

ServiceNow and Lansweeper compete in IT service management and asset management. ServiceNow appears to have an edge due to its extensive customization and integration capabilities, appealing especially to large enterprises, whereas Lansweeper is favored for its cost-effective asset management solutions.
Features: ServiceNow offers extensive ITSM capabilities, advanced workflow customization, and vibrant community support for custom app development. It seamlessly integrates with ITIL processes. Lansweeper excels in IT asset management, providing detailed device data, effective for tracking assets and monitoring system performance.
Room for Improvement: ServiceNow could improve its user interface for simplicity and enhance documentation. Its licensing and complexity can pose challenges. Lansweeper could enhance customer support and advance its cloud integration and security functions.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ServiceNow provides deployment flexibility across cloud and on-premises with varying customer service responsiveness. Lansweeper primarily deploys on-premises, limiting flexibility but offering decent support, though service may degrade as it scales.
Pricing and ROI: ServiceNow, though often costly with a complex licensing structure, offers significant ROI through its broad functionality. Lansweeper's competitive pricing makes it appealing for IT asset management, promising substantial ROI with less complexity.
It ended up being more cost-effective than BMC for the license we obtained.
Thanks to ServiceNow's end-to-end automation, we save five to ten days of cycle time for each invoice.
They have removed the costs associated with on-prem infrastructure, including data center costs, power costs, and physical server costs.
ServiceNow offers a great return on investment because it saves us a lot of time and increases the efficiency of team members to complete their tickets and work on the PRBs to solve the root cause.
If they weren't available, I would leave a message, and they would usually return my call within an hour, addressing any issues I had.
We have regular 30-minute meetings, and when we have technical support questions, they either connect us to support or provide immediate answers.
Customers with premium or enterprise-level licenses often reported fast and knowledgeable responses.
The support is exemplary and deserves a perfect rating.
Obtaining support for maintenance is the current challenge because they don't have a presence in the local market.
Whenever we have had issues, they have provided good support, and those issues have never recurred.
You can start with just scanning your network and later add all the other features it provides to prepare reports.
When it comes to scalability, it is difficult to remember specifics since my lab environment is small, but I believe Lansweeper can scan quite a few devices.
There are no limitations or performance issues with ServiceNow; it is cloud-based, so it is highly scalable and performs well.
It is capable of vertical scaling with no issues.
ServiceNow's scalability is very good as it can be deployed in each environment.
It is cloud-based, so it is highly scalable and performs well.
I haven't faced any issues with stability; I've rarely seen any downtime.
ServiceNow is stable enough.
For example, Lansweeper can scan 7-Zip version 7.2, but when a new version 7.3 comes out, Lansweeper shows it as new software.
It would be advantageous if AD audit functionality could be integrated, showing users' actions and latest activities.
Reporting needs to be more customized as per customer requirements.
It makes no sense in my opinion, and they should offer the team at the front to help customize the product to fit each company's needs, as every company has different demands and forms of submitting a request that need adjustment over time.
My priority points for improvement are the UI glitches and modern AI technology integrations for faster incident management.
There is a need for bug or error tracking in ServiceNow.
It is quite cheap compared to other solutions, and the installation was very easy.
They purchased licenses for around 300 to 400 users or devices.
ServiceNow's pricing can be justified if more functionality is required.
ServiceNow does come with a price.
ServiceNow is expensive for all regions.
The best feature of Lansweeper is that it works on a local network without any agents installed on the equipment; it uses embedded Microsoft tools for communication and collecting information.
The most valuable feature in the dashboard is the search functionality, which enables users to find all relevant data efficiently.
Lansweeper has made the job easier for us. That's the best benefit.
ServiceNow provides a wide range of functionality, covering all the necessary modules, unlike Jira which is primarily for IT.
Automation capabilities are impressive, bolstered by a vast repository of out-of-the-box connectors and plugins that facilitate integration with various applications worldwide.
The features of ServiceNow that I find most valuable include its ability to easily access ticket details if you know the ticket number, monitor the timeline of when the ticket was created, and see the current status.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| ServiceNow | 12.9% |
| Lansweeper | 4.8% |
| Other | 82.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 55 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 35 |
| Large Enterprise | 171 |
Lansweeper provides efficient IT asset management, automating scanning, discovery, and reporting while offering robust cloud capabilities. It's designed for IT, security, and executive teams to enhance insights and strategic planning.
Lansweeper is known for its comprehensive IT asset management features, including automated scanning, detailed reporting options, and extensive hardware and software tracking. Its agentless deployment and support for various platforms boost performance and usability, facilitating real-time data management with cloud capabilities. While many value Lansweeper's robust functionality, users point to areas for improvement, such as customer support, enhanced cloud features, and report customization. Scalability in large networks and better integration of security functions like vulnerability management are noted as areas for growth.
What are Lansweeper's key features?Lansweeper is widely implemented in industries to manage IT and OT assets, offering detailed endpoint monitoring, automated task scheduling, and desktop inventory management. Companies utilize it for license counting, software deployment, and enhancing security by tracking device status and software updates.
ServiceNow offers customizability and cloud-based integration that sustains operational efficiency. Enabling change and incident management, it accelerates workflow automation and project management without downtime issues, serving deployment needs for IT service and productivity enhancements.
ServiceNow stands out with its adaptable workflows and cloud-native infrastructure, boosting IT service, project, and asset management. Known for its robust incident and change management, the platform addresses business needs through its user-centric design and extensive integration options. By facilitating seamless IT operations and automation, ServiceNow empowers businesses to enhance productivity and efficiency. Regular updates ensure users benefit from the latest features without service interruptions, although pricing and licensing complexities demand attention. Users seek improved reporting tools and a more intuitive design while expressing interest in refined mobile functionality and better documentation.
What are the key features of ServiceNow?ServiceNow finds implementation across industries like IT, HR, asset management, and help desks, addressing ticketing and configuration needs. Businesses use its dashboard for tracking performance metrics, enhancing decision-making in departments like HR service delivery. Its adaptability also makes it suitable for industries requiring robust operational management and process automation, driving efficiency and growth.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.