D3 Security vs Exabeam comparison

D3 Security and Exabeam are both solutions in the Security Incident Response category. D3 Security is ranked #7 with an average rating of 10.0, while Exabeam is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.5. Additionally, 100% of D3 Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Exabeam users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Exabeam and D3 Security compete in cybersecurity solutions. Exabeam has an edge in ease of use and customer support, while D3 Security shines with comprehensive features.

Features: Exabeam offers advanced threat detection, robust identity protection, and behavioral analytics. D3 Security provides extensive orchestration, automation features, and streamlined incident response. D3 Security's automation capabilities stand out.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Exabeam features an easy deployment model and excellent support, ideal for quick implementation. D3 Security has a more involved deployment process, but offers robust service options compensating with comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: Exabeam is cost-effective, with favorable ROI due to competitive pricing and efficient performance. D3 Security, despite a premium cost, provides strong ROI for organizations utilizing its automation and orchestration features, justifying its higher initial cost.

To learn more, read our detailed D3 Security vs. Exabeam Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

D3 Security vs. Exabeam

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Torq

Featured Reviews

Nimrod Vardi

Global IT Director at OpenWeb

Automation workflows have transformed our IT, enabling secure just-in-time access control

We work with them quite often, so we have a direct line regarding areas in Torq that have room for improvement. If we have a feature request, we can request it. I do not have anything in mind at the moment. We were a design partner for a short while, so we feel that they listen and that users of the system have an impact on the way the system is designed for the better. They have a new community, which is something that I personally suggested years ago. There are many people like me in different places and they might have already built the workflow that I need. Having the option to share workflows or to jump on a thread and say I have this need, did anyone ever build a workflow for it, is amazing. Someone would jump in and say yes, sure, here, take this workflow. I think this is an amazing thing and I really hope that the community will come alive because I think this is really powerful. This is something that I already suggested and it did happen eventually, and I am quite happy with it. I do not have any specific feature in mind that I have a need for at the moment.

Read full review

Muhammad Aamir Riaz

Senior Manager Security Operation Center at The Bank of Punjab

Useful for automation and reporting and has open API for seamless integration

It was easy to integrate the tool with our infrastructure because all the APIs are pre-built. We just created a drag-and-drop prompt to integrate the solution with our infrastructure. I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten. Everyone needs to evaluate this solution according to their organization's needs because it can integrate well, but this depends on the technology you already have in your organization. It is an automation tool for detection and response, and while integration is possible, using legacy products could create issues. Some legacy products are closed systems and do not expose their APIs to other vendors. In such cases, you could run into problems. If you are considering this solution, check which APIs are available before you proceed. Otherwise, you may get the solution, but you must spend time on integrations. They provide integration support, but it's not automatic; it will take time.

Read full review

Deepanshu Hans

Solution Architect at CTC

Improved threat detection has provided clear user risk insights and streamlined incident response

Exabeam's UEBA is the most valuable feature that I have found so far. Exabeam's UEBA displays the type of description that it could show in a console regarding one particular user, the rating that it shows, and how vulnerable the user is, which is very good. Exabeam's automation for incident response is very good. The machine learning capabilities of Exabeam are also good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I appreciate most about Torq is that it is an essential part of our system."

"Since we started working with Torq, I am handling much fewer alerts, it is becoming really easy for me to handle an alert, I have all the information that I need, I do not need to connect to different vendors to receive this information, and the main thing I got from Torq is time, which now helps me to build another automated system and learn."

"Any request that comes in, regardless of how complex it is, I can accomplish it with Torq."

"If I review about 100 vendors that I might work with, Torq is definitely in the top five that gave me personally investment back, just because every bit of effort I put into Torq eventually became a workflow that gave it back to me."

"As an analyst, it has demonstrated potential to reduce workforce requirements and time needed for related activities."

"Once I started to use the system and I saw the potential, it changed all of our work in IT."

"Using that one piece of AI, we auto-closed 511 cases in quarter four alone."

"The solution's valuable feature is its GUI. It has more than 450 connectors, which are excellent for connecting devices and automating integration. The solution has all the features we need. We deployed it in our environment, and it's fully integrated. Thanks to their open APIs, the seamless integration makes everything work well together."

"It is an out-of-the-box automated integration with our 20 departments. We perform L1 LiveOps automatically through the portal."

"It's a very user-friendly product and it's a very comprehensive technology."

"The setup is not difficult. It was easy."

"The advanced analytics has a really great overview of user behavior."

"The user interface and the timelines they use are the most valuable features. The price model is very simple so that one can understand it easily and there are no surprises within it."

"The solution's automation capabilities are great."

"Exabeam has improved our organization by speeding up the investigation process."

"The Exabeam SIEM has a user friendly UI interface."

"Exabeam Fusion SIEM has a good performance and more advantages than traditional solutions."

More Exabeam pros

Cons

"It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet."

"Regarding stability, I have noticed some lagging, crashing, and downtime, which is one of my largest gripes."

"Regarding the pricing of Torq, I would say it is expensive."

"We have MCP that we are working with our cloud security platform, and we wanted to connect this MCP to the case management."

"Even now, we have workflows that are in production that use AI steps and I get different results, making it unusable to some degree."

"The initial deployment of Torq was not easy."

"Reporting needs improvement. MTTR and MTTD metrics aren't directly available in playbooks and require manual effort to achieve."

"The reporting, especially custom reporting, needs to be improved. Additionally, it would be better if it could be hosted on Linux."

"They should provide detailed information about detecting phishing emails."

"The initial setup of Exabeam Fusion SIEM is complex because it needs to integrate with the SIEM solution, but after this is complete it is straightforward."

"We use the on-prem Exabeam product and face limitations using the web UI and administration of custom models and rules."

"We had a large volume right from the beginning and they weren't quite prepared for that. That's something that they should think about when it comes to customers that have a large volume to start off with."

"Exabeam's integration capabilities are not good, as Exabeam has a very limited number of integrations and no out-of-box integration, which is an area where Exabeam should improve."

"The customer service and support are not satisfactory."

"The solution's reporting and dashboarding could be improved."

"Exabeam lacks customizable dashboards, which might be a limitation if visualization is a key requirement."

More Exabeam cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There is an annual license required to use Exabeam Fusion SIEM. The price of the solution should be reduced."

"Exabeam Fusion SIEM's pricing is reasonable."

"The solution is expensive."

"The platform is not extremely expensive compared to its direct competitors; I would rate its pricing around six out of ten."

"They have a great model for pricing that can be based either on user count or gigabits per day."

"Exabeam is not a cheap solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Incident Response solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

25%

Computer Software Company

17%

University

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Torq?

We do not utilize the AI features that much. When it comes to general AI features of Torq, we are just slowly startin...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Torq?

Torq markets itself as a security tool, and we do use them for security, but not in the traditional sense they market...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Torq?

I would rate Torq an eight overall. I feel that Torq is as good as the effort you put into it. The limitations are ve...

See all answers

What needs improvement with D3 Security?

The reporting, especially custom reporting, needs to be improved. Additionally, it would be better if it could be hos...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for D3 Security?

We use the tool for automation and reporting. It helps to automate our playbooks.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering D3 Security?

It was easy to integrate the tool with our infrastructure because all the APIs are pre-built. We just created a drag-...

See all answers

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?

It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendli...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Exabeam Fusion SIEM?

I do not have much information about the pricing. However, I am aware that Exabeam is cheaper than Palo Alto based on...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Exabeam Fusion SIEM?

Exabeam's integration capabilities are not good, as Exabeam has a very limited number of integrations and no out-of-b...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tines vs Torq

Compared 36% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Torq

Compared 15% of the time

Blink Ops vs Torq

Compared 13% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Torq

Compared 9% of the time

More Torq Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs D3 Security

Compared 23% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs D3 Security

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs D3 Security

Compared 13% of the time

Swimlane vs D3 Security

Compared 9% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Cloud vs D3 Security

Compared 5% of the time

More D3 Security Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Exabeam

Compared 6% of the time

Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs Exabeam

Compared 5% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Exabeam

Compared 4% of the time

DTEX InTERCEPT vs Exabeam

Compared 4% of the time

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Exabeam

Compared 4% of the time

More Exabeam Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Torq

February 2026

Download Torq product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Incident Response

March 2026

Download D3 Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Exabeam

March 2026

Download Exabeam product report

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Torq

D3 Security

Demo not available

Exabeam

Overview

Torq is the enterprise AI SOC solution that effectively combines adaptive insights and automation to handle critical threats efficiently. It manages threat lifecycles, swiftly moving from triage to response, ensuring effective risk management.

Torq is designed to streamline security operations by aggregating telemetry across your security stack. It investigates significant risks and manages threats from triage to containment and remediation. This AI-driven tool enhances the capabilities of your SecOps team, allowing them to achieve more impactful results without introducing complicated processes.

What are the key features of Torq?

Adaptive Agentic Insights: Provides real-time threat intelligence tailored to specific security challenges.
Automation: Automates responses to security incidents, minimizing manual intervention requirements.
Threat Lifecycle Management: Comprehensive handling of threats from detection to remediation.
Telemetry Aggregation: Integrates data across platforms for a unified security overview.

Why consider Torq based on reviews?

Efficiency: Users notice significant reductions in time spent managing threats.
Risk Reduction: Enhanced ability to identify and address critical threats promptly.
Resource Optimization: Allows teams to allocate effort to other critical tasks by reducing manual security operations.
Scalability: Adaptable to meet the demands of growing or changing infrastructures.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Torq shows effectiveness by adapting to specific risk scenarios often encountered in these fields. Its integration with existing infrastructures makes it a valuable asset for maintaining stringent security standards, essential for protecting critical data and operations in diverse high-stakes environments.

Torq

D3 Security provides a full-lifecycle incident management platform—one that enables multiple detection sources, enriches standards-based workflows with threat intelligence, orchestrates response, and always guides its users to conclusive remediation. The system is unique in its ability to eliminate incident recurrence, through root cause and corrective action discovery, digital forensics case management, and by generating a foundation of actionable intelligence that supports policies, countermeasures and controls.

D3 Security

Exabeam Fusion is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:

-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease

Exabeam

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

S&P Global, Scotiabank, Cybereason, Cummins

Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank

Buyer's Guide

D3 Security vs. Exabeam

March 2026

Free Report: D3 Security vs. Exabeam

Find out what your peers are saying about D3 Security vs. Exabeam and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our D3 Security vs. Exabeam report.

See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors and best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.