Catalogic DPX vs Dell NetWorker comparison

Catalogic and Dell Technologies are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Catalogic is ranked #75, while Dell Technologies is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.6. Catalogic holds a 0.5% mindshare in BRS, compared to Dell Technologies’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution.

Catalogic DPX

Read 2 Catalogic DPX reviews

1,368 Views
1,286 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Dell NetWorker

Read 86 Dell NetWorker reviews

6,613 Views
6,084 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Catalogic DPX

Dell NetWorker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Catalogic DPX and Dell NetWorker are leading data protection solutions. Users express satisfaction with the pricing and support of Catalogic DPX, though Dell NetWorker excels with its comprehensive features, which users find worth the higher price.

Features: Catalogic DPX offers comprehensive backup and recovery capabilities, minimal impact on system performance, and scalability. Dell NetWorker provides advanced integration with various enterprise environments, robust automation features, and superior versatility.

Room for Improvement: Catalogic DPX needs enhancements in reporting features and a more intuitive configuration process. Dell NetWorker requires better documentation, reduced complexity in initial setup, and user-friendly enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deployment of Catalogic DPX is simple with quick setup and responsive support. Dell NetWorker’s deployment is complex and time-consuming, though stable once configured. Service quality is high but occasionally slow to respond. Catalogic DPX wins in deployment simplicity and customer support responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Catalogic DPX is cost-effective with a good balance between setup costs and ROI. Dell NetWorker, though more expensive, justifies its cost with robust features and higher ROI. Catalogic DPX is preferable for budget-conscious buyers, while Dell NetWorker is ideal for those prioritizing advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catalogic DPX

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

75th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Dell NetWorker

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Catalogic DPX is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dell NetWorker is 1.2%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Dell NetWorker	1.2%
Catalogic DPX	0.5%
Other	98.3%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

it_user292722

Data Center Global SAP Operations Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

We use it to backup some high output critical physical servers, knowing that in case of disaster we could still recover to our VM environment. The user interface needs improvement.

The user interface needs improvement, the selection boxes to select a backup job are very small not adequate for managing 400+ backup jobs, we only see 8 job names in the small scroll window. The scheduler features are lacking, we must edit backup specs to reach the option to change the schedule. The new reporting feature has greatly improved the product, prior to this it was very difficult to have a full view of our backup schedules when scheduling a new job. Since the move from Syncsort to Catalogic, the quality control of upgrades has diminished and backups that used to work could not be restored without contacting Catalogic for a fix. We still see a lot of value in the product, but hope that the next few updates will not cause more issues... We wanted a mission critical enterprise solution, and sincerely hope that the future upgrades will bring the product back on track.

Read full review

RaedHassan

Senior Specialist Backup/Storage at National Bank of Kuwait

Has supported flexible multi-platform backups and improved over time

Regarding the effectiveness of Dell NetWorker in terms of role-based access controls, I have experience with it, but I find it somewhat lacking in flexibility as it offers limited features, and I would rate it around seven out of ten. It is not that there is something wrong with the role-based access controls in Dell NetWorker, but it lacks many permissions or roles to assign, providing options only for administrator or user. To improve Dell NetWorker for the next release, I recommend enhancing flexibility in the policy, allowing selection of multiple options within the same policy, and addressing issues like the DNS lookup dependency to make it more controllable from Dell NetWorker itself rather than relying on other applications. Looking forward, I would like to see improved policy features and a more enhanced GUI, as it is still slow.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"By implementing an OVF (docker based) and without any agents on your servers, you’ll get a system which provides you with: Orchestration, Automation DR and Data analytics."

"Catalogic has great features including the ability to P2V from snapvaults, and recently the addition of agent-less backups for Linux."

"This solution might be a bit complex for an end-user but it's a great solution for a technical person."

"The solution offers very good backups and has all of the basic features any other solution would have on offer."

"Good scalability and virtual environment protection."

"The updated graphical interface is better than it used to be."

"The solution has a longer lifespan."

"It is application aware for Meditech, Exchange and SQL."

"Networker with Data Domain has a great value in integration with VMware regarding the enhanced backup window and high value of deduplication and capacity saving we can get with this setup especially in case of protecting high number of VMs."

"The price is a little on the high side, but it's reliable and provides a good service."

More Dell NetWorker pros

Cons

"And hearing about all these awesome posibilities, it kind of struck me that this was only possible with NetApp storage."

"Since the move from Syncsort to Catalogic, the quality control of upgrades has diminished and backups that used to work could not be restored without contacting Catalogic for a fix."

"The implementation process could be improved."

"he API side of the solution has certain shortcomings."

"It is not easy to understand and deploy. It is complex in nature."

"I would not recommend Dell EMC NetWorker, as the product will end in a few years."

"It could be more user-friendly."

"We pretend to start image backups from VMware, but we are also working with Xen and RHEV, and this product doesn't support those platforms."

"It's complex in nature."

"The interface is the same, so when we are trying to troubleshoot the logs, it doesn't display properly."

More Dell NetWorker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is excellent from the pricing point of view. It is free with Data Protection Suite. Similarly, when you purchase Avamar, Dell EMC NetWorker is free with one terabyte license capacity. Its price is very competitive."

"Licensing is based on the number of terabytes, so you need to purchase packages."

"The price of the license could be cheaper and it would be a benefit if they came up with a new pricing model. The competitors here in Oman sell universal licensing where a number of virtual machines are hosted at the customer place which can be licensed, or you can license the CPU sockets in those servers. However, NetWorker offers only CPU sockets or overall storage capacity to backup, but there is no universal licensing where you can provide a number of VMs. They should offer more options to stay competitive with other solutions, such as Veeam."

"It's approximate, but I believe we pay around $20-30,000 a month in licensing."

"We use a license without a time term. We just need to buy additional support when needed."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The pricing is okay."

"Pricing is cheaper for this product, compared to its competitors."

More Dell NetWorker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	33
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What's the difference between Dell EMC Avamar and Dell EMC NetWorker?

From the very beginning, Dell EMC NetWorker considers users and those who might potentially become users. In terms of both pricing and setup, this product offers an experience that is significantly...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell NetWorker?

Regarding the pricing of Dell NetWorker, it depends on the deal or negotiation we have with the vendor, making it reasonable, although I cannot make a definitive decision without knowing the specif...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Dell NetWorker?

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 18% of the time

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 9% of the time

Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 4% of the time

More Catalogic DPX Competitors

Dell PowerProtect Data Manager vs Dell NetWorker

Compared 14% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Dell NetWorker

Compared 9% of the time

Dell Avamar vs Dell NetWorker

Compared 5% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Dell NetWorker

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Dell NetWorker

Compared 5% of the time

More Dell NetWorker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

June 2026

Download Catalogic DPX product report

Buyer's Guide

Dell NetWorker

June 2026

Download Dell NetWorker product report

Also Known As

BEX

NetWorker

Overview

Catalogic DPX offers a robust data protection solution aimed at optimizing backup and recovery processes with efficiency and reliability. Designed to cater to complex IT environments, it ensures seamless data management and protection capabilities.

Intended for enterprises seeking comprehensive data protection, Catalogic DPX delivers advanced features for backup, recovery, and management of data across multiple platforms. The capacity to integrate seamlessly with current systems enhances its functionality, providing users with flexible, scalable solutions that accommodate dynamic business needs. This adaptability is critical in maintaining data integrity and agility in complex IT frameworks.

What are the most important features of Catalogic DPX?

Backup and Restore: Provides fast, reliable backup and restoration options.
Snapshot Management: Integrates with storage arrays for instant access to snapshots.
Replication: Ensures data availability through efficient data replication technologies.
Deduplication: Reduces storage requirements through advanced deduplication techniques.
Ransomware Protection: Offers robust security measures against ransomware threats.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines backup processes, reducing time and labor.
Cost Savings: Minimizes expenses related to storage and recovery operations.
Scalability: Adapts to growing IT demands without compromising performance.
Data Security: Ensures high standards of data protection across environments.

Businesses in industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing implement Catalogic DPX to manage vast amounts of critical data with ease. Its deployment supports compliance with industry-specific regulations, ensuring secure and efficient data handling tailored to unique business requirements.

Catalogic

Dell NetWorker offers an intuitive interface, broad compatibility, and strong deduplication capabilities. It's designed for backup and recovery in VMware environments, providing seamless integration with Data Domain and support for large databases.

Focusing on efficient backup and recovery, Dell NetWorker supports physical and virtual servers, ensuring data protection and continuity. It features Client Direct for efficient data handling, automates and centralizes backup tasks, and is known for its robust performance. Some areas of improvement include enhancing deduplication, documentation, reporting, cloud vendor integrations, and third-party storage solutions compatibility. With complex configuration and scaling challenges, it requires skilled personnel for optimal use. Enhanced VMware, Hyper-V, and Microsoft Exchange support is needed, as is improved technical support and stability.

What are Dell NetWorker's key features?

User-friendly interface simplifies management.
Broad compatibility with diverse environments.
Strong deduplication for efficient storage use.
Seamless Data Domain integration.
Client Direct for direct data transfers.
Automated and centralized backup tasks.
Highly scalable to accommodate growing needs.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Improved data protection and continuity.
Streamlined backup and recovery processes.
Efficient handling of large data volumes.
Long-term data retention capabilities.
Integration with VMware and Data Domain.
Secure and reliable data management.

Dell NetWorker is implemented across industries like telecommunications, astronomy, and banking, primarily for backup and recovery across physical and virtual servers. Companies utilize it for secure data storage, safeguarding critical systems, and managing sizable databases. Many integrate it with VMware, leveraging its capabilities for data restoration to ensure business continuity.

Dell Technologies

Sample Customers

Hendrick Medical, CommonFund, Red-8, Fairfax County Schools, Tectrade, Storage Assessments

Republic Bank, Westgate Resorts, Macquire Cloud Services, Shriners, Panatonni, Qatar Islamic Bank, Eurosport

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.