Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Microsoft Dynamics GP comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft Dynamics AX and Microsoft Dynamics GP are both solutions in the ERP category. Microsoft Dynamics AX is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft Dynamics GP is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.7. Microsoft Dynamics AX holds a 2.3% mindshare in ERP, compared to Microsoft Dynamics GP’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Microsoft Dynamics AX users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Microsoft Dynamics GP users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Dynamics AX

Read 59 Microsoft Dynamics AX reviews

6,551 Views
6,027 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Read 25 Microsoft Dynamics GP reviews

3,030 Views
2,909 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics AX

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Dynamics AX and Dynamics GP compete in the ERP category. Dynamics AX holds an edge for large enterprises due to its comprehensive functionality, whereas Dynamics GP is more appealing to small to mid-sized businesses with its strong financial capabilities.

Features: Microsoft Dynamics AX integrates departments and offers comprehensive functionality in finance, manufacturing, and HR, with strong master planning and supply chain capabilities. Dynamics GP features a strong financial module, seamless Microsoft Office integration, and a simple, user-friendly interface.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Dynamics AX faces scalability and integration challenges, particularly in industries like retail, and needs improved reporting flexibility. Dynamics GP requires enhancements to its manufacturing module and better support for advanced financial reporting. The end-of-life status of GP creates a need for cloud-based evolution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Dynamics AX offers on-premises, public, and private cloud deployment options with customer service largely depending on partner support. Dynamics GP primarily supports on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, with excellent customer support but relies on partners for technical consistency.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Dynamics AX has higher initial and ongoing costs, making it suitable for larger enterprises, with users reporting reasonable returns due to its extensive features. Dynamics GP offers moderate pricing but requires extra investment for cloud flexibility, remaining cost-effective for smaller setups with effective management.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Dynamics AX

Ranking in ERP

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Activity Based Costing Software (5th)

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Ranking in ERP

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics AX is 2.3%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics GP is 1.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Dynamics AX	2.3%
Microsoft Dynamics GP	1.3%
Other	96.4%

ERP

Featured Reviews

Osama Nabih

Chief Executive Officer at Easy Touch

Improved manufacturing processes have supported flexible dimensions and strong integrated workflows

I think the integration capabilities of Microsoft Dynamics AX need to be enhanced. There are many features for integration, such as APIs and connectors, but I need more ready APIs that link directly. I think it would be better to make APIs for each module in Microsoft Dynamics AX, so integration can be easier directly. For example, sales orders, sales quotations, and GL entries should each have direct APIs to facilitate linking to other systems, making the integration stronger. Real-time analytics is not strong unless I add a Power BI tool. In finance and operations, the new version of Microsoft Dynamics AX is very good, even excellent, but in previous versions, it needs to be linked to a Power BI tool to have strong real-time analytics. There is a gap for improvement in support. Microsoft support can be very hard to reach and often does not provide proper support for general issues, with responses sometimes being too detailed and not addressing the core issues quickly, which leads me to sometimes solve problems myself.

Read full review

reviewer2723988

Executive Director, Digital & Technology at a tech consulting company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integration and flexibility deliver outstanding business experiences with innovative platforms enhancements

Scale is a primary concern. If the product vision continues to serve small and mid-cap companies, they need to continue incorporating features into the out-of-the-box solution because small-caps typically lack budget for in-house IT organizations to customize and maintain systems. If they want to expand beyond mid-cap and enter the large-cap market, they need to consider balance and provide more customizability. This includes extending process flows through more APIs and building a more modular architecture with granular backend exposed via API. The process layer should allow clients to customize while invoking back-office APIs. The general perception positions Microsoft Dynamics GP in the middle of the market. Systems such as NetSuite and ServiceNow occupy the lower category, providing narrow use cases. Microsoft Dynamics GP offers more breadth and out-of-the-box capabilities at a slightly higher price point. At the top end, SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce offer extensive customizability at a premium price, suitable for large organizations with multiple transactions and customers. Microsoft Dynamics GP currently occupies a favorable position in the middle segment with limited competition.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The finance and finance reporting features are good."

"It is easy to use, and it has a great UI. It has very well-structured modules. In terms of setup and configuration, they're logically placed, which makes it easy for any user to pick up information and learn more about the system, rather than just be plain key users of that business operating system."

"The tool's most important capabilities are for retail and finance. Microsoft Dynamics AX 2012 doesn't have many integration capabilities, but Microsoft 365 has the most capabilities to integrate with any type of standalone software and has many more features."

"Microsoft Dynamics is a great product; all Dynamic products are great, and it is stable, suitable for businesses, and covers all business needs."

"Difficult to measure but definitely improved working practises and management information"

"AX is nearly a Tier One product, so implementations are long, but there's a lot of flexibility. Also, the ability to handle different issues found in larger organizations."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics AX is its full integration with Excel, allowing for cut and paste functionality between Excel and the system."

"It has the same UI and is very similar to any other Microsoft product."

More Microsoft Dynamics AX pros

"We have not encountered any noteworthy scalability issues; it’s a matter of increasing the power of the servers and hardware/software that it runs on."

"Numerous third-party add-on products are available to purchase for specific business needs."

"It helps to streamline and automate their accounting processes."

"It is quite a robust system."

"The product is very user-friendly and is easy to navigate, and you can track everything from beginning to end quite easily."

"I’ve implemented several hundred Microsoft Dynamics GP systems for many customers, and the improvements brought about in the client’s reporting and transaction functions are off the charts."

"The solution is easy to use and not complicated. Also, it is easy to get trained on. Also, there is good information available on the web. The GP community is quite broad and there are many blogs online."

"User-friendly: A key factor for a financial application Helps my company a lot"

More Microsoft Dynamics GP pros

Cons

"The biggest improvement needed with the solution is security control or rights control to internal users."

"Microsoft Dynamics AX 2012 ERP systems development and customizations can be quite expensive to implement."

"Microsoft needs more presence in our region to help with management and maintenance."

"We experienced some challenges with the mobile apps due to the insufficient processing capacity to handle the workload effectively."

"The general speed of the solution needs improvement."

"The product is standardised across industries so it is not a good fit for all types of sectors."

"The support here in Turkey could be better. However, the international support is good."

"There is no Arabic interface in Microsoft Business Central, which is a big weak point."

More Microsoft Dynamics AX cons

"With payroll, the payroll that they have offers US or Canadian tax. However, here, our tax payments are different from the US and Canada. It is very difficult to put in our tax tables. We need some customization. It should be readily available for any country to use according to their tax implications. The system should know different types of tax regimes around the world so that it can accommodate. It's a little bit rigid on that."

"There should also be extra redundancy when posting to modules."

"The purchase order and processing aspects of the solution should be improved."

"There should also be extra redundancy when posting to modules. We use different sets of books such as CashBook and CheckBooks therefore if I select the wrong one the solution allows the transaction to just pass without warning."

"It can be expensive. It depends on the size of your business and what you are trying to achieve with it."

"Not quite all the reports are fully exportable to Excel."

"It still can be improved in web-based and build reporting. "

"I would rate technical support for Microsoft Dynamics GP on a scale of 1 to 10 as six or five maximum."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft Dynamics AX is expensive."

"The platform's price offering is good."

"There is an annual licensing cost for Microsoft Dynamics AX."

"The product's pricing is expensive. The tool costs 210 USD per user for one month."

"Comparatively, Business Central appears to be more cost-effective. Microsoft offers Business Central at only $70 per user per month in the US. In contrast, GP requires an initial investment, including around $9,000 for the GP license for three users and additional expenses for hardware. Therefore, the initial investment for GP is quite substantial. On the other hand, cloud-based ERP products like Business Central do not entail the same upfront investment and operate on an ongoing, subscription-based model."

"The product's license renewal cost could be better."

"In relation to the cloud, it might be expensive for a longer duration. However, it's essential to consider the demands of enterprise users. While it's cost-effective in the short run, it becomes relatively costly in the long run."

"It's too expensive for customers to take this on themselves. As partners, we will buy this on behalf of the customers and then charge this value for each project."

More Microsoft Dynamics AX pricing and cost advice

"The solution's price is steep."

"I would say that the pricing is moderate, not cheap, and not expensive. There are many more expensive ERPs than GP, and there are less expensive as well, so it is moderately priced."

"Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft."

"In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective."

"It is an affordable solution."

"We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support."

"I think the tool is competitively priced and it's more of a one-time investment with a low annual renewal fee."

"For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics AX?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics AX?

For industrial companies, I mainly use Microsoft Dynamics AX for those processes. Most of my clients are manufacturing clients, so I work with food industries, steel industries, plastic industries,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics AX?

Microsoft Dynamics AX provides benefits like saving time because it is very easy to use and it offers strong processes to implement full business processes, mapping them with customer business for ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

D365 BC licensing SAAS model with subscription ranging $70/User/Month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics GP?

One area we’d like to see improved is cloud modernization and integration. Dynamics GP has been reliable for many businesses, but stronger native cloud capabilities, automation, AI, and easier inte...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

I have implemented Microsoft Dynamics GP in commercial and public sector organizations. In commercial pharma life sciences, Salesforce Veeva implementation supports commercial organizations doing p...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics AX

Compared 16% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Microsoft Dynamics AX

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs Microsoft Dynamics AX

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics SL vs Microsoft Dynamics AX

Compared 6% of the time

Comarch ERP Enterprise vs Microsoft Dynamics AX

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics AX Competitors

SAP S/4HANA vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 14% of the time

SAP ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 7% of the time

Sage MAS vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 6% of the time

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics GP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics AX

October 2026

Download Microsoft Dynamics AX product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP

October 2026

Download Microsoft Dynamics GP product report

Also Known As

Dynamics AX, Axapta, MS Dynamics AX

Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP

Overview

Microsoft Dynamics AX is an integrated enterprise resource planning system offering extensive modules for finance, logistics, and manufacturing. Known for its Excel integration and competitive pricing, it provides companies with flexible and customizable workflows for efficient business processes.

Microsoft Dynamics AX provides comprehensive support for manufacturing, retail, and financial management. Its centralized structure ensures effective data management and smooth workflow automation, while integration with third-party applications allows for real-time analysis and customization. Although there is a need for improved APIs, a more modern interface, and robust financial features, Dynamics AX supports a varied range of business operations with its cloud and on-premise setups. The system has some security limitations and performance challenges, and its reliance on Power BI for real-time analytics highlights areas for development, especially for on-premise users.

What are the key features of Microsoft Dynamics AX?

Integration with Excel: Facilitates data management and analysis by linking seamlessly with Excel.
Customizable Workflow: Automates business processes to boost efficiency.
Robust Modules: Includes finance, logistics, and manufacturing modules.
Third-party Integration: Enhances flexibility with external applications.
Centralized Design: Supports effective data management across processes.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Streamlined Operations: Assists in improving business processes and decision-making.
Cost Efficiency: Offers competitive pricing, balancing cost with functionality.
Flexibility: Accommodates cloud and on-premise setups for diverse needs.
Enhanced Financial Controls: Aids in managing finance-related tasks effectively.
Decision-making Improvement: Provides tools to support strategic business decisions.

Manufacturing sectors use Microsoft Dynamics AX for resource planning and supply chain management, enhancing operational efficiency. Retail companies benefit from its real-time analysis and finance capabilities. Service industries find its HR and inventory management features valuable, leveraging the system for both on-premise and cloud setups to optimize processes and integration.

Microsoft

Microsoft Dynamics GP is a comprehensive business management solution providing financial control, accounting features, and extensive reporting. It is built to support small to midsize companies offering reliable stability and simplicity in setup.

Microsoft Dynamics GP integrates with Microsoft Office and supports a range of business operations including financials, sales, and inventory management. Despite its strong functionality in financial reporting and analytics, it faces challenges with its outdated interface and limited cloud capabilities. Companies can enhance the system's functionality through Power Apps and Power Platform alongside third-party add-ons. While it is known for its financial stability and user-friendly navigation, improving integration and scalability remains a priority.

What are some key features?

Financial Control: Strong capabilities in accounting and compliance support.
Extensive Reporting: Provides customizable reporting and analytics options.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with Microsoft Office and other systems.
Core Modules: Includes financials, sales, inventory management, and analytics.
Customization: Offers customizable solutions with third-party add-ons.

What benefits do businesses expect?

Reliable Stability: Offers easy setup and dependable performance.
User Navigation: Known for user-friendly interfaces.
Supportive Community: Access a strong network for guidance and collaboration.
Data Accuracy: Enhance data management with Smart Place features.

Many companies use Microsoft Dynamics GP as their primary accounting and financial management platform, supporting accounts payable, receivable, payroll, and inventory management. The integration capabilities allow it to serve as an ERP for small to midsize entities, facilitating additional functionalities in logistics, HR, warehouse operations, and more.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

ConQuaestor, D & H Distributing, Sunny Queen, Mesa Associates, Britax Childcare, Ibema, Arafa, Sabo S.p.A.

Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

November 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.