Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Microsoft Dynamics GP comparison

Microsoft Dynamics AX and Microsoft Dynamics GP are both solutions in the ERP category. Microsoft Dynamics AX is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.8, while Microsoft Dynamics GP is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.7. Microsoft Dynamics AX holds a 2.5% mindshare in ERP, compared to Microsoft Dynamics GP’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Microsoft Dynamics AX users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Microsoft Dynamics GP users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Dynamics AX

Read 59 Microsoft Dynamics AX reviews

5,200 Views
4,784 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Read 25 Microsoft Dynamics GP reviews

2,091 Views
2,007 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics AX

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Dynamics AX and Dynamics GP compete in the ERP category. Dynamics AX holds an edge for large enterprises due to its comprehensive functionality, whereas Dynamics GP is more appealing to small to mid-sized businesses with its strong financial capabilities.

Features: Microsoft Dynamics AX integrates departments and offers comprehensive functionality in finance, manufacturing, and HR, with strong master planning and supply chain capabilities. Dynamics GP features a strong financial module, seamless Microsoft Office integration, and a simple, user-friendly interface.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Dynamics AX faces scalability and integration challenges, particularly in industries like retail, and needs improved reporting flexibility. Dynamics GP requires enhancements to its manufacturing module and better support for advanced financial reporting. The end-of-life status of GP creates a need for cloud-based evolution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Dynamics AX offers on-premises, public, and private cloud deployment options with customer service largely depending on partner support. Dynamics GP primarily supports on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, with excellent customer support but relies on partners for technical consistency.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Dynamics AX has higher initial and ongoing costs, making it suitable for larger enterprises, with users reporting reasonable returns due to its extensive features. Dynamics GP offers moderate pricing but requires extra investment for cloud flexibility, remaining cost-effective for smaller setups with effective management.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Dynamics AX

Ranking in ERP

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Activity Based Costing Software (5th)

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Ranking in ERP

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics AX is 2.5%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics GP is 1.4%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Dynamics AX	2.5%
Microsoft Dynamics GP	1.4%
Other	96.1%

ERP

Featured Reviews

reviewer2765214

Senior Sales Support Supervisor at a manufacturing company with 501-1,000 employees

Has required ongoing support and modernization but effectively manages core operations and complex workflows

Microsoft Dynamics AX is a very strong ERP system, applicable for customizations to help companies and organizations streamline their processes. The specific feature I find most valuable about Microsoft Dynamics AX is the applicable permissions. There are many levels of security and permissions for each user to monitor and access specific data relative to their functions. Additionally, the linkage and transition between exploring and moving from window to window, from function to function is valuable. The impact of Microsoft Dynamics AX on managing financial processes is significant. It's a very important element for financial departments as it represents all transactions, references, and records. The adjustments and availability to create more than one virtual company allow large companies, which combined represent one group of companies, to connect and streamline their financials and operations.

Read full review

reviewer2723988

Executive Director, Digital & Technology at a tech consulting company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integration and flexibility deliver outstanding business experiences with innovative platforms enhancements

Scale is a primary concern. If the product vision continues to serve small and mid-cap companies, they need to continue incorporating features into the out-of-the-box solution because small-caps typically lack budget for in-house IT organizations to customize and maintain systems. If they want to expand beyond mid-cap and enter the large-cap market, they need to consider balance and provide more customizability. This includes extending process flows through more APIs and building a more modular architecture with granular backend exposed via API. The process layer should allow clients to customize while invoking back-office APIs. The general perception positions Microsoft Dynamics GP in the middle of the market. Systems such as NetSuite and ServiceNow occupy the lower category, providing narrow use cases. Microsoft Dynamics GP offers more breadth and out-of-the-box capabilities at a slightly higher price point. At the top end, SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce offer extensive customizability at a premium price, suitable for large organizations with multiple transactions and customers. Microsoft Dynamics GP currently occupies a favorable position in the middle segment with limited competition.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It was an okay solution when we delivered hardware and we had to do maintenance."

"Technical support is very good."

"The response time of the solution is very good."

"It's scalable."

"Almost all of the features that we use are efficient. Live master planning successfully handles all of our company's requirements."

"The relation between CRM and Sales, that's the main strength of this ERP."

"It is flexible and cost-effective."

"The product's most valuable features are its day-to-day operations, Power BI-driven workspaces, and homepage."

More Microsoft Dynamics AX pros

"Microsoft Dynamics GP has supported our compliance with industry regulations completely."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily update and maintain accurate data across all aspects of our operations."

"For a bigger environment, this is the best product to go with for an in-house support team."

"The solution is easy to use."

"It is strong in integration."

"Snowflake's ability to handle large queries efficiently is very beneficial, unlike other databases which can take a significant amount of time for similar tasks."

"The fixed assets, payroll, the data module, and user-friendliness are most valuable."

"The solution offers integrations with other software as well. We have integration with Microsoft Office where we can do Word and Excel, etc."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP pros

Cons

"It is being decommissioned."

"The support here in Turkey could be better. However, the international support is good."

"I sometimes put in wrong data that needs correction, but I cannot change it or approve it without withdrawing it. It will then take time for me to go back in and edit it."

"The product needs improvement in procurement planning. It also needs to include a production scheduling feature."

"Microsoft Dynamics AX should include more connectors for third-party integrations. It should also include more features that AI models can govern."

"From a consultant's point of view, I recommend an enhancement in terms of detailed documentation for the products on the website."

"Our version has performance issues so it gets stuck and is slow."

"Microsoft Dynamics AX needs to improve its support and the developer experience. Developing and programming are more complex. Automation and integration with other apps should be simplified."

More Microsoft Dynamics AX cons

"Initially, we encountered challenges, particularly with users transitioning from their previous applications."

"Windows authentication is not available for the full GP 2016 client."

"Not quite all the reports are fully exportable to Excel."

"It still can be improved in web-based and build reporting. "

"This is now a legacy product, so they're phasing it out over time."

"Scale is a primary concern. If the product vision continues to serve small and mid-cap companies, they need to continue incorporating features into the out-of-the-box solution because small-caps typically lack budget for in-house IT organizations to customize and maintain systems."

"The biggest problem with GP is that it's not cloud based and it doesn't lend itself to subscription licensing. But Microsoft wants everything in the cloud and licensed on a subscription basis.Even tThough GP can be deployed on a cloud server, but basically, it's a Windows based product. It uses the older model and companies purchase the program and pay a 16-18 sixteen- eighteen percent annual renewal fee but Microsoft wants everybody to pay monthly or annual renewal fees on a subscription basis."

"With the exception of the great deal of work we put into customizing the system for our inventory needs, the only suggestion for improvement would be to simplify even further the administration and customization side of things."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is $180 to $200 per user per month with a minimum of 20 users, which makes selling the product a bit difficult."

"Go for cloud implementation, if cost is critical."

"The tool is cheap."

"It is not the cheapest solution, but it is also not the most expensive one. It's in between and is cheaper than SAP but more expensive than other local vendors. It is worth the cost."

"The price of the solution could benefit from being less expensive."

"The product's license is expensive. My company is located in a region where we have to pay the most for the tool due to our currency and inflation scenario."

"The tool's licensing model is based on user subscription. The pricing needs to be reduced for the Indian and South Asian markets."

"The yearly licenses are priced okay."

More Microsoft Dynamics AX pricing and cost advice

"Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft."

"I would say that the pricing is moderate, not cheap, and not expensive. There are many more expensive ERPs than GP, and there are less expensive as well, so it is moderately priced."

"For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."

"I think the tool is competitively priced and it's more of a one-time investment with a low annual renewal fee."

"In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective."

"It is an affordable solution."

"We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support."

"The solution's price is steep."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

22%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics AX?

I think the integration capabilities of Microsoft Dynamics AX need to be enhanced. There are many features for integration, such as APIs and connectors, but I need more ready APIs that link directl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics AX?

For industrial companies, I mainly use Microsoft Dynamics AX for those processes. Most of my clients are manufacturing clients, so I work with food industries, steel industries, plastic industries,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics AX?

Microsoft Dynamics AX provides benefits like saving time because it is very easy to use and it offers strong processes to implement full business processes, mapping them with customer business for ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

D365 BC licensing SAAS model with subscription ranging $70/User/Month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics GP?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

I have implemented Microsoft Dynamics GP in commercial and public sector organizations. In commercial pharma life sciences, Salesforce Veeva implementation supports commercial organizations doing p...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics AX

Compared 16% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Microsoft Dynamics AX

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs Microsoft Dynamics AX

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics SL vs Microsoft Dynamics AX

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs Microsoft Dynamics AX

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics AX Competitors

SAP S/4HANA vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 15% of the time

Sage MAS vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 7% of the time

SAP ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 7% of the time

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 6% of the time

QAD Cloud ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics GP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics AX

June 2026

Download Microsoft Dynamics AX product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP

June 2026

Download Microsoft Dynamics GP product report

Also Known As

Dynamics AX, Axapta, MS Dynamics AX

Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP

Overview

Microsoft Dynamics AX is an integrated enterprise resource planning system offering extensive modules for finance, logistics, and manufacturing. Known for its Excel integration and competitive pricing, it provides companies with flexible and customizable workflows for efficient business processes.

Microsoft Dynamics AX provides comprehensive support for manufacturing, retail, and financial management. Its centralized structure ensures effective data management and smooth workflow automation, while integration with third-party applications allows for real-time analysis and customization. Although there is a need for improved APIs, a more modern interface, and robust financial features, Dynamics AX supports a varied range of business operations with its cloud and on-premise setups. The system has some security limitations and performance challenges, and its reliance on Power BI for real-time analytics highlights areas for development, especially for on-premise users.

What are the key features of Microsoft Dynamics AX?

Integration with Excel: Facilitates data management and analysis by linking seamlessly with Excel.
Customizable Workflow: Automates business processes to boost efficiency.
Robust Modules: Includes finance, logistics, and manufacturing modules.
Third-party Integration: Enhances flexibility with external applications.
Centralized Design: Supports effective data management across processes.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Streamlined Operations: Assists in improving business processes and decision-making.
Cost Efficiency: Offers competitive pricing, balancing cost with functionality.
Flexibility: Accommodates cloud and on-premise setups for diverse needs.
Enhanced Financial Controls: Aids in managing finance-related tasks effectively.
Decision-making Improvement: Provides tools to support strategic business decisions.

Manufacturing sectors use Microsoft Dynamics AX for resource planning and supply chain management, enhancing operational efficiency. Retail companies benefit from its real-time analysis and finance capabilities. Service industries find its HR and inventory management features valuable, leveraging the system for both on-premise and cloud setups to optimize processes and integration.

Microsoft

Microsoft Dynamics GP is a comprehensive business management solution providing financial control, accounting features, and extensive reporting. It is built to support small to midsize companies offering reliable stability and simplicity in setup.

Microsoft Dynamics GP integrates with Microsoft Office and supports a range of business operations including financials, sales, and inventory management. Despite its strong functionality in financial reporting and analytics, it faces challenges with its outdated interface and limited cloud capabilities. Companies can enhance the system's functionality through Power Apps and Power Platform alongside third-party add-ons. While it is known for its financial stability and user-friendly navigation, improving integration and scalability remains a priority.

What are some key features?

Financial Control: Strong capabilities in accounting and compliance support.
Extensive Reporting: Provides customizable reporting and analytics options.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with Microsoft Office and other systems.
Core Modules: Includes financials, sales, inventory management, and analytics.
Customization: Offers customizable solutions with third-party add-ons.

What benefits do businesses expect?

Reliable Stability: Offers easy setup and dependable performance.
User Navigation: Known for user-friendly interfaces.
Supportive Community: Access a strong network for guidance and collaboration.
Data Accuracy: Enhance data management with Smart Place features.

Many companies use Microsoft Dynamics GP as their primary accounting and financial management platform, supporting accounts payable, receivable, payroll, and inventory management. The integration capabilities allow it to serve as an ERP for small to midsize entities, facilitating additional functionalities in logistics, HR, warehouse operations, and more.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

ConQuaestor, D & H Distributing, Sunny Queen, Mesa Associates, Britax Childcare, Ibema, Arafa, Sabo S.p.A.

Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

June 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.