querying."

"I haven't seen a return on investment; unfortunately, I cannot share relevant metrics such as time saved, fewer employees needed, or money saved."

"I've tried both on-premises and cloud-based deployments, and each has its limitations."

"InfluxDB can be improved by addressing issues such as performance drops, queries being more difficult to understand, and its high memory usage."

"Customer support is fair enough but can be improved."

More InfluxDB cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We are using the open-source version of InfluxDB."

"InfluxDB recently increased its price. It is very expensive now."

"InfluxDB is open-source, but there are additional costs for scaling."

"The tool is an open-source product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with InfluxDB?

If the dashboarding facility can be improved in terms of the visualization parameters and the amount of support available from the community, as well as having smarter alerts to send those alerts t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?

My main use case for InfluxDB is to inject all my performance data and visualize it as a data source into Grafana. My data comes from JMeter from a plugin, which is inserting data to InfluxDB, and ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering InfluxDB?

It is good to start with InfluxDB to stabilize your data, visualize your data, and have the data stored on a time-series basis. I would recommend everyone to get into InfluxDB and start using it. T...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

Zabbix vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

StackState vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Precisely Network Management vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 7% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB

Compared 7% of the time

MySQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

SQLite vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

ClickHouse vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

More InfluxDB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

June 2026

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB

June 2026

Download InfluxDB product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

No data available

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor provides real-time insight into communication networks, ensuring seamless connectivity and performance.

Designed for efficient management of unified communications, CA Unified Communications Monitor helps organizations monitor, diagnose, and manage their network and communication services efficiently. It delivers critical network visibility, allowing IT teams to quickly identify and resolve performance issues. Built with scalability in mind, it supports environments of all sizes, adapting to evolving network demands.

What are the key features of CA Unified Communications Monitor?

Real-time Monitoring: Provides live updates and dashboards for continuous network performance oversight.
Scalability: Handles growing network demands effortlessly, supporting various organization sizes.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed analytics and reporting to help in troubleshooting and performance analysis.
Custom Alerts: Configures alerts for proactive issue management, ensuring quick response to potential disruptions.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating CA Unified Communications Monitor?

Improved Network Performance: Enhances overall communication quality by addressing bottlenecks promptly.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces downtime and maintenance costs through proactive monitoring and quick issue resolution.
Enhanced User Satisfaction: Ensures a seamless user experience with consistent communication services.
Operational Agility: Adapts easily to growing network needs, supporting efficient management processes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education benefit significantly from CA Unified Communications Monitor implementation. It ensures stable connections for remote consultations in healthcare, supports financial data transmission, and enables interactive learning experiences in education. By facilitating uninterrupted and high-quality communications, it directly contributes to business continuity and improved operational outcomes.

Broadcom

InfluxDB offers efficient time series data handling with fast writes, optimized storage, and seamless Grafana integration, making it ideal for high-volume applications like crypto trading and real-time monitoring. Its SQL-like query language and cloud-based options enhance user experience and system scalability.

InfluxDB stands out with its ability to handle high-volume time series data efficiently, thanks to fast data writes and efficient compression. It is highly scalable, providing clustering features for improved performance management. Integration with Grafana enhances visualization, making it easier to analyze complex data through a user-friendly SQL-like query language. Real-time monitoring, historical data access, and proactive alerts enhance system reliability. Its cloud offering simplifies maintenance and operations, making it attractive for users seeking an efficient time series database.

What are the key features of InfluxDB?

Fast Data Writes: Ensures quick data handling necessary for real-time applications.
Optimized Storage: Reduces space requirements and improves performance.
Efficient Compression: Supports high-volume data like time series, enhancing throughput.
Grafana Integration: Supports seamless visualization and analysis of data.
SQL-like Query Language: Simplifies complex data operations with user-friendly queries.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Performance: Fast processing and optimized storage for better application responsiveness.
Scalability: Clustering features ensure adaptability to growing data volumes.
Improved Reliability: Proactive alerts and real-time monitoring prevent system downtimes.
Ease of Use: SQL-like language and intuitive visuals improve user accessibility.

InfluxDB is applied extensively in industries handling high-volume data needs. For sensor data storage in production environments, it offers reliable performance. Its role in server management metrics and performance monitoring is crucial for maintaining optimal operations. In crypto market data collection, it supports fast-paced trading environments. Industries use it for real-time tracking, like maritime vessel monitoring, leveraging its rapid data handling and visualization capabilities. Its applications also extend to IoT environments, API performance tracking, HVAC systems, and log aggregation, often integrating with Prometheus, Docker, and AWS to enhance system capabilities.

InfluxData

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. InfluxDB

June 2026

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. InfluxDB

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. InfluxDB and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. InfluxDB report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.