Catchpoint vs Centreon comparison

Catchpoint and Centreon are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Catchpoint is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.4, while Centreon is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.3. Catchpoint holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Centreon’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Centreon users who would recommend it.

Catchpoint

Read 24 Catchpoint reviews

5,049 Views
2,424 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

8,544 Views
6,835 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

Centreon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Catchpoint and Centreon compete in the network monitoring space. Catchpoint offers more advanced monitoring capabilities, with a strength in delivering comprehensive analytics, while Centreon is favored for its cost-effectiveness, especially appealing for small to mid-sized enterprises.

Features: Catchpoint offers real-time monitoring, synthetic testing, and performance analytics, ideal for large-scale needs. Centreon provides network visualization, easy tool integration, and focuses on simple network management. Catchpoint's feature set is comprehensive with detailed metrics, while Centreon is known for its usability and integration options.

Room for Improvement: Catchpoint could improve by reducing deployment complexity, enhancing response times from customer support, and offering more cost-effective pricing options for smaller businesses. Centreon may benefit from expanding its advanced analytics features, improving synthetic testing capabilities, and optimizing network insights for larger enterprises needing deeper data analysis.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon is appreciated for its straightforward deployment and efficient customer service which aids in quick issue resolution. Catchpoint, while powerful, tends to have a more complex deployment process, with knowledgeable but sometimes slower customer service response times, impacting the overall experience.

Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint requires a higher initial investment, justified by its advanced features, yet it provides a strong ROI through enhanced insights and performance improvements. Centreon offers competitive pricing, focusing on quick ROI by reducing operational costs, making it attractive for budget-conscious businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Catchpoint vs. Centreon Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Centreon

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.6

Catchpoint enhances efficiency and competitiveness by reducing outages, improving monitoring, saving time, cutting costs, and boosting trust.

Sentiment score

8.1

Centreon enhances ROI through efficient monitoring, quick issue resolution, cost savings, and minimal impact during outages.

There has been a significant reduction in major incidents observed due to the proactive alerting Catchpoint provides.

reviewer2867268

Observability Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

We used to spend at least 30 to 40 minutes on average on a call to detect what the problem was, but that reduced drastically to around 16 to 18 minutes.

Chethan Premsingh

Manager, Observability Automation & Service Operations at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

We have seen considerable returns on investment with Catchpoint, saving both money and employee time while reducing penalties from clients due to fewer outages during network deployments.

AshutoshSingh

Associate Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Catchpoint report

Centreon provides timesaving and costsaving benefits as it lets us manage multiple devices on a single platform.

Tinkesh Chaudhary

Network Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

It significantly saves time by automating monitoring tasks and reduces costs as it requires fewer resources.

Aadinath Tikone

System Administrator at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Centreon report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.9

Catchpoint's 24/7 support is praised for quick response, accessibility, and professional services, but network response times need improvement.

Sentiment score

7.1

Centreon's customer service is responsive and knowledgeable, though availability limitations and support level improvements are needed.

The initial migration and the initial days of monitoring Catchpoint involved having a dedicated TAM and a dedicated support number that could give us quick answers.

Chethan Premsingh

Manager, Observability Automation & Service Operations at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

They would literally write Playwright for you if you cannot get the element right.

Gitanjali Bhainsora

Senior Software Engineer at Turing

The customer support for Catchpoint is really good; they get you on the call and will assist you if you are mixed up or blocked with some kind of coding.

reviewer2867130

Lead Embedded SRe at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Catchpoint report

We do not have direct access to Centreon's technical support.

Tinkesh Chaudhary

Network Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

If issues arise, like services appearing as down in Centreon, technical support helps check the polar-server communication.

Aadinath Tikone

System Administrator at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Technical support from Centreon responds within 24 hours and resolves issues quickly.

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

For more quotes and insights, download the Centreon report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.1

Catchpoint scales effectively for SaaS, requires manual configuration for on-premise, and lacks cluster support in single-node deployments.

Sentiment score

7.0

Centreon is valued for flexibility and scalability, though improvements in data management and alert scaling are recommended.

The migration part, especially onboarding a new application for monitoring, is seamless and does not require a lot of our effort and analysis.

Chethan Premsingh

Manager, Observability Automation & Service Operations at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

Updating the license for the number of users is easy to do in Catchpoint.

reviewer2866356

Product Specialist at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

We have not faced any issues regarding scalability.

reviewer2867268

Observability Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Catchpoint report

Occasionally, for several hours, we do not receive any alerts, causing a business impact.

Tinkesh Chaudhary

Network Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

We use other tools for adding and deploying configured devices, but direct access from Centreon would be beneficial.

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

For more quotes and insights, download the Centreon report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.8

Catchpoint is praised for stability and reliability, consistently achieving high ratings with no downtime or major issues reported.

Sentiment score

7.5

Centreon is stable and reliable, though stability may vary; support resolves issues swiftly, especially with the latest versions.

Catchpoint is stable.

reviewer2870424

IT Sm & Customer Support Lead at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Catchpoint report

Sometimes we do not receive alerts, causing business impact, and users ask why no alerts were received.

Tinkesh Chaudhary

Network Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Centreon is a much more straightforward and stable tool compared to Icinga.

Aadinath Tikone

System Administrator at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Centreon report

Room For Improvement

Catchpoint needs improvements in setup, user experience, navigation, API integration, pricing models, and international monitoring for better efficiency.

Centreon users seek improved customization, monitoring, UI, documentation, integration, mobile features, auto-remediation, multilingual support, and notifications.

This is one area where I would like to see improvement in the tool because many applications nowadays use multi-factor authentication, and Catchpoint does lag a bit in providing the end-to-end synthetic observability for applications dependent on MFA.

reviewer2867268

Observability Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

If we could receive similar data for the China market as we do for North America and Asia Pacific, this would be helpful.

AnmolRai

Technical Consultant Project Lead at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

There is no auto-tuning for alerts, so auto-tuning features for alerts would be beneficial.

Gaurav-Bansal

Support Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Catchpoint report

Enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks.

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Reliability is sometimes an issue. Centreon has a developer mode and production mode, but sometimes alerts don't come through in production mode.

Tinkesh Chaudhary

Network Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

While Centreon excels at server-level monitoring, it lacks the ability to track web app availability and latency, unlike Dynatrace, which is efficient in this area.

Aadinath Tikone

System Administrator at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Centreon report

Setup Cost

Catchpoint pricing varies and is consumption-based, favoring large enterprises but can be costly for smaller organizations.

Centreon provides an open-source solution for SMEs but has a complex pricing model for enterprises needing premium features.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing is good, and the licensing is also good.

reviewer2866356

Product Specialist at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

There is always a need to negotiate a bit more to get the best cost for the licenses we plan to buy.

reviewer2867268

Observability Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

you just need to buy the licenses, and the team sends you the license keys, which is pretty easy.

Gaurav-Bansal

Support Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Catchpoint report

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive.

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

For more quotes and insights, download the Centreon report

Valuable Features

Catchpoint offers synthetic monitoring, user-friendly dashboards, early issue detection, and global visibility, enhancing performance and reducing downtime.

Centreon offers unlimited monitoring, enhanced visualization, and customizable features for efficient oversight with extensive device compatibility and anomaly detection.

Catchpoint helps us detect issues before anybody could report them, which can impact clients because it provides prior monitoring that also sees outside the infrastructure.

Gaurav-Bansal

Support Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

Out of those features, the hop-by-hop breakdown of BGP peers is the one that made the biggest difference in my work because I have not seen this feature in others.

Chethan Premsingh

Manager, Observability Automation & Service Operations at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

The alerting functionality in Catchpoint provides value. We configure thresholds for response times and failures so that our operations team could be notified whenever authentication failed, APIs became unavailable, or page performance degraded beyond acceptable limits.

Gitanjali Bhainsora

Senior Software Engineer at Turing

For more quotes and insights, download the Catchpoint report

Monitoring is a fundamental pillar of technical support, and Centreon streamlines this process, reducing the need for extensive manual checks.

Aadinath Tikone

System Administrator at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Centreon's real-time monitoring, despite having some manual aspects, supports us in managing our operations effectively.

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Centreon allows us to monitor all of our devices on one platform.

Tinkesh Chaudhary

Network Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Centreon report

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

13th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (14th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (4th)

Centreon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

27th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

21st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (27th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Catchpoint is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Centreon is 1.2%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Catchpoint	0.6%
Centreon	1.2%
Other	98.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2867268

Observability Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Proactive synthetic monitoring has reduced major incidents and provides global user experience insights

One thing that is not available is the multi-factor authentication feature concerning monitoring any applications. If an application depends upon MFA for its login flow, Catchpoint doesn't have the ability to bypass or monitor that flow for multi-factor authentication. This is one area where I would like to see improvement in the tool because many applications nowadays use multi-factor authentication, and Catchpoint does lag a bit in providing the end-to-end synthetic observability for applications dependent on MFA. This is one of the major areas needing improvement. Otherwise, Catchpoint has been one of the greatest tools in the synthetic monitoring or digital experience monitoring space, and I don't see anything else right now, but MFA is something that certainly needs some improvement.

Read full review

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I am not directly involved in pricing, but the pricing is very decent.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

Catchpoint can be improved by supporting some of the APIs and other technical testing with some kind of metric validations as well. I do not have anything more to add about the needed improvements,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Catchpoint?

My main use case for Catchpoint is mostly automating. I use Catchpoint automatically for automated monitoring of our various UIs and also the backend APIs. We rely on Chrome and Selenium and JavaSc...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs Catchpoint

Compared 4% of the time

AppNeta by Broadcom vs Catchpoint

Compared 4% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

August 2026

Download Catchpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

August 2026

Download Centreon product report

Overview

Catchpoint is a robust monitoring solution offering synthetic and real user monitoring, network performance analysis, and root cause identification. It enhances response times, reduces downtime, and improves user experience through advanced features and support.

Catchpoint provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities that ensure application availability and improve user experience. By delivering synthetic and real user monitoring, API tracking, and cloud network performance insights, it enables companies to diagnose issues, maintain service reliability, and anticipate problems. Organizations can effectively simulate user actions, monitor endpoints, and obtain actionable insights for diverse applications and websites, supporting seamless digital transactions.

What are the key features of Catchpoint?

Synthetic and Real User Monitoring: Offers comprehensive insights into performance and user interactions.
Root Cause Analysis: Identifies issues quickly to minimize downtime and improve service reliability.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides tailored views for performance metrics and test results.
Alert Notifications: Keeps teams informed of potential issues with timely alerts.
Network Performance Monitoring: Tracks cloud and local network performance for optimal operation.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Savings: Optimizes performance to reduce operational costs and enhance ROI.
Improved SLA Management: Helps maintain service level agreements with reduced false alerts.
Enhanced User Experience: Delivers consistent and responsive applications to users.
Operational Efficiency: Automates processes for minimizing manual intervention.

Catchpoint is implemented across industries for proactive performance monitoring, ensuring digital platform reliability and superior user experience. Its tools enable companies to track application availability and network performance, utilizing global coverage to deliver crucial insights for decision-making processes.

Catchpoint

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Centreon

August 2026

Free Report: Catchpoint vs. Centreon

Find out what your peers are saying about Catchpoint vs. Centreon and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Catchpoint vs. Centreon report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.