InfoScale vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud comparison

InfoScale and PagerDuty are both solutions in the Autonomous Operational Resilience category. InfoScale is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while PagerDuty is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5. InfoScale holds a 14.7% mindshare in AOR, compared to PagerDuty’s 8.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of InfoScale users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 99% of PagerDuty users who would recommend it.

InfoScale

Read 9 InfoScale reviews

1,804 Views
162 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Read 92 PagerDuty Operations Cloud reviews

9,341 Views
93 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

InfoScale

PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 11, 2026

PagerDuty Operations Cloud and InfoScale compete in the cloud operations management category. PagerDuty Operations Cloud has the upper hand due to its stronger incident management and comprehensive alerting system, whereas InfoScale excels in data integrity and high availability.

Features: PagerDuty Operations Cloud offers advanced incident management, multi-channel notifications, and seamless integration with monitoring tools. InfoScale provides intelligent failover and fallback mechanisms, advanced storage virtualization, and ensures high availability.

Room for Improvement: PagerDuty Operations Cloud could enhance event intelligence, lower prices for smaller teams, and improve mobile app integration. InfoScale's licensing costs are high, and the interface could be more user-friendly with updates to the graphical interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PagerDuty Operations Cloud supports public and private cloud environments with responsive customer service, though accessibility and response times could improve. InfoScale is typically deployed on-premises, focusing on reliability in large environments but may need more versatile interface options.

Pricing and ROI: PagerDuty Operations Cloud, while costly for smaller teams, offers considerable ROI with improved operational efficiency and reduced MTTR. InfoScale's high pricing limits accessibility, but it provides solid ROI in operational reliability and disaster recovery.

To learn more, read our detailed InfoScale vs. PagerDuty Operations Cloud Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

InfoScale vs. PagerDuty Operations Cloud

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 907,731 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

InfoScale

Ranking in Autonomous Operational Resilience

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (19th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (26th), High Availability Clustering (1st), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (14th), Data Storage for Kubernetes (2nd)

PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Ranking in Autonomous Operational Resilience

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (5th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (1st), AIOps (5th), Critical Event Management (CEM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Autonomous Operational Resilience category, the mindshare of InfoScale is 14.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PagerDuty Operations Cloud is 8.5%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Autonomous Operational Resilience Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PagerDuty Operations Cloud	8.5%
InfoScale	14.7%
Other	76.8%

Autonomous Operational Resilience

Featured Reviews

TABISH JAVED

Site Reliability Engineer (Certified) at Kyndryl India

Automated recovery has minimized downtime and supports seamless multi‑datacenter failover

Beyond pricing, there are areas where I would like to see InfoScale improved or enhanced. Veritas offers three management approaches. The first, which Veritas currently recommends, is Veritas Operation Manager. The second is the Cluster Manager Java Console graphical interface. The Cluster Manager Java Console has not been revised since version 6.1 or 6.2. This tool was critical for me, particularly valuable when managing small cluster footprints of 20 to 30 server nodes. I relied heavily on this tool, but Veritas has moved away from it in favor of Operation Manager. I recommend Veritas continue evolving this tool rather than discarding it. The third approach is the command line, suitable for individuals with extensive Veritas expertise and experience, but command line use in live environments consumed excessive time, leading me to prefer the graphical interface. Apart from pricing, I have not discovered disadvantages. The product is excellent. My concern is Veritas discarding the Cluster Manager Java Console in favor of Veritas Operation Manager. Setting up Operation Manager requires time and a dedicated server that runs continuously. I had to create a single server just for Veritas Operation Manager. While this works well for larger environments with hundreds of clusters, it is less useful for smaller deployments. I still recommend Veritas reconsider this application and evolve it by incorporating new features from Veritas Operation Manager. Adding these new features to the Java console would be beneficial because that tool runs on my laptop without consuming environment resources, and I can connect directly to clusters from my laptop. I am not opposing Veritas Operation Manager, which is excellent and resembles hardware management consoles for power machines, but smaller tools that previously performed these tasks should remain as options to provide clients with greater ease. From a features and functionality perspective, I do not find missing features in InfoScale at this moment. However, I am not actively using Veritas, managing only legacy machines on older hardware. I am upgrading operating systems but not Veritas due to contract expiration and end-of-life status. The contract is not being renewed because the customer wants to move away. Since I have not logged into VCS since 2021 and transferred responsibilities to another team, I am unaware of features arriving in version 8 or beyond and cannot comment specifically on recent Veritas introductions.

Read full review

reviewer2879727

Cloud Dev Ops Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Unified incident response has reduced alert noise and improves on-call focus and coordination

PagerDuty Operations Cloud could improve its noise reduction by making deduplication and suppression more automated instead of manually tuned, and the service dependency graph could be more intuitive with cleaner visuals and easier-to-understand root cause tracing during major incidents. Automation could go further with smarter runbook triggers and AI-driven suggestions to help find root causes, which could save a lot of time for engineers who are struggling to understand what is actually happening. These AI capabilities could lower the time by maybe 50–60%. Analytics and reporting could be more flexible, allowing custom dashboards and filters and team-level MTTA and MTTR breakdowns, so that it is segregated based on teams and it is much easier to have custom dashboards for the teams to understand more. Alert storms were a recurring frustration for the on-call team, and escalation overrides and service dependency graphs can get a bit confusing in larger environments. More customizable analytics and smarter automation would make the platform even easier, more flexible and more powerful for the team to understand. PagerDuty Operations Cloud could improve its analytics flexibility with customized dashboards and AI capabilities to be more trained and more reliable. Service dependency mapping can also feel cluttered in big environments, making it harder to trace upstream and downstream impacts during bigger incidents. We implemented PagerDuty Operations Cloud's AI to help with alert grouping and early incident insights, but accuracy was not consistent enough to rely on during critical events. It occasionally grouped unrelated alerts or missed correlations, which limited the operational efficiency gains we expected. The on-call team still depended heavily on manual triage because AI suggestions were not always aligned with the real root cause. Overall, AI added some value but it has not yet reached the reliability needed to significantly improve the incident response efficiency. It needs more training or more work.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It offers High Availability for many applications, including Oracle and SAP environment."

"In a live incident scenario, the data replication process occurs in real-time, and compared to other products, this data replication feature works effectively, ensuring data availability, and we can implement this scenario using Veritas Volume Replication (VVR), which is the most usable feature in InfoScale for data replication."

"Over the last two years, we did not experience any application failover or receive alerts due to the immediate switchover mechanism in active-active mode that ensures no downtime, helping us significantly with confidence and trust in our organization."

"The best feature is that it supports high availability and automatic failover, which minimizes downtime and helps the environment reduce downtime and improve high availability for critical applications."

"It's a stable solution."

"The best feature in InfoScale is the file system, which is the greatest feature as you can get any storage LUN from any hardware because it's software-defined and create a volume that can consist of storage from two or more different vendors, which avoids any vendor lock-in and makes it easier when you expand as time goes."

"It integrates well with other solutions."

"InfoScale's ability to maintain data integrity and availability during a cyber event such as a ransomware attack is excellent."

More InfoScale pros

"The alerts are immediate in this solution, which allows us to respond to errors quickly."

"All of our on-call hand-offs are now fully automated with the scheduling system inside PagerDuty."

"The aspect I appreciate most about PagerDuty Operations Cloud is certainly the incident management capabilities."

"I see PagerDuty Operations Cloud as a very good incident management and on-call platform, mostly used by large-scale organizations because it comes with premium pricing, but it is very reliable with alerting and on-call scheduling, triggering incidents, escalation policies, rules, and runbooks."

"PagerDuty Operations Cloud has positively impacted our organization by ensuring that our banking applications, which operate 24/7, remain functional and efficient, contributing to better service availability."

"The inbound integrations that PagerDuty provides with most of the DevOps tools are valuable."

"With PagerDuty Operations Cloud's alert reduction feature, I have noticed that it helped me prevent costly incidents in my organization."

"Many customization, AI features, and automatic features are really making my work easy, and being a Major Incident Manager of my team, resolving P1 and P2 incidents quickly and on time, PagerDuty Operations Cloud really helps me a lot to deal with it."

More PagerDuty Operations Cloud pros

Cons

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that pricing is a little higher and should be reduced since most companies cannot afford it."

"While InfoScale is mainly used by enterprise-level customers, it does not inherently support many applications, which presents a scalability issue."

"It could be more stable and more secure."

"The primary concern is licensing cost, as the customer is unwilling to invest further and has begun cost-cutting measures."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit expensive, but rather than that, because it is used in critical environments with no competitor, most of the customers go for it anyways."

"Many customers can see the benefits of InfoScale, but they are usually not able to buy the products and solutions because of the licensing costs."

"It's very difficult to implement."

"Based on my experience with support, I would rate them a nine, only because occasionally the first person I talk to does not know more than I do and it needs to be escalated to reach someone more knowledgeable."

More InfoScale cons

"I rate the platform an 8 out of 10 because, as mentioned, there could be better ways of creating incidents or using a phone number to contact someone who is on call."

"I would like to see more content in the notification messages; although, that might be a configuration on our end."

"I would like the UI to be more intuitive. I would like to be able to group or color-code the discoveries. When you create a system, you have a listing of all the different configurations. You can list them by teams, but some additional color coding would be helpful. I would break it down by incident controls. In other words, it should be broken down it into response teams and engineering divisions."

"PagerDuty should be integrated with other tools, so it can import the IT roster automatically. Our other rules continue to work once they're configured, but the roster must be added manually."

"I think PagerDuty Operations Cloud can be improved cost-wise as it is a bit high when compared with Opsgenie services that are offered by Jira, so I think if you can manage that part it will be good."

"I am not a direct end user of PagerDuty. It's hard to consider its shortcomings in that sense."

"The On-Call Teams feature could be better in terms of levels of conditions related to which team or member should get the responsibility of handling a matter or incident."

"This solution works best in conjunction with a proper logging system, which can be an additional cost to organizations."

More PagerDuty Operations Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our clients pay for licensing on a yearly basis."

"The solution is paid on a monthly basis and represents about 1% of the platform's budget."

"The price is very high."

"If we wanted phone calls or additional SMSs, we would have to pitch up for those. They give us so many per month per user, then we have to pay extra if it goes over that."

"They're very good in pricing compared to the competitors in the area. I would rate them a five out of five in terms of pricing."

"The cost is quite high. But if you want to get a full-featured application and you have a big team..."

"If you add more people, then you have to pay more, which is always a thing with the SaaS solutions."

"PagerDuty has monthly and yearly licenses available, the costs of which can get quite high if you have a large number of users."

"Licensing costs are around $700 a month, and the only additional costs, are phone costs in some instances."

More PagerDuty Operations Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Autonomous Operational Resilience solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

907,731 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Media Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Performing Arts

11%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	74

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas InfoScale Availability?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit expensive, but rather than that, because it is used in critical environments with no competitor, most of the customers go f...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veritas InfoScale Availability?

InfoScale can be improved if it added more robust reporting features; it has reporting, but it is very simple. If it created an integration with a reporting tool that makes it official, customers c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Veritas InfoScale Availability?

My main use case for InfoScale is that we use it in many scenarios. In some scenarios, we use it for clustering for a product like Enterprise Vault, using InfoScale Enterprise, where we handle the ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PagerDuty?

I am not sure about the influence of PagerDuty Operations Cloud on revenue protection in terms of reducing alert fatigue and incident costs, as these are organizational-level decisions, and employe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with PagerDuty?

I think PagerDuty Operations Cloud could be improved by having two fields for incident updates. In my work, I handle incidents that have two fields: work notes visible only to developers working on...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PagerDuty?

My usual use cases with PagerDuty Operations Cloud involve handling incidents through a full flow. When there is an outage, an incident is created that can be either severity one or severity two. A...

See all answers

Comparisons

Windows Server Failover Clustering vs InfoScale

Compared 13% of the time

IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs InfoScale

Compared 11% of the time

Portworx Enterprise vs InfoScale

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Platform Computing LSF vs InfoScale

Compared 10% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs InfoScale

Compared 7% of the time

More InfoScale Competitors

Opsgenie vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

xMatters vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

BigPanda vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Moogsoft vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More PagerDuty Operations Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

InfoScale

July 2026

Download InfoScale product report

Buyer's Guide

PagerDuty Operations Cloud

July 2026

Download PagerDuty Operations Cloud product report

Also Known As

Veritas InfoScale Availability, Arctera InfoScale for Kubernetes

No data available

Overview

InfoScale delivers robust data availability and protection for enterprises by managing critical workloads across hybrid cloud environments, ensuring minimal downtime and seamless performance.

InfoScale is designed to enhance data resilience and operational efficiency. By enabling quick data access across hybrid infrastructures, it reduces potential downtime and enhances business continuity. Its scalable architecture adapts to dynamic workloads, providing reliable performance under pressure while maintaining seamless integration with cloud-based solutions.

What are the key features of InfoScale?

Data Resiliency: Ensures continuous data availability through advanced clustering and replication technologies.
Scalability: Supports dynamic scaling to meet changing demands without compromising performance.
Cloud Integration: Offers seamless transition and operation within cloud environments.
Automated Operations: Streamlines management processes with automation to reduce manual intervention.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Increased Uptime: Improved reliability translates to reduced business interruption.
Cost Efficiency: Potentially lowers operational costs through optimized resource allocation.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust protection measures for critical data assets.
Operational Agility: Facilitates swift adaptation to evolving business requirements.

InfoScale is particularly effective in sectors such as healthcare and finance where data integrity and uptime are crucial. Its implementation empowers industries to handle data-intensive operations efficiently, ensuring continuity and compliance with industry standards.

InfoScale

PagerDuty Operations Cloud focuses on efficient incident management, featuring advanced alert and notification systems, mobile alerts, and AI-driven functionalities that facilitate streamlined on-call schedules and integrations with major monitoring tools.

PagerDuty Operations Cloud offers comprehensive incident management with real-time alerts and notifications via mobile, SMS, and calls. This empowers teams to respond swiftly and reduce missed incidents. Efficient on-call management through automated scheduling and escalation enhances team productivity, while AI-driven alert grouping minimizes noise. Integration with tools like AWS and Datadog further streamlines operations.

What are the key features of PagerDuty Operations Cloud?

Real-time Incident Alerts: Improves response times by ensuring immediate notifications.
AI-driven Alert Grouping: Minimizes noise for enhanced focus and efficiency.
Automated Scheduling: Streamlines on-call management and escalation.
Monitoring Tool Integration: Seamlessly works with tools like AWS and Datadog.
Mobile Alerts: Enables SMS and call notifications for instant communication.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces operational burden through automation.
Improved Team Productivity: Lowers incident noise and accelerates resolution.
Enhanced Customization: Tailors alert prioritization and escalation policies.
Time Savings: Expedites incident management and reduces error rates.

PagerDuty Operations Cloud implementation spans industries like e-commerce and IT services, where it automates anomaly detection and manages high-severity incidents. Its integration capabilities and AIOps features significantly enhance incident management, proving valuable for sectors demanding real-time performance and responsiveness.

PagerDuty

Sample Customers

Wayne State University, Zenith Mart

40% of the Fortune 100 TrustPagerDuty. Customers include: Slack, Intuit, Zendesk, Panasonic, Pinterest, Airbnb, eHarmony, McKesson, Comcast

Buyer's Guide

InfoScale vs. PagerDuty Operations Cloud

June 2026

Free Report: InfoScale vs. PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about InfoScale vs. PagerDuty Operations Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

907,731 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our InfoScale vs. PagerDuty Operations Cloud report.

See our list of best Autonomous Operational Resilience vendors.

We monitor all Autonomous Operational Resilience reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.