No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Huddle vs Microsoft Teams comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Huddle
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
9.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Content Collaboration Platforms (21st)
Microsoft Teams
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
179
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (3rd), Enterprise Social Software (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Messaging and Collaboration solutions, they serve different purposes. Huddle is designed for Content Collaboration Platforms and holds a mindshare of 1.3%, up 0.2% compared to last year.
Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, focuses on Virtual Meetings, holds 3.7% mindshare, down 3.8% since last year.
Content Collaboration Platforms Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Huddle1.3%
Office 3658.2%
Dropbox Business - Enterprise7.7%
Other82.8%
Content Collaboration Platforms
Virtual Meetings Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Teams3.7%
Zoom Workplace Business7.0%
Webex5.1%
Other84.2%
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

it_user669327 - PeerSpot reviewer
Digital Marketing Manager at a non-tech company with 11-50 employees
With a dispersed team, we set permissions on files that are relevant to each team.
We use Huddle to store important team files. With a dispersed team, we set permissions on files that are relevant to each team. This helps us keep files up to date, as well as to streamline projects For file sharing, we were working on a pitch for a European-based client and our team was broken…
Anna Virtsan - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Project Manager at UkrSibbank
Have streamlined daily workflow and task management but still face inconvenience from recent interface changes and limited integration options
There are challenges and issues in Microsoft Teams, such as after recent updates where group chats were combined with Teams, chats, and groups into one. Users have to work with settings to make it normal again so Teams are separated from chats, and that was a really inconvenient update. Many users ask me to help make it back again to separate Teams and groups from one-to-one chats. That's probably the worst update they've made recently. Additionally, there are some minor features, such as when I work with messages, I don't have an actual forward or quote option when replying to someone's message. I need to be careful not to miss the quote sign. For a lot of people, they are confused about where the quotes option is. I've received a couple of hundred support tickets just regarding this issue. The function to share email to Teams chat doesn't work sometimes due to our compliance policies, and sometimes it would be nice to be able to forward an email to the group chat and have further discussions. Microsoft Teams could improve by being less glitchy because it glitches a lot, leading to undelivered emails and undelivered messages. It would be beneficial if the MS application Shifts, which adds functionality to groups, could be integrated into the groups calendar. Currently, many teams don't use the app because it is not integrated with the general calendar or the Outlook calendar, making it basically a useless application. The platform needs less Copilot and more people. The general Copilot integration into the platform is less glitchy, but Microsoft Teams is quite heavy and glitchy sometimes. Stability depends a lot on compliance restrictions, policies, and quality of internet. Sometimes, when updates are enrolling, the platform glitches, breaks, or shuts down.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We use Huddle to store important team files, and with a dispersed team, we set permissions on files that are relevant to each team, helping us keep files up to date and streamline projects."
"Arranging online meetings is the most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Teams are the ease of use, and it is very good for a small virtual office for meetings and calendars which sync well together."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly."
"It's great for meeting conferences."
"The most valuable feature for me is the chat."
"Microsoft Teams is a friendly and easy-to-install solution."
"For collaboration purposes, it's been very, very handy to use, and it's great for chat purposes."
"Microsoft Teams has helped us improve collaboration through the use of chats, as well as conferencing, voice calls, knowledge management, and maintaining a repository."
 

Cons

"I think the navigation from project to project could be improved, but other than that, nothing I would add."
"One of my colleagues was trying to use Microsoft Teams on their laptop, and it was slow in terms of booting up when initially starting it. For example, it was not running in the background. In general, it takes some time to load. Zoom tends to have a faster loading time."
"Teams doesn't always sync to show as Do Not Disturb during Outlook meetings."
"Microsoft Teams can start being more interactive and intuitive by implementing artificial intelligence and machine learning."
"For future releases, I would like to see Microsoft Teams to make a lighter application and drop some features."
"The interface must be more user-friendly."
"Microsoft Teams withdrew the Wiki function, which was quite a good and useful feature."
"The biggest issue is web content."
"We encountered occasional outages, which occurred a couple of times last year while using the product."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I don't think the solution is as expensive as big Webex licenses. It doesn't usually offer one-on-one licenses, so it's hard to compare. It's more expensive than the Google equivalent, but you can't replace Microsoft Teams with Google's offering."
"The solution is expensive and I would rate it a nine out of ten."
"We have a license for the solution."
"The solution has a reasonable price in the market."
"It costs around $12 for SharePoint and Teams per user."
"You don't buy only the Teams license; you buy it as part of the Microsoft 365 bundle."
"The solution is affordable."
"The solution's pricing is average."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
16%
Construction Company
14%
Educational Organization
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business66
Midsize Enterprise46
Large Enterprise74
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
When we pay for Microsoft Teams, it is always expensive. I do not know exactly how much the license is, but when we pay, it is always expensive.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
There are too many features in Microsoft Teams, and I think it is not good. I believe they should have fewer features in Microsoft Teams and limit it to calls, presentations, and sharing, similar t...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Teams?
My main use cases for Microsoft Teams are for meetings and calls. I have not yet used it for collaboration.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
MS Teams
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AKQA, beats by dre, UK Cabinet Office, Centrica, ComCast, Commonwealth Secretariat, UK Department for Culture Media and Sport, US Department of Homeland Security, UK Education Funding Agency, Epson, Go-Ahead, Grant Thornton, KIA, KPMG, Megger, UK Ministry of Justice, NASA, US Department of Defense, P&G Prestige, Panasonic, Pearson, QinetiQ, Sony
Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Dropbox and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: July 2026.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.