Hyland OnBase vs OpenText Documentum comparison

Hyland and OpenText are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Hyland is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7, while OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.6. Hyland holds a 6.7% mindshare in ECM, compared to OpenText’s 12.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Hyland OnBase

Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews

2,084 Views
1,343 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Documentum

Read 31 OpenText Documentum reviews

3,382 Views
2,516 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

OpenText Documentum

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

OpenText Documentum and Hyland OnBase compete in the enterprise document management systems category. OpenText Documentum holds an advantage due to its comprehensive security and lifecycle management, despite some room for improvement in user interface and technology integration.

Features: OpenText Documentum offers comprehensive security, a centralized repository for varied content, and lifecycle management, making it suitable for large enterprises. Hyland OnBase provides strong audit trails, flexibility, and broad application across different business needs with a modular platform.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Documentum needs better integration with modern web technologies, improved cloud support, and refined user interfaces to overcome performance challenges. Hyland OnBase could enhance user experience and training, expand process management capabilities, and adjust pricing for certain regions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Documentum is deployable across on-premises, public, and hybrid cloud environments, though its customer service receives mixed reviews with noted delays. Hyland OnBase is typically deployed on-premises, with average-rated customer service, citing complexity in support due to system intricacies.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Documentum is often critiqued for its high cost, but some users find it a necessary investment for compliance and document management, offering ROI through its reliability. Hyland OnBase is recognized for its modularity and reasonable pricing in specific regions, with ROI seen in enhanced process management despite perceived high costs in some areas.

To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. OpenText Documentum Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. OpenText Documentum

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (19th), Low-Code Development Platforms (14th)

OpenText Documentum

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 6.7%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Documentum is 12.5%, up from 10.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Phemy Lekalakala

Manager of Information Systems at University of the Witwatersrand

Stable content and workflow management solution with a valuable retention module

We use this solution for record management and digitization of records. We also use it for workflows and to build online forms The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed.…

Read full review

Sunil Mudambi

Founder & Managing Director at 3 Cubed Business Consulting Pte Ltd

Saves time and increases an organization's productivity

It's a great enterprise content management product. Our customers love the product for its stability and scalability. Search is the most useful feature of the solution. The way we retrieve documents is more important than how we store them. There's no use if we can't find a document. It's the most critical feature. My organization works with other customers. We are consultants for OpenText. Our customers have seen a lot of benefits in terms of regulatory compliance. Industries like banking are highly regulated. The product captures the information centrally so everybody in the bank can see the right information at the right time. It is tamper-proof and enables us to return to the document source, which is helpful with legal issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's most valuable features are integration and flexibility."

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

"We found the setup process to be okay since they do offer a troubleshooting guide."

"The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents."

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."

"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

"Integrating Hyland OnBase with our systems enabled us to automate document designs and templates, which was extremely helpful in the finance and banking industry."

More Hyland OnBase pros

"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."

"OpenText Documentum has improved availability and performance in our organization."

"It provides possibilities for us to save documents and supporting the business process while doing so."

"The most valuable feature is the good automation engine, which helps in reducing the development cost and allows easy development of applications."

"The stability is very good."

"Two things are excellent in Documentum. One is business process management. The other is its support for metadata."

"OpenText Documentum's composition is good. It is convenient and straight out of the box."

"The most valuable feature is the management."

Cons

"I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial."

"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."

"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application."

"An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution."

"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."

"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."

More Hyland OnBase cons

"I would like to see performance improvements, especially regarding slow response times."

"OpenText Documentum's user interface could be improved a little bit."

"The price is quite high as the licensing prices are significant."

"The main issue is the software's performance when storing around 10 million or more documents. It becomes slow and needs improvement. Perhaps it's a cloud-related issue, but it needs to be addressed. It could be due to our S3 bucket or something else. Nevertheless, this is a significant challenge we're facing."

"The price is quite high as the licensing prices are significant."

"The BPM side should be improved."

"In BPM could be better. Its GUI needs the ability to build more rules. This is a crucial feature. For example, OpenText has some products that allow you to control your checks, invoices, and so on. They have exciting approaches to converting pictures to text, but the tool for business process management isn't easy to use. The GIU is not so good."

"Documentum is a very robust system. Everything can be improved, but at this time, I do not have anything in particular. If anything, they can put our software in their standard."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"The tool's price is high."

"It falls in line with a lot of things that are out there on the market. There is nothing extraordinary in terms of great or bad."

"It is quite an expensive product."

"The product is expensive."

"The price is considered affordable now."

"OpenText Documentum has announced a new licensing model, which could be more expensive."

"OpenText Documentum's pricing is good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hyland OnBase?

The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, ad...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Documentum?

It falls in line with a lot of things that are out there on the market. There is nothing extraordinary in terms of great or bad.

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenText Documentum?

The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText Documentum?

The price is quite high as the licensing prices are significant.

See all answers

Comparisons

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 19% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 13% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Extended ECM vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

SharePoint vs OpenText Documentum

Compared 23% of the time

OpenText Extended ECM vs OpenText Documentum

Compared 18% of the time

IBM FileNet vs OpenText Documentum

Compared 12% of the time

Alfresco vs OpenText Documentum

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Content Manager vs OpenText Documentum

Compared 4% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

May 2025

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Documentum

May 2025

Download OpenText Documentum product report

Also Known As

OnBase

Dell EMC Documentum, Documentum , Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

OpenText Documentum organizes, preserves and makes information
accessible, while ensuring it adheres to all privacy and security
protocols. Documentum manages content across file stores and integrates
with enterprise applications, including SAP, Salesforce and Microsoft,
to help organizations conquer information management challenges.

Documentum provides integrated support for the entire lifecycle of a
wide range of content; beyond typical office documents to include CAD files, design
templates, rich media, audio, video, instant messaging threads, blog
posts, images and more.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Agility; Bibliotheca Alexandrina; Capitec Bank; Department of Social Development, Republic of South Africa; County of Los Angeles, Department of Human Resources; Fresenius Kabi; Heathrow Airport; Lahey Health; Linde PLC; Milestone Pharma Co. Ltd; National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development; Open Grid Europe GmbH; REPCO NEX Industrial Solutions; Springer Nature; Syngene International; Tata Power DDL; University of Texas Austin

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. OpenText Documentum

April 2025

Free Report: Hyland OnBase vs. OpenText Documentum

Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. OpenText Documentum and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hyland OnBase vs. OpenText Documentum report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.