Adobe Workfront vs Planview Daptiv comparison

Adobe and Planview are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Additionally, 90% of Adobe users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Planview users who would recommend it.

Adobe Workfront

Read 42 Adobe Workfront reviews

5,804 Views
3,715 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

Read 12 Planview Daptiv reviews

2,508 Views
1,129 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Adobe Workfront

Planview Daptiv

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adobe Workfront and Planview Daptiv based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Project Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Adobe Workfront vs. Planview Daptiv Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront vs. Planview Daptiv

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Workfront

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (6th), Digital Asset Management (1st)

Planview Daptiv

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (14th)

Featured Reviews

Chris French

Manager, Enterprise Workfront Team at Capital One

Enhanced project management and automation simplify reporting and approval processes

I think that Adobe Workfront could be improved in several areas, including reporting, which I've already mentioned. There are very specific things within the custom forms that I think could be improved, such as having different labels within forms instead of system-wide. The ability to hide options in a drop-down at the custom form level instead of system-wide would be another improvement. There are times we have to create brand new fields because we need slightly different wording within the label. If we had the capability, we could easily trim down from over 1,000 custom fields to about 400 custom fields if we had the ability to have individual labels by form. So reporting is a big one, and I think there are some not huge changes needed, but improvements to custom forms and custom fields would be beneficial. My experience with reporting in Adobe Workfront so far is that the reporting could be better. The ability to report is great, but I think it is too difficult. Regarding dashboards, they are crucial to be able to pull information from different levels, but that's also a negative because it is very difficult to do that on a report. If I have issue-level data and project-level data that I need to see, with some custom coding, you can do some of it in a report, but in general, if you have a lot of that blended data between levels, you need to use a dashboard, which requires two different reports due to the difficulty in pulling data at the different levels into one thing.

Read full review

reviewer2068344

Director of Operations at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Useful project management capabilities, beneficial dashboards, but project planning could improve

The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance. In a future release, it would be beneficial to have a undo button.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I love the custom forms - the custom forms have fulfilled every need for data needs within Workfront, and the flexibility to integrate custom form fields into any report, view, filter or grouping has been wonderful"

"Adobe Workfront is a very broad platform, and when examining its primary function, it excels at project management and collaborative work management, with flexibility that allows it to be used for many things beyond overall project management in terms of general metadata compiling."

"Feature-wise, I would say that its overall ability to be infinitely customizable is valuable...My experience with the support team has been amazing."

"Adobe Workfront offers a streamlined process that is more user-friendly compared to other tools in the market, providing comprehensive features with built-in integration for creative tools, addressing the pain point of creative collaboration in the content supply chain."

"The best features in Adobe Workfront from my perspective are the project management and automation from the back end, the tool called Workfront Fusion where we can automate processes."

"Our customers are very happy, as we can finish their tasks and projects within the stipulated timeframe."

"Mostly, it has to do with reporting project status updates to the management team."

"AtTask is a great project management and workflow management tool."

More Adobe Workfront pros

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

"Changepoint allowed us to model resource request/assignment workflow in our large PS organization."

"The powerful collaboration is definitely the most valuable and the fact that you can adjust flexibility to almost any methodology, and the easy creation of complete new functionalities without programming code."

"I like the reporting engine, IBM Cognos, especially the analytics. That's a good tool. It's quite strong on the ideation and capacity-planning side, which is a huge plus."

"The experience with Changepoint has been great considering that most organizations won't use 90% of the application's features."

"I implemented for a large client of mine and saw them quickly get up and running and leverage Daptiv to help them manage their IT demand from their internal customers."

"It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project management features of the application to be particularly valuable, such as project boards, reporting, and the ability to customize views. Additionally, task management and project scheduling were also highly utilized. However, capacity planning was not used as much as the others, as there was a lack of support from executives to invest in training and implementing it due to a lack of processes in place. The project planning features, dashboard, and reporting capabilities were considered the most valuable."

"The most valuable features are resource allocation and capacity planning."

More Planview Daptiv pros

Cons

"The interface can also be customized to fit and accept many tools for better performance and customer service improvement."

"We were having some difficulties creating different kinds of reports and dashboards."

"The biggest room for improvement comes from faster iteration times."

"Lots of bugs with AtTask. I had to call Help line A LOT for help."

"The downtime, while not too long or frequent, is an area for improvement."

"I have used the product and instantiated it, almost seven years back. The process was fairly complex, however, I don't know if they have changed the same now. But this is something I think, if not addressed can be improved. Another area that needs a little attention, is the change of implementation lead. Back when we had Workfront instantiated, we often had our timeline delayed due to the change in the implementation lead. Now Workfront is under Adobe and, in case, this issue, isn't fixed it should be given due attention. Also, Workfront is a universal tool, which can pose a difficulty for small businesses and companies, who don't have the required time, effort, and knowledge to configure it periodically."

"Workfront works well if you are just trying to use out of the box functionality but once you try and get specific to your own business needs, it lacks in flexibility."

"The solution's visualization feature could be user-friendly."

More Adobe Workfront cons

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions i.e. to Infor ERP, Confluence, ..."

"The previous solution that we were using was Projector PSA; it was overall a superior product."

"Accessing some functions is a bit obscure and requires some knowledge of how the product works, but the upgrade from v2012 to 2014 improved that situation and I expect the upcoming upgrade to 2017 to further streamline operations."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current."

"I would say there is too much work that has to go into the configuration up front and for the first 6 months to 1 year after, which costs time, money, and resources, and it is not a very advanced tool and seems interface-wise to be behind the times."

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"The user interface is quirky and does not always conform to the expected Microsoft UI standards."

More Planview Daptiv cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Adobe purchased Workfront in the past year, and they're putting work into developing the platform, so I expect the price to rise. It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable for the value it provides. It isn't Monday.com where you pick a license with a set price, and you've got a project manager."

"We are partners with Adobe, so we get the licensing at a cheaper rate."

"The pricing of Workfront is completely license based."

"Adobe Workfront is an expensive solution."

"Speaking about pricing, I wouldn't recommend it to a smaller company because I do think the price point is higher than other solutions that can work."

"The pricing is a barrier to implementation. It is expensive compared to other competitors. Speaking about licensing, they have a private manager license for $1000, which you can use for administration as well. Then they offer a worker license for $500, and then a reviewer or contributor license which is free."

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Healthcare Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

16%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	30

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workfront?

The per-user cost in the ultimate plan of Adobe Workfront is approximately $1,232 when purchasing 800 to 1,000 licenses. The ultimate plan includes Fusion, which is an excellent automation tool. In...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workfront?

The platform could benefit from additional customization features. The external lookup field, which allows custom API calls to fill data, is limited to two thousand results, which is insufficient f...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Workfront?

We specifically implement Adobe Workfront for other clients as Deloitte is a partner of Adobe. We work with different clients to implement Workfront and streamline marketing resource management wit...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jira vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 6% of the time

Wrike vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 5% of the time

Autodesk Flow Production Tracking vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 5% of the time

Asana vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 4% of the time

More Adobe Workfront Competitors

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 10% of the time

Jira vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 7% of the time

Wrike vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 7% of the time

ITM Platform vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 3% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront

August 2026

Download Adobe Workfront product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv

July 2026

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Also Known As

AtTask, Workfront DAM

No data available

Overview

Adobe Workfront provides customizable tools for project management, including dashboards and reports, promoting efficient workflows and team collaboration.

Adobe Workfront supports organizations with features like real-time data access, creative tool integration, and automated processes. It facilitates resource allocation and project tracking with role-based access control, making it a versatile platform for diverse methodologies. While its interface is user-friendly, some areas like reporting and custom fields could use simplification and faster system scalability.

What are Adobe Workfront's key features?

Customizable dashboards and reports: Facilitate data-driven decision-making with personalized insights.
Workflows and automation capabilities: Streamline processes and enhance productivity with Fusion.
Integration with creative tools: Seamlessly connect with CRM and DAM for synchronized operations.
Secure role-based access: Protect sensitive data while ensuring appropriate access levels.

What benefits or ROI should users expect from Adobe Workfront?

Improved project efficiency: Optimize resource planning and task management.
Enhanced collaboration: Ensure smooth communication within distributed teams.
Centralized project tracking: Maintain clear visibility on campaign progress and performance.
Streamlined approval processes: Reduce bottlenecks with automated workflows.

In marketing, Adobe Workfront is implemented for managing project timelines and resources, integrating with CRM and DAM tools. Companies streamline workflows to improve campaign planning and performance. By utilizing agile methodologies, they maintain a centralized hub for tracking and collaboration, enabling more efficient project completion.

Adobe

Planview Daptiv offers robust project management capabilities with a focus on resource allocation, capacity planning, and collaboration.

Planview Daptiv is known for its excellent reporting, flexibility, and no-code functionalities. It includes beneficial portfolio views and comprehensive dashboards while integrating with IBM Cognos for enhanced analytics. The platform's timekeeping feature efficiently records billable hours, and its project boards and task management add significant value. However, improvements are needed in areas like expense management and resource allocation. Some users encounter complex and outdated features. Enhanced security measures, better integrations with tools like ITFM, and improved analytics would boost its utility.

What are the standout features of Planview Daptiv?

Resource Allocation: Efficiently manage and allocate resources across projects.
Capacity Planning: Support project planning and execution with effective capacity planning tools.
Collaboration: Enhance team collaboration through powerful integrated tools.
Reporting: Utilize excellent reporting capabilities for comprehensive insights.
No-code Functionality: Easily create features without special coding skills.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Improved Project Oversight: Centralize project management across multiple scenarios.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined timekeeping and task management processes.
Enhanced Analytics: Benefit from advanced analytics with IBM Cognos integration.
Optimized Resource Use: Make informed decisions with resource allocation and capacity planning.

Organizations use Planview Daptiv in IT and construction projects, multi-project oversight, and comprehensive tracking. Consultancy firms employ it for PSA activities, aiding in the implementation process. It supports new project management offices post-merger for technical tasks, similar to Jira.

Planview

Sample Customers

Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront vs. Planview Daptiv

August 2026

Free Report: Adobe Workfront vs. Planview Daptiv

Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Workfront vs. Planview Daptiv and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Adobe Workfront vs. Planview Daptiv report.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.