IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] vs OneLogin comparison

IBM and One Identity are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Additionally, 93% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 99% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

Read 29 IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] reviews

93% willing to recommend

OneLogin

Read 95 OneLogin reviews

9,442 Views
4,627 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

OneLogin

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] and OneLogin are competing in the identity and access management sector. Although IBM Tivoli Access Manager offers competitive pricing, OneLogin's advanced features make it a superior product, justifying the higher cost.

Features: IBM Tivoli Access Manager provides robust authentication and access control, risk-based access, and SSO for enterprise settings. OneLogin features advanced single sign-on, comprehensive integration with third-party applications, and SmartFactor Authentication for adaptive security.

Room for Improvement: IBM Tivoli Access Manager could improve by simplifying deployment, enhancing user interface, and expanding integration abilities. OneLogin should focus on expanding customization options, enhancing customer support for technical issues, and reducing the complexity of initial setup procedures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Tivoli Access Manager requires significant technical resources for setup, offering strong legacy system integration support. OneLogin stands out for its simple cloud-based deployment and responsive customer service, ensuring a swift implementation with minimal disruption.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Tivoli Access Manager offers competitive pricing favorable for stable environments. OneLogin, despite higher initial costs, provides a strong ROI with scalable solutions, lower maintenance expenses, and flexible pricing options suited to future-proofing business strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed Single Sign-On (SSO) Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OneLogin

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (4th), User Provisioning Software (4th), Identity Management (IM) (4th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (3rd), Access Management (4th)

Featured Reviews

it_user711612

Senior Consultant at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Reverse proxy provides central control over authentication and authorization.

It is a single product that caters for all the business needs throughout the organization. It provides a seamless integration that in turn encourages most of the applications to use the SSO features Reverse proxy is the most valuable feature as it provides central control over authentication and…

Read full review

Amit Rathod

Senior Analyst - IDAM at Toll Holdings Limited

Unified sign-in has simplified access control and has supported end-to-end identity lifecycle

The authentication process is good, but sometimes the responsiveness to requests for enhancement is very slow. I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability. I experience downtimes two to three times per year. OneLogin's support team is sometimes very slow to respond. There is a feature limitation with mapping, as OneLogin does not provide one-to-all mapping. For client deployment, we need to create separate mappings for each request, and we cannot use the same mapping for multiple requests. Other areas that have room for improvement are related to API limitations. If a client requires more APIs, such as 5,000 or 6,000, OneLogin charges more. The API rate limits by default or the standard limit should provide more than 5,000. Additionally, OneLogin could provide more flexibility in configuration. These are the main limitations I have identified with OneLogin.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Single Sign-On functionality is valuable because the core purpose of the product is to allow universal (or bespoke) SSO for application suites."

"It is a totally secure way of accessing clients through various application portals for more than ten EU countries, just by using single sign-on."

"It is a very stable and good product."

"Provided more secure computing."

"Several SSO methods are supported out of box, federation based SSO (SAML / Oauth / OpenID etc) setup is easy, performance and scalability are very good, and the internal STS token service can be used for custom SSO tokens."

"Tivoli Access Manger lets you separate security from applications and manage at one place."

"It is one of the best products in the present market in the area of access management."

"It is a simple-to-deploy solution, with many features that are supported out-of-the-box without complicated setup."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] pros

"OneLogin has strengthened my security posture, streamlined user onboarding and offboarding, and provided a seamless experience for employees accessing multiple applications."

"The single sign-on feature of OneLogin is the most valuable and useful for me, as it allows one-click access to all apps, eliminating password juggling and frustration while providing centralized access control."

"We are receiving good feedback from end-users for the seamless authentication, as they are very happy with the solution; they do not need to provide passwords multiple times for different applications, only needing to log in once to access all their provided applications, resulting in an excellent user experience."

"Overall, OneLogin has been a reliable and user-friendly IAM platform that helps simplify SSO and strengthen MFA adoption without creating too much complexity for users or administration."

"This product has removed barriers for users to log into multiple services, so it provides a better user experience."

"OneLogin helps improve security posture, increases user productivity by allowing access to multiple applications with a single password, and has reduced support tickets once users fully learned how to use the tool."

"We have seen almost a 50 to 60% reduction in IT support tickets, making the task much easier."

"OneLogin is incredible and easy to use and provides robust security features that simplify our login processes."

More OneLogin pros

Cons

"The whole product could be made into one suite instead of multiple components which are essentially a part of the same infrastructure."

"Older TAM versions are not compatible for connecting to a DB."

"The TAMeB policy server is not scalable."

"Looking at their roadmap, they have a broad grasp of the security features which the industry needs."

"I would rate the technical support a 6/10."

"Initial setup was complicated because TAM was implemented as a part of the IDM solution."

"This product is also available in the appliance offering which has not yet matured and has many issues."

"Redundant Policy servers had to be manually configured using LB."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] cons

"OneLogin could improve its admin interface and troubleshooting experience because some configuration and error logs can be difficult to track during complex integrations or provisioning issues."

"I'd like OneLogin to have a customization section that displays the company's offerings, categorized by different topics."

"The solution keeps going down for many hours, which impacts the entire company."

"There are many downsides. OneLogin is designed for small businesses, not for big enterprises, which is why it has limited features."

"In some cases, users have noted delays in response times or slower escalations for more complex problems, particularly outside standard support scenarios."

"The pricing could be reduced to make OneLogin more effective."

"OneLogin should provide better documentation on configuring policies and roles and ensure that customer support is available 24/7 with experienced staff to improve the complexity of the deployment process."

"The initial setup could be more simplified; apart from this, everything is perfect and a very smooth solution."

More OneLogin cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The IBM prices are, as ever, extortionate, even with a business partnership, and high levels of discounts."

"The price of the licensing is fine."

"The pricing for OneLogin seems to be okay. The pricing and licensing are affordable. If you'd consider OneLogin to be expensive, it's worth it."

"It was cheap in the beginning, and then it became very expensive. We were initially charged $2 per user per month, which was fine, but by the second year, they increased it to $5 per user. That became very expensive for us because we had about 1,500 users. At $2 per user, it comes out to be $3,000 a month, which is $36,000 a year. If we move to $5 per user, it comes out to be $7,500 a month. That made its cost so high. That is why we removed the product because the cost was high."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. It is much cheaper than other products."

"Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions."

"While I wish OneLogin's pricing was more affordable, their licensing model, which is based on per user, is acceptable."

"OneLogin's pricing, from the perspective of the education sector, seems quite reasonable for the value it delivers."

"We were happy with the price we got when we signed up, but I don't know what will happen when the time comes to renew because it is a different company now. We haven't seen any pricing models or had that discussion yet. My renewal is a year and a half away. It's worth what we're paying for it. There's no way we could provide the level of service for cheaper or try to do the same in-house."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

14%

Marketing Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	127
Midsize Enterprise	28
Large Enterprise	66

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with OneLogin by One Identity?

During implementation, there were not many features that I remember not using in practice. Mostly, there were certain APIs that we were experimenting with earlier but did not use, so we created cus...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OneLogin by One Identity?

My main use case for OneLogin is to enforce workforce identity, and we implemented this in Malaysia's biggest retail client, so all of their employees' applications can be securely accessed through...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OneLogin by One Identity?

When I am working in OneLogin on a normal day or week, the first thing I typically do in the platform is handling SSO configurations, so I add applications and interact with application stakeholder...

See all answers

Comparisons

Symantec Siteminder vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Okta Platform vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Idira Identity vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Competitors

Okta Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

LastPass Business vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs OneLogin

Compared 4% of the time

More OneLogin Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

June 2026

Download IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin

June 2026

Download OneLogin product report

Also Known As

Tivoli Access Manager, IBM Security Access Manager

OneLogin Workforce Identity

Overview

IBM Tivoli Access Manager is a robust and secure centralized policy management solution for e-business and distributed applications. IBM Tivoli Access Manager WebSEAL is a high performance, multi-threaded Web server that applies fine-grained security policy to the Tivoli Access Manager protected Web object space. WebSEAL can provide single sign-on solutions and incorporate back-end Web application server resources into its security policy.

IBM

OneLogin offers organizations a user-friendly platform for single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and seamless access management. It enhances security and streamlines processes, making it vital for application management.

Designed for ease of integration, OneLogin helps organizations efficiently manage access and improve cybersecurity through centralized application management. It simplifies onboarding and offboarding, enhancing remote work capabilities and offering robust user mapping. Users appreciate seamless integration and reliable logs. However, it could improve with enhanced technical support, more out-of-box connectors, and better customization options. Challenges with device management and system integrations have been noted, with legacy application support and infrastructure stability needing attention.

What are the key features of OneLogin?

Single Sign-On: Provides centralized access to applications.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security with multiple verification steps.
Self-Service Password Resets: Empowers users to manage their passwords.
Ease of Integration: Connects seamlessly with cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits can users expect?

Improved Time Management: Streamlines user access processes.
Reduced Security Incidents: Strengthens authentication measures.
Efficient Interface: Facilitates smooth user navigation.
Enhanced Remote Work: Supports flexible workforce needs.

Organizations employ OneLogin for single sign-on and identity management, connecting users to applications like CRM and Slack. It supports role-based access control and seamless cloud transition, integrating with Active Directory to enhance user management in industries demanding strong security and efficiency.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc.

OneLogin has thousands of customers across multiple industries and from around the globe such as Uber, Airbnb, Noom, Petco, Sony, Lucky Brand, Tesco, Airbus, Japan Airlines, Aetna, Compass, Kaplan, Susan G. Komen, AAA and PennyMac.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Okta, One Identity and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best User Provisioning Software vendors, and best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.