Microsoft Entra ID vs RSA Authentication Manager comparison

Microsoft and RSA are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7, while RSA is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0. Microsoft holds a 15.9% mindshare in AS, compared to RSA’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of RSA users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 234 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

9,863 Views
7,461 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

RSA Authentication Manager

Read 12 RSA Authentication Manager reviews

855 Views
787 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

RSA Authentication Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

RSA Authentication Manager and Microsoft Entra ID are both prominent in the authentication management domain. Users generally prefer the scalability and advanced integrations of Microsoft Entra ID, though RSA Authentication Manager is praised for its robust security features.

What features are offered by RSA Authentication Manager in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

RSA Authentication Manager offers comprehensive security features, detailed reporting capabilities, and strong authentication methods. Microsoft Entra ID provides seamless integration with Microsoft tools, a cloud-based infrastructure, and scalability suited for large enterprises.

What areas of improvement can be found in RSA Authentication Manager in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

RSA Authentication Manager could benefit from better user management, more intuitive controls, and a more modern interface. Microsoft Entra ID users suggest improvements in the initial setup process, more extensive documentation, and enhanced user support during deployment.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of RSA Authentication Manager in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

RSA Authentication Manager has a straightforward deployment process but can be complex to maintain. Its customer service is positively rated. Microsoft Entra ID’s cloud-centric deployment model simplifies the setup for modern environments, although customer service experiences are variable among users.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with RSA Authentication Manager in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

RSA Authentication Manager users find its high upfront setup costs justified by strong security and long-term ROI. Microsoft Entra ID’s subscription model is cost-effective for organizations using Microsoft services and provides quick ROI through its integrations.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA Authentication Manager Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA Authentication Manager

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Authentication Systems

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

234

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (1st), Identity Management (IM) (1st), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (1st), Access Management (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (2nd)

RSA Authentication Manager

Ranking in Authentication Systems

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 15.9%, down from 21.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Authentication Manager is 1.9%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Bahram Piri

Chief Executive Officer & Founder at IDmelon Technologies

Security focus and seamless implementation increase platform productivity

Microsoft Entra ID can be improved in many ways, and there's a big wish list.If we're focusing on security, something that I definitely expect is improvement in the UI and UX for frontline workers. This is important, especially for non-tech savvy individuals. It is something Microsoft Entra ID could do to improve for a wider audience. It's important to focus on the frontline workers since they are non-tech savvy individuals. They are not like those back-office engineering C-level employees who are constantly dealing with computers, and we need to build a specific user experience and user interface for them to handle this stuff. That's something I expect Microsoft to focus on more for Microsoft Entra ID.

Read full review

Akinwale Sekiteri

Managing Partner at Teksphere Global Services Limited

A highly effective and versatile solution that excels in terms of security, integration, scalability, and customer support

I highly recommend it because when you compare RSA with other products, it has consistently stood out. In the past, one area where people encountered challenges was in terms of price flexibility, but it significantly improved. You can now negotiate, discuss terms, and work with it to achieve a pricing arrangement that suits your needs, and if they recognize you as a loyal customer, they are more than willing to accommodate your requirements and reach mutually agreeable terms. Overall, I would rate it around nine out of ten when considering factors like durability, data performance, scalability, integration, and security, and excels in these areas.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's multi-tenant, residing in multiple locations. The authentication happens quickly. Irrespective of whether I'm in Australia, the US, India, or Africa, I don't see any latency. Those are the good features that I rely on."

"Conditional access and Privileged Identity Management (PIM) are the most valuable features from a security perspective."

"The ability to see and control PCs and mobile devices is the most valuable. I can see where they are and how many we have. I can also see the age and retention of PCs."

"The most valuable feature is the ease of scalability."

"The features around permissions are excellent."

"Multi-factor authentication (MFA) has improved our customers' security posture. Multi-factor authentication has two layers of authentication, which helps in case you input your credentials into a phishing website and then it has access to your credentials. So if they use your credentials, then you have proof on your phone that was sent to the end user."

"The centralized management feature is very valuable."

"Privileged Identity Management (PIM), managed identities, dynamic groups, and extension and security attributes are all great features."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

"The single sign-on feature is the most important."

"It stands out as a comprehensive and adaptable solution that excels in both on-premises and cloud-based authentication, offers strong security with multi-layered authentication, and boasts a well-maintained product with reliable performance."

"Easy setup, deployment, and integration in different infrastructures, including virtual ones."

"RSA Authentication Manager is the best available solution."

"The most valuable feature is the provision part. The mapping and the logging is also very good. In addition, the troubleshooting, from a console point of view, is easy for administration and on the provisioning and logging part."

"RSA Authentication Manager is a robust solution that provides comprehensive protection for both on-premise and cloud-based applications."

"It is a good solution for token identification."

"It is a stable solution. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten."

More RSA Authentication Manager pros

Cons

"Microsoft Entra ID's impact on access and identity management is relatively limited."

"The documentation could be better."

"There is a feature that we have been waiting for regarding Bicep templates. The option to use Bicep templates to deploy Microsoft Entra ID objects from the Azure Portal is needed."

"I would like to dive into some of the things that we saw today around the workflows at this Microsoft event. I cannot say that they need to make it better because I do not have much experience with it, but something that is always applicable to Microsoft is that they need to be able to integrate with their competitors. If you look at IDP, they do not integrate with Okta."

"The workflow management for registering new applications and users could be improved."

"It would be an improvement if Authenticator made it easier to recover the app if you reboot your cellphone and lose access."

"There is no documentation about how Microsoft will scale Azure AD for customers. It only mentions that it will scale out if you have a lot of requests but does not mention how in detail."

"One challenge with Entra ID is its complexity, stemming from integrating many components into a single solution."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

"We have encountered issue when trying to expand this particular solution for a large set of users across the country."

"The product's capabilities to protect cloud environments need improvement."

"RSA Authentication Manager is perfect. We do not see current missing products or enhancements yet emphasize the importance of a continuous development roadmap."

"We are not planning on using the solution in the future."

"Enhancing the user interface and expanding their marketing efforts in regions like Nigeria and West Africa could be beneficial."

"Perhaps parts of the the user interface should become more intuitive."

"Our major problem is the authentication via Microsoft, via Microsoft cloud systems. This is our major aim, to be a valued product for the future. The biggest problem is to work against cheap cloud systems. Cloud identification is our main problem at this time."

"There is room for improvement in the RSA support."

More RSA Authentication Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution has three types of tiers: E1 has very basic features. You get limited stuff in E2 and cannot have Office 360 associated with it. E3 is on the costly side and has all the features."

"It can be a bit expensive for organizations, but they do have different pricing models. Their free tier can be used on a personal level, but for an organization, the licenses might be a bit expensive. In general, the licenses can become cheaper, which will make it accessible for more people."

"The licensing model is straightforward. I don't think there are any issues with the E3 license or E5 license."

"If you have a different IDP today, I would take a close look at what your licensing looks like, then reevaluate the licensing that you have with Microsoft 365, and see if you're covered for some of this other stuff. Folks sometimes don't realize that, "Oh, I'm licensed for that service in Azure." This becomes one of those situations where you have the "aha" moment, "Oh, I didn't know we can do that. Alright, let's go down this road." Then, they start to have conversations with Microsoft to see what they can gain. I would recommend that they work closely with their TAM, just to make sure that they are getting the right level of service. They may just not be aware of what is available to them."

"Microsoft Authenticator is included in the package when we purchase a license from Microsoft."

"It is in line. Because we are so early, we have not had to come back on a cycle where we are having to negotiate again."

"Be sure: You know your userbase, e.g., how many users you have. You choose the right license and model that suit your business requirements."

"It is not too expensive."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

"The solution is costly."

"As a new customer, the minimum cost would be four dollars, but you have room for negotiation, potentially bringing it down to as low as three dollars."

"The pricing is a little bit complicated because sometimes resellers are able to make prices that are too low. Our price, with a discount, is typically not as high as some of our competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

28%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Government

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Regarding pricing, for the services we receive, it seems within the market range and about average.

See all answers

What do you like most about RSA Authentication Manager?

It stands out as a comprehensive and adaptable solution that excels in both on-premises and cloud-based authentication, offers strong security with multi-layered authentication, and boasts a well-m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with RSA Authentication Manager?

RSA Authentication Manager is perfect. We do not see current missing products or enhancements yet emphasize the importance of a continuous development roadmap.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for RSA Authentication Manager?

We use RSA Authentication Manager for web applications and internal applications. We have a number of applications connected to it, serving over thirty thousand clients. It is integrated into every...

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon Cognito vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Cisco Duo vs RSA Authentication Manager

Compared 26% of the time

Thales Authenticators vs RSA Authentication Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Yubico YubiKey vs RSA Authentication Manager

Compared 7% of the time

RSA SecurID vs RSA Authentication Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Authentication Manager

Compared 7% of the time

More RSA Authentication Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

May 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

May 2025

Download RSA Authentication Manager product report

Also Known As

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

ACE/Server

Interactive Demo

Microsoft

Demo not available

RSA

Overview

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Microsoft

RSA Authentication Manager is the platform behind RSA SecurID that allows for centralized management of the RSA SecurID environment including authentication methods, users, applications, and agents across multiple physical sites. It verifies authentication requests and centrally administers authentication policies for organizations' end users.

RSA

Sample Customers

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Tiera, Fred Loya, BRE Leasing, ADP, BlueFort Security, New Hanover County

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA Authentication Manager

April 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA Authentication Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA Authentication Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA Authentication Manager report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.