Google Cloud Identity vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

Google and Ping Identity are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Google is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.7, while Ping Identity is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2. Google holds a 12.3% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Ping Identity’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Identity

Read 25 Google Cloud Identity reviews

4,915 Views
4,276 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Read 30 Ping Identity Platform reviews

5,618 Views
1,910 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Identity

Ping Identity Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 2, 2024

Ping Identity Platform and Google Cloud Identity are competing products in identity management. Google Cloud Identity is perceived as superior due to its comprehensive features, making it a favorable investment.

Features: Ping Identity Platform offers robust single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and strong security controls tailored for complex environments. It supports a range of authentication methods and allows extensive customization. Google Cloud Identity provides seamless integration with Google services, ease of use, and advanced security features suitable for cloud-based ecosystems. Its capabilities include multifactor authentication, group access management, and integration with Google Workspace.

Room for Improvement: Ping Identity Platform could benefit from enhanced integration options with non-standard applications and simplification of its user interface. It might also improve support documentation for new users. Google Cloud Identity may improve by expanding its security features to match the depth of more security-focused solutions, offering more detailed controls for multifactor authentication, and providing better user training resources to ease the learning curve.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ping Identity Platform presents a structured deployment model with dedicated customer support, ensuring a smoother setup process for clients. Google Cloud Identity benefits from its flexible cloud-based deployment model, which enhances scalability and provides integrated support within Google's ecosystem, although it may require a steeper learning curve for new users.

Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform follows a traditional pricing model with potentially higher upfront costs, emphasizing security and potentially leading to substantial ROI for organizations prioritizing secure identity management. Google Cloud Identity offers competitive pricing, appealing to businesses utilizing Google's services, delivering substantial ROI through enhanced productivity and security features with less focus on individual security configurations compared to Ping Identity Platform.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Identity

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (10th), Cloud Resource Access Management (5th)

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (4th), Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (9th), Access Management (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Identity is 12.3%, up from 11.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 3.8%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Ping Identity Platform	3.8%
Google Cloud Identity	12.3%
Other	83.9%

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Bhushan Ladkhedkar

Head - Work Transformation at Econz

User lifecycle management becomes streamlined with unified access and context-aware policies

If applications support SAML protocols, integration is always an easy task. However, there are difficulties with form-based applications or LDAP-based applications, particularly traditional applications. We need more flexibility not only with SAML but also with LDAP-based and form-based applications. Context-aware access currently only works with SAML-based applications. If other application integrations could support context-aware access, that would be helpful, as companies are in a transition mode with various traditional, form-based, and LDAP-based applications. Mobile device management could be improved. Through Google Cloud Identity, we can manage Android applications and have control over iOS devices, but container functionality is missing. This is particularly important for BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) scenarios, especially in India where the market is now split equally between iOS and Android users. Improvements in this area and integration capabilities would be beneficial.

Read full review

Shruthi R Varikoti

Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo

Generative AI automates access reviews and provides workflow efficiencies

I work with Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC), IT Service Management (ITSM), and Customer Service Management (CSM) modules of ServiceNow. My project is related to cybersecurity. I have touched on generative AI and integrations like SOAP APIs. I have used the Ping Identity Platform for seamless…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most beneficial feature for enhancing security is context-aware access."

"Cloud Identity is scalable enough for our needs. It's serving more than 3,000 users in our organization."

"The solution is moderate to difficult to use. I found the approach was practical. Following the steps made it very easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is that you can manage users from one central location."

"I used it as an administrator without implementing it myself. As for valuable aspects or benefits, the significant point is that it's a straightforward, single solution that just works."

"The Cloud Identity is well advanced in terms of features, applications, and the components that it is offering."

"I have not experienced any serious problem with stability."

"The best features of Google Cloud Identity are that it's free and works with modern applications, meaning if it's OAuth or using the OAuth protocol, it's very easy to integrate with those applications."

More Google Cloud Identity pros

"The only feature we were looking for in PingID was SSO integration with our existing web app."

"I like PingFederate."

"I would recommend PingFederate as an IAM solution for its no-code environment, single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, bidirectional services, and advanced features."

"PingFederate gives you granular control over the settings. There are many options for fine-tuning policies."

"PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tools like ForgeRock and Okta, but I find PingFederate to be the most customizable."

"It gets a mobility portal in place in conjunction with Office 365. It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower."

"The product's most valuable features include its cloud-based capabilities for handling cloud applications and providing authentication and authorization through OIDC and SAML. It also supports integrations needed for both local and internal applications, including legacy applications requiring web server access."

"What I like best about PingID is that it's very user-friendly. PingID is well-built as a developer tool and regularly upgrades and updates via patches. I also like that PingID has clear documents that will help you integrate it with other solutions."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"Google Cloud Identity should improve its compatibility with other products without any impact, such as Jamf Cloud."

"The one place it could be improved is the password vaulting. The password vaulting does not prevent the admins from reading users' passwords, and that's a debate."

"The solution's storage capacity could be increased."

"In the next release, I would like to see integration with different systems, mainly wireless SIEMS and other analytical systems that we want to introduce."

"Mobile device management could be improved. Through Google Cloud Identity, we can manage Android applications and have control over iOS devices, but container functionality is missing."

"The interface could be more user-friendly."

"Technical support is slow."

"Overall, I would give a zero out of 10 for Google's support. There is no easy way to navigate issues without paid consultation, making it quite frustrating."

More Google Cloud Identity cons

"Currently, the main integration is SAML-based, but other integration methodologies need to be supported."

"There is room for improvement in the solution, particularly in security."

"PingID should put a little more effort into making a pretty self-explanatory deck about their tech features and the services they offer."

"We had issues with the stability."

"PingID's device management portal should be more easily accessible via a link. They provide no link to the portal like they do for the service. The passwordless functionality could be more comprehensive. You can't filter based on hardware devices. Having that filtering option would be great. Device authentication would be a great feature."

"Notifications and monitoring are two areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement."

"They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement."

"PingID classifies the type of environment into internal and external, which is an area for improvement because you need to take additional steps to trust internal and external users."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"When I worked on Cloud Identity, they offered a free or enterprise version. You can synchronize and create up to 100 user identities in the free version. After that, you have to purchase a business or enterprise license. In that model, you'll be charged based on the number of users."

"The licensing cost depends on the partners and the relationship between the company and the partners."

"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is a bit expensive."

"I rate the product price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"The product is billed on a monthly basis depending on the number of users."

"The solution is not expensive."

More Google Cloud Identity pricing and cost advice

"The product is costly."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also access to both Microsoft’s user community as well as around-the-clock customer s...

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Cloud Identity?

The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Identity is its stability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Identity?

It's crucial to monitor costs carefully, as there can be unexpected charges. I have been charged even when there was supposed to be free credit.

See all answers

What do you like most about PingID?

The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?

The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingID?

The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 83% of the time

Okta Platform vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 2% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 2% of the time

SOTI MobiControl vs Google Cloud Identity

Compared 1% of the time

More Google Cloud Identity Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity

January 2026

Download Google Cloud Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

January 2026

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

Cloud Identity, Cloud Identity Premium

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

Cloud Identity is an Identity as a Service (IDaaS) and enterprise mobility management (EMM) product. It offers the identity services and endpoint administration that are available in G Suite as a stand-alone product. As an administrator, you can use Cloud Identity to manage your users, apps, and devices from a central location - the Google Admin console.

Google

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

ExtraHop Networks, HealthChannels

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

December 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.