Eggplant Test vs Tricentis qTest comparison

Keysight Technologies and Tricentis are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.3, while Tricentis is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.7. Keysight Technologies holds a 3.6% mindshare in TMT, compared to Tricentis’s 8.7% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

3,597 Views
504 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Tricentis qTest

Read 19 Tricentis qTest reviews

1,868 Views
1,382 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Tricentis qTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Tricentis qTest and Eggplant Test are both software testing tools with significant market presence. Tricentis qTest leads in features and pricing, while Eggplant Test has superior functionality.

Features: Tricentis qTest is known for comprehensive test management capabilities, integration with multiple development tools, and robust reporting features. Eggplant Test excels in advanced automation, cross-platform testing, and AI-driven testing methodologies.

Room for Improvement: Tricentis qTest needs better scalability, improved performance during peak usage, and enhanced customer support. Eggplant Test requires an intuitive learning curve and stronger integration with popular third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis qTest provides a straightforward deployment process but has occasional complexities needing support, with helpful yet slow customer service. Eggplant Test offers smooth deployment and strong customer support but faces delays in complex issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis qTest is seen as cost-effective with strong ROI due to its features and lower setup costs. Eggplant Test is more expensive but justified by advanced automation features and substantial long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. Tricentis qTest Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Tricentis qTest

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.7

Eggplant Test automation cut testing time and costs, saving $75,000 per tester and achieving fast ROI with increased efficiency.

Sentiment score

1.0

Tricentis qTest delivers ROI by enhancing efficiency, visibility, and collaboration, with quick adoption, ease of use, and seamless upgrades.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

Due to the fast adoption, there is a quick ROI along with faster and better maintenance due to Tosca's AI and self-healing aspects.

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.5

Eggplant Test customer service is praised for quick, knowledgeable support, despite some time zone and coverage challenges.

Sentiment score

1.0

Tricentis qTest customer service is responsive and effective, despite integration challenges and occasional slower first-tier support.

I'm not impressed because it depends on the resolution of the screen, so I wouldn't highly recommend this tool.

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Eggplant Test offers 24x7 support.

Naresh Nathala

Practice Head - QA at IdeaBytes

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

Any issue resolution is fairly quick.

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

5.5

Eggplant Test scales well and integrates strongly but faces challenges with licensing costs and performance slowdowns in large packs.

Sentiment score

8.3

Tricentis qTest offers scalable, seamless performance supporting global teams, requiring minimal maintenance, with robust integration and feature growth.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.1

Eggplant Test is praised for stability and responsive support but faces occasional crashes, latency, and high resource usage.

Sentiment score

8.1

Tricentis qTest offers stable performance with rare downtime, consistent availability, and improved integration, receiving positive user feedback.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

As for stability and performance, apart from a few hiccups and glitches, Tricentis qTest worked fine.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report

Room For Improvement

Eggplant Test struggles with usability, integration, setup issues, and outdated features, requiring improvements in performance, support, and accessibility.

Tricentis qTest requires improved reporting, better integration, enhanced user interface, installation processes, and faster, robust support and features.

For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective.

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

The two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture.

Naresh Nathala

Practice Head - QA at IdeaBytes

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

There may be missing features that should be included in the next release of Tricentis qTest, such as integration with other tools, specifically integration with Parasoft.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

It also does not allow for task tracking or calculating time spent on tasks, which affects project timelines.

Prajkta Ambekar

Test Automation Specialist -Full Stack at IBM

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report

Setup Cost

Eggplant Test is costly yet ideal for large enterprises, with execution-only licenses offering better cost-effectiveness than competitors.

Tricentis qTest offers moderate enterprise pricing, supports global teams, and includes options for volume discounts and optional tools.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

The solution is expensive.

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The pricing and execution of qTest are easy.

Prajkta Ambekar

Test Automation Specialist -Full Stack at IBM

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report

Valuable Features

Eggplant Test excels in cross-platform testing with AI-driven automation, simplifying processes and enhancing collaboration through modular scripts.

Tricentis qTest provides seamless integration, robust reporting, and scalable test management, enhancing agile testing efficiency across diverse needs.

It can auto-heal the test cases and suggest new paths for testing, enhancing our ability to automate end-to-end journeys across various applications.

Naresh Nathala

Practice Head - QA at IdeaBytes

It can integrate with GitHub, allowing you to work with DevOps pipelines, so whenever you make changes in GitHub, it runs and checks the smoke testing on the server.

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report

There are also AI insights available based on the data and defects raised, which gives a view of functionalities where there are challenges and where more regression needs to happen.

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

I have seen measurable benefits with Tricentis qTest in terms of time-saving and resource-saving.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

A valuable feature is the ease of uploading, as well as creating folders.

Prajkta Ambekar

Test Automation Specialist -Full Stack at IBM

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Management Tools

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (13th), Test Automation Tools (12th)

Tricentis qTest

Ranking in Test Management Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 3.6%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis qTest is 8.7%, down from 15.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tricentis qTest	8.7%
Eggplant Test	3.6%
Other	87.7%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

User stories and test artifacts migrate seamlessly to innovative management tools

Customers are moving towards Tricentis due to their association with SAP. There is interest in understanding if there are connectors for converting UFT scripts to Tosca, as many customers are looking to make this transition. We have developed capabilities for automated migration from ALM to Tricentis qTest without any loss of data. However, for UFT to Tosca migration, scripts need to be rewritten as there are no automatic converters available. From a project perspective, there have not been many challenges with Tricentis products. The main improvement area would be developing a connector to move UFT scripts to Tosca, which would enable quicker and easier movement for customers. This would aid faster adoption of Tosca and ease the financial pressure on clients who currently need to invest in rewriting scripts.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis qTest?

The solution is expensive. For the features that are available, depending on the volumes of licenses we get, we are able to get better discounts as strategic partners of Tosca. We can pass some ben...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tricentis qTest?

One of the things I noticed was the reporting part wasn't very good. It was hard to customize the dashboards in Tricentis qTest, and there were limitations in the dashboard. There may be missing fe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tricentis qTest?

The main use cases for Tricentis qTest are for test management, to keep test cases and execute those. Overall, centralized test management with Tricentis qTest was beneficial for the team's product...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 16% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 24% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 16% of the time

TestRail vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 13% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 6% of the time

More Tricentis qTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

January 2026

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis qTest

January 2026

Download Tricentis qTest product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

qTest

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Tricentis is the global leader in enterprise continuous testing, widely credited for reinventing software testing for DevOps, cloud, and enterprise applications. The Tricentis AI-based, continuous testing platform provides a new and fundamentally different way to perform software testing. An approach that’s totally automated, fully codeless, and intelligently driven by AI. It addresses both agile development and complex enterprise apps, enabling enterprises to accelerate their digital transformation by dramatically increasing software release speed, reducing costs, and improving software quality.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

McKesson, Accenture, Nationwide Insurance, Allianz, Telstra, Moët Hennessy-Louis Vuitton (LVMH PCIS), and Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Tricentis qTest

December 2025

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. Tricentis qTest

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. Tricentis qTest and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. Tricentis qTest report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.