Check Point Web Gateway vs NetScaler Secure Web Gateway [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Check Point Software Technologies and Citrix are both solutions in the Secure Web Gateways (SWG) category. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Citrix users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point Web Gateway and NetScaler Secure Web Gateway [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Zscaler and others in Secure Web Gateways (SWG).

To learn more, read our detailed Secure Web Gateways (SWG) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iboss

Featured Reviews

Ashok Ananthula

Senior Consultant Proxy Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Cloud gateway has strengthened remote web security and now needs better Mac and ISP support

The problem our organization had is that iboss failed for the Mac devices. It is not able to give a successful agent for the Mac agents. That is where in 2025, we had to migrate to the Palo Alto-based platform. If your use case is for just Windows laptops,you can consider this platform as an option One issue is the data center resiliency part. In India especially, they are not tied up with the Tier 1 ISPs like Tata or Airtel; they were having Tier 2 ISPs and encountered many issues reaching few major sites that my organization depends on, and they were having problems that they could not fix quickly. They also lack a mechanism to route that traffic within their data center; rather, they ask customers to make a pac file change to route it to Singapore explicitly. It would be better if they route from their backend , i mean even if I send it to India DC, they should be able to route it internally to make that work; however, they fail to do that and ask the customer to route it in the pac file. Another suggestion is that in China, they do not have the proper setup; they used to have numerous problems with slowness and lack of premium circuits in China as well. That leads to multiple sites working slowly with latency-related issues. So the main issue is the ISP-related problems that need to be solved.

Read full review

KlavsThaarup

Senior Security Consultant at Orange Cyberdefense

Has improved threat visibility and centralized management but needs wider feature support

We have not worked much with granular control over web usage policies, so I cannot provide detailed feedback. We have not worked with the effectiveness of the multi-layered defense approach in threat prevention. Their product coverage is not as extensive as some competitors. They have fewer products and features compared to competitors. Support for operational technology (OT) is not as comprehensive in Check Point Web Gateway as it is in competing products.

Read full review

it_user1330167

Manager at a government with 501-1,000 employees

Enables our users to have access to our custom-built applications but it should be easier to manage

We haven't had any problems with scalability for the use cases we've got. There are around twenty users of this solution in my company. We don't have plans to increase usage. Now that everybody is working from home, everyone has their own laptop so coming through remotely is easy. All we have to do it set up the remote environment which is why we set up terminal servers. Everyone seems to work pretty well. We also use a terminal server which is less easy to manage.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From a use-case scenario, what I like the most is the plug-in. I like the fact that we can do the filtering of these devices offsite independent of the network they are connected to, and we do not have to have traffic coming back inside our network."

"Our primary use case for this product is DLP,"

"Technical support is pretty sharp and very responsive."

"iboss is easy to use despite its complexity. Multiple engineers manage it, but it's significantly more straightforward to administer than traditional VPNs and web proxies."

"Iboss is a solution that prevents advanced persistent threats, and has a zero tolerance for attacks."

"I would rate the technical support of iboss a solid 10 without a shadow of a doubt."

"First of all, the security policies are essential. I do not have to rely solely on Active Directory for our users."

"iboss has significantly lowered the number of security incidents. It is crazy how much it blocks and how much it is aware of the outside danger."

More iboss pros

"Check Point Web Gateway is a reliable and stable solution."

"The most valuable feature that I see in the application is the filtering of the URLs."

"You don't have to wander around the tool since it is very simple. You can grab and get a hold of the tool very quickly."

"It can also be used as a reverse proxy through the checkpoint."

"Application control allows the administrator to create granular policies based on users to allow, block, or limit access."

"One of its rather outstanding capabilities is its ability to add an extra layer of protection to our company's internal network."

"The stability of the tool is very good."

"Application control gives IT teams an opportunity to set suitable policies that can be used by all teams when coding."

More Check Point Web Gateway pros

"It is absolutely stable."

"As the solution is now, we are able to satisfy all of our requirements."

"Our primary use case is for when our employees are working remotely, this gives them access to our custom-built application."

"From my point of view, this solution is stable and we haven't had any real issues."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is dual authentication, which is good from a security perspective."

Cons

"I have heard they are doing DDoS filtering, but I am not certain if they are implementing it correctly."

"SSL decryption: We had issues with learners using apps instead of using web browsers. This type of encryption is tough for any appliance in a BYOD environment."

"Sometimes, obviously, there are bugs."

"The reporting feature needs improvement. It doesn't give you the expected results. It is quite difficult to get the specific reports needed, and it is not as intuitive as the rest of the platform."

"File integrity monitoring would be very advantageous as an additional feature."

"I would like to see simpler dashboards, more detailed reporting, and faster performance in iboss."

"The solution could be stronger on the integration side and offer more cloud applications like G Suite or Oracle."

"Sometimes the agent stops working in iboss, and we have to reinstall the agent."

More iboss cons

"The solution should improve integration."

"The tool's stability needs improvement. The biggest problem is with updates."

"I would like to see improvement in the tool's availability."

"It is expensive. Its price should be better."

"The product requires prior knowledge and information and would be difficult for an engineer with minimal experience to understand."

"I would like to be able to see an integration with centralized management services."

"There should be an improvement in interface integration."

"There is room for improvement in support because the solution needs multiple regions to reach certain features and validations."

More Check Point Web Gateway cons

"The pricing of this solution can really be improved."

"The price of this solution is a little bit high and can be improved."

"It would be helpful if this solution would collect information about people who are connecting from external devices so that we can rate their user experience in using the virtual desktops."

"In terms of improvement, it should be easier to manage. We have a small team and don't have much expertise, we need things that are easy to manage."

"I would like to see more monitoring, and there could always be deeper information to find out where issues are."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have not priced the solution recently, but they were competitive with other vendors in the past."

"We had the cost of purchasing a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs. However, the following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs."

"The overall pricing for iboss is very competitive and transparent."

"It is not expensive, and it is also not cheap. iboss is priced right in the sweet spot for the number of features it offers."

"It is probably in line with other solutions, but I do not deal with the financial side."

"It is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"The price is on the higher side, even when compared to Azure Firewall Premium."

"Our customers pay a licensing fee annually or once in three or five years, per their requirements."

"This program is very, very expensive."

"There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges attached to the product. The product is neither too expensive nor too cheap, so it comes at a good price point for my company."

"It is expensive. Licensing is on a yearly basis. You need to do the support subscription."

"The product is not cheap. It is expensive."

"If one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the tool's price as a seven out of ten."

"The price is very high."

"The pricing of this solution can really be improved."

"Our annual fees are approximately $80,000 USD."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Web Gateways (SWG) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with iboss?

iboss could be improved by making the dashboard more user-friendly, providing more detailed real-time alerts, and imp...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iboss?

iboss is primarily used for cloud security, helping to protect users when they access websites and cloud applications...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iboss?

The pricing and licensing for iboss were reasonable for the security features. The setup costs were manageable, thoug...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Web Gateway?

It will be the same pricing as other solutions. Fortinet is the cheaper product, while Palo Alto and Check Point Web ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point Web Gateway?

As of now, I did not notice any significant areas for improvement. The interface of Check Point Web Gateway is far be...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Check Point Web Gateway?

My main use case for Check Point Web Gateway was web filtering and application control. When I want to block social m...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs iboss

Compared 10% of the time

Netskope vs iboss

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs iboss

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs iboss

Compared 6% of the time

FortiSASE vs iboss

Compared 5% of the time

More iboss Competitors

Cisco Umbrella vs Check Point Web Gateway

Compared 26% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs Check Point Web Gateway

Compared 16% of the time

Skyhigh Security vs Check Point Web Gateway

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Web Security Appliance vs Check Point Web Gateway

Compared 6% of the time

Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway vs Check Point Web Gateway

Compared 3% of the time

More Check Point Web Gateway Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iboss

October 2026

Download iboss product report

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Web Gateway

October 2026

Download Check Point Web Gateway product report

Buyer's Guide

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

October 2026

NetScaler Secure Web Gateway [EOL] report

Download NetScaler Secure Web Gateway [EOL] product report

Also Known As

iBoss Cloud Platform

No data available

Overview

iboss is the Zero Trust SASE platform that gives organizations complete visibility and governance over their AI, data, and applications through one unified platform, one console, one policy engine, and one data lake.

Your endpoints may already stop malware. Your data and application activity can still be invisible. iboss decrypts and understands every connection, then turns that signal into answers security leaders can act on.

The platform leads with three capabilities in this order: AI Security and Visibility, Data Security and Visibility, and App Visibility and Control. Zero Trust Network Access, VPN replacement, and SD-WAN sit underneath as the access fabric that carries those three. Trusted by global enterprises and government agencies.

What are the most important features of Iboss?

- AI Security and Visibility: conversation capture, shadow-AI discovery, AI DLP, and agent governance across Claude, Co-Work, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok, and emerging services.

- Data Security and Visibility: full SSL/TLS decryption, deep content inspection, MIP label compliance, and one-click compliance reporting.

- App Visibility and Control: signatureless CASB, dual risk scoring, in-app controls, and SSPM for major SaaS.

- Containerized Zero Trust SASE: dedicated containers, isolated SSL keys, one console, one policy engine, one data lake.

- Access fabric: ZTNA, VPN replacement, and SD-WAN under the same platform.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

- Complete visibility over AI, data, and applications from one platform instead of separate point tools.

- Encrypted traffic is inspected by default so data decisions use content and context together.

- Shadow SaaS and new web tools appear as they are used, with enforceable controls in one console.

- Native data sovereignty through dedicated containers, in-region inspection, and per-customer SSL key custody.

- Scale proven in published materials: 10M+ users, 100+ countries, 150B+ transactions, 2.5B+ threats blocked.

Economic buyers are CISOs, CIOs, and VPs of Security. Champions include security architects, network and infrastructure leaders, SecOps, and GRC. Primary segments: enterprise and business, financial services, government (including FedRAMP Gov Cloud), healthcare, manufacturing, legal and professional services, retail and hospitality, and MSP/MSSP partners. Education, including K-12, is one vertical among these.

iboss

Check Point Web Gateway is designed for network security with a focus on protecting against threats like malware and phishing. It offers cloud deployment, URL filtering, malware protection, and real-time threat intelligence.

Check Point Web Gateway ensures stable performance through a cloud-based infrastructure and offers a range of capabilities such as URL filtering, application control, and malware protection. It supports granular policies and real-time threat intelligence, playing a crucial role in enhancing web traffic filtering and compliance enforcement. The gateway provides intuitive security management features, including antivirus, DLP, encryption detection, and behavioral analysis. While it supports role-based access control and prevents access to malicious websites, there is room for improvement in response times and documentation. Users find challenges in interface appeal, deployment complexities, and authentication policy management. Cost and scalability concerns exist, with a need for enhanced mobile integration and endpoint accessibility.

What are the key features of Check Point Web Gateway?

User-friendly interface: Offers intuitive navigation and configuration.
Stable performance: Reliable operation with robust infrastructure.
Cloud deployment: Facilitates easy access and management.
URL filtering: Blocks unauthorized or harmful websites.
Application control: Manages and restricts application access.
Malware protection: Detects and prevents malicious software.
Intrusion prevention system (IPS): Alerts and defends against online threats.

What benefits can users find in reviews?

Granular policies: Tailored security measures for diverse needs.
Efficient monitoring: Real-time visibility into network activity.
Real-time threat intelligence: Updated protection against new threats.
Data loss prevention (DLP): Safeguards against unauthorized data exposure.
Role-based access control: Ensures appropriate user permissions and security.

In industries such as banking and e-commerce, Check Point Web Gateway is used widely for securing network infrastructures against data breaches and ensuring compliance. Its multi-layer architecture supports seamless integration with site-to-site VPNs and user access management, enhancing overall security.

Check Point Software Technologies

With SSL decryption, NetScaler Secure Web Gateway helps you cost-effectively eliminate blind spots in your environment and strengthen your security posture.

Citrix

Sample Customers

Trusted by global enterprises and government agencies.

Morton Salt, Medical Advocacy and Outreach, BH Telecom, Lightbeam Health Solutions, X by Orange, Cadence, Nihondentsu, Datastream Connexion, Good Sam, Omnyway, FIASA, Pacific Life, Banco del Pacifico, Control Southern, Xero, Centrify, Tradair, Laterlite, Phoenix International, Unisinos, Wilkin Chapman, Connexus Energy, Mutua Universal, Smart & Final, Central New Mexico Community Colleg, Grupo Financiero Multiva

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Zscaler and others in Secure Web Gateways (SWG). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Secure Web Gateways (SWG) vendors.

We monitor all Secure Web Gateways (SWG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.