Device42 vs Lansweeper comparison

Device42 and Lansweeper are both solutions in the IT Asset Management category. Device42 is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2, while Lansweeper is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2. Device42 holds a 4.1% mindshare in IAM, compared to Lansweeper’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Device42 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lansweeper users who would recommend it.

Device42

Read 34 Device42 reviews

4,548 Views
2,047 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Lansweeper

Read 17 Lansweeper reviews

2,729 Views
2,702 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Device42

Lansweeper

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Device42 and Lansweeper are competitors in the IT asset management category, both offering distinctive traits that cater to varying needs. Device42 has a slight edge in network infrastructure management with its agentless discovery and advanced mapping capabilities, while Lansweeper excels in software inventory and scanning features.

Features: Device42 shines with its agentless asset discovery, application dependency mapping, and IP address tracking, which contribute to secure and efficient network infrastructure management. Conversely, Lansweeper offers powerful software inventory capabilities, comprehensive scan operations, and automatic device discovery, providing users with extensive asset and software monitoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Device42 could enhance its requisition process by integrating pre-purchase asset tracking and improve its cable management and discovery depth, as well as reporting and mobile access. Lansweeper would benefit from better security functions, integration with cloud services, and enhanced support options. Both could improve usability and reporting, tailored to their distinct focus and user feedback.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Device42 provides superior customer support, characterized by its proactive approach and quick resolutions, setting it apart despite both being primarily on-premises. Lansweeper also receives positive feedback but is limited in technical support availability compared to Device42. Deployment is straightforward for both, with Device42's extensive support being a noted advantage.

Pricing and ROI: Device42 is seen as more expensive, with additional features elevating costs, though it offers significant ROI through time-saving and streamlined management. Lansweeper is cost-effective, especially for smaller organizations, despite price hikes, offering important value with its competitive licensing model. These solutions enhance asset management efficiency, impacting ROI through differing pricing strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed Device42 vs. Lansweeper Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Device42 vs. Lansweeper

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.6

Device42 enhances ROI by streamlining IT asset management, application mapping, and offering insightful reports for cost-effective operations.

Sentiment score

3.5

Lansweeper is praised for remote efficiency, cost savings, and reporting, though some doubt its overall financial return.

The TCO calculations based on five years and three years have yielded a remarkable ROI compared to on-premise workload, validating the business case submission to the customer.

Manmohan Rao

Associate Vice President at Hitachi Systems India Private Limited

I can confidently say at least 30% is the savings which we have seen.

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Device42 is a fully-featured tool that includes everything we need with powerful auto-discovery and intelligent application dependency mapping.

Likod Andrew

Financial Specialist at Wells Fargo

For more quotes and insights, download the Device42 report

It ended up being more cost-effective than BMC for the license we obtained.

reviewer2729955

Systems Integration Specialist Advisor at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Lansweeper report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

8.1

Device42's customer service is praised for prompt, knowledgeable support, despite occasional delays, frequently earning high satisfaction ratings.

Sentiment score

5.1

Lansweeper offers responsive email support with informative resources, despite time zone challenges, earning high user ratings.

Customer support for Device42 is fantastic.

Manmohan Rao

Associate Vice President at Hitachi Systems India Private Limited

Our internal teams have also leveraged the platform which is available for the customers and the partners to onboard them, have a bit of training on the tool and then ask any specific questions to either the TAM or the customer support team.

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

When it comes to resolving technical issues, the support team is responsive and always available to help.

Funmilola Olayiwola

Cloud Presales Engineer at Activedge Technologies Ltd.

For more quotes and insights, download the Device42 report

If they weren't available, I would leave a message, and they would usually return my call within an hour, addressing any issues I had.

MarcosCastro

IT Analyst at Ivy Rehab Network

We have regular 30-minute meetings, and when we have technical support questions, they either connect us to support or provide immediate answers.

EdSantos

System Administrator at Loma Linda University

Customers with premium or enterprise-level licenses often reported fast and knowledgeable responses.

Akram Syed

Data Engineering at Kroger Health

For more quotes and insights, download the Lansweeper report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.2

Device42 effectively scales for organizations, enhancing expansion with API integration and Remote Collectors, despite horizontal scaling limitations.

Sentiment score

6.7

Lansweeper is scalable for businesses, offering ease of setup and centralized management, despite challenges in large distributed environments.

It is very much scalable and allows you to design your discovery solution without facing any challenge.

Manmohan Rao

Associate Vice President at Hitachi Systems India Private Limited

Device42's scalability works well for me; if I want to add more resources, such as a Remote Collector for a new site, I can easily connect it to the main appliance.

reviewer2799393

Senior Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The scalability is good and with the increase in the size of the environment, it has definitely grown and changed over the last couple of years.

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Device42 report

You can start with just scanning your network and later add all the other features it provides to prepare reports.

IgorKabish

CTO at Four Nine Agency

When it comes to scalability, it is difficult to remember specifics since my lab environment is small, but I believe Lansweeper can scan quite a few devices.

reviewer2729955

Systems Integration Specialist Advisor at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Lansweeper report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.0

Device42 proves reliable with minimal downtime, easy integration, manageable resources, quick issue resolution, and high user satisfaction.

Sentiment score

7.0

Lansweeper is stable and user-friendly but may experience performance issues with heavy tasks and non-Windows systems.

Device42 is stable and has been reliable for my organization.

Manmohan Rao

Associate Vice President at Hitachi Systems India Private Limited

Device42 has been pretty stable.

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Stability for Device42, in terms of reliability, is generally acceptable.

Hafidz Rusydi

Solutions Architect at KAF Group

For more quotes and insights, download the Device42 report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Lansweeper report

Room For Improvement

Device42 users seek enhanced interface, integration, pricing, with improved widgets, graphics, navigation, automation, and support efficiency.

Lansweeper users want better reporting, deployment, support, asset management, integration, UI, scalability, version tracking, and cost effectiveness.

Device42 could benefit from improvements, specifically regarding the deployment of the software, which sometimes can be hectic and become time-consuming.

Likod Andrew

Financial Specialist at Wells Fargo

I foresee areas of improvement for the agent-less solution, which could be very useful for those organizations that might not allow configuring an agent in their source machines for workload discovery.

Manmohan Rao

Associate Vice President at Hitachi Systems India Private Limited

From an ITSM and ticketing perspective, I would say if there were integrations available, that would have really been better because a lot of times what we end up seeing or leveraging is ServiceNow because they have that native or out of the box capability, and even Freshservice has that capability out of the box.

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Device42 report

For example, Lansweeper can scan 7-Zip version 7.2, but when a new version 7.3 comes out, Lansweeper shows it as new software.

IgorKabish

CTO at Four Nine Agency

It would be advantageous if AD audit functionality could be integrated, showing users' actions and latest activities.

Sandip Bhogal

Service Desk Analyst - Endpoint Management and Support at The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust

Reporting needs to be more customized as per customer requirements.

Ganesh Karki

Ict Advisor at SOS Children's Villages

For more quotes and insights, download the Lansweeper report

Setup Cost

Device42 offers cost-effective pricing for managing 1,000-2,000 devices, though addon costs and competition may affect perceptions.

Lansweeper provides cost-effective IT asset management with straightforward licensing, though prices are close to competitors without negotiation options.

Compared to other competitors, it does not cost much, and I would recommend it from a cost perspective.

Manmohan Rao

Associate Vice President at Hitachi Systems India Private Limited

For example, I felt the BMC Discovery pricing was quite high.

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Device42 are relatively cost-effective and affordable.

Likod Andrew

Financial Specialist at Wells Fargo

For more quotes and insights, download the Device42 report

It is quite cheap compared to other solutions, and the installation was very easy.

IgorKabish

CTO at Four Nine Agency

They purchased licenses for around 300 to 400 users or devices.

Ganesh Karki

Ict Advisor at SOS Children's Villages

For more quotes and insights, download the Lansweeper report

Valuable Features

Device42 excels in asset discovery, dependency mapping, and integrated IT management, enhancing security, cloud readiness, and efficiency.

Lansweeper offers robust IT asset management, supports versatile platforms, and enhances decision-making through comprehensive insights and integration options.

Device42 has positively impacted my organization by providing granularity toward application discovery compared to other assessment tools, which is a differentiator since none of the other tools provide such granularity, leading to better decision-making for my migration to the public cloud.

Manmohan Rao

Associate Vice President at Hitachi Systems India Private Limited

We have leveraged that to discover IT assets such as physical servers, VMs, network devices, containers, storage devices, the applications, cloud resources and their relationships or their dependencies with each other and to the outside.

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Device42 has positively impacted our organization by helping us become one of the best companies for asset management and inventory for the enterprise businesses we work with.

Funmilola Olayiwola

Cloud Presales Engineer at Activedge Technologies Ltd.

For more quotes and insights, download the Device42 report

The best feature of Lansweeper is that it works on a local network without any agents installed on the equipment; it uses embedded Microsoft tools for communication and collecting information.

IgorKabish

CTO at Four Nine Agency

The most valuable feature in the dashboard is the search functionality, which enables users to find all relevant data efficiently.

Sandip Bhogal

Service Desk Analyst - Endpoint Management and Support at The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust

Lansweeper has made the job easier for us. That's the best benefit.

Hardik-Patel

Lead System Support Specialist at Government of Prince Edward Island

For more quotes and insights, download the Lansweeper report

Categories and Ranking

Device42

Ranking in IT Asset Management

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management Databases (2nd), IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools (3rd), Data Center Infrastructure Management (1st)

Lansweeper

Ranking in IT Asset Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the IT Asset Management category, the mindshare of Device42 is 4.1%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lansweeper is 4.8%, down from 13.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Asset Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Lansweeper	4.8%
Device42	4.1%
Other	91.1%

IT Asset Management

Featured Reviews

Manmohan Rao

Associate Vice President at Hitachi Systems India Private Limited

Granular discovery has ensured confident workload migration and optimized cloud move group planning

Device42 offers the best features for workload assessment, particularly useful for cloud-to-cloud workload or on-premise data center workload, especially when planning for workload migration to the public cloud. For application and infrastructure discovery, Device42 has enabled me to know the number of machines running in the on-premise environment and has managed to capture complete utilization metrics or trends of their utilization. This has benefited me in right-sizing systems for my public cloud total cost of ownership (TCO) planning, providing me granularity to right-size these systems while planning a migration to the public cloud. Device42 has positively impacted my organization by providing granularity toward application discovery compared to other assessment tools, which is a differentiator since none of the other tools provide such granularity, leading to better decision-making for my migration to the public cloud. Device42 has improved my migration projects by providing granularity around system dependencies that gave me confidence knowing which systems communicate with each other parked in a particular move group. My move group planning became so robust that I am not leaving any system behind in the on-premise data center from my planning, which saves a lot of time and effort, leading to cost optimization—a value addition.

Read full review

EdSantos

System Administrator at Loma Linda University

Significant asset management capabilities boost IT efficiency and support proactive monitoring

A positive aspect of Lansweeper is that they maintain a 30-minute recurring schedule with us for feedback. I have mentioned to the Lansweeper team that I would appreciate a clear separation between computers joined to our on-premise domain and those joined to the Microsoft Entra directory, as this distinction is currently difficult to make. In terms of reporting and knowledge, Lansweeper completely fulfills our needs. The software installation capability is being phased out as they now have the cloud version app, where this ability and Actions have been removed. My experience is primarily with Windows systems in Lansweeper, but it also supports Mac systems. We are currently adding Macs to scanning, though functionality is somewhat limited compared to Windows. It scans servers too, though this isn't the primary focus. Regarding network scanning, there are some security considerations due to specific service or port requirements on switches. For Windows needs in terms of asset management, report creation, and detailed information visibility, it is an excellent product. Building reports is straightforward, and while the database is quite extensive and may require research depending on needs, the information is readily available.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	20

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Device42?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Device42 are relatively cost-effective and affordable. I do not know if a small organization would be able to afford it, but I presume it would also be co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Device42?

I think Device42 can be improved by adding more features around the CMDB aspect and lifecycle management. I do not think many people use it for that functionality, but if they were to expand the su...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Device42?

My main use case for Device42 is that we use it as a CMDB and affinity map to check out network topology or determine when we need to decom something in a life cycle. We use it for many different p...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lansweeper?

It is quite cheap compared to other solutions, and the installation was very easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lansweeper?

It is difficult for me to suggest improvements to Lansweeper since I thought it performed effectively for its intended purpose. I did not use the ITSM tools aspect, which connects to a CMDB, becaus...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lansweeper?

My use cases with Lansweeper primarily involve discovery for data center migrations. I did this when I worked for my company, where we used BMC's Discovery for asset discovery. Another customer wan...

See all answers

Comparisons

Freshservice vs Device42

Compared 8% of the time

ServiceNow CMDB vs Device42

Compared 8% of the time

NetBox.dev vs Device42

Compared 7% of the time

Faddom vs Device42

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds IPAM vs Device42

Compared 3% of the time

More Device42 Competitors

ManageEngine IT Asset Management vs Lansweeper

Compared 21% of the time

ServiceNow Discovery vs Lansweeper

Compared 14% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Lansweeper

Compared 8% of the time

Spiceworks vs Lansweeper

Compared 7% of the time

ServiceNow vs Lansweeper

Compared 7% of the time

More Lansweeper Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Device42

May 2026

Download Device42 product report

Buyer's Guide

Lansweeper

April 2026

Download Lansweeper product report

Overview

Device42 empowers enterprises with automatic IT asset discovery, application dependency mapping, and agentless discovery, streamlining asset management, improving decision-making, and supporting migration initiatives.

Device42 automates network discovery and provides comprehensive IT data management, making it indispensable for asset and infrastructure management. The platform’s integration capabilities, such as with ServiceNow, allow seamless management of physical and virtual environments. Its application dependency mapping is a critical feature for efficient cloud migration, while advanced search and dashboards enhance operational tasks. Device42's ease of deployment coupled with integration into cloud services offers robust operational insights and simplifies onboarding.

What are Device42's key features?

Automatic IT Asset Discovery: Enables detailed information collection on hardware and software.
Application Dependency Mapping: Facilitates tracking of application dependencies for effective cloud migration.
Agentless Discovery: Assists in uncovering assets without the need for specialized agents.
Network Topology Visualization: Assists in visual representation of network connections.
Cloud Integration: Simplifies the integration with cloud services for enhanced insights.

What benefits should be evaluated in Device42?

Improved Decision-Making: Optimizes resource utilization and boosts strategic initiatives.
Seamless Integration: Enhances connectivity with platforms like ServiceNow.
Efficiency in Auditing: Eases compliance and auditing processes.
Simplified Onboarding: Streamlines initial setups and deployment.
Enhanced Operational Insights: Supports better management through comprehensive data visualization.

Device42 is widely used across sectors for IT asset and infrastructure management, where automation in inventory and documentation aids compliance and resource optimization. It excels in industries requiring integration with existing systems and comprehensive network solutions. Application dependency mapping bolsters cloud migration efficiency in enterprise environments.

Device42

Lansweeper provides efficient IT asset management, automating scanning, discovery, and reporting while offering robust cloud capabilities. It's designed for IT, security, and executive teams to enhance insights and strategic planning.

Lansweeper is known for its comprehensive IT asset management features, including automated scanning, detailed reporting options, and extensive hardware and software tracking. Its agentless deployment and support for various platforms boost performance and usability, facilitating real-time data management with cloud capabilities. While many value Lansweeper's robust functionality, users point to areas for improvement, such as customer support, enhanced cloud features, and report customization. Scalability in large networks and better integration of security functions like vulnerability management are noted as areas for growth.

What are Lansweeper's key features?

Automated Scanning: Efficiently discovers and tracks hardware and software assets without manual intervention.
Centralized Dashboards: Offers a unified view of asset data across multiple platforms.
Cloud Capabilities: Ensures real-time data access and management anytime, anywhere.
Vast Reporting Options: Provides customizable and detailed reports for in-depth analysis.
Agentless Deployment: Simplifies implementation across devices without needing software agents.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Control: Manages IT budgets effectively with comprehensive asset tracking.
Compliance Tracking: Ensures adherence to industry regulations through detailed reporting.
Strategic Planning: Offers insights that aid long-term IT and security planning.
Enhanced Security: Monitors device and software status to identify potential vulnerabilities.
Improved Efficiency: Automates many tasks, freeing teams to focus on strategic initiatives.

Lansweeper is widely implemented in industries to manage IT and OT assets, offering detailed endpoint monitoring, automated task scheduling, and desktop inventory management. Companies utilize it for license counting, software deployment, and enhancing security by tracking device status and software updates.

Lansweeper

Sample Customers

Computershare, Concur, Doosan, Fitch Ratings Inc., Fujitsu, HomeAway, Jasper Wireless, Mercedes-Benz, Square, Twitch, UCSB, Zayo Group Inc.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Device42 vs. Lansweeper

April 2026

Free Report: Device42 vs. Lansweeper

Find out what your peers are saying about Device42 vs. Lansweeper and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Device42 vs. Lansweeper report.

See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.