Microsoft Dynamics GP vs SAP S/4HANA comparison

Microsoft and SAP are both solutions in the ERP category. Microsoft is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.7, while SAP is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.9. Microsoft holds a 1.4% mindshare in ERP, compared to SAP’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Read 25 Microsoft Dynamics GP reviews

2,490 Views
2,415 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SAP S/4HANA

Read 127 SAP S/4HANA reviews

14,982 Views
13,634 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics GP

SAP S/4HANA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Dynamics GP and SAP S/4HANA are competitors in the enterprise resource planning software market. SAP S/4HANA appears to have an advantage in scalability and performance, while Microsoft Dynamics GP is noted for affordability and ease of use.

Features: Microsoft Dynamics GP provides essential features such as strong accounting, financial management, and ease of customization. It is user-friendly, making it suitable for small to medium-sized businesses. SAP S/4HANA offers advanced functionalities like real-time data analytics, robust integration capabilities, and comprehensive financial reporting, catering to larger enterprises with complex operations.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Dynamics GP could enhance its scalability and introduce more advanced features to cater to larger businesses. It may also refine its integration capabilities with third-party tools. SAP S/4HANA may improve by lowering its implementation complexity and offering more budget-friendly options for smaller organizations. Improved user interface simplicity could further enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Dynamics GP offers straightforward deployment suitable for smaller organizations, with accessible customer service. SAP S/4HANA requires extensive deployment processes, ideal for larger businesses needing tailored solutions, with comprehensive support for complex issues.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Dynamics GP boasts a lower setup cost, attracting organizations seeking cost-effective solutions with quick ROI. SAP S/4HANA, despite a higher initial investment, promises substantial ROI through enhanced efficiency and scalability, making it suitable for enterprises eyeing long-term growth with advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,877 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Ranking in ERP

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP S/4HANA

Ranking in ERP

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

127

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics GP is 1.4%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP S/4HANA is 6.1%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAP S/4HANA	6.1%
Microsoft Dynamics GP	1.4%
Other	92.5%

ERP

Featured Reviews

reviewer2723988

Executive Director, Digital & Technology at a tech consulting company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integration and flexibility deliver outstanding business experiences with innovative platforms enhancements

Scale is a primary concern. If the product vision continues to serve small and mid-cap companies, they need to continue incorporating features into the out-of-the-box solution because small-caps typically lack budget for in-house IT organizations to customize and maintain systems. If they want to expand beyond mid-cap and enter the large-cap market, they need to consider balance and provide more customizability. This includes extending process flows through more APIs and building a more modular architecture with granular backend exposed via API. The process layer should allow clients to customize while invoking back-office APIs. The general perception positions Microsoft Dynamics GP in the middle of the market. Systems such as NetSuite and ServiceNow occupy the lower category, providing narrow use cases. Microsoft Dynamics GP offers more breadth and out-of-the-box capabilities at a slightly higher price point. At the top end, SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce offer extensive customizability at a premium price, suitable for large organizations with multiple transactions and customers. Microsoft Dynamics GP currently occupies a favorable position in the middle segment with limited competition.

Read full review

MuhammadNadeem3

Manager Sap at PTCL

Integrated workflows have streamlined hiring, purchasing, and daily operations across departments

Areas of SAP S_4HANA that could be improved or enhanced include the evolving aspects of the application over time. There are other SAP applications such as SuccessFactors and Ariba that integrate with SAP S_4HANA. In recent years, SAP introduced an addition called RISE with SAP, which allows companies to use cloud solutions instead of requiring their own premises hardware. SAP partners with cloud providers such as Azure, Amazon, and Google, assisting companies in migrating from hardware to cloud solutions. A challenge that arises is the lack of immediate expertise when raising tickets for problem resolution with SAP, leading to delays. We have asked SAP to improve this area to provide users with better benefits from the cloud solution, as we encounter this issue frequently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have not encountered any noteworthy scalability issues; it’s a matter of increasing the power of the servers and hardware/software that it runs on."

"The solution offers integrations with other software as well. We have integration with Microsoft Office where we can do Word and Excel, etc."

"Microsoft Dynamics GP has supported our compliance with industry regulations completely."

"User-friendly: A key factor for a financial application Helps my company a lot"

"Customer service is very good and technical support is very good."

"I haven't used it a lot, but the best thing is that the processes are very detailed."

"We have gained the capability to control and address various issues within the financial module effectively."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily update and maintain accurate data across all aspects of our operations."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP pros

"SAP S/4HANA is a very easy-to-use and user-friendly solution."

"The ability to optimize performance by allowing both data transactions and analytics on a single platform is particularly valuable."

"Only SAP payroll products can handle data management in IT and HR, processing millions of payrolls monthly for big organizations. S/4HANA payroll can manage massive volumes of data, process payroll in minutes, and provide outcomes. Other applications cannot process more than 4000-5000, but SAP S/4HANA payroll has been proven for 30-40 years."

"The solution's most valuable features are performance and processes."

"The scalability is excellent, especially on cloud deployment models."

"It is a stable solution."

"I have been using SAP for more than 13 years and the new SAP S4HANA was not only a simple upgrade, they have made a lot of improvements. They have simplified a lot of the functions, the all-new interface gives users a better experience. The database itself is quite efficient in nature and it provides effective data queries. It is a good upgrade from the previous version of SAP R/3."

"The use of a memory-based database makes it more efficient."

More SAP S/4HANA pros

Cons

"With the exception of the great deal of work we put into customizing the system for our inventory needs, the only suggestion for improvement would be to simplify even further the administration and customization side of things."

"I would rate technical support for Microsoft Dynamics GP on a scale of 1 to 10 as six or five maximum."

"The issue we're encountering is that it's primarily designed for independent installations and not initially structured as a cloud-based solution, which has led to challenges with connectivity."

"With payroll, the payroll that they have offers US or Canadian tax. However, here, our tax payments are different from the US and Canada. It is very difficult to put in our tax tables. We need some customization. It should be readily available for any country to use according to their tax implications. The system should know different types of tax regimes around the world so that it can accommodate. It's a little bit rigid on that."

"Budget commitment and an easy way to import transactions into bank management. Reconcile to GL tool should also incorporate bank management transactions."

"Dynamics GP could be improved in terms of its usability and modernization."

"The purchase order and processing aspects of the solution should be improved."

"There should also be extra redundancy when posting to modules."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP cons

"This solution works with the configuration, if the prerequisites are very clear and can be configured it works perfectly. If you need to simulate something, as a predictive tool this kind of simulation is not very accurate and it has limitations. This is something that could improve."

"We are always looking for a better user experience. We would like to see more consolidation in SAP S4HANA because of all the financial compliance and regulatory changes."

"Support is a challenge. The effectiveness of the SAP support paradigm depends on particular skills."

"While the solution contemplates a competitively priced model, its pricing could be cheaper."

"The infrastructure management from SAP rates as a six. I rate infrastructure support this way because it takes too long, and it's hard to reach the right people."

"We are missing these standard packages here in Turkey. Every customer has to build their own solutions for regulatory needs, such as sending invoices to the authority."

"This is a very costly solution."

"SAP S4HANA could improve by having a more seamless easier integration, faster integration. The overall implementation timelines can be reduced by leveraging Agile methodology."

More SAP S/4HANA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective."

"We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support."

"Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft."

"For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."

"It is an affordable solution."

"I would say that the pricing is moderate, not cheap, and not expensive. There are many more expensive ERPs than GP, and there are less expensive as well, so it is moderately priced."

"I think the tool is competitively priced and it's more of a one-time investment with a low annual renewal fee."

"The solution's price is steep."

"It's quite an expensive solution"

"The solution often does not survive our shortlist round because it is very expensive when compared to other products."

"It is an expensive solution. On a scale from one to five, with five being the most expensive, I would rate the price at four."

"Its pricing could be better."

"The price of the solution is reasonable but some modules can be expensive. When comparing SAP S4HANA to other solutions, such as Oracle, it is not expensive."

"There is an annual license for SAP S4HANA."

"I don't think any company would find the product expensive"

"The price of the solution is on the higher side compared to others."

More SAP S/4HANA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

22%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	51
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	56

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

D365 BC licensing SAAS model with subscription ranging $70/User/Month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics GP?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

I have implemented Microsoft Dynamics GP in commercial and public sector organizations. In commercial pharma life sciences, Salesforce Veeva implementation supports commercial organizations doing p...

See all answers

Are there any advantages of SAP S4 HANA over SAP Business One (SAP B1) apart from the cost?

SaP Business One is a complete solution for business management. The software applications are broad, ranging from accounting to project management and human resources. It is very versatile and com...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA?

SAP S_4HANA could definitely be improved by making the transformation process much simpler, perhaps through AI tools to automate a significant portion of it, as there is still much uncertainty with...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP S4HANA?

My main use case for SAP S_4HANA is finance and billing. I use SAP S_4HANA for finance and billing through different modules, such as FICO and BRIM. Different modules are utilized for various purpo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 18% of the time

SAP ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 6% of the time

Sage MAS vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 6% of the time

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 5% of the time

QAD Cloud ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics GP Competitors

SAP ERP vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 25% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 4% of the time

SAP S/4HANA Cloud vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 4% of the time

QAD Cloud ERP vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 2% of the time

More SAP S/4HANA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP

July 2026

Download Microsoft Dynamics GP product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP S/4HANA

July 2026

Download SAP S/4HANA product report

Also Known As

Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP

SAP S4HANA

Overview

Microsoft Dynamics GP is a comprehensive business management solution providing financial control, accounting features, and extensive reporting. It is built to support small to midsize companies offering reliable stability and simplicity in setup.

Microsoft Dynamics GP integrates with Microsoft Office and supports a range of business operations including financials, sales, and inventory management. Despite its strong functionality in financial reporting and analytics, it faces challenges with its outdated interface and limited cloud capabilities. Companies can enhance the system's functionality through Power Apps and Power Platform alongside third-party add-ons. While it is known for its financial stability and user-friendly navigation, improving integration and scalability remains a priority.

What are some key features?

Financial Control: Strong capabilities in accounting and compliance support.
Extensive Reporting: Provides customizable reporting and analytics options.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with Microsoft Office and other systems.
Core Modules: Includes financials, sales, inventory management, and analytics.
Customization: Offers customizable solutions with third-party add-ons.

What benefits do businesses expect?

Reliable Stability: Offers easy setup and dependable performance.
User Navigation: Known for user-friendly interfaces.
Supportive Community: Access a strong network for guidance and collaboration.
Data Accuracy: Enhance data management with Smart Place features.

Many companies use Microsoft Dynamics GP as their primary accounting and financial management platform, supporting accounts payable, receivable, payroll, and inventory management. The integration capabilities allow it to serve as an ERP for small to midsize entities, facilitating additional functionalities in logistics, HR, warehouse operations, and more.

Microsoft

SAP S/4HANA is an advanced ERP system utilizing in-memory computing, offering real-time analytics and seamless integration. Its user-centric Fiori interface simplifies operations, making it ideal for diverse business needs in finance, logistics, and high-performance data management.

SAP S/4HANA stands out for its in-memory database technology and integrated analytics, which provide organizations with real-time access to data, enhancing business efficiency. It simplifies complex processes through prebuilt scenarios and allows robust customization to fit specific industry needs. The platform is crucial for high-performance data management and decision-making across sectors like finance and logistics, integrating different departments to support digital transformation initiatives. It offers both cloud and on-premise deployment options, catering to large-scale enterprises seeking flexibility, scalability, and improved operational efficiency.

What are the key features of SAP S/4HANA?

In-Memory Database: Enables real-time analytics and data processing.
Seamless Module Integration: Allows departments to work cohesively across the platform.
User-Friendly Fiori Interface: Enhances the overall user experience with intuitive design.
Integrated Analytics: Provides comprehensive insights for better business decisions.
Customization Options: Offers flexibility to tailor processes to specific business needs.

What benefits or ROI should be reviewed?

Improved Efficiency: Real-time data access helps streamline operations.
Enhanced Decision-Making: Integrated analytics provide actionable insights.
Scalability: Supports growth with flexible deployment options.
Cross-Department Integration: Facilitates collaboration across different business functions.
Cost-Benefit Balance: Evaluate setup costs vs. operational improvements.

In industries like finance, supply chain, and manufacturing, SAP S/4HANA supports business processes by integrating core functions and enabling real-time analytics. It enhances financial management, inventory control, and purchasing decisions, making it popular among large-scale users in retail and pharmaceuticals.

SAP

Sample Customers

Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall

Nestle, O.C. Tanner, Sabre, New York Life Insurance Co., MEMEBOX, Siemens AG.

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA

August 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.