Lansweeper vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management comparison

Lansweeper and ManageEngine are both solutions in the IT Asset Management category. Lansweeper is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4, while ManageEngine is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.6. Lansweeper holds a 7.3% mindshare in IAM, compared to ManageEngine’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Lansweeper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Lansweeper

Read 17 Lansweeper reviews

2,220 Views
2,220 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine IT Asset Manag...

Read 9 ManageEngine IT Asset Management reviews

1,411 Views
1,213 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Lansweeper

ManageEngine IT Asset Manag...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

ManageEngine IT Asset Management and Lansweeper compete in the IT asset management category. ManageEngine excels in pricing and support while Lansweeper's superior feature set gives it a competitive edge.

Features: ManageEngine IT Asset Management helps with tracking asset details, software license management, and integration with financial systems for tasks like depreciation. It supports network inventory and ensures compatibility with service desks. Lansweeper offers advanced network scanning capabilities, enables monitoring of CPU and memory usage, and provides detailed asset reports, including IP addresses and firmware information.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine could benefit from enhancing its network scan capabilities, expanding reporting options for easier data insights, and improving its automation features for asset management tasks. Lansweeper has room to enhance its help desk service potential, simplify its interface for users unfamiliar with IT tools, and improve the detail in its default reporting options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine offers intuitive deployment both on-premises and via the cloud, with responsive customer support ensuring a seamless implementation process. Lansweeper focuses on a cloud-first deployment strategy and provides straightforward setup, making it scalable from 1,000 to 1,000,000 devices while maintaining strong customer service support.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine's competitive pricing structure is especially appealing to larger organizations, ensuring a quick return on investment with its comprehensive features. Although Lansweeper may have a higher initial setup cost, its innovative feature set contributes to a strong ROI over time, particularly through efficient asset management and reporting capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Lansweeper vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Lansweeper vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Lansweeper

Ranking in IT Asset Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ManageEngine IT Asset Manag...

Ranking in IT Asset Management

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

License Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Asset Management category, the mindshare of Lansweeper is 7.3%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine IT Asset Management is 4.5%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Asset Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Lansweeper	7.3%
ManageEngine IT Asset Management	4.5%
Other	88.2%

IT Asset Management

Featured Reviews

EdSantos

System Administrator at Loma Linda University

Significant asset management capabilities boost IT efficiency and support proactive monitoring

A positive aspect of Lansweeper is that they maintain a 30-minute recurring schedule with us for feedback. I have mentioned to the Lansweeper team that I would appreciate a clear separation between computers joined to our on-premise domain and those joined to the Microsoft Entra directory, as this distinction is currently difficult to make. In terms of reporting and knowledge, Lansweeper completely fulfills our needs. The software installation capability is being phased out as they now have the cloud version app, where this ability and Actions have been removed. My experience is primarily with Windows systems in Lansweeper, but it also supports Mac systems. We are currently adding Macs to scanning, though functionality is somewhat limited compared to Windows. It scans servers too, though this isn't the primary focus. Regarding network scanning, there are some security considerations due to specific service or port requirements on switches. For Windows needs in terms of asset management, report creation, and detailed information visibility, it is an excellent product. Building reports is straightforward, and while the database is quite extensive and may require research depending on needs, the information is readily available.

Read full review

Md Abdul Hakim

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Helpful smart automation and tracking that can be used with minimal adjustments

This is a recording system, and it's an automation system. It's very smart. I use it with minimal adjustments needed. The focus is on test management. Everything can be tracked from asset management. Asset management offers many facilities. It doesn't require additional training for ManageEngine or technicians. Assets are simply reported from the dashboard, indicating where IT is missing, where compliance is mentioned, or where action is needed, with driver updates. All facilities are available in the enterprise edition, allowing users, customers, or any organization to easily obtain their referred insights. Anyone can easily install it. There are no handbells. An app provides instructions, with documentation available. Sometimes, IT issues arise like fraud blocking or service-related problems. Upon facing an issue, feedback is integrated, and the solution is provided from their end. This is a very IT-friendly solution. We get LiveSat and IT management. Facilities are accessible, like exporting the installation folder, making the migration process easy. Failover or redundancy can occur within two to five hours, making it scalable. This is a very stable solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We've found the most value right now in the inventory of the equipment."

"The best feature of Lansweeper is the discovery; it is really automatic and straightforward to install and use."

"Provides good reports from every asset."

"What I appreciate best about Lansweeper is the scanning itself, as setting up scanning was relatively easy, and the reporting was comprehensive with numerous different reporting options, including a feature for creating your own reports."

"We have seen a return on investment with Lansweeper, as we save time preparing reports for Microsoft, and it has been very useful in terms of cost savings."

"It is very flexible and very powerful. The reporting scripts that are continually posted are a real benefit. It makes it easier for someone who is a consumer, but not necessarily a power user, to quickly create and run reports, get updates, and know what tasks need to be performed."

"For Windows needs in terms of asset management, report creation, and detailed information visibility, it is an excellent product."

"The most valuable feature of Lansweeper is IT asset management. In the realm of cybersecurity, having knowledge of what is on the network is critical. We are able to conduct reports and see the assets we have. Initially, the solution required a machine on the local network to scan everything, but it has evolved to include agents that can report to a device, and more recently, an agent that can send data to the cloud even if the device is outside of the network. This has proven to be especially useful during the pandemic, as it has allowed us to keep track of devices that have been sent home with employees."

More Lansweeper pros

"The auto-discovery feature has helped us a lot."

"The ability to define custom templates for asset management helps track assets, budgets, warranties, and expiries effectively."

"The most valuable component of the ITSM tool is the help desk due to its organized way of raising tickets."

"We are satisfied with the product because each module is user-friendly, and we can customize it based on our organization's requirements."

"The technical support is great."

"It's very smart. I use it with minimal adjustments needed."

"This is a very stable solution."

"The most valuable component of the ITSM tool is the help desk due to its organized way of raising tickets."

More ManageEngine IT Asset Management pros

Cons

"The support experience hasn't been satisfactory. Establishing a direct connection with someone is challenging, as communication is limited to chat or forums through a web link. There's a lack of direct interaction with support personnel, making it difficult to have real-time conversations or seek immediate assistance, which is not ideal."

"In Vietnam, there's no Lansweeper office, making it difficult to find the right vendor to get the license."

"In Lansweeper, reporting has some glitches. Reporting needs to be more customized as per customer requirements."

"I don't have any complaints about it, and I've never really had any issues. It isn't wizard-driven or anything like that, but it doesn't need to be. For someone who is not familiar with system administration, it would be daunting. There would be a lot of info there. They wouldn't necessarily know what to do, but that's not its target audience. For its target audience, in particular, it doesn't need to change. It is really a good tool."

"The feature to deploy software in endpoints needs to be improved."

"The support is an area that could improve. The support staff could be more knowledgeable."

"It would be beneficial if the solution could show more account-related information, beyond just the main Active Directory user account, and include management capabilities for other account types."

"For example, Lansweeper can scan 7-Zip version 7.2, but when a new version 7.3 comes out, Lansweeper shows it as new software, requiring us to manually add this software to the whitelist or change it in reports; it should be counted as the previous version."

More Lansweeper cons

"I hope it includes barcode features, as barcode scanning and MacAdes cannot currently be mapped with this field."

"The asset management tool is costly."

"Responses from ManageEngine should be faster."

"I would love to see a digital adoption feature or guide that navigates first-time users through the application, as it is quite complex with many relevant and irrelevant elements."

"The assets that can be discovered are pretty easy to manage, but there should be a better way to manage non-discoverable assets. Our development team works on bots and tests particular hardware. They have got different varieties of hardware. They want a feature for managing these assets within a warehouse kind of environment. For example, our IT has received 100 items, and they have assigned these items as a bulk unit to a project manager. The project manager further wants to distribute these items within his or her team. Instead of maintaining a separate Excel sheet, the project manager should be able to reallocate these items from within the tool so that we have hierarchical entities for the same unit."

"The engineering area needs improvement."

"It requires some development to be better, more comfortable, and usable, enhancing customer satisfaction."

More ManageEngine IT Asset Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its cost is terrific. It has a great price and is cost-effective, and the license is free under a hundred nodes. I like the fact that it gets regular updates. Of course, it notifies you of the product and you can patch it and all that, but I like the fact that it is very affordable for the number of nodes. A company with three or four computers doesn't need it, but a company that has dozens or hundreds has to have some kind of governance. It can do everything such as Windows, Linux, and network devices, and the discovery is really intelligent. For example, you'd find smart devices, IOTs, and things like that. I'm very happy with it."

"The Lansweeper's price has increased and is now on par with or even higher than competitors, it still offers significant value in the area of IT asset management."

"It actually costs some money in the long run because of the licensing model."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Lansweeper's pricing a seven out of ten."

"It is not high and it is fair according to the worth it offers."

"Its price is reasonable, but I wish it was lower."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lansweeper?

It is quite cheap compared to other solutions, and the installation was very easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lansweeper?

It is difficult for me to suggest improvements to Lansweeper since I thought it performed effectively for its intended purpose. I did not use the ITSM tools aspect, which connects to a CMDB, becaus...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lansweeper?

My use cases with Lansweeper primarily involve discovery for data center migrations. I did this when I worked for my company, where we used BMC's Discovery for asset discovery. Another customer wan...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine IT Asset Management?

The pricing of ManageEngine IT Asset Management is publicly available, so customers can verify its fairness. Some companies may request discounts, which ManageEngine can provide. The licensing mode...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine IT Asset Management?

When we encounter issues with ManageEngine IT Asset Management, we check the online portal or ChatGPT, and they provide numerous knowledge bases on YouTube and Google. However, the issue is that th...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ManageEngine IT Asset Management?

The pricing of ManageEngine IT Asset Management is handled by the management team, so I am not involved with that aspect. I consider it a stable solution. My overall rating for ManageEngine IT Asse...

See all answers

Comparisons

ServiceNow Discovery vs Lansweeper

Compared 17% of the time

Device42 vs Lansweeper

Compared 11% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Lansweeper

Compared 9% of the time

Spiceworks vs Lansweeper

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow vs Lansweeper

Compared 6% of the time

More Lansweeper Competitors

ServiceNow vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Compared 15% of the time

Snow License Manager vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Compared 8% of the time

Axonius vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Compared 5% of the time

Device42 vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Compared 5% of the time

Mobile Reach vs ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine IT Asset Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Lansweeper

January 2026

Download Lansweeper product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine IT Asset Management

January 2026

Download ManageEngine IT Asset Management product report

Overview

Managing IT has never been a bigger challenge. Hardware, software, and users can be anywhere at any time, making IT environments extremely dynamic and often complex. A seemingly simple question has become terribly difficult to answer: ‘Who is using what?’ This question inspired Lansweeper and still drives us today. We believe that answering it is crucial to tackle and simplify many of the challenges IT professionals face every day.

MISSION
At Lansweeper we develop and support our software which builds and leverages a system of record in any IT environment.

Lansweeper

ManageEngine AssetExplorer is a web-based IT Asset Management (ITAM) software that helps you monitor and manage assets in your network from Planning phase to Disposal phase. AssetExplorer provides you with a number of ways to ensure discovery of all the assets in your network. You can manage software & hardware assets, ensure software license compliance and track purchase orders & contracts - the whole nine yards! AssetExplorer is very easy to install and works right out of the box.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

TRA

Buyer's Guide

Lansweeper vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management

January 2026

Free Report: Lansweeper vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Lansweeper vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Lansweeper vs. ManageEngine IT Asset Management report.

See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.