Mojo Networks vs Omada Access Points comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Arista and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Arista is ranked #24, while TP-Link is ranked #13 with an average rating of 10.0. Arista holds a 1.5% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Arista users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

2,341 Views
2,294 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

4,113 Views
4,072 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Mojo Networks and Omada Access Points are competing products in the wireless network solutions market. Mojo Networks seems to have the upper hand in scalability and cloud management, while Omada excels in integration capabilities for seamless connectivity.

Features: Mojo Networks provides advanced cloud-based management and analytics for enhanced network monitoring. Its Cognitive WiFi platform and WIPS offer strong security and flexibility. Omada Access Points deliver robust networking protocols, easy deployment, and compatibility with wired technologies, making them suitable for diverse applications.

Room for Improvement: Mojo Networks could simplify its deployment process and expand integration options. Improvement in user interface intuitiveness would benefit non-technical users. Omada Access Points could enhance their mesh network capabilities, improve security for open SSIDs, and provide more advanced cloud management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Omada Access Points offer quick deployment with straightforward setup, supported by comprehensive documentation. Mojo Networks has a more complex deployment process, requiring more extensive setup time, but it offers powerful customization options that cater to specific technical needs.

Pricing and ROI: Mojo Networks has a higher initial setup cost, offering substantial ROI through enhanced capabilities and scalability. It is an excellent choice for businesses that prioritize advanced features and long-term growth. Omada Access Points have a lower entry price and provide value through efficient management and cost-effective scaling, appealing to businesses seeking economical initial deployment and strong integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Mojo Networks vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks vs. Omada Access Points

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Mojo Networks is 1.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 3.0%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Omada Access Points	3.0%
Mojo Networks	1.5%
Other	95.5%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

reviewer1253430

Development & Innovation Expert at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

They have good specs, and the price is lower than competing solutions

Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development. They could also enhance the reporting capabilities. At the same time, Omada's reporting has improved considerably in the latest version. That was an issue for us, but now it seems okay. More carrier-grade integrations should be available on Omada access points in the future. They could also add a hot spot and maybe a mobile upload solution. I still have issues from time to time when switching access points. I'm still connected to the SSID, but my signal drops when I switch from 5 Ghz to 2.4 Ghz. I'm not switched to the other access point that is closer to me. I should have been switched automatically to the other access point. Occasionally, the handoff doesn't work. I have tried this with WiFi 6, and it worked fine, so I think they may have resolved this issue in the latest versions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Arista Mojo Wifi has improve stability, visibility anf performance across our enterprise."

"In summary, there is very little that can be improved with this product."

"The fact that they are autonomous and can function even without access to the management panel is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"The cloud-based architecture of the controller is valuable because it obviously saves on my hardware costs."

"The stability of the solution has been good. We haven't had any issues."

"For support, we do not have to deal with a whole phone menu tree. You get to talk to an engineer right away."

"At certain points, there are hardware updates and they send notifications before they do the updates."

"The initial setup was easy."

More Mojo Networks pros

"The most valuable feature is the cloud-based management option, as it is very convenient to manage and this product is easy to use."

"The performance and availability of Omada Access Points have met our business needs, particularly in improving network control and facilitating direct access for developers to branch services."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to deploy and reliable."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"This product is easy to use."

"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."

"We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi."

"It has all the common solutions that all other solutions provide, but it is very effective, and its cost is 60% less than Ruckus."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"The user interface could use improvement, and Mojo is working on it. The features and functions are in two different places, and they are in the process of moving them into one place."

"The distribution can be improved, particularly in this part of the world."

"The RF signalling and data analytics parts should be improved."

"The setup was complex."

"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different “apps” to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network. This can be confusing, although Mojo has made great strides in combining these into “Aware”."

"Technical support could be more helpful. They are lacking a bit in that regard."

"The user interface needs improvement. It could be a little bit more user-friendly."

"The price should be lowered. It is too high for our country."

More Mojo Networks cons

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development."

"The technical support could be improved."

"We have not been satisfied with the performance of TP-Link Auranet EAP."

"TP-Link Auranet EAP is not very efficient, they need to improve it."

"Upgrading the hardware capabilities to newer versions like Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 7 would be a helpful improvement."

"There is room for wider improvements and additional features to enhance managing capabilities."

"The solution takes a long time to switch to another connection, which should be improved."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license is provided per access point, so you buy an access point and you use it."

"In Australian dollars, we buy it for five years at $1,200."

"The pricing was a good value and substantially less than some of the other products that we looked at. In some cases, with some of the big names, this product was even close to half the price."

"They have been a great price competitor against some of the other big brands, like Meraki, especially for cloud-based WiFi. However, Meraki has been more expensive. They beat Meraki on features for the WiFi, which makes them a better choice even if the price is the same."

"It requires a license and that's a recurring cost and that has a really high cheque value."

"Since they have only the cloud and on-premises platform, the price looks good compared to the other OEMs like Cisco and Ruckus. For one of the Wi-Fi 6 access points for five years, they might be charging 20,000 to 25,000 INR."

"The price of the solution is too high for our country."

"The cost is a one-time fee."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

"The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs."

"TP-Link provides solutions that are more cost-effective than other well-known brands."

"Its benefit is that it is cost effective."

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."

"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."

"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."

"TP-Link is a good price. They have a good price. But technology-wise, it has to be better."

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

16%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TP-Link Auranet EAP?

Omada is a good solution that I would recommend, and it is less expensive while providing good results. I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks

Compared 10% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Mojo Networks

Compared 4% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 11% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 7% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 7% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 7% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

October 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

October 2026

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

Mojo Networks delivers cloud-based architecture focusing on control, visibility, security, and reliability, with support for high-density WiFi requirements and seamless integration for expanded network environments.

Mojo Networks is renowned for its cloud-based architecture, providing robust control and visibility with strong security features like WIPS. Its autonomous capabilities and adaptive analytics, such as Cognitive WiFi, add significant value by ensuring effective guest WiFi management and diagnostics. Its intuitive installation and automated configuration facilitate network expansions, further enhancing the user experience with a mesh network. Strong security means and cost efficiency set Mojo Networks apart in the competitive market space.

What are the standout features?

Cloud-Based Architecture: Integrated system offering control and visibility.
WIPS Security: Offers enhanced wireless security features.
Cognitive WiFi: Advanced analytics for network optimization.
Autonomous Capabilities: Simplifies management with automation.
Mesh Network: Guarantees seamless connectivity.

What should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Simple installation and configuration process.
Scalability: Facilitates easy network expansion.
Reliability: Stable performance in high-density environments.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing across regions.
Security: Comprehensive protection against threats.

Mojo Networks is prevalent in public WiFi infrastructure and corporate guest WiFi across offices, schools, and restaurants. Its cloud-managed feature supports robust managed WiFi offerings, popularly deployed in educational institutions to ensure a secure distributed wireless environment. Businesses value its ease of management and security features with widespread application across many sectors.

Arista

Omada Access Points deliver high performance and easy setup for both wired and wireless technologies. Ideal for business applications, they provide centralized cloud management and secure VPN implementation.

Designed to enhance network control and efficiency, Omada Access Points are user-friendly, allowing straightforward deployment and integration with network needs. While offering cost-effectiveness and a modern interface, areas for improvement include scaling capabilities, coverage, security tools, and technical support. API integration, distance coverage, and speed require attention, and updates to newer Wi-Fi versions could bolster performance.

What are the key features of Omada Access Points?

High Performance: Ensures robust connectivity.
Reliability: Consistent network stability.
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable for businesses.
Easy Setup: Simplified configuration process.
Centralized Cloud Management: Streamlines administration.
Secure VPN Implementation: Enhances security measures.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Efficiency: Improved network operations.
Network Control: Better management capabilities.
Business Integration: Ideal for business environments.
User-Friendly Design: Simplifies deployment and use.

Omada Access Points are widely implemented in SMBs, offices, and campgrounds, often used by telecom operators and businesses for ERP and cloud applications. They enhance connectivity in industrial and commercial contexts, facilitating wireless network design for residential and client use.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks vs. Omada Access Points

September 2026

Free Report: Mojo Networks vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Mojo Networks vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mojo Networks vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.