Cisco TelePresence vs Webex comparison

Cisco TelePresence and Webex are both solutions in the Virtual Meetings category. Cisco TelePresence is ranked #6 with an average rating of 10.0, while Webex is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.9. Cisco TelePresence holds a 2.9% mindshare in VM, compared to Webex’s 6.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Cisco TelePresence users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Webex users who would recommend it.

Cisco TelePresence

Read 9 Cisco TelePresence reviews

963 Views
953 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Webex

Read 128 Webex reviews

3,354 Views
3,253 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Cisco TelePresence

Webex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Cisco TelePresence and Webex are products in the video conferencing market. Webex appears to have the upper hand due to its cloud-based flexibility and integration capabilities.

Features: Cisco TelePresence provides high-definition video quality, an immersive communication experience, and secure network integration. Webex offers comprehensive collaboration tools, seamless integration with various applications, and device adaptability for digital meetings and collaborative projects.

Room for Improvement: Cisco TelePresence could enhance mobility options, reduce infrastructure dependency, and streamline integration with third-party platforms. Webex might benefit from improved user interface intuitiveness, more robust offline functionalities, and enhanced audio clarity in low-bandwidth scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco TelePresence requires significant infrastructure investment and on-site installation, suitable for businesses seeking permanent setups. Webex offers cloud-based deployment with minimal setup, making it ideal for rapid remote team implementation. Both offer responsive customer support, with Webex maximizing time efficiency through its deployment model.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco TelePresence involves high upfront costs due to hardware needs but provides returns for businesses using its full capabilities. Webex presents a cost-effective entry with flexible subscription models, facilitating scalability and quicker deployment, yielding faster ROI for diverse enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco TelePresence

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Webex

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

128

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of Cisco TelePresence is 2.9%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Webex is 6.5%, down from 17.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Virtual Meetings Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Webex	6.5%
Cisco TelePresence	2.9%
Other	90.6%

Virtual Meetings

Featured Reviews

OSCAR DE LA PENA

Senior Solution Architect at Ricoh España, S.L.U.

One-click meeting access and seamless integration enhance video conferencing experience

Cisco TelePresence could improve the WebRTC connections, as they are quite slow. The end user experiences delays when using WebRTC, sometimes taking one minute or more to receive a connection. This issue is mainly due to Cisco taking a long time to download and start the WebRTC client on their devices. Ensuring it is embedded in the device could help.

Read full review

Akhil Viswam

Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Collaborating in hybrid incident calls has become faster while the meeting interface still needs fixes

The best features are the ability to schedule meetings and launch ad hoc meetings. Additionally, we can create breakout rooms within the meeting itself, which is another excellent feature. Whenever we have production issues, many teams join a single Webex call. Sometimes we need to group together as separate smaller groups and work in parallel to identify the production issues. In those cases, we create Webex breakout rooms and each member joins the corresponding breakout session to progress on their task. Webex helps significantly in the hybrid environment. When we are working from home, it is very easy for us to meet with other team members and the management to get in touch and progress. Webex improves communication because even if we are working from home, we can connect with people and talk to them on a video call. It has improved the incident resolution time by getting into a call in Webex rooms and remediating the issues together as soon as possible. Audio and video quality is excellent for Webex. It has saved considerable time in terms of incident remediation. Whenever we have issues, we jump on a call and work together in parallel. This approach saves time and improves efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have a dual screen option to enable video and content sharing."

"It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."

"The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature."

"TelePresence allows our customers to have a quick meeting while traveling and still be effective. It saves time and money."

"The speaker tracker feature in Cisco Telepresence is highly valuable, especially the ability to track multiple participants and change focus during meetings."

"The most valuable features of Cisco TelePresence are the basic standard features and the ease of use. Additionally, the configuration and integration are exemplary."

"The configuration is a valuable."

"Telepresence's most valuable feature is keeping highly paid employees, such as executives, on the ground instead of wasting time flying around the world. So if you have the right telepresence plan and form, it's not just the video cameras and the systems behind them, it's the way you lay out your meeting room.You can have multiple offices interconnecting in a single meeting, and it looks like everybody's in the same big conference room together because the telepresence yields such a fantastic amount of clarity."

More Cisco TelePresence pros

"Webex has enhanced the remote team collaboration process regarding time management and cost savings."

"We use Webex for virtual meetings."

"I like WebEx's stability and ease of use. The screen-sharing tools and audio controls are also nice."

"The stability of the solution is the most important feature."

"Webex is a thin client and we like the interface. It is easy to use."

"Webex is a reliable solution and has good video quality."

"Over the years, the all-in-one capability has been the most valuable feature of Webex; we have calling tools, chat tools, and meeting tools all in one tool now, making it very easy to use for all communication purposes."

"The installation of Webex is simple. You only need to click an executable file to run it. it is very easy."

More Webex pros

Cons

"Cisco TelePresence could improve the WebRTC connections, as they are quite slow."

"The calling features can be improved."

"The tool is expensive."

"MX800 comes only with one available DVI port. A few more HDMI ports will improve the system's capability."

"Cisco TelePresence could improve its integration capabilities."

"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. It was complex with badges and certificates. Too crazy."

"The price of Cisco TelePresence overall should be reduced."

"I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added."

"Sometimes, the solution lags because of performance issues."

"Usability needs improvement. Webex is more complex compared to Zoom."

"The solution is heavy and slow."

"Webex's translation feature could work more accurately."

"The product's user interface is an area with shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

"I'd like to see a modernized user interface, something a bit more colorful."

"The performance is not always good and could be improved."

"An opportunity they could benefit from would be a version that includes meeting transcription. I usually use a third-party product to do transcription."

More Webex cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I will rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"We used high definition, 1080p, but again, it required license purchases. For example, with three licenses (TP licenses), each allowing one 1080p screen, if I had six participants, I'd need to lower the resolution to 720p or lower to accommodate more participants. More licenses meant more cost."

"The price of Cisco Telepresence is high, especially in Brazil. However, the quality of the product justifies the cost."

"Cisco TelePresence license is expensive and should be reduced. There is only a cost for the license and it is annually."

"The pricing is expensive, therefore I rate it an eight out of ten."

"I am using the free version of Webex."

"I have recently switched to a different solution. WebEx is more costly. There are equivalent solutions at a lower cost."

"I believe the license to be monthly."

"You need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges of the product. You need to opt for a subscription-based licensing model for your organization. The product is a bit expensive."

"Webex is expensive, especially compared to Zoom or Google."

"There is a need to pay the licensing charges to use Webex Enterprise Edition."

"Licensing is subscription-based and the cost varies depending on how many minutes are included in the plan."

"The pricing of this solution is fine and I am satisfied with it."

More Webex pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

15%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Wholesaler/Distributor

Marketing Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	40
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	62

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cisco TelePresence?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cisco TelePresence?

Cisco is a leader in video conferencing solutions because they apply the latest technologies to their devices and services, such as artificial intelligence and versatile functionalities. Security i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco TelePresence?

My primary use case for Cisco TelePresence ( /products/cisco-telepresence-reviews ) is providing video conferencing solutions for internal and external users, especially for enterprises. I am a par...

See all answers

What do you like most about Webex?

Webex improved our overall team collaboration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webex?

From when I last implemented it, I found the price to be expensive. The licensing model doesn't work because if I want to implement it for an organization, I need to pay a per-user license, which m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webex?

Webex can be simplified in terms of user interface, where many features should be displayed in a compact view, with similar features grouped together and a minimalistic design helping users underst...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zoom Workplace Business vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 17% of the time

LifeSize vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Teams vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Meeting Server vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Cloud Video vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 9% of the time

More Cisco TelePresence Competitors

Zoom Workplace Business vs Webex

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Meeting Server vs Webex

Compared 7% of the time

GoToWebinar vs Webex

Compared 6% of the time

GoToMeeting vs Webex

Compared 6% of the time

3CX Live Chat vs Webex

Compared 5% of the time

More Webex Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

March 2026

Download Cisco TelePresence product report

Buyer's Guide

Webex

February 2026

Download Webex product report

Also Known As

TelePresence

Cisco Spark

Overview

Cisco TelePresence Server brings multiparty video to unified communications deployments. Its flexible video, audio, and content-sharing capabilities allow users to participate in video conferences with multiple parties. Users can easily create, launch, and join meetings using standards-based video endpoints. Or their mobile devices or Cisco WebEx clients. Or even third-party video endpoints. The server provides high-quality, standards-based video conferencing for mobile, desktop, and room systems.

Cisco

Webex is designed to help companies improve communication and increase productivity with unlimited HD video meetings in shared meeting spaces.

Companies can use Webex, a Cisco product, to collaborate with peers, share documents and other information, create high-impact webinars and online events, and present dynamic online courses. It can be tailored to your exact company needs and can be fully integrated with mobile apps for iPhone, iPad, Android, and BlackBerry.

Cisco

Sample Customers

Afni, AGCO, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC Children's), Del Papa Distributing, Instituto Zaldivar, ING Bank, Moffitt Cancer Center, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, San Jose State University, Sub-Zero Wolf, Transwestern and Metropolis Investment Holdings, Vital Images

Seagate Technology, Kohn Pedersen Fox, World Vision International, Glen Raven, University of Notre Dame, CEV Multimedia, The Food Group, LUMEDX, California Baptist University, and Georgetown University Law Center.

Buyer's Guide

Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex

March 2026

Free Report: Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex report.

See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.