Microsoft Project Server vs Planview Daptiv comparison

Microsoft and Planview are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3, while Planview is ranked #14. Microsoft holds a 5.0% mindshare in PPM, compared to Planview’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Planview users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Project Server

Read 62 Microsoft Project Server reviews

3,600 Views
1,836 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

Read 12 Planview Daptiv reviews

2,123 Views
934 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Microsoft Project Server

Planview Daptiv

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Microsoft Project Server and Planview Daptiv are key players in the project management category. Microsoft Project Server has the upper hand due to its strong integration capabilities and ease of use, appealing to Microsoft product users.

Features: Microsoft Project Server offers graphical scheduling, efficient permissions handling, and seamless integration with Microsoft tools like Excel and Power BI, facilitating project baselines management and complex portfolio handling. Planview Daptiv provides robust task scheduling, reporting capabilities, and project management features, which are versatile but lack in-depth specialization, resulting in less distinctiveness in any particular area.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Project Server struggles with collaborative functions and tool integrations, limiting its cloud and hybrid solutions, and faces feedback regarding slow performance, complicated reporting, and project scheduling complexity. Planview Daptiv could enhance specific features such as capacity planning and reporting. Its lack of specialization suggests that targeting a niche could improve its market position.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Project Server offers both on-premises and cloud deployments, but complexity in deployment and support reliability are challenges, necessitating technical expertise and sometimes inadequate online support. Planview Daptiv provides flexible deployment in private and public clouds, with mixed satisfaction in technical support levels, preferring user-friendly support models contrary to Microsoft's community resource leverage.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Project Server commands a higher initial investment due to complex licensing but delivers substantial ROI through its extensive features. It faces competition from cheaper alternatives but justifies costs through enhanced functionality. Planview Daptiv's flexible pricing with role-based costs and volume discounts offsets high initial costs with lower ongoing expenses, offering distinct ROI improvement over time and benefiting those with budget concerns.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Project Server vs. Planview Daptiv Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project Server vs. Planview Daptiv

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Project Server

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planview Daptiv

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Project Server is 5.0%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview Daptiv is 3.2%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Project Server	5.0%
Planview Daptiv	3.2%
Other	91.8%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

JorgeValenzuela

Owner at CPSTECH

Collaborative task management simplifies office work, but agile methodology features need enhancement

In order to improve Microsoft Project Server, collaborative features could be enhanced, as it is possible to improve it in a collaborative way similar to other office products, for example, using cloud drives like OneDrive. Another feature is Kanban or other features such as Scrum with agile methodologies. Microsoft Project Server is limited and falls short in using agile methodologies, which is the most important issue to improve. Microsoft Project Server is a good product; it is possible to improve regarding enabling agile features because the teams in my work are using Trello and Jira products due to the blackboards, Kanban, and Scrum. To do activities and stopping activities is more comfortable and easier to use, making it more practical in my teamwork. These features do not exist in Microsoft Project Server.

Read full review

reviewer2068344

Director of Operations at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Useful project management capabilities, beneficial dashboards, but project planning could improve

The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance. In a future release, it would be beneficial to have a undo button.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best features of Microsoft Project Server are the online collaborative working capabilities, which enable collaborative online work."

"Technical support is very responsive - particularly on critical tickets."

"The technical support for Microsoft Project Server and the support is very good. Microsoft support is working very well."

"The solution has improved the organization primarily due to the transparency between each individual team, and I have likely seen a 20% to 28% increase in productivity benefit over a year's time."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the tool's reporting is very good."

"The centralization of all projects baselines in Project Server gave us control over the process."

"The stability of the 2019 version is quite good."

"The key things are managing interactions, resource allocation, resource-leveling (enterprise) and as a collaborative tool, because we use it across multiple projects at a time."

More Microsoft Project Server pros

"It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project management features of the application to be particularly valuable, such as project boards, reporting, and the ability to customize views. Additionally, task management and project scheduling were also highly utilized. However, capacity planning was not used as much as the others, as there was a lack of support from executives to invest in training and implementing it due to a lack of processes in place. The project planning features, dashboard, and reporting capabilities were considered the most valuable."

"I implemented for a large client of mine and saw them quickly get up and running and leverage Daptiv to help them manage their IT demand from their internal customers."

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

"I like the reporting engine, IBM Cognos, especially the analytics. That's a good tool. It's quite strong on the ideation and capacity-planning side, which is a huge plus."

"Consequently, it is the single point of truth for both our project managers and our senior leadership."

"Reporting of IT capacity available for first time, time sheets available for first time."

"The experience with Changepoint has been great considering that most organizations won't use 90% of the application's features."

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

More Planview Daptiv pros

Cons

"The solution needs to be much more stable."

"In terms of the performance, I think it's something that took a big toll on the service when a lot of people logged in finally, so that's something that can be improved in the future."

"Permission management needs improvement."

"When we started using this solution from scratch, we got lost. Microsoft should provide some templates for configurations for certain use cases."

"I only encountered stability issues with the 2010 version."

"It needs to be more collaborative from inside the application. It only does project scheduling for me. It would be good if it could do other things and be more collaborative, such as sharing tasks for users. It is not really incorporated into MS Office, so you can't copy-paste stuff. It is on its own, doing its own thing. It is only used for scheduling, and it doesn't work well with anything else."

"The solution could improve the ease of access could improve. It can be time-consuming."

"We think that calculations are not working correctly, and there is a need to enter data a couple of times in order to give the correct calculations."

More Microsoft Project Server cons

"The user interface is quirky and does not always conform to the expected Microsoft UI standards."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current."

"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions i.e. to Infor ERP, Confluence, ..."

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"The previous solution that we were using was Projector PSA; it was overall a superior product."

"Accessing some functions is a bit obscure and requires some knowledge of how the product works, but the upgrade from v2012 to 2014 improved that situation and I expect the upcoming upgrade to 2017 to further streamline operations."

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"Expense management, simulation scenarios, and budget control could be great and useful features to include."

More Planview Daptiv cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing was procured before my involvement."

"It's not subscription-based, we purchased the on-premises version."

"I cannot comment on the price as I was not responsible for purchasing the solution."

"A standard license is cheaper, but if you want more features, then there is a premium license or professional license."

"There is a subscription model for different types of users for different types of roles."

"I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it."

"I think they need more flexibility with licensing, because there are preconceived ideas that don't allow as much flexibility with the various licenses."

"Microsoft Project Server is an expensive solution. Small businesses will not be able to afford it."

More Microsoft Project Server pricing and cost advice

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Construction Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	33

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Project Server?

The pricing for Microsoft Project Server is standard, around $200-$250, but I think it's actually $80 to $100 per year. The pricing for Microsoft Project Server is relative; I would say it is cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Project Server?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Project Server?

Today, the use cases for Microsoft Project Server are for office tasks, such as writing in Word processors, worksheets in Excel, Word processors with Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, and Microsoft ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 8% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Portfolio and Project Management vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 6% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 5% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Project Server Competitors

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 9% of the time

Jira vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 8% of the time

Wrike vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 7% of the time

ITM Platform vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 6% of the time

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 5% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project Server

June 2026

Download Microsoft Project Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv

June 2026

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Also Known As

MS Project Server

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Project Server streamlines project management with features like resource allocation, project scheduling, and SharePoint integration. It's valued for its intuitive interface and ability to provide comprehensive insights through advanced reporting and dashboards.

Designed to enhance collaboration and efficiency, Microsoft Project Server supports complex task management by integrating seamlessly with SharePoint. It offers tools like Gantt charts and timeline management for effective tracking. Users benefit from Excel and Power BI compatibility, enhancing analytical capabilities. Despite its powerful functionalities, users identify areas for improvement in tool integration, resource management, and collaboration features. There are calls for a modernized interface and more flexible pricing. While the cloud version boasts continuous updates, the on-premises model lags behind.

What are the main features of Microsoft Project Server?

Resource Allocation: Optimizes workload across projects.
Project Scheduling: Helps plan timelines effectively.
SharePoint Integration: Facilitates collaboration.
Gantt Charts: Visual timeline for task tracking.
Power BI Integration: Advanced data analytics capabilities.

What benefits should you look for in Microsoft Project Server reviews?

Intuitive Interface: Easy to navigate and learn.
Scalability: Adjusts to growing project demands.
Customization: Tailors to specific project needs.
Detailed Insights: Comprehensive project overviews.

Microsoft Project Server finds its application across industries by providing tools for planning IT infrastructure and managing enterprise-level projects. It helps organizations document projects and manage portfolios, enabling clear visibility into performance through milestones and KPIs.

Microsoft

Planview Daptiv offers robust project management capabilities with a focus on resource allocation, capacity planning, and collaboration.

Planview Daptiv is known for its excellent reporting, flexibility, and no-code functionalities. It includes beneficial portfolio views and comprehensive dashboards while integrating with IBM Cognos for enhanced analytics. The platform's timekeeping feature efficiently records billable hours, and its project boards and task management add significant value. However, improvements are needed in areas like expense management and resource allocation. Some users encounter complex and outdated features. Enhanced security measures, better integrations with tools like ITFM, and improved analytics would boost its utility.

What are the standout features of Planview Daptiv?

Resource Allocation: Efficiently manage and allocate resources across projects.
Capacity Planning: Support project planning and execution with effective capacity planning tools.
Collaboration: Enhance team collaboration through powerful integrated tools.
Reporting: Utilize excellent reporting capabilities for comprehensive insights.
No-code Functionality: Easily create features without special coding skills.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Improved Project Oversight: Centralize project management across multiple scenarios.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined timekeeping and task management processes.
Enhanced Analytics: Benefit from advanced analytics with IBM Cognos integration.
Optimized Resource Use: Make informed decisions with resource allocation and capacity planning.

Organizations use Planview Daptiv in IT and construction projects, multi-project oversight, and comprehensive tracking. Consultancy firms employ it for PSA activities, aiding in the implementation process. It supports new project management offices post-merger for technical tasks, similar to Jira.

Planview

Sample Customers

Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project Server vs. Planview Daptiv

June 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Project Server vs. Planview Daptiv

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Project Server vs. Planview Daptiv and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Project Server vs. Planview Daptiv report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.