F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs Oracle Access Manager comparison

F5 and Oracle are both solutions in the Access Management category. F5 is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.3. F5 holds a 2.0% mindshare in AM, compared to Oracle’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Man...

Read 18 F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) reviews

2,814 Views
619 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Oracle Access Manager

Read 21 Oracle Access Manager reviews

1,071 Views
985 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Man...

Oracle Access Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Oracle Access Manager and F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) compete in the access management category. F5 BIG-IP APM holds the upper hand due to its advanced features which users find worth the investment.

Features: Oracle Access Manager is valued for seamless integration with existing infrastructure, robust authentication options, and scalability. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is appreciated for its dynamic access controls, granular policy management, and flexible deployment options.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Access Manager users mention the need for enhanced documentation, simplified configuration steps, and better ecosystem integration. F5 BIG-IP APM users suggest improvements in the complexity of initial setup, better troubleshooting guidance, and enhanced ecosystem integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Access Manager has straightforward deployment in familiar Oracle environments but mixed reviews in customer service responsiveness. F5 BIG-IP APM, despite slightly more complex deployment, receives higher marks for its dedicated support team and detailed onboarding assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Access Manager offers competitive initial pricing appealing to budget-conscious buyers. F5 BIG-IP APM, though more costly upfront, is perceived to deliver superior ROI due to its extensive feature set and robust performance.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Oracle Access Manager Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Oracle Access Manager

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Man...

Ranking in Access Management

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (15th), Network Access Control (NAC) (7th), SSL VPN (5th), Remote Access (10th)

Oracle Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is 2.0%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Access Manager is 2.2%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)	2.0%
Oracle Access Manager	2.2%
Other	95.8%

Access Management

Featured Reviews

SÜ

SalihUcpinar

Senior Cyber Security Consultant at KoçSistem

Has provided reliable policy controls and secure web access for large enterprises

I consider Cloudflare when evaluating centralized access control features; Cloudflare utilizes multi-factor authentication and full API support, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) needs to enhance its API support. I recommend F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) for large companies such as Tüpraş and Ford. Tüpraş is one of the biggest companies in Turkey, along with other customers such as Tofaş, Euroko, Koç Holding, and more. For on-premises deployment, I would rate it a 10. For cloud deployment, I would rate it a seven. I primarily use it on-premises. I rate F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) eight out of ten.

Read full review

SurajShah

Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Offers strong support and consistent updates improve security features

It is a heavyweight application. The product deployment and installation takes time, and the environment details are complex. ForgeRock is very quick to deploy on Tomcat, but Oracle Access Manager must be deployed on WebLogic, a heavyweight server. You cannot deploy Oracle Access Manager on Tomcat. If an organization has sufficient budget to spend on servers, then it is useful. For organizations that do not want to spend too much money on Oracle Access Manager, maintenance and upgrades take time, whereas with ForgeRock, that is the opposite as fewer resources are required. Being a heavyweight application, it will take more time for deployment and installation compared to ForgeRock or Okta. Okta is cloud-based, so it does not take much time. ForgeRock on-premise only needs deployment on a Tomcat server, making it less complex as it is a lightweight application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a product that is easy to install and integrate, and it is simple to use."

"The tool is reliable and easy to configure."

"Our customers have never complained about the stability"

"Stickiness is the most valuable feature of the product."

"In my opinion, the GUI is perfect with the configuration options provided. F5 BIG-IP has given customization options and policy configuration tools in the GUI. It's good and good enough to work."

"A lot of features are useful to me, including mostly the authentication, SAML, or SSO, with no sign-on."

"I rate the overall solution nine out of ten."

"The product allows us to create customized portals for your users."

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) pros

"Excellent SSO solution for Oracle products."

"The product was built to be scalable."

"Access Manager allows us to efficiently manage a broad spectrum of applications while ensuring secure, single-page application access."

"I find the authentication module, authentication scheme, and security policy most useful in Oracle Access Manager."

"The most important functions of Oracle Access Manager are single sign-on and its integration capability with different applications."

"The product supports customization."

"Overall, I rate Oracle Access Manager nine out of ten for its extensive capabilities."

"The product allows customization via custom code."

More Oracle Access Manager pros

Cons

"The price of this product can be improved."

"F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager has room for improvement in integration with other products."

"If I could copy and paste objects instead of picking and configuring them from scratch each time, it would be great."

"The main improvement needed for F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is to integrate into the cloud-delivered services from F5."

"The solution’s GUI looks very old."

"I'd suggest improved documentation integration directly within the GUI. Right now, finding comprehensive documentation often requires going to external websites like the community portal."

"We do not have knowledgeable support teams locally."

"I have had a lot of issues in the past few months with the agents, which was disappointing."

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) cons

"There could be some improvements in the documentation and overall knowledge base of the solution."

"Although Oracle Access Manager is generally stable, we experienced issues with multi-domain configurations and web agent settings."

"In the next release, they should focus more on use cases related to customer access management, customer identity, and access management."

"The mobile access to the solution isn't ideal. They should work to improve its functionality."

"There are problems with stability."

"The product is complicated and difficult to install and configure."

"The pricing of the solution is in need of improvement. Oracle products are very expensive."

"The technical support is not very good at all."

More Oracle Access Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Recently, they have simplified the licensing"

"The product is very expensive."

"The tool is a little bit expensive."

"The tool is affordable."

"I cannot comment on the exact pricing because Oracle has different licensing models for other clients, making it flexible."

"The product is a little expensive."

"Can be expensive as a solution."

"The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase."

"On a scale where one is a high price, and ten is a low price, I rate the solution a one. Purchasing a license for the solution is very expensive now."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)?

In my opinion, the GUI is perfect with the configuration options provided. F5 BIG-IP has given customization options and policy configuration tools in the GUI. It's good and good enough to work.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)?

F5 products are more expensive than other solutions but are valued for their quality and reliability, akin to purchasing a Bentley as opposed to an Audi.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)?

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is not user-friendly and operates slowly. Additional features for architecture such as Anycast would be beneficial. The ability to run the Anycast feature woul...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Access Manager?

I am currently not exposed to the pricing issue, but I think Oracle Access Manager is more expensive than other products. I have not dealt with the setup cost concern as we have a team responsible ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Access Manager?

For scalability, Oracle Access Manager demonstrates a high level due to high availability and scalability with redundant nodes to load balance across multiple nodes for Oracle Access Manager and Or...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Access Manager?

My main use cases for Oracle Access Manager involve using it as an authentication server integrated with Oracle Internet Directory as LDAP, which contains the user store for authentication. We have...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ivanti Connect Secure vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 6% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 5% of the time

Citrix Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 4% of the time

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 22% of the time

OpenText Access Manager with Managed Services vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 21% of the time

Okta Platform vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Security Verify Access vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 11% of the time

ForgeRock vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 11% of the time

More Oracle Access Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

January 2026

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) report

Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager

January 2026

Download Oracle Access Manager product report

Also Known As

F5 Access Policy Manager

No data available

Overview

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is an access management proxy solution for managing global access to the enterprise networks, cloud providers, applications, and application programming interfaces (APIs). Through a single management interface, BIG-IP APM consolidates remote, mobile, network, virtual, and web access.

BIG-IP APM can also serve as a bridge between modern and classic authentication and authorization protocols and methods. For applications which are unable to support modern authentication and authorization protocols, like SAML and OAuth with OIDC, but which do support classic authentication methods, BIG-IP APM converts user credentials to the appropriate authentication standard supported by the application.

BIG-IP APM Benefits:

Ease of use
Flexibility
Ability to integrate with other systems
Security features
Granular access control
Responsive and helpful support team

BIG-IP APM Features:

Support for Identity Aware Proxy (IAP) enabling Zero Trust application access
Context-based authorization with dynamic L4/L7 ACLs
Integration with third-party MFA solutions
DTLS 2.0 mode for delivering and securing applications
SAML 2.0 identity federation support
Support for OAuth 2.0 authorization protocol
SSO support for classic authentication (Kerberos, header- based, etc.), credential caching, OAuth 2.0, SAML 2.0, and FIDO2 (U2F)
AAA server authentication and high-availability
Integration with leading IAM vendor products (Microsoft, Okta, Ping Identity)
BIG IP Edge Client and F5 Access integrate with VMware Horizon ONE (AirWatch), Microsoft Intune and IBM MaaS360
Risk-based access leveraging third-party UEBA and risk engines (HTTP Connector)

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by BIG-IP APM users.

Mahmmoud Rabie, Senior Site Reliability Engineer, writes that BIG-IP APM is "A highly stable solution for load balancing, but the initial setup is complex."

Clyde Livingston, Senior Process Specialist at Telstra, says that BIG-IP APM is "Easy to use, useful access remotely, but lacking stability."

Chris Lam, Senior Solution Consultant at Macroview Telecom Limited, states that BIG-IP APM is "Useful for remote access VPN and VPI integration with VMware.

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.

Oracle

Sample Customers

City Bank, Ricacorp Properties, Miele, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office

SekerBank, University of Melbourne

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Oracle Access Manager

December 2025

Free Report: F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Oracle Access Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Oracle Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Oracle Access Manager report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.