Microsoft Entra ID vs RSA SecurID comparison

Microsoft and RSA are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7, while RSA is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.5. Microsoft holds a 15.9% mindshare in AS, compared to RSA’s 6.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of RSA users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 234 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

9,863 Views
7,461 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

RSA SecurID

Read 9 RSA SecurID reviews

3,262 Views
2,808 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

RSA SecurID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

RSA SecurID and Microsoft Entra ID compete in the security solutions category. Based on user reviews, RSA SecurID excels in support and ease of deployment, while Microsoft Entra ID often edges out in overall features and ROI.

What features are offered by RSA SecurID in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Users highlight the valuable two-factor authentication, robust security integrations, and advanced threat detection of RSA SecurID. Microsoft Entra ID is praised for its comprehensive identity management, seamless integration with Microsoft services, and multi-factor authentication. Entra ID's features generally appeal more to users due to their broader scope and versatility.

What areas of improvement can be found in RSA SecurID in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

User reviews suggest RSA SecurID could improve its mobile support, ease of use for non-technical users, and user interface. Microsoft Entra ID users seek better multi-cloud support, more efficient troubleshooting resources, and enhanced third-party integrations. Microsoft Entra ID's issues are more aligned with evolving tech trends.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of RSA SecurID in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

RSA SecurID is noted for smoother deployment, particularly in large enterprises, and has robust customer service. Microsoft Entra ID faces fewer deployment hurdles within Microsoft ecosystems but can be challenging in multi-vendor environments. Its customer service receives mixed reviews. RSA SecurID is favored for deployment ease and support responsiveness.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with RSA SecurID in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

RSA SecurID has a higher setup cost but provides a high ROI through enhanced security. Microsoft Entra ID offers competitive pricing, especially for existing Microsoft customers, and demonstrates a substantial ROI by leveraging Microsoft’s ecosystem. Users feel that despite the higher initial cost, RSA SecurID’s long-term security benefits justify the investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Authentication Systems

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

234

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (1st), Identity Management (IM) (1st), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (1st), Access Management (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (2nd)

RSA SecurID

Ranking in Authentication Systems

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 15.9%, down from 21.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA SecurID is 6.8%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Bahram Piri

Chief Executive Officer & Founder at IDmelon Technologies

Security focus and seamless implementation increase platform productivity

Microsoft Entra ID can be improved in many ways, and there's a big wish list.If we're focusing on security, something that I definitely expect is improvement in the UI and UX for frontline workers. This is important, especially for non-tech savvy individuals. It is something Microsoft Entra ID could do to improve for a wider audience. It's important to focus on the frontline workers since they are non-tech savvy individuals. They are not like those back-office engineering C-level employees who are constantly dealing with computers, and we need to build a specific user experience and user interface for them to handle this stuff. That's something I expect Microsoft to focus on more for Microsoft Entra ID.

Read full review

Chandan Tripathi

Identity and Access Management Principal at Mobily

Useful for making logins more secure by using multifactor authentication but extremely expensive

There is room for improvement in a few areas. Firstly, it lacks support for OIDC and OS capabilities, making it less versatile for integrating various applications. Secondly, there are some limitations in the number of supported applications. Lastly, it doesn't offer an agent-based or reverse-proxy-based approach to integration, which could enhance its flexibility.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Entra ID can be deployed using a hybrid model for organizations with a significant on-premises presence, or in a fully cloud-based setup for those that do not."

"Many of its features are valuable, including: facilitating application authentication, privileged access management, processes for attestation, and access reviews."

"Microsoft Entra ID has helped us defend against token theft and nation-state attacks."

"Microsoft Entra ID, integrated with Microsoft Teams, has enhanced the security of access to applications and resources within our environment."

"The most valuable feature of Azure AD is its ability to connect with services outside of Microsoft, although documentation is necessary to properly implement these connections."

"The best feature of Microsoft Entra ID is that it provides more granular control over user identities."

"The most valuable components of the solution are provisioning and deprovisioning since both features work...Microsoft Entra Verified ID is a very stable solution."

"The solution's ease of use is one of its most valuable features."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

"The most valuable features of RSA SecurID Access are push notifications, multifactor authentication, and ease of integration and deployment."

"I think it is really good when it comes to the hard token side of things."

"It is a scalable solution."

"One of the most valuable feature is the ID soft token and hard token."

"I would say that the two-factor authentication and the ease of installation and configuration are the most valuable features of this solution."

Cons

"From an admin perspective, I would like to see improvement in the Microsoft Graph API."

"Their support needs improvement. The UI can also be better. The menu options are very confusing at times."

"I want to see more features to improve security, such as integrated user behavior analysis."

"Microsoft's biggest challenge is the documentation."

"There should be a clearer separation between objects held in Entra and Azure, so we don't need to approach the Entra ID team to create rules, policies, and app registrations."

"The main issue is that because Active Directory is in the cloud, it will inevitably be dependent on internet connectivity."

"Microsoft Authenticator is as easy as Google Authenticator, but it is not open to all types of applications. Google Authenticator is integrated with other third-party platforms and applications, whereas Microsoft Authenticator is not. It should have more integration with third-party platforms and applications."

"I would like to see some additional attributes for user objects in Microsoft Entra, especially for tasks such as users and account validation, including guest users and guest accounts."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

"There are different compliances across the globe; RSA SecurID Access could be more complaint-based."

"The interface needs to improve a lot. It should be easier to manage and navigate."

"Sometimes, we encounter issues with other applications that are not compatible with RSA SecurID Access and require expert troubleshooting. At those times, we need additional support from an implementation perspective. This is an area where Oracle can improve as there is no substitute for reliable and efficient support."

"It doesn't offer an agent-based or reverse-proxy-based approach to integration, which could enhance its flexibility."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is per user. It is also based on the type of user that you're synchronizing up there."

"The licensing costs are yearly. There is a standard fee per user."

"We pay a yearly license. Licenses are very expensive."

"Azure has an educational package available for students with a variety of licenses and different software available."

"The cost of Entra ID depends entirely on our organization's specific needs and use cases."

"It is in line. Because we are so early, we have not had to come back on a cycle where we are having to negotiate again."

"From a pricing standpoint, with all the services that we get, we are okay. I do not see a problem with the pricing structure. We are getting our money's worth."

"We are a non-profit organization, so we get good prices from Microsoft for their products. It is working well, but it could be cheaper. For the type of organization we are, it would be good if they could give a little bit more and be more generous like Google, which has completely free services. Microsoft has free versions or web services called Office 365 E1, which is free for use, but we want to have it with more qualified clients."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

"I think the price of this solution is reasonable compared to YubiKey and Duo given that it offers the same similar features."

"RSA SecurID Access is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

28%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Government

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Regarding pricing, for the services we receive, it seems within the market range and about average.

See all answers

What do you like most about RSA SecurID Access?

The most valuable features of RSA SecurID Access are push notifications, multifactor authentication, and ease of integration and deployment.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RSA SecurID Access?

RSA SecurID Access is quite expensive. I would rate it a ten out of ten in terms of costliness.

See all answers

What needs improvement with RSA SecurID Access?

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon Cognito vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Yubico YubiKey vs RSA SecurID

Compared 57% of the time

Cisco Duo vs RSA SecurID

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA SecurID

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiToken vs RSA SecurID

Compared 4% of the time

Thales Authenticators vs RSA SecurID

Compared 3% of the time

More RSA SecurID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

May 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

May 2025

Download RSA SecurID product report

Also Known As

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

RSA SecurID Access, RSA Access Manager

Interactive Demo

Microsoft

Demo not available

RSA

Overview

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Microsoft

The RSA SecurID Suite combines the separate disciplines of access management and authentication with identity governance and user lifecycle management into one comprehensive suite. It goes way beyond the capabilities of traditional identity and access management systems by using risk analytics to provide identity and access assurance. This helps organizations solve two fundamental challenges:

Verifying that their users are who they say they are.
Providing their users with the right level of access.

RSA

Sample Customers

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Milliman, Geisinger Health System, Advanced Micro Devices

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID

April 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.