No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Gemalto Protiva [EOL] vs OneLogin comparison

Thales and One Identity are both solutions in the User Provisioning Software category. Additionally, 100% of Thales users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 99% of One Identity users who would recommend it.
OneLogin
Read 95 OneLogin reviews
  • 9,442 Views
  • 1,416 Comparison Views
99% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Gemalto Protiva EOL and OneLogin compete in the authentication services category. OneLogin leads due to advanced features and integration capabilities, offering superior value despite higher costs.

Features: Gemalto Protiva EOL offers robust security authentication, encryption capabilities, and identity protection for enterprises. OneLogin provides cloud-based identity management, single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and extensive integration, showing its versatility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OneLogin is easier to implement with a simple deployment model and efficient support. Gemalto Protiva EOL requires a more complex setup.

Pricing and ROI: Gemalto Protiva EOL is cost-effective for businesses with straightforward security needs. OneLogin, although more expensive initially, enhances productivity and offers higher ROI with its advanced features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed User Provisioning Software Report (Updated: June 2026).
Buyer's Guide
User Provisioning Software
June 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Gemalto Protiva [EOL]
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OneLogin
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
95
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (4th), User Provisioning Software (4th), Identity Management (IM) (4th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (3rd), Access Management (4th)
 

Featured Reviews

PC
Paul Connaire
RAS Team Lead at Produban USA
A cost-effective solution, but the user interface lacks the ability to customize
In the UK, I think that we are one of the biggest utilizers of the service. With the restrictions that it has, I don't think it's got massive upscalability. For general users it is fine, but the scalability could be better. We started with approximately eight and a half thousand users, and we currently have about twelve-thousand people using it. This is used widely across a number of user groups, including administrators, end users, general users, and specific privileged users for two-factor authentication. We do plan to increase the usage of this solution. Our current capacity is fourteen thousand but we will probably grow beyond that.
Read full review
Amit Rathod - PeerSpot reviewer
Amit Rathod
Senior Analyst - IDAM at Toll Holdings Limited
Unified sign-in has simplified access control and has supported end-to-end identity lifecycle
The authentication process is good, but sometimes the responsiveness to requests for enhancement is very slow. I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability. I experience downtimes two to three times per year. OneLogin's support team is sometimes very slow to respond. There is a feature limitation with mapping, as OneLogin does not provide one-to-all mapping. For client deployment, we need to create separate mappings for each request, and we cannot use the same mapping for multiple requests. Other areas that have room for improvement are related to API limitations. If a client requires more APIs, such as 5,000 or 6,000, OneLogin charges more. The API rate limits by default or the standard limit should provide more than 5,000. Additionally, OneLogin could provide more flexibility in configuration. These are the main limitations I have identified with OneLogin.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The Gemalto Protiva suite is really complete as it has smart card managed software, Secure Digital Key, drivers, smart card reader, smart card, OTP readers etc."
"The most valuable feature for us is the ability to use Active Directory groups as virtual containers instead of domains because it means that we can control our access groups better."
"OneLogin has highly impacted our organization positively because it provides full customized control of user access and multi-factor authentication with great supported methods such as SMS OTP or email OTP, which are the key positive things we are getting from this solution."
"OneLogin has a very positive impact on our organization, especially in the areas of security, user experience, and operational efficiency."
"OneLogin has impacted our organization by making work efficient for people by granting them easy access and logins."
"Together, SSO and MFA provide a strong user experience, reducing the workload on the development team."
"Overall, there is satisfaction with OneLogin, and based on the current experience with the product, it would be recommended to other users."
"OneLogin is still the market's most exemplary solution."
"The solution helped save money for our organization, either by optimizing time-intensive processes or by increasing productivity."
"Overall, it not only strengthens security but also simplifies the access management process, making daily operations more efficient and manageable."
More OneLogin pros
 

Cons

"The user interface needs improvement. It is not obvious where things are; while the cosmetics are ok, the way it's laid out on the screen could be better."
"The user interface needs improvement."
"This product doesn't necessarily provide us with all of the functionality that we need, such as being able to share passwords with external users."
"As organizations grow, managing complex role structures, handling exceptions, and integrating older or custom applications can take more effort than expected."
"However, OneLogin does not have the ability to set a custom timeout on rotating security codes."
"I believe support response time and troubleshooting for complex integrations could be improved in some cases for OneLogin."
"While I initially used OneLogin's desktop feature to extend SSO, I discontinued it two years ago due to limitations."
"I would like better reporting from SmartFactor Authentication when a user is not able to sign in due to a new location, new IP, new device, et cetera."
"OneLogin can be improved by enhancing the reporting and the dashboard customization for more flexibility, and troubleshooting federation or integration issues can sometimes take more effort than expected."
"However, if there were multiple documentations about the technical points and what each tab on the GUI is used for, it would be very helpful for others who want to learn, because I did not find a lot of resources about it on the internet."
More OneLogin cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is a cost-effective solution compared to some other products out there."
"Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions."
"We were happy with the price we got when we signed up, but I don't know what will happen when the time comes to renew because it is a different company now. We haven't seen any pricing models or had that discussion yet. My renewal is a year and a half away. It's worth what we're paying for it. There's no way we could provide the level of service for cheaper or try to do the same in-house."
"While I wish OneLogin's pricing was more affordable, their licensing model, which is based on per user, is acceptable."
"It was cheap in the beginning, and then it became very expensive. We were initially charged $2 per user per month, which was fine, but by the second year, they increased it to $5 per user. That became very expensive for us because we had about 1,500 users. At $2 per user, it comes out to be $3,000 a month, which is $36,000 a year. If we move to $5 per user, it comes out to be $7,500 a month. That made its cost so high. That is why we removed the product because the cost was high."
"The price of the licensing is fine."
"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. It is much cheaper than other products."
"OneLogin's pricing, from the perspective of the education sector, seems quite reasonable for the value it delivers."
"The pricing for OneLogin seems to be okay. The pricing and licensing are affordable. If you'd consider OneLogin to be expensive, it's worth it."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Provisioning Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Outsourcing Company
19%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
University
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business124
Midsize Enterprise31
Large Enterprise66
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with OneLogin by One Identity?
During implementation, there were not many features that I remember not using in practice. Mostly, there were certain APIs that we were experimenting with earlier but did not use, so we created cus...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for OneLogin by One Identity?
My main use case for OneLogin is to enforce workforce identity, and we implemented this in Malaysia's biggest retail client, so all of their employees' applications can be securely accessed through...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering OneLogin by One Identity?
When I am working in OneLogin on a normal day or week, the first thing I typically do in the platform is handling SSO configurations, so I add applications and interact with application stakeholder...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Oracle Identity Governance vs Gemalto Protiva [EOL] Logo
Oracle Identity Governance vs Gemalto Protiva [EOL]
Compared 22% of the time
RSA Authentication Manager vs Gemalto Protiva [EOL] Logo
RSA Authentication Manager vs Gemalto Protiva [EOL]
Compared 18% of the time
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Gemalto Protiva [EOL] Logo
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Gemalto Protiva [EOL]
Compared 16% of the time
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Gemalto Protiva [EOL] Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Gemalto Protiva [EOL]
Compared 14% of the time
Symantec Identity Governance and Administration vs Gemalto Protiva [EOL] Logo
Symantec Identity Governance and Administration vs Gemalto Protiva [EOL]
Compared 13% of the time
More Gemalto Protiva [EOL] Competitors
Okta Platform vs OneLogin Logo
Okta Platform vs OneLogin
Compared 8% of the time
Auth0 Platform vs OneLogin Logo
Auth0 Platform vs OneLogin
Compared 7% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID vs OneLogin Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs OneLogin
Compared 5% of the time
LastPass Business vs OneLogin Logo
LastPass Business vs OneLogin
Compared 5% of the time
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs OneLogin Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs OneLogin
Compared 4% of the time
More OneLogin Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
June 2026
Gemalto Protiva [EOL] reportDownload Gemalto Protiva [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
OneLogin
June 2026
OneLogin reportDownload OneLogin product report
 

Also Known As

Protiva
OneLogin Workforce Identity
 

Overview

Gemalto Protiva [EOL] offered strong identity and access management solutions tailored to enhance enterprise security. It provided authentication and digital protection critical for businesses relying on precise access to sensitive information.

Gemalto Protiva [EOL] was acclaimed for its robust security features, facilitating authentication processes and protecting digital assets from unauthorized access. Designed to cater to businesses seeking heightened security measures, it delivered multifactor authentication options and seamless integration with existing systems. Its use spanned across secure login and transaction services, ensuring that user data remained protected against breaches.

What were the key features offered by Gemalto Protiva [EOL]?
  • Multifactor Authentication: Provided layers of security for user validation.
  • Seamless Integration: Easily connected with existing IT infrastructures.
  • Versatile Deployment: Supported both on-premise and cloud environments.
  • Enhanced Security Tokens: Utilized smart cards and USB tokens for credential security.
  • Comprehensive Access Control: Centrally managed user access to sensitive information.
What benefits or ROI should you consider in reviewing Gemalto Protiva [EOL]?
  • Increased Security: Strengthens defenses against unauthorized data access.
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces potential financial loss from data breaches.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Aids adherence to industry security standards.
  • User Productivity: Simplifies login processes, saving time and resources.

In healthcare, Gemalto Protiva [EOL] protected patient data and ensured compliance with health regulations. In finance, it secured transactions and user accounts, while in education, it safeguarded academic records and research data, highlighting its versatility across distinct sectors.

Thales

OneLogin offers organizations a user-friendly platform for single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and seamless access management. It enhances security and streamlines processes, making it vital for application management.

Designed for ease of integration, OneLogin helps organizations efficiently manage access and improve cybersecurity through centralized application management. It simplifies onboarding and offboarding, enhancing remote work capabilities and offering robust user mapping. Users appreciate seamless integration and reliable logs. However, it could improve with enhanced technical support, more out-of-box connectors, and better customization options. Challenges with device management and system integrations have been noted, with legacy application support and infrastructure stability needing attention.

What are the key features of OneLogin?
  • Single Sign-On: Provides centralized access to applications.
  • Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security with multiple verification steps.
  • Self-Service Password Resets: Empowers users to manage their passwords.
  • Ease of Integration: Connects seamlessly with cloud and on-premises systems.
What benefits can users expect?
  • Improved Time Management: Streamlines user access processes.
  • Reduced Security Incidents: Strengthens authentication measures.
  • Efficient Interface: Facilitates smooth user navigation.
  • Enhanced Remote Work: Supports flexible workforce needs.

Organizations employ OneLogin for single sign-on and identity management, connecting users to applications like CRM and Slack. It supports role-based access control and seamless cloud transition, integrating with Active Directory to enhance user management in industries demanding strong security and efficiency.

One Identity
 

Sample Customers

Exostar, Sunrise Health Region, Baker Tilly, Seattle Children's, SEW-Eurodrive
OneLogin has thousands of customers across multiple industries and from around the globe such as Uber, Airbnb, Noom, Petco, Sony, Lucky Brand, Tesco, Airbus, Japan Airlines, Aetna, Compass, Kaplan, Susan G. Komen, AAA and PennyMac.
Buyer's Guide
User Provisioning Software
June 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, SailPoint, Omada and others in User Provisioning Software. Updated: June 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors and best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.