Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ping Identity Platform vs Transmit Security comparison

Ping Identity and Transmit Security are both solutions in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category. Ping Identity is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2, while Transmit Security is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.0. Ping Identity holds a 11.5% mindshare in CIaA, compared to Transmit Security’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ping Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Transmit Security users who would recommend it.
Ping Identity Platform
Read 29 Ping Identity Platform reviews
  • 1,149 Views
  • 267 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Transmit Security
Read 1 Transmit Security review
  • 221 Views
  • 40 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Ping Identity Platform and Transmit Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, Ping Identity, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ping Identity Platform
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (3rd), Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (8th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (5th), Access Management (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)
Transmit Security
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
10th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (24th), Identity Management (IM) (21st), Passwordless Authentication (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category, the mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 11.5%, down from 11.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Transmit Security is 2.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
 

Featured Reviews

MAHESHKUMAR7 - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers multi-factor authentication and application support side of PingFederate but application only supports specific protocols
A lot of teams work with technical support, but I work with it for user issues only. You might need support with things like application swaps, application names, and application URLs. I didn't know where to find those in Ping Identity, so I contacted technical support for those issues. The support team is very clever and active. They provide end-to-end support once an issue is created. I have worked with most of the support team. I also work with the support team because I work with the operations team. I provide 24/7 support to production and non-production environments. I coordinate with application and network teams to troubleshoot critical tickets and issues related to Ping Identity solutions.
Read full review
reviewer2382384 - PeerSpot reviewer
Good in terms of customization and security, offers flexible deployment, and easy to use
I like Transmit FlexID, which is more focused on user-based identity. Transmit interface is flexible and user-friendly, which is important for our workload. Switching from one authentication code to multiple exposure or two-factor authentication (MFA) is seamless. Transmit provides security and addresses sensitive administrative work on both technical ends. Their authentication suite helps us secure our infrastructure. Overall, I'd rate Transmit highly in security.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Setting up the infrastructure with Ping Identity Platform is very easy compared to other IAM products."
"It gets a mobility portal in place in conjunction with Office 365. It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower."
"I find the auto-discovery feature the most valuable. It helps us automate a lot of things using a single password across applications."
"The only feature we were looking for in PingID was SSO integration with our existing web app."
"The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in."
"It provides ease of connecting all our devices."
"PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tools like ForgeRock and Okta, but I find PingFederate to be the most customizable."
"From a security perspective, I highly value the product's biometric authentication methods such as FIDO, FaceID, YubiKey, and the mobile app."
More Ping Identity Platform pros
"Transmit interface is flexible and user-friendly, which is important for our workload. Switching from one authentication code to multiple exposure or two-factor authentication (MFA) is seamless."
 

Cons

"We can choose a drop-down to search for which certificate we have to create, which is difficult."
"PingID would benefit from a better user interface for integration."
"If the solution is going to compete with Microsoft, they need to offer more unique functionality to keep their current user base."
"They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement."
"In Ping Identity, we have had some issues. We've worked with logging and troubleshooting, including some firewall and security issues."
"They could enhance the product's device tracking for better zero-trust security would be beneficial. Currently, it tracks IPs well but lacks detailed device information, which is crucial from a security standpoint."
"We have encountered instances where it is not easy to do authentication."
"Some colleagues have mentioned API connectivity, data security, and privacy issues."
More Ping Identity Platform cons
"Pricing is an area where Transmit Security could improve. The pricing needs to be more competitive."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."
"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."
"The tool is quite affordable."
"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."
"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."
"The product is costly."
"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."
"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."
More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
41%
Retailer
9%
Healthcare Company
5%
Transportation Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingID?
The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?
The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.
See all answers
What needs improvement with PingID?
The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.
See all answers
What do you like most about Transmit Security?
Transmit interface is flexible and user-friendly, which is important for our workload. Switching from one authentication code to multiple exposure or two-factor authentication (MFA) is seamless.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Transmit Security?
The product itself is good, and the technical support is strong. However, I'd rate pricing around a seven out of ten, with one being cheap and ten being expensive. There's room for improvement. Con...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Transmit Security?
Pricing is an area where Transmit Security could improve. The pricing needs to be more competitive.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 18% of the time
ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 8% of the time
Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 7% of the time
Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 7% of the time
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 6% of the time
More Ping Identity Platform Competitors
Auth0 vs Transmit Security Logo
Auth0 vs Transmit Security
Compared 48% of the time
ForgeRock vs Transmit Security Logo
ForgeRock vs Transmit Security
Compared 16% of the time
Okta Customer Identity vs Transmit Security Logo
Okta Customer Identity vs Transmit Security
Compared 16% of the time
More Transmit Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Ping Identity Platform
June 2025
Ping Identity Platform reportDownload Ping Identity Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
June 2025
Transmit Security reportDownload Transmit Security product report
 

Also Known As

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ
BindID, FlexID, WorkID
 

Overview

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.
Ping Identity

Transmit Security offers a cloud-based platform for streamlining Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM), enhancing security and user experiences.

Transmit Security's platform encompasses advanced Identity Orchestration for automating access decisions and facilitating streamlined customer identity management. Core features include real-time user activity monitoring through Detection and Response, robust Identity Management, automated Identity Verification, Authentication Services with options like passwordless logins and multi-factor authentication, and comprehensive Data Validation.

What are the key features of Transmit Security?
  • Identity Orchestration: Automates access control, integrating multiple data sources.
  • Detection and Response: Monitors user activity, reducing potential risks.
  • Identity Management: Offers user registration and single sign-on capabilities.
  • Identity Verification: Ensures authenticity with automated checks.
  • Authentication Services: Includes passwordless logins and multi-factor authentication.
  • Data Validation: Enhances accuracy and prevents fraud.
What are the value benefits of using Transmit Security?
  • Improved Security: Enhanced measures protect user identities and data.
  • Operational Efficiency: Automating identity processes saves time and resources.
  • Compliance Support: Adheres to industry standards and regulations.
  • Seamless User Experience: Simplifies access with user-friendly authentication methods.

Transmit Security is trusted across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, offering tailored solutions to meet specific industry regulations and customer expectations, improving both security and user engagement.

Transmit Security
 

Sample Customers

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
Mitgate, Telepass, Metro Bank, Santander
Buyer's Guide
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
June 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, Ping Identity, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM). Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.