Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Glean Platform vs Google Vertex AI comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Glean Platform
Ranking in AI-Agent Builders
10th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Indexing and Search (15th), Search as a Service (11th)
Google Vertex AI
Ranking in AI-Agent Builders
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
AI Development Platforms (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the AI-Agent Builders category, the mindshare of Glean Platform is 3.0%. The mindshare of Google Vertex AI is 6.2%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI-Agent Builders Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Google Vertex AI6.2%
Glean Platform3.0%
Other90.8%
AI-Agent Builders
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2783439 - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps at a marketing services firm with 51-200 employees
Consolidating marketing content has streamlined sales prospect outreach and collaboration
The best features Glean Platform offers are mostly the view, which I think is very good. What I find most helpful about the view is that the user interface is very good. It is very easy to chat with the chatbot and get all the material that I want in the way that I need it. Glean Platform has positively impacted my organization by making it definitely very easy to consolidate a lot of the materials and easy to look at it all at once.
Hamada Farag - PeerSpot reviewer
Technology Consultant at Beta Information Technology
Customization and integration empower diverse AI applications
We are familiar with most Google Cloud services, particularly infrastructure services, storage, compute, AI tools, containerization, GCP containerization, and cloud SQL. We are familiar with approximately eighty percent of Google's services, primarily related to infrastructure, AI, containers, backup, storage, and compute. We are familiar with Gemini AI and Google Vertex AI, and we have completed some exercises and cases with our customers for Google AI. We use automation in machine learning. I work with a team where everyone has specific responsibilities. We have design and development processes in place. Based on my experience, I would rate Google Vertex AI a 9 out of 10.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI-Agent Builders solutions are best for your needs.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
12%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Vertex AI?
I purchased Google Vertex AI directly from Google, as we are a partner of Google. I would rate the pricing for Google Vertex AI as low; the price is affordable.
What needs improvement with Google Vertex AI?
We used AutoML feature for developing AI models automatically, but we are not comfortable with the performance of those models. We have to do some fine-tuning, hyperparameter optimization, and othe...
What is your primary use case for Google Vertex AI?
We are developing AI models and agents using Google Vertex AI platform, and we are deploying them using Google Vertex AI platform on Google Cloud Platform, GCP. With just one single platform, Googl...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, n8n.io, Microsoft and others in AI-Agent Builders. Updated: January 2026.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.