No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Kronos Workforce Central Software [EOL] vs PeopleSoft comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kronos Workforce Central So...
Average Rating
7.2
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PeopleSoft
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
86
Ranking in other categories
ERP (9th), Activity Based Costing Software (4th), Benefits Administration (6th), Talent Management (5th), Demand Management (1st), Talent Acquisition (5th)
 

Featured Reviews

RO
IT Manager at Soporte Antivirus Ltda
Has a simple interface, is easy to use, and has good stability
It's really easy to use and has a simple interface.  The networking could use improvement.  One to three years. Stability is good.  Scalability is just fine. We have fifty users, most of them are admin roles.  Their technical support is very good. They are very helpful. The initial setup was…
IanCampbell - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Decades of use have delivered secure, customizable control for public sector operations and finance
I have just completed three assessments: one on inventory demand planning, another on using artificial intelligence to bring supplier contracts in portable document format directly into PeopleSoft. PeopleSoft works both internally as well as with third-party products that integrate seamlessly with PeopleSoft. PeopleSoft operates both from a need-to-know-only basis as well as being able at the same time to do group purchase and realize large quantity purchase discounts. My clients have used marketplaces, and it is really industry-specific whether they use one or not, or if there is even one available. I would rate this product nine out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The advanced scheduler helps to ensure proper staffing."
"It's really easy to use and has a simple interface."
"Technical side: The level of detail (building blocks) in configuration (setup) makes it scalable and secure on a functional level, as well as on a data level."
"Do it."
"Poor user experience."
"The flexibility in configuration is this product’s most valuable feature."
"PeopleSoft automatically generates code, making it easier to integrate with third-party or internal systems."
"Having a complete enterprise solution where all the reporting is in our own centralized system is great."
"It provides a very stable platform for us to support key applications, including Procure to Pay, HR/Payroll, AP/AR, Fixed Asset, and Financial Reporting."
"All the features of the solution are integral to the functionality. Additionally, the navigation customization is beneficial."
"The solution is easy to scale, expand and make bigger."
"Because the UI is so easy to use, it makes our work processes flow more efficiently, which, of course, impacts cost and time savings."
"PeopleSoft is resilient and has the flexibility for us to customize it."
"We find the Campus Solutions very valuable."
 

Cons

"Poor user experience. Web based, but requires old version of Java on the desktop which is a security nightmare."
"The networking could use improvement."
"Licenses are expensive."
"Customer Service: 3/10 Technical Support: I would give technical support a rating of 3/10. A lot of the time, their technical support person did not understand the issue."
"The setup was complex."
"PeopleSoft should be more flexible with the configuration. There should be less coding and more configuration."
"In my opinion, it needs more performance, maybe something technical related, because it's very slow for us and even small activities take a while."
"Regarding technical support, they often discourage using PeopleSoft and push for Oracle. Many support staff are offshore and don't understand the system well."
"Response time takes very long and requires a person to be awake night and day to benefit from it."
"We needed to do a lot of integration with third-party applications in order to get the functionality that we needed. The API integration could be better."
"On the other hand, the more recent push for standardization precludes customized approaches to certain industry requirements."
"I think it needs better integration with other parties."
"Oracle PeopleSoft HCM is one of the most expensive systems in the HCM area, so if the organization has budget limitations, then I would not recommend this system."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is expensive."
"I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, with ten being expensive."
"The main issue we have with the solution is that it is very expensive."
"The solution is priced per module."
"I would consider this to be an expensive product, but the quality justifies it."
"The expenses related to the solution are nominal."
"PeopleSoft has a yearly maintenance fee."
"This solution offers annual licensing. We pay per user."
"The tool is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Benefits Administration solutions are best for your needs.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Comms Service Provider
10%
University
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business28
Midsize Enterprise16
Large Enterprise50
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What are the differences between Oracle HCM Cloud and PeopleSoft?
Although both are solutions to manage HR, their differences make each one suitable for different companies. Oracle Cloud HCM is a platform for connecting all human resource processes in your organ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PeopleSoft?
The pricing is customer-specific, so I am not generally privy to what the pricing for licensing is. However, generally, I think PeopleSoft is certainly cheaper than cloud solutions.
What needs improvement with PeopleSoft?
More delivered artificial intelligence functionality in operations and finance would be helpful.
 

Also Known As

Kronos Manager
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Finish Line, Rock Bottom
BMI Healthcare, Lone Star College System, Jefferson County Public Schools, Griffith University, Los Rios Community College District, Tervita Corporation, INFRA S.A. de C.V., ICF Habitat, Central Washington University, Tech Mahindra Limited, Cognizant Technology Solutions, Stanford Childrens Health
Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, Oracle, UKG and others in Benefits Administration. Updated: July 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.