ISL Online vs Transmit Security comparison

ISL Online and Transmit Security are both solutions in the Remote Access category. ISL Online is ranked #31, while Transmit Security is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.3. ISL Online holds a 1.2% mindshare in VUS, compared to Transmit Security’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ISL Online users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Transmit Security users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ISL Online and Transmit Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed ISL Online vs. Transmit Security Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ISL Online vs. Transmit Security

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Remote Access category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 6.3%, down from 10.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ISL Online is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Transmit Security is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Access Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Intune	6.3%
Transmit Security	0.4%
ISL Online	1.2%
Other	92.1%

Remote Access

Featured Reviews

OluwashileAdeniyi

Senior Infrastructure Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized endpoint security has improved and supports hybrid work and BYOD policies

Regarding what I dislike about Microsoft Intune and its downsides, I would say that more Mac controls are needed because we have limited Mac and Linux control. When comparing controls and policies between Windows, Mac, and Linux, Windows has almost everything you can think of, while Mac and Linux have limited types of control. You cannot implement certain things on Mac and Linux that you can on Windows. The limited controls are a major issue. Additionally, if Microsoft could find a way to embed servers into Microsoft Intune, that would be beneficial. Microsoft Intune is not really designed for servers or Windows servers. It is more tailored towards Windows 11 and Windows 10 operating systems. Windows servers are not fully supported. Enterprise organizations usually have both servers and endpoints, which are users' workstations. For servers, most people look for other solutions such as SCCM, which is Configuration Manager. However, SCCM is what Microsoft Intune is trying to replace. Both SCCM and Microsoft Intune belong to Microsoft. Microsoft is trying to transition organizations into Microsoft Intune, the native cloud solution. However, because this update is still in process, servers are not fully compatible with Microsoft Intune and cannot be managed by it. The current policy that has emerged from issues with clients is what they call co-management, which is relatively new, and I do not know if adoption is significant. Many legacy or older customers who have been using these products for decades still have SCCM. When it is time for them to manage their Windows devices, they use what is called cloud attach. Cloud attach is a term whereby your SCCM is connected to your Microsoft Intune. Most people do not know about it, but I have deployed it for several organizations. Cloud attach and co-management work together so that your device is in SCCM, but some policies are pushed from Microsoft Intune. It is like two different solutions working hand in hand. That is what they call co-management. Microsoft Intune does not bring all of your endpoint and security management tools into one place, which is the goal and how it should be. However, as I mentioned, servers are not included. If we talk about end users, Microsoft Intune does bring all your devices together. In a typical enterprise environment, you have end users with workstations, laptops, company-issued phones, and bring your own devices. You can create policies for all of these. However, for the backend, your servers do not have much coverage. Servers are not really covered by Microsoft Intune in that way.

Read full review

ErikDas

Owner at Cherub

Easy to deploy, stable, scalable and safe

I previously used TeamViewer. ISL Online is definitely the better choice compared to TeamViewer, as it offers a more secure connection that does not involve peer-to-peer transport, and all data is encrypted. A single license for ISL Online costs about the same as TeamViewer but with multiple licenses, ISL Online is cheaper.

Read full review

reviewer2804310

Lead Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Journey orchestration has improved fraud prevention but still needs shared rules and better usability

The main improvement needed is that with the tool, you have to build rules for each and every application. There is no common place where you can write the rules and use that rule for all your applications, which is missing. This is a big feature that is missing compared to the other products in the market. Additionally, the SDKs, Journey Player, and other components are not business-friendly, so you really have to be technical to get into it and do those things. A non-technical person would find it really hard to implement and learn things inside Transmit Security. Even though it requires less coding, you still have to have some technical people in your team to really write the rules and integrate those rules into your application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to wipe data from and reset devices is one of the most important and valuable features. If a device is reported stolen, we can freeze it or wipe the data from it, preventing data leakage."

"Its overall integration into Microsoft 365 is great."

"It is user-friendly, and the performance is also good. It is a convenient product"

"The valuable feature of this solution is its ease of use."

"Cloud-based device management is the best feature for me as it impacts my company the most; it is much easier than the previous Configuration Manager or SCCM."

"Microsoft Intune has transformed my organization; we are managing to scale the Intune deployment across all our regions efficiently, and it works perfectly for our needs."

"This product allows us to restrict users who have access to the system, or to Office 365."

"Microsoft Intune policies, remote wipe, and using corporate and private profiles are valuable features, but MFA is the most valuable feature as it ensures that the end user is authentic."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"I personally really appreciate the file transfer feature as it is really easy to use."

"Without ISL Online, I would not be able to work from home."

"The stability is great; reliability is what's very important to me, as well as security, and this solution may have only had one instance of downtime in 14 years."

"The solution has a lot of features. It does what it is made to do and that's all we can ask for, really."

"ISL Online is easy to use. It provides a single platform on which we can do everything, and it's very low maintenance. After installation, you don't need an IT manager or staff to watch over it. It's secure. It's most important for us."

"ISL Online is easy to use and it provides a single platform for various challenges we face in IT."

"The code can be delivered in multiple ways, including an email with a link for an unattended connection."

"Good communication is a key to good business and ISL helps a lot."

More ISL Online pros

"Transmit Security has impacted my organization positively because it is reassuring to know that we are building on top of a trusted tool, and we do not rely on developers that could make mistakes, and because it is an authentication platform, that could be detrimental."

"Transmit Security has positively impacted my organization by improving the development of workflows in order to help the user experience."

"Transmit interface is flexible and user-friendly, which is important for our workload. Switching from one authentication code to multiple exposure or two-factor authentication (MFA) is seamless."

"Transmit Security has played a major role for our organization, especially in the authentication areas."

Cons

"Although Intune is from the same provider, its integration with other Microsoft products, like Microsoft Defender or Microsoft Purview, could be improved."

"I consider Microsoft Intune's customer support decent but not always fast or consistent, especially compared to expectations in an enterprise environment."

"It would help if administrators could pinpoint the exact location of a stolen device to help law enforcement retrieve it and apprehend the suspect."

"The interoperability or communication with a different platform can be better. It is a two-way street. It is not only about Microsoft. The other platforms also have to be willing to share some information, but that absolutely can be improved."

"There should be more predictability in the release cycle. We don't feel we have any control over when new updates come out, and whether there are changes to the backend functionality or to the user interface. Updates just happen."

"Microsoft Intune could be improved by adding short video tutorials or direct links to Microsoft articles in the information button."

"We would like to see the ability to use multiple personas on a device, similar to Samsung Knox, included in future updates."

"There could be more competent processes and improvements in the policy space."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"I would like to have a little bit more information when new features are released. They have added features that I didn't know about in the past. It would be easier for me to implement new features and consolidate them with other systems in our network if I knew beforehand."

"There could be a section in the menu describing the new features and changes."

"It would be helpful if they had iSupport for supporting Apple phones."

"We miss the possibility to communicate via head-set in ISL. At the moment, we combine ISL for visual communication with Skype for verbal communication."

"What bothered me the most was that when I connected to the computer at the office, I was afraid that someone would turn on the monitor and watch what I was doing."

"I would like to be able to access and manage all brands of smartphones."

"Updating the program could be improved. When they're pushing updates, you don't really know that there's an update available."

"They need to better advertise the features."

More ISL Online cons

"Pricing is an area where Transmit Security could improve. The pricing needs to be more competitive."

"The main improvement needed is that with the tool, you have to build rules for each and every application."

"The scalability of Transmit Security is a little bit tricky. It is not easy to scale and depends on the complexity of my workflows and how many users I am going to support."

"The customer support varies, but overall, we are satisfied."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft Intune is pretty reasonable. We have difficulty with Azure, which is probably why we have not put many assets in Azure. Everything we put there is very expensive."

"They have categorized the licenses according to the size of the business. So, if it's a smaller organization, we can choose the license accordingly. If it's a big organization, then we can choose accordingly. Everything is clearly mentioned, and we can decide. It's suitable for all kinds of infrastructure, and that's very goo"

"We have a limited budget for security investments, so Microsoft should consider reducing pricing in our region. This would make investment more viable, especially since larger businesses in other countries can afford it easily."

"There is a license needed to use the solution and we are on an annual license."

"It is reasonable. When you have Microsoft 365 E3 or E5 license, it is already licensed in that license. So, you could say it is free."

"We use Defender ATP and E5 licenses."

"Intune is linked with Microsoft. We can deploy the Microsoft E365 license to users by Intune. There are different types of licenses, such as device administrator licenses, E5 licenses for device enrollment manually, and P1 and p2 licenses for device enrollment automatically. These are the licenses required for the administration."

"Intune is included with our F3 and E5 licenses."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"We have a pay-per-use license available for 500 minutes within one year for 95 Euros. However, this option is not popular. Alternatively, we can purchase a one-year license for 339 Euros; if we need two licenses, the cost is double, and for three licenses, the cost is triple with a ten percent discount. For 99 Euros a year, we can open multiple sessions on the same computer with a multi-session subscription."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Access solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Performing Arts

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

30%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	192
Midsize Enterprise	62
Large Enterprise	185

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	1

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Transmit Security?

I have heard that pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Transmit Security are a little bit expensive, but I am not ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Transmit Security?

I think Transmit Security can be improved by creating features that would allow the replacing of other companies such...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Transmit Security?

My main use case for Transmit Security is access management and identity journey coordination. A specific example of ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 4% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

TeamViewer vs ISL Online

Compared 29% of the time

Splashtop Remote Support vs ISL Online

Compared 15% of the time

ScreenConnect vs ISL Online

Compared 10% of the time

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs ISL Online

Compared 10% of the time

More ISL Online Competitors

Auth0 Platform vs Transmit Security

Compared 16% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Transmit Security

Compared 13% of the time

EVOLVEUM midPoint vs Transmit Security

Compared 8% of the time

ForgeRock vs Transmit Security

Compared 8% of the time

More Transmit Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

June 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

ISL Online

June 2026

Download ISL Online product report

Buyer's Guide

Transmit Security

May 2026

Download Transmit Security product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

No data available

BindID, FlexID, WorkID

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

ISL Online provides secure, cross-platform remote access and user-friendly features. Its unattended access and robust security options enhance IT operations without needing user interaction, making it ideal for versatile applications.

ISL Online stands out with its comprehensive remote access capabilities, facilitating controlled, secure connections across numerous platforms. Its ease of setup and stability make it a trusted option for diverse customers, enabling organized computer management and efficient customer support. Cloud and on-premise hosting flexibility underlines its adaptability in varied environments. The platform's strong unattended access mechanisms, seamless file transfer capabilities, and intuitive utilities such as drawing tools ensure efficient remote sessions. Strong encryption and generated security codes underscore its commitment to maintaining high security standards.

What are the key features of ISL Online?

Secure Remote Access: Allows control without user interaction.
Platform Versatility: Compatible with multiple systems.
Unattended Access: Enables efficient access when users are absent.
File Transfer: Provides seamless data exchange.
Intuitive Drawing Tools: Facilitates communication and collaboration.
Categorized Computer Management: Enhances IT efficiency.

What benefits can be expected when evaluating ISL Online?

High Security: Offers reliable encryption and code generation.
Stability: Users report robust performance during sessions.
Ease of Setup: Quick and straightforward configuration.
Cloud and On-Premise Flexibility: Supports different deployment models.
Efficient Customer Support: Improved response times and issue resolution.

ISL Online is widely used for remote technical support and customer assistance, enabling IT firms and managed service providers to remotely manage client devices and troubleshoot server issues. Government offices and broadcasting entities rely on it for secure access to unattended servers. ERP system providers benefit from its problem-solving and seamless file transfer capabilities, while cross-platform compatibility supports integration into unique IT environments, enhancing client interactions.

ISL Online

Transmit Security's cloud-based platform provides comprehensive Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) services, streamlining identity and access solutions with innovative functionalities.

Transmit Security delivers a robust suite of CIAM services, focusing on identity orchestration for automated access control, detection and response for risk management, and identity management with features like single sign-on and verifications. Offering authentication services including multi-factor options, the platform ensures data validation, enhancing accuracy and fraud prevention with minimal technical complexity through its low-code approach.

What are the key features of Transmit Security?

FlexID: Tailored user experiences for identity management.
Multi-factor Authentication: Offers secure, passwordless logins.
AuthScript: Simplified programming for application flows.
Graphic Interface: Facilitates workflow development and customization.
Journey Orchestration: Enhances user interaction and fraud prevention with low-code solutions.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Customization: Allows intricate configurations for specific needs.
Security: Protects high-risk transactions and data accuracy.
User Experience: Simplified application workflows enhance interactions.
Technical Efficiency: Backend journey coordination reduces recompilation needs.

Transmit Security is widely implemented for seamless user application and access management across industries needing secure and efficient identity coordination. In sectors like finance, it helps manage customer identities and protect high-risk transactions such as bank transfers, leveraging technologies like biometrics and RESTful API integrations, although pricing and technical complexity can be challenging for some enterprises.

Transmit Security

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Mitsubishi Chemicals, Konica Minolta, Raifeissen bank, Terpel, Singtel, Teleroute, SOS Kinderdorf, Arsys, EMAAR, Dutco, Alterdata

Mitgate, Telepass, Metro Bank, Santander

Buyer's Guide

ISL Online vs. Transmit Security

June 2026

Free Report: ISL Online vs. Transmit Security

Find out what your peers are saying about ISL Online vs. Transmit Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ISL Online vs. Transmit Security report.

See our list of best Remote Access vendors.

We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.