No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs HPE Wireless WAN comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
HPE Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Wireless WAN category, the mindshare of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is 10.5%, down from 12.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Wireless WAN is 6.6%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
HPE Wireless WAN6.6%
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN10.5%
Other82.9%
Wireless WAN
 

Featured Reviews

Md Anwar Hossain - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Manager Cambium Products at AFCwave
Uses zero-touch provisioning to simplify deployment and reduce reliance on technical expertise
Cambium should improve the product lineup for Cambium Networks Wireless WAN. Currently, when comparing it with other OEMs, the first lineup includes a product called 2x2 MU-MIMO, and if a customer needs a 4x4 MU-MIMO, they must go for a higher model. There should be an available model with a minimum cost in between. Both on-premises and cloud deployment models are applicable for Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, as both on-premises and cloud environments are used for deployment. The dynamic frequency selection is useful because there is an Auto RF feature that automatically and dynamically changes the channel to reduce interference, managing all aspects of the dynamic frequency.
DD
IT Operations Specialist at Rohde & Schwarz
Centralized features have simplified deployment and improved day-to-day network management
One of the best features of HPE Wireless WAN is Wi-Fi Direct, as it provides dual-band frequency and helps to connect Bluetooth with IoT devices. I am comfortable with this feature and find it beneficial for connectivity. I use centralized management features such as WLC. They have improved operational efficiency significantly. It is one of the best tools we have for centralized management because it is easy to manage, manually delete, and create sites. This makes it easy to implement policies across the network. I see measurable benefits from this centralized solution, which is quite easy to handle as people are comfortable managing the tool. Users do not need hardcore technical expertise to operate it on a day-to-day basis, making it quite comfortable.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a good product for cloud management."
"The features I appreciate most in Cambium Networks Wireless WAN include its licensing model."
"What I find valuable is the fact that you don't need to purchase any license. Basically you just get the hardware for the access points, configure an IP and connect it with a switch."
"One could say that Cambium is a scalable solution."
"Technical support has been good."
"The most valuable features of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN are cloud management and links."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is more into the wireless and access points"
"When we log in to the device, we can easily configure it. So it is quite user-friendly."
"It is a new product backed by HPE's expertise in networking and telecommunications. We can also work with 3Com products."
"We've found the scalability to be good."
"HPE Wireless offers easy approval due to its budget-friendly pricing, is scalable and user-friendly for administrators, has commendable stability with no issues in almost two years of use, and its ease of cloud-based management is a standout advantage."
"They have improved operational efficiency significantly; it is one of the best tools we have for centralized management because it is easy to manage, manually delete, and create sites."
"The performance is good and it is easy to use."
"It is a good and stable solution."
"The solution is easy to use."
"I recommend HPE Wireless WAN based on its competitive features and customer use cases."
 

Cons

"Sometimes there are some latencies in devices. Otherwise, it is, for some time, not as stable."
"If someone wants to go to the location-based portal of the product, like the one available in Meraki, it would not be possible, and it is an area that needs improvement."
"The solution's price could be better."
"The Cambium user interface and configuration should be improved."
"The installation is difficult."
"Cambium's solution is flexible for various connectivity needs, although there are limitations based on the specific equipment and metrics. The indoor coverage typically reaches up to sixty meters and may require external antennas for optimal performance and for outdoor connectivity, Cambium Networks offer excellent scalability and coverage, especially with sectorial access points."
"If it's in a warehouse, it is very hard to deploy."
"The solution needs to add an LTE solution and/or something in 3.5GHz."
"I would like for it to be faster. It should be a faster device."
"The tool must warn the management about unwanted traffic."
"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further."
"The solution works smoothly unless more than twenty users connect to a single access point, at which point it becomes overloaded."
"The scalability and the support could be better."
"The sales sync should connect with and sync up with the customers."
"The solution is quite expensive. You have to pay for every node and it can get expensive fast, it is approximately £3,000 per month."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing part of the solution is not very expensive."
"The price of this solution is expensive in Bangladesh. The cost is approximately 56,000 BDT for the XV2 which is expensive. They should reduce their price."
"There are no licensing fees, it's a one-time cost."
"I rate the product price one on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price. There are no costs in addition to the product's standard licensing fees."
"I think the pricing is fine for Cambium."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN has medium pricing."
"The solution's licensing cost depends on the number of nodes."
"When it comes to licensing costs we have been using the Cambium devices on a trial basis."
"We have been satisfied with the price."
"The license cost of the product falls under the category of a moderately priced tool."
"Price wise, it is on the medium end of the scale. It could be lower."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN is high."
"If you are concerned with your budget, then you can go for the cheaper model."
"The solution is quite expensive. You have to pay for every node and it can get expensive fast, it is approximately £3,000 per month."
"Customers pay for HPE Wireless WAN based on the contract. It's usually paid yearly. There's an additional cost, particularly for the hardware."
"The price is perfect for me."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
21%
Computer Software Company
7%
Construction Company
7%
Marketing Services Firm
7%
Outsourcing Company
27%
Educational Organization
13%
Construction Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Cambium or Ubiquiti Wireless?
For me, Ubiquiti was easy to install, configure, set up, and maintain, while also providing solid coverage and better handoffs between APs. This is especially relevant if you are using Apple produc...
What needs improvement with Cambium?
Cambium should improve the product lineup for Cambium Networks Wireless WAN. Currently, when comparing it with other OEMs, the first lineup includes a product called 2x2 MU-MIMO, and if a customer ...
What needs improvement with HPE Wireless WAN?
I am not in a position to fully address what can be improved for HPE Wireless WAN currently. However, there are some areas that need improvement, such as connectivity issues and additional features...
What is your primary use case for HPE Wireless WAN?
I am unable to specify the exact use case for why we or our clients use HPE Wireless WAN, as we are in the service industry and work based on client requirements. I am not involved in the purchase ...
 

Also Known As

Cambium PMP Series, Cambium ePMP Series
Wireless WAN, HP Wireless WAN
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Wireless Etc, Agricultural Technology Company in Brazil, Redfox, SKYNET, HOUSTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPLEBEE’S
Bell Canada
Find out what your peers are saying about Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. HPE Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.