MetricStream vs SecurityScorecard comparison

MetricStream and SecurityScorecard are both solutions in the IT Vendor Risk Management category. MetricStream is ranked #9 with an average rating of 5.5, while SecurityScorecard is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. MetricStream holds a 4.6% mindshare in IVRM, compared to SecurityScorecard’s 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 71% of MetricStream users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of SecurityScorecard users who would recommend it.

MetricStream

Read 6 MetricStream reviews

2,935 Views
1,174 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

SecurityScorecard

Read 13 SecurityScorecard reviews

3,341 Views
2,205 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

MetricStream

SecurityScorecard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

MetricStream and SecurityScorecard compete in governance, risk, and compliance management. SecurityScorecard often has an advantage due to its cybersecurity rating features, aligning well with user preferences despite MetricStream's pricing and support.

Features:MetricStream focuses on integrated risk management, audit management, and compliance automation, supporting extensive risk management processes. SecurityScorecard provides cybersecurity risk ratings, continuous monitoring, and in-depth security analytics, with a primary focus on cybersecurity risk assessment and monitoring.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:MetricStream offers a robust deployment model with support for complex integrations and customizations. SecurityScorecard offers a straightforward deployment approach with a focus on cloud-based solutions and quick resolutions through responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI:MetricStream generally has a higher initial setup cost but promises considerable long-term ROI with its risk management solutions. SecurityScorecard has a lower setup cost, providing quick cybersecurity insights and potentially higher ROI by focusing on preventing security incidents.

To learn more, read our detailed MetricStream vs. SecurityScorecard Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

MetricStream vs. SecurityScorecard

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MetricStream

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

9th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Continuous Controls Monitoring (4th), GRC (8th), IT Governance (5th)

SecurityScorecard

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Legal & Compliance (2nd), AI Procurement & Supply Chain (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the IT Vendor Risk Management category, the mindshare of MetricStream is 4.6%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SecurityScorecard is 5.7%, down from 11.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Vendor Risk Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SecurityScorecard	5.7%
MetricStream	4.6%
Other	89.7%

IT Vendor Risk Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2860572

Business Analyst at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Centralized compliance workflows have improved audit readiness but still need better UX and analytics

Since I have used MetricStream for the last three years, one of the top improvements that comes to my mind is enhanced user experience and UX/UI. I believe that while MetricStream is highly configurable, some workflows can feel really complex for occasional users or first-time users, and I do not find the existing UI/UX experience very intuitive. A more intuitive interface with simplified navigation and role-based dashboards could reduce training time and improve user adoption for both first-time and occasional users. Additionally, MetricStream could include advanced analytics and AI capabilities. More AI-driven insights using predictive risk analysis and intelligent recommendations could help organizations identify compliance gaps before they become audit findings. Furthermore, simplified configuration and integration could be beneficial; configuring workflows, forms, and integrations currently requires a lot of specialized expertise. Low-code or no-code enhancements and easier integration with enterprise systems such as SharePoint, ServiceNow, SAP, or Azure DevOps could reduce implementation effort and operational time. The reporting needs enhancement, perhaps by including role-based reporting and simplifying the dashboard, which currently has too much information and can overwhelm first-time or occasional users. It would be better to show only what is necessary or introduce configurations to display what each user wants to see on their dashboard. MetricStream could definitely improve its accuracy and reliability of output. It could provide more curated, personalized recommendations instead of generic suggestions. Additionally, MetricStream could develop recommendations that align with role-based dashboards instead of providing uniform recommendations across the board.

Read full review

Aayush Gangwar

Application security engineer at a media company with 51-200 employees

Vendor risk monitoring has strengthened our security posture and reduced insurance costs

In terms of improvements, I feel SecurityScorecard could enhance some of the integrations based on AI platforms, where I could receive suggestions from the AI tool regarding why SecurityScorecard rates specific issues as critical or high. Details on the technical mitigation would help my non-technical teams understand the security issues better. I think improvements could be made on the reporting side as well, such as the ability to download customizable reports. While SecurityScorecard offers various kinds of reports now, they are limited to predefined formats. Having the ability to choose specific fields for an automated report would be very helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Key features are usability and ease of configuration, and it allows us to have all the information in a single place and provide real-time indicators and information for our executives."

"MetricStream is something like an all-in-one solution where I do not need to write scripts or conduct audits."

"The interface is mobile-friendly and it is getting a good response from our customers."

"It has good features and good functionality, and our customers feel there is a lot of merit in that."

"Since implementing MetricStream, audit teams have shaved about two weeks off of annual planning across various teams, allowing audit departments of about 140 auditors across maybe 10 teams to squeeze in 10 extra audits, one audit per each team, if not additional testing."

"For our client, MetricStream made the audits incredibly efficient, and in real time, I could provide the status of the audit to stakeholders, indicating which controls had deviations, which control was pending, and who it was pending on."

"SecurityScorecard helps us identify potential vulnerabilities early, reduce third-party risk, and make more informed security decisions without relying only on questionnaires or self-reporting information."

"Since we onboarded SecurityScorecard, our organization has been positively impacted by significantly improving our security maturity."

"Fortify Data offers attack surface capabilities that identify vulnerabilities, exposed ports, and dark web information."

"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."

"SecurityScorecard has impacted my organization positively as it was a surprise to notice that many of our customers follow us there, and the tool scans the web twice per day, so we can see how hackers and what they can see from our publicly available IPs."

"With SecurityScorecard, the most valuable feature is the ability to identify if third parties or vendors have digital threats that may impact our company. It also scans all internal domains and IPs to find vulnerabilities in the digital landscape. The continuous monitoring capabilities have been beneficial by providing ongoing assessments of potential risks."

"The initial setup takes just a couple of days and doesn't require any installation."

"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."

More SecurityScorecard pros

Cons

"I would like to see out-of-the-box integration with more security, it would be helpful."

"We would like to have more dashboards and reports, such as geographical and trend reports in the next version. Also, an improvement in the mobile version would be helpful."

"The support part is terrible, rating about one out of ten."

"Since I have used MetricStream for the last three years, one of the top improvements that comes to my mind is enhanced user experience and UX/UI."

"MetricStream at that point did not have a template, and I had to build the entire SOX 404 IT general controls testing framework myself."

"MetricStream's scalability is adaptable, though the biggest issue I have encountered with clients has been around upgrades that require re-implementing customizations to the out-of-box solutions after significant upgrades."

"The product can be improved by incorporating more data points and intelligence around dark web information and threat data."

"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."

"There are areas for improvement in response times and overall support."

"Some wanted a different solution."

"SecurityScorecard can be improved. As it currently stands, it does a good job monitoring public-facing devices and the internet and DNS."

"I realized that because my company was acquired by a bigger organization, SecurityScorecard started associating other portfolio company vulnerabilities to our score, which was not helpful because it was giving us wrong data and giving us vulnerabilities we did not have."

"Regarding my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for SecurityScorecard, since it does not require active deployment on our side being a SaaS-first company, I expected slightly lower pricing."

"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."

More SecurityScorecard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They are flexible in terms of customers' needs."

"Even though it's competitive, they offer flexible pricing structures."

"The pricing of SecurityScorecard is fair. I would rate it a seven. It's a bit more on the expensive side. In Brazil, for example, making a payment to the vendor involves wire transfers and high taxes, making it more expensive. Selling SecurityScorecard or any American vendor's product in the United States is very different from selling in South America or Brazil."

"The pricing could be split into a lower-paid tier for smaller organizations and another higher tier for others with a more security-focused outlook. $1000 per month is more than some companies pay for their internet connections in total. UPDATE: they have a new 400$ a month tier for starters."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Healthcare Company

11%

Educational Organization

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with MetricStream?

MetricStream can be improved in the area of developers. There are two parts of developers: those who prepare solutions for clients and those from India who support the application. The support part...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for MetricStream?

My main use case for MetricStream was that I was a developer and I prepared templates for a client while also testing the UI platform for the client. I can give a specific example of a template I p...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering MetricStream?

The advice I would give to others looking into using MetricStream is to not use MetricStream. I would rate this recommendation a four out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SecurityScorecard?

I have seen a return on investment with SecurityScorecard as it is easy to use and has saved us some time, so we do not need to do the scans on our own.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SecurityScorecard?

I suggest that SecurityScorecard could be improved by giving a little more specifics on how the scanning works and how you are able to detect those IPs, including more details on the privacy side a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SecurityScorecard?

My main use case for SecurityScorecard is to keep an eye on our vulnerabilities and also monitor which companies follow us in the platform, and we keep track when our score drops so we can fix it. ...

See all answers

Comparisons

RSA Archer vs MetricStream

Compared 13% of the time

IBM OpenPages vs MetricStream

Compared 9% of the time

AuditBoard vs MetricStream

Compared 7% of the time

Mitratech Prevalent vs MetricStream

Compared 6% of the time

Nasdaq BWise vs MetricStream

Compared 5% of the time

More MetricStream Competitors

Bitsight vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 18% of the time

RiskRecon vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 13% of the time

UpGuard Vendor Risk vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 6% of the time

Black Kite vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 6% of the time

ProcessUnity vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 5% of the time

More SecurityScorecard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MetricStream

June 2026

Download MetricStream product report

Buyer's Guide

SecurityScorecard

May 2026

Download SecurityScorecard product report

Overview

MetricStream is a cloud-based platform providing robust audit, compliance, and risk management tools. Users enjoy features like mobile interfaces and centralized risk libraries, though some report interface flow issues and technical support challenges.

MetricStream stands out for its audit, risk, and compliance capabilities, delivering customizable and standardized risk management across departments. Its comprehensive dashboards and reporting tools streamline compliance processes, reducing planning time and breaking down silos. Though described as a pricier option, it efficiently integrates risk elements and supports users with mobile interfaces and cloud availability. Areas for improvement include enhancing security integration, improving interface flow, and boosting support services, particularly from India.

What features does MetricStream offer?

Mobile-Friendly Interfaces: Provides easy access to risk and compliance tools on mobile devices.
Cloud Availability: Ensures scalability and data accessibility across regions.
Comprehensive Dashboards: Offers detailed insights for compliance and audit processes.
Centralized Risk Libraries: Facilitates standardized risk management across departments.
Robust Reporting Tools: Enhances governance with detailed reports and analytics.

What benefits can users find in MetricStream reviews?

Reduces Silos: Streamlines processes and improves communication across departments.
Saves Planning Time: Offers efficient audit process management and compliance adherence.
Efficient Integration: Combines risk elements effectively for comprehensive governance.

System integrators utilize MetricStream in audit and risk management, focusing on template preparation and UI testing. They assemble components like Lego pieces, but face challenges with larger solutions requiring developer participation for code alterations. Initial implementation is often delayed by India-based technical support, impacting operations. Enterprise and Operations Risk Management are commonly employed with MetricStream, highlighting its industry relevance.

MetricStream

SecurityScorecard provides cybersecurity management with features like continuous monitoring and comprehensive vulnerability identification, crucial for managing third-party risks and improving security posture through external assessments and visual dashboards.

SecurityScorecard enhances cybersecurity by offering tools for external security assessments, vulnerability detection, and informed decision-making. By incorporating visual dashboards and daily updates, it simplifies usability and risk management. Its integration with Jira aids in efficient handling of cyber risks, while compliance support and risk scoring further reinforce a strong security framework. The platform assists in fostering effective security conversations with stakeholders and vendors, although enhancements in response time, mobile functionality, and threat intelligence integration are desired by users. SecurityScorecard's intuitive design and automated processes, combined with its support for cyber insurance underwriting, provide a comprehensive approach to managing modern cybersecurity challenges.

What are SecurityScorecard's Essential Features?

Easy Reporting: Simplifies the creation of security reports for stakeholders.
Continuous Monitoring: Constantly tracks security status and vulnerabilities.
Third-Party Risk Assessment: Evaluates external entities to identify potential risks.
Vulnerability Identification: Comprehensive detection of system weaknesses.
Jira Integration: Enhances risk management and task tracking.

What Benefits or ROI Should Users Look For?

Improved Security Posture: Strengthens overall cyber defense strategies.
Informed Decision-Making: Empowers stakeholders with actionable insights for security decisions.
Enhanced Compliance Support: Assists organizations in meeting regulatory and compliance requirements.
Efficient Risk Management: Streamlines processes to identify and mitigate risks effectively.

Industries like healthcare and finance leverage SecurityScorecard to assess cybersecurity resilience. By scanning domains and providing detailed security scores, it aids organizations in informed vendor selection and robust risk management, ensuring compliance and reducing exposure to cyber threats.

SecurityScorecard

Sample Customers

Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago, ACCO Brands Corporation, AgFirst Farm Credit Bank, AIB International, Associated Banc-Corp, BAE Systems, Barclaycard, Dell Inc, DIRECTV, Energizer, Fresenius Kabi, Hasbro, Goodyear, HudsonCity Savings Bank, Infigen Energy, Kaydon, Leroy Merlin, Mountry Financial Corp., Nicholas Piramal, Pepco, Pfizer, Societe Generale, Whitney Bank

TriNet, USAA, Zurich, Gilt Groupe, McGraw Hill Financial

Buyer's Guide

MetricStream vs. SecurityScorecard

June 2026

Free Report: MetricStream vs. SecurityScorecard

Find out what your peers are saying about MetricStream vs. SecurityScorecard and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MetricStream vs. SecurityScorecard report.

See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.