Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Microsoft Dynamics GP comparison

Microsoft Dynamics AX and Microsoft Dynamics GP are both solutions in the ERP category. Microsoft Dynamics AX is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.8, while Microsoft Dynamics GP is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.7. Microsoft Dynamics AX holds a 2.4% mindshare in ERP, compared to Microsoft Dynamics GP’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Microsoft Dynamics AX users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Microsoft Dynamics GP users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Dynamics AX

Read 59 Microsoft Dynamics AX reviews

5,850 Views
5,382 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Read 25 Microsoft Dynamics GP reviews

2,490 Views
2,415 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics AX

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Dynamics AX and Dynamics GP compete in the ERP category. Dynamics AX holds an edge for large enterprises due to its comprehensive functionality, whereas Dynamics GP is more appealing to small to mid-sized businesses with its strong financial capabilities.

Features: Microsoft Dynamics AX integrates departments and offers comprehensive functionality in finance, manufacturing, and HR, with strong master planning and supply chain capabilities. Dynamics GP features a strong financial module, seamless Microsoft Office integration, and a simple, user-friendly interface.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Dynamics AX faces scalability and integration challenges, particularly in industries like retail, and needs improved reporting flexibility. Dynamics GP requires enhancements to its manufacturing module and better support for advanced financial reporting. The end-of-life status of GP creates a need for cloud-based evolution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Dynamics AX offers on-premises, public, and private cloud deployment options with customer service largely depending on partner support. Dynamics GP primarily supports on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, with excellent customer support but relies on partners for technical consistency.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Dynamics AX has higher initial and ongoing costs, making it suitable for larger enterprises, with users reporting reasonable returns due to its extensive features. Dynamics GP offers moderate pricing but requires extra investment for cloud flexibility, remaining cost-effective for smaller setups with effective management.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Dynamics AX

Ranking in ERP

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Activity Based Costing Software (5th)

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Ranking in ERP

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics AX is 2.4%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics GP is 1.4%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Dynamics AX	2.4%
Microsoft Dynamics GP	1.4%
Other	96.2%

ERP

Featured Reviews

reviewer2765214

Senior Sales Support Supervisor at a manufacturing company with 501-1,000 employees

Has required ongoing support and modernization but effectively manages core operations and complex workflows

Microsoft Dynamics AX is a very strong ERP system, applicable for customizations to help companies and organizations streamline their processes. The specific feature I find most valuable about Microsoft Dynamics AX is the applicable permissions. There are many levels of security and permissions for each user to monitor and access specific data relative to their functions. Additionally, the linkage and transition between exploring and moving from window to window, from function to function is valuable. The impact of Microsoft Dynamics AX on managing financial processes is significant. It's a very important element for financial departments as it represents all transactions, references, and records. The adjustments and availability to create more than one virtual company allow large companies, which combined represent one group of companies, to connect and streamline their financials and operations.

Read full review

reviewer2723988

Executive Director, Digital & Technology at a tech consulting company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integration and flexibility deliver outstanding business experiences with innovative platforms enhancements

Scale is a primary concern. If the product vision continues to serve small and mid-cap companies, they need to continue incorporating features into the out-of-the-box solution because small-caps typically lack budget for in-house IT organizations to customize and maintain systems. If they want to expand beyond mid-cap and enter the large-cap market, they need to consider balance and provide more customizability. This includes extending process flows through more APIs and building a more modular architecture with granular backend exposed via API. The process layer should allow clients to customize while invoking back-office APIs. The general perception positions Microsoft Dynamics GP in the middle of the market. Systems such as NetSuite and ServiceNow occupy the lower category, providing narrow use cases. Microsoft Dynamics GP offers more breadth and out-of-the-box capabilities at a slightly higher price point. At the top end, SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce offer extensive customizability at a premium price, suitable for large organizations with multiple transactions and customers. Microsoft Dynamics GP currently occupies a favorable position in the middle segment with limited competition.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is reporting."

"The response time of the solution is very good."

"I like that it's a complete ERP solution from production level to branch level."

"The most valuable features of Microsoft Dynamics AX are ease of use and performance."

"Microsoft Dynamics AX makes it possible to provide a solution by using an interconnected ERP solution that can integrate with other products such as SAP, Oracle, and other global ERP types, providing a lot of functionality and giving customers all their information in one completely integrated application."

"We find Microsoft Dynamics AX much better than S/4HANA."

"AX is nearly a Tier One product, so implementations are long, but there's a lot of flexibility. Also, the ability to handle different issues found in larger organizations."

"We choose Microsoft Dynamics AX because it fits our needs the most; it's a very good product builder."

More Microsoft Dynamics AX pros

"It is quite a robust system."

"The initial setup was very easy; you do not need a lot of technical in-depth knowledge to handle the implementation, and the stability is reliable."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily update and maintain accurate data across all aspects of our operations."

"The stability was reliable."

"It is strong in integration."

"We have not encountered any noteworthy scalability issues; it’s a matter of increasing the power of the servers and hardware/software that it runs on."

"I’ve implemented several hundred Microsoft Dynamics GP systems for many customers, and the improvements brought about in the client’s reporting and transaction functions are off the charts."

"I haven't used it a lot, but the best thing is that the processes are very detailed."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP pros

Cons

"This solution could be improved with more expert resources and an easier implementation process."

"Where different programmers have been let loose the product has a number of view inconsistencies and there are still issues that were in 4."

"The on-premises and desktop versions are not user-friendly."

"There is room for improvement in the licensing model and associated costs of this solution."

"There should be the capability for users to enhance the application by using a low-code or no-code product from the Microsoft family."

"Our version has performance issues so it gets stuck and is slow."

"If I had to add something in the next release, it would probably be a mobile application for a sister application of Dynamics 365; not the ERP but the Dynamics 365 HR solution. It would definitely help if we could have Microsoft or a Microsoft partner introduce a mobile application for it."

"The initial setup can be complex at times and has room for improvement."

More Microsoft Dynamics AX cons

"I would rate technical support for Microsoft Dynamics GP on a scale of 1 to 10 as six or five maximum."

"Not quite all the reports are fully exportable to Excel."

"Many of our customers are migrating to the cloud rather than staying on-premises."

"The purchase order and processing aspects of the solution should be improved."

"The biggest problem with GP is that it's not cloud based and it doesn't lend itself to subscription licensing. But Microsoft wants everything in the cloud and licensed on a subscription basis.Even tThough GP can be deployed on a cloud server, but basically, it's a Windows based product. It uses the older model and companies purchase the program and pay a 16-18 sixteen- eighteen percent annual renewal fee but Microsoft wants everybody to pay monthly or annual renewal fees on a subscription basis."

"This is now a legacy product, so they're phasing it out over time."

"As technology changes, I would say probably in the area of chart up account needs improvement because chart up account is a string. So if they make it more flexible."

"With the exception of the great deal of work we put into customizing the system for our inventory needs, the only suggestion for improvement would be to simplify even further the administration and customization side of things."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's licensing model is based on user subscription. The pricing needs to be reduced for the Indian and South Asian markets."

"The solution is expensive."

"It is not the cheapest solution, but it is also not the most expensive one. It's in between and is cheaper than SAP but more expensive than other local vendors. It is worth the cost."

"One license costs $1,000."

"The product's pricing is expensive. The tool costs 210 USD per user for one month."

"The pricing is expensive."

"It's too expensive for customers to take this on themselves. As partners, we will buy this on behalf of the customers and then charge this value for each project."

"One client was looking at a $5M SAP proposal and we got AX in just under $2M, and they were very happy with it as they have several sister companies that face $500K SAP upgrades/maintenance seemingly annually."

More Microsoft Dynamics AX pricing and cost advice

"It is an affordable solution."

"We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support."

"I think the tool is competitively priced and it's more of a one-time investment with a low annual renewal fee."

"I would say that the pricing is moderate, not cheap, and not expensive. There are many more expensive ERPs than GP, and there are less expensive as well, so it is moderately priced."

"For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."

"The solution's price is steep."

"In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective."

"Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

22%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics AX?

I think the integration capabilities of Microsoft Dynamics AX need to be enhanced. There are many features for integration, such as APIs and connectors, but I need more ready APIs that link directl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics AX?

For industrial companies, I mainly use Microsoft Dynamics AX for those processes. Most of my clients are manufacturing clients, so I work with food industries, steel industries, plastic industries,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics AX?

Microsoft Dynamics AX provides benefits like saving time because it is very easy to use and it offers strong processes to implement full business processes, mapping them with customer business for ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

D365 BC licensing SAAS model with subscription ranging $70/User/Month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics GP?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

I have implemented Microsoft Dynamics GP in commercial and public sector organizations. In commercial pharma life sciences, Salesforce Veeva implementation supports commercial organizations doing p...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics AX

Compared 15% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Microsoft Dynamics AX

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs Microsoft Dynamics AX

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics SL vs Microsoft Dynamics AX

Compared 7% of the time

Comarch ERP Enterprise vs Microsoft Dynamics AX

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics AX Competitors

SAP S/4HANA vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 16% of the time

SAP ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 6% of the time

Sage MAS vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 6% of the time

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 5% of the time

QAD Cloud ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics GP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics AX

July 2026

Download Microsoft Dynamics AX product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP

July 2026

Download Microsoft Dynamics GP product report

Also Known As

Dynamics AX, Axapta, MS Dynamics AX

Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP

Overview

Microsoft Dynamics AX is an integrated enterprise resource planning system offering extensive modules for finance, logistics, and manufacturing. Known for its Excel integration and competitive pricing, it provides companies with flexible and customizable workflows for efficient business processes.

Microsoft Dynamics AX provides comprehensive support for manufacturing, retail, and financial management. Its centralized structure ensures effective data management and smooth workflow automation, while integration with third-party applications allows for real-time analysis and customization. Although there is a need for improved APIs, a more modern interface, and robust financial features, Dynamics AX supports a varied range of business operations with its cloud and on-premise setups. The system has some security limitations and performance challenges, and its reliance on Power BI for real-time analytics highlights areas for development, especially for on-premise users.

What are the key features of Microsoft Dynamics AX?

Integration with Excel: Facilitates data management and analysis by linking seamlessly with Excel.
Customizable Workflow: Automates business processes to boost efficiency.
Robust Modules: Includes finance, logistics, and manufacturing modules.
Third-party Integration: Enhances flexibility with external applications.
Centralized Design: Supports effective data management across processes.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Streamlined Operations: Assists in improving business processes and decision-making.
Cost Efficiency: Offers competitive pricing, balancing cost with functionality.
Flexibility: Accommodates cloud and on-premise setups for diverse needs.
Enhanced Financial Controls: Aids in managing finance-related tasks effectively.
Decision-making Improvement: Provides tools to support strategic business decisions.

Manufacturing sectors use Microsoft Dynamics AX for resource planning and supply chain management, enhancing operational efficiency. Retail companies benefit from its real-time analysis and finance capabilities. Service industries find its HR and inventory management features valuable, leveraging the system for both on-premise and cloud setups to optimize processes and integration.

Microsoft

Microsoft Dynamics GP is a comprehensive business management solution providing financial control, accounting features, and extensive reporting. It is built to support small to midsize companies offering reliable stability and simplicity in setup.

Microsoft Dynamics GP integrates with Microsoft Office and supports a range of business operations including financials, sales, and inventory management. Despite its strong functionality in financial reporting and analytics, it faces challenges with its outdated interface and limited cloud capabilities. Companies can enhance the system's functionality through Power Apps and Power Platform alongside third-party add-ons. While it is known for its financial stability and user-friendly navigation, improving integration and scalability remains a priority.

What are some key features?

Financial Control: Strong capabilities in accounting and compliance support.
Extensive Reporting: Provides customizable reporting and analytics options.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with Microsoft Office and other systems.
Core Modules: Includes financials, sales, inventory management, and analytics.
Customization: Offers customizable solutions with third-party add-ons.

What benefits do businesses expect?

Reliable Stability: Offers easy setup and dependable performance.
User Navigation: Known for user-friendly interfaces.
Supportive Community: Access a strong network for guidance and collaboration.
Data Accuracy: Enhance data management with Smart Place features.

Many companies use Microsoft Dynamics GP as their primary accounting and financial management platform, supporting accounts payable, receivable, payroll, and inventory management. The integration capabilities allow it to serve as an ERP for small to midsize entities, facilitating additional functionalities in logistics, HR, warehouse operations, and more.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

ConQuaestor, D & H Distributing, Sunny Queen, Mesa Associates, Britax Childcare, Ibema, Arafa, Sabo S.p.A.

Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

August 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.