Microsoft Dynamics GP vs SAP S/4HANA comparison

Microsoft and SAP are both solutions in the ERP category. Microsoft is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.7, while SAP is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6. Microsoft holds a 1.4% mindshare in ERP, compared to SAP’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Read 25 Microsoft Dynamics GP reviews

2,091 Views
2,007 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SAP S/4HANA

Read 127 SAP S/4HANA reviews

12,975 Views
11,548 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics GP

SAP S/4HANA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Dynamics GP and SAP S/4HANA are competitors in the enterprise resource planning software market. SAP S/4HANA appears to have an advantage in scalability and performance, while Microsoft Dynamics GP is noted for affordability and ease of use.

Features: Microsoft Dynamics GP provides essential features such as strong accounting, financial management, and ease of customization. It is user-friendly, making it suitable for small to medium-sized businesses. SAP S/4HANA offers advanced functionalities like real-time data analytics, robust integration capabilities, and comprehensive financial reporting, catering to larger enterprises with complex operations.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Dynamics GP could enhance its scalability and introduce more advanced features to cater to larger businesses. It may also refine its integration capabilities with third-party tools. SAP S/4HANA may improve by lowering its implementation complexity and offering more budget-friendly options for smaller organizations. Improved user interface simplicity could further enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Dynamics GP offers straightforward deployment suitable for smaller organizations, with accessible customer service. SAP S/4HANA requires extensive deployment processes, ideal for larger businesses needing tailored solutions, with comprehensive support for complex issues.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Dynamics GP boasts a lower setup cost, attracting organizations seeking cost-effective solutions with quick ROI. SAP S/4HANA, despite a higher initial investment, promises substantial ROI through enhanced efficiency and scalability, making it suitable for enterprises eyeing long-term growth with advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,838 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Ranking in ERP

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP S/4HANA

Ranking in ERP

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

127

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics GP is 1.4%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP S/4HANA is 5.8%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAP S/4HANA	5.8%
Microsoft Dynamics GP	1.4%
Other	92.8%

ERP

Featured Reviews

reviewer2723988

Executive Director, Digital & Technology at a tech consulting company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integration and flexibility deliver outstanding business experiences with innovative platforms enhancements

Scale is a primary concern. If the product vision continues to serve small and mid-cap companies, they need to continue incorporating features into the out-of-the-box solution because small-caps typically lack budget for in-house IT organizations to customize and maintain systems. If they want to expand beyond mid-cap and enter the large-cap market, they need to consider balance and provide more customizability. This includes extending process flows through more APIs and building a more modular architecture with granular backend exposed via API. The process layer should allow clients to customize while invoking back-office APIs. The general perception positions Microsoft Dynamics GP in the middle of the market. Systems such as NetSuite and ServiceNow occupy the lower category, providing narrow use cases. Microsoft Dynamics GP offers more breadth and out-of-the-box capabilities at a slightly higher price point. At the top end, SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce offer extensive customizability at a premium price, suitable for large organizations with multiple transactions and customers. Microsoft Dynamics GP currently occupies a favorable position in the middle segment with limited competition.

Read full review

MuhammadNadeem3

Manager Sap at PTCL

Integrated workflows have streamlined hiring, purchasing, and daily operations across departments

Areas of SAP S_4HANA that could be improved or enhanced include the evolving aspects of the application over time. There are other SAP applications such as SuccessFactors and Ariba that integrate with SAP S_4HANA. In recent years, SAP introduced an addition called RISE with SAP, which allows companies to use cloud solutions instead of requiring their own premises hardware. SAP partners with cloud providers such as Azure, Amazon, and Google, assisting companies in migrating from hardware to cloud solutions. A challenge that arises is the lack of immediate expertise when raising tickets for problem resolution with SAP, leading to delays. We have asked SAP to improve this area to provide users with better benefits from the cloud solution, as we encounter this issue frequently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For a bigger environment, this is the best product to go with for an in-house support team."

"It helps to streamline and automate their accounting processes."

"The most valuable feature is financial control. The accounting aspect allows us to manage our clients and payments."

"Snowflake's ability to handle large queries efficiently is very beneficial, unlike other databases which can take a significant amount of time for similar tasks."

"The solution offers integrations with other software as well. We have integration with Microsoft Office where we can do Word and Excel, etc."

"The stability was reliable."

"Microsoft Dynamics GP has strong out-of-the-box reporting capabilities, and its integration with Office 365, Power Apps, and Power Platform provides great additional benefits, helping deliver better experiences to employees and customers."

"All versions were exceptional at making our accounting staff's jobs far easier."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP pros

"Overall product rating: ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature is the inbuilt standards included in SAP that customers can adopt easily. Also offers to customize it based on the specific requirements."

"It is a stable solution."

"It is exclusive to have SAP in your company. It is the best system in the world."

"I can verify and provide the overall financial aid report and also the management report, which makes it better and easier to implement and provides a better view of business operations."

"From a technological point of view, the in-memory database is one of the key highlights."

"For me, S/4HANA is the best value solution in the world."

"SAP has many functionalities and a high level of detail so that you can manage all processes in detail without any issues."

More SAP S/4HANA pros

Cons

"As technology changes, I would say probably in the area of chart up account needs improvement because chart up account is a string. So if they make it more flexible."

"Overall, the solution wasn't that great. The product doesn't do consolidations."

"There should also be extra redundancy when posting to modules. We use different sets of books such as CashBook and CheckBooks therefore if I select the wrong one the solution allows the transaction to just pass without warning."

"With the exception of the great deal of work we put into customizing the system for our inventory needs, the only suggestion for improvement would be to simplify even further the administration and customization side of things."

"As for room for improvement, they have different modules, project and analytical accounting, but it will be good to have that kind of part in the standard package. To have that additional reporting functionality where you can add an attribute or something, which you can report again. So you can analyze the cost by not just natural accounts but also by a project, without having to go through another module edit on top and then the other module edit on top. The more modules you add, sometimes it doesn't work that well. Additionally, it would be easier to have the solution on the cloud. That's our consideration. We are trying to move all our systems to the cloud, and GP is one of them that we are going to move in the next couple of years. I would rate the solution seven or seven point five out of ten."

"At times, navigating the user console can be challenging, particularly when trying to find account information."

"The biggest problem with GP is that it's not cloud based and it doesn't lend itself to subscription licensing. But Microsoft wants everything in the cloud and licensed on a subscription basis.Even tThough GP can be deployed on a cloud server, but basically, it's a Windows based product. It uses the older model and companies purchase the program and pay a 16-18 sixteen- eighteen percent annual renewal fee but Microsoft wants everybody to pay monthly or annual renewal fees on a subscription basis."

"It requires a lot of expertise to implement."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP cons

"I would like to see improvements in the graphical user interface and core modules in SAP S/4HANA. Even after 20 years, there haven't been developments in these areas. The purchase order, sales order, and core modules like CRM have remained unchanged. The financial data and modules have also stayed the same. Fiori is available but hasn't brought many changes to the core modules."

"This solution works with the configuration, if the prerequisites are very clear and can be configured it works perfectly. If you need to simulate something, as a predictive tool this kind of simulation is not very accurate and it has limitations. This is something that could improve."

"I think the user interface still needs improvement. While efforts are being made to enhance and make it more user-friendly, there are still shortcomings. Fiori is a great step forward, but work must be done. So, I believe SAP S/4HANA should focus more on improving GUI access. We also had a difficult time migrating the fixed assets."

"Planned Order List needs a change of screen."

"The difficulty level of the initial setup depends on the person's skills. If you know the basic knowledge of the database, then it will be easy, otherwise, it will be very difficult."

"The cost of the solution is quite high. It needs to be adjusted."

"There is room for improvement in areas such as security features within SAP S/4HANA, which could further enhance the overall usability and effectiveness of the platform. To make SAP S/4HANA better, there's a focus on enhancing responsiveness and reducing operational costs. This includes improving automation within the system to address strategic needs and accommodate users who primarily speak English, which is an ongoing effort."

"There might be some restrictions in the public cloud."

More SAP S/4HANA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is steep."

"In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective."

"It is an affordable solution."

"We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support."

"For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."

"I think the tool is competitively priced and it's more of a one-time investment with a low annual renewal fee."

"I would say that the pricing is moderate, not cheap, and not expensive. There are many more expensive ERPs than GP, and there are less expensive as well, so it is moderately priced."

"Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft."

"The price of SAP S4HANA could be cheaper."

"The pricing is a five out of ten, with ten being expensive and one being cheap."

"SAP is a costly product in terms of maintenance for an organization who has reached a particular level."

"SAP S/4HANA is expensive."

"I have found the price of the solution is on the medium to the expensive side of the scale. There is a license for this solution and there are additional maintenance fees."

"Regarding pricing, I don't regularly deal with the financial aspects, but it is not a cheap solution."

"It is on a quarterly basis. There are no additional costs. There is just the standard fee."

"The product is expensive"

More SAP S/4HANA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,838 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

23%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	51
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	56

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

D365 BC licensing SAAS model with subscription ranging $70/User/Month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics GP?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

I have implemented Microsoft Dynamics GP in commercial and public sector organizations. In commercial pharma life sciences, Salesforce Veeva implementation supports commercial organizations doing p...

See all answers

Are there any advantages of SAP S4 HANA over SAP Business One (SAP B1) apart from the cost?

SaP Business One is a complete solution for business management. The software applications are broad, ranging from accounting to project management and human resources. It is very versatile and com...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA?

SAP S_4HANA could definitely be improved by making the transformation process much simpler, perhaps through AI tools to automate a significant portion of it, as there is still much uncertainty with...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP S4HANA?

My main use case for SAP S_4HANA is finance and billing. I use SAP S_4HANA for finance and billing through different modules, such as FICO and BRIM. Different modules are utilized for various purpo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 16% of the time

Sage MAS vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 7% of the time

SAP ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 7% of the time

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 6% of the time

QAD Cloud ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics GP Competitors

SAP ERP vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 25% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 5% of the time

SAP S/4HANA Cloud vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 4% of the time

NetSuite ERP vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 2% of the time

More SAP S/4HANA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP

June 2026

Download Microsoft Dynamics GP product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP S/4HANA

May 2026

Download SAP S/4HANA product report

Also Known As

Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP

SAP S4HANA

Overview

Microsoft Dynamics GP is a comprehensive business management solution providing financial control, accounting features, and extensive reporting. It is built to support small to midsize companies offering reliable stability and simplicity in setup.

Microsoft Dynamics GP integrates with Microsoft Office and supports a range of business operations including financials, sales, and inventory management. Despite its strong functionality in financial reporting and analytics, it faces challenges with its outdated interface and limited cloud capabilities. Companies can enhance the system's functionality through Power Apps and Power Platform alongside third-party add-ons. While it is known for its financial stability and user-friendly navigation, improving integration and scalability remains a priority.

What are some key features?

Financial Control: Strong capabilities in accounting and compliance support.
Extensive Reporting: Provides customizable reporting and analytics options.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with Microsoft Office and other systems.
Core Modules: Includes financials, sales, inventory management, and analytics.
Customization: Offers customizable solutions with third-party add-ons.

What benefits do businesses expect?

Reliable Stability: Offers easy setup and dependable performance.
User Navigation: Known for user-friendly interfaces.
Supportive Community: Access a strong network for guidance and collaboration.
Data Accuracy: Enhance data management with Smart Place features.

Many companies use Microsoft Dynamics GP as their primary accounting and financial management platform, supporting accounts payable, receivable, payroll, and inventory management. The integration capabilities allow it to serve as an ERP for small to midsize entities, facilitating additional functionalities in logistics, HR, warehouse operations, and more.

Microsoft

SAP S/4HANA is an advanced ERP system utilizing in-memory computing, offering real-time analytics and seamless integration. Its user-centric Fiori interface simplifies operations, making it ideal for diverse business needs in finance, logistics, and high-performance data management.

SAP S/4HANA stands out for its in-memory database technology and integrated analytics, which provide organizations with real-time access to data, enhancing business efficiency. It simplifies complex processes through prebuilt scenarios and allows robust customization to fit specific industry needs. The platform is crucial for high-performance data management and decision-making across sectors like finance and logistics, integrating different departments to support digital transformation initiatives. It offers both cloud and on-premise deployment options, catering to large-scale enterprises seeking flexibility, scalability, and improved operational efficiency.

What are the key features of SAP S/4HANA?

In-Memory Database: Enables real-time analytics and data processing.
Seamless Module Integration: Allows departments to work cohesively across the platform.
User-Friendly Fiori Interface: Enhances the overall user experience with intuitive design.
Integrated Analytics: Provides comprehensive insights for better business decisions.
Customization Options: Offers flexibility to tailor processes to specific business needs.

What benefits or ROI should be reviewed?

Improved Efficiency: Real-time data access helps streamline operations.
Enhanced Decision-Making: Integrated analytics provide actionable insights.
Scalability: Supports growth with flexible deployment options.
Cross-Department Integration: Facilitates collaboration across different business functions.
Cost-Benefit Balance: Evaluate setup costs vs. operational improvements.

In industries like finance, supply chain, and manufacturing, SAP S/4HANA supports business processes by integrating core functions and enabling real-time analytics. It enhances financial management, inventory control, and purchasing decisions, making it popular among large-scale users in retail and pharmaceuticals.

SAP

Sample Customers

Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall

Nestle, O.C. Tanner, Sabre, New York Life Insurance Co., MEMEBOX, Siemens AG.

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA

June 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,838 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.