Mojo Networks vs Omada Access Points comparison

Arista and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Arista is ranked #24, while TP-Link is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. Arista holds a 1.1% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Arista users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

991 Views
971 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

3,133 Views
3,102 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Mojo Networks and Omada Access Points are competing products in the wireless network solutions market. Mojo Networks seems to have the upper hand in scalability and cloud management, while Omada excels in integration capabilities for seamless connectivity.

Features: Mojo Networks provides advanced cloud-based management and analytics for enhanced network monitoring. Its Cognitive WiFi platform and WIPS offer strong security and flexibility. Omada Access Points deliver robust networking protocols, easy deployment, and compatibility with wired technologies, making them suitable for diverse applications.

Room for Improvement: Mojo Networks could simplify its deployment process and expand integration options. Improvement in user interface intuitiveness would benefit non-technical users. Omada Access Points could enhance their mesh network capabilities, improve security for open SSIDs, and provide more advanced cloud management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Omada Access Points offer quick deployment with straightforward setup, supported by comprehensive documentation. Mojo Networks has a more complex deployment process, requiring more extensive setup time, but it offers powerful customization options that cater to specific technical needs.

Pricing and ROI: Mojo Networks has a higher initial setup cost, offering substantial ROI through enhanced capabilities and scalability. It is an excellent choice for businesses that prioritize advanced features and long-term growth. Omada Access Points have a lower entry price and provide value through efficient management and cost-effective scaling, appealing to businesses seeking economical initial deployment and strong integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Mojo Networks vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks vs. Omada Access Points

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Mojo Networks is 1.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 3.7%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Omada Access Points	3.7%
Mojo Networks	1.1%
Other	95.2%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

reviewer1253430

Development & Innovation Expert at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

They have good specs, and the price is lower than competing solutions

Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development. They could also enhance the reporting capabilities. At the same time, Omada's reporting has improved considerably in the latest version. That was an issue for us, but now it seems okay. More carrier-grade integrations should be available on Omada access points in the future. They could also add a hot spot and maybe a mobile upload solution. I still have issues from time to time when switching access points. I'm still connected to the SSID, but my signal drops when I switch from 5 Ghz to 2.4 Ghz. I'm not switched to the other access point that is closer to me. I should have been switched automatically to the other access point. Occasionally, the handoff doesn't work. I have tried this with WiFi 6, and it worked fine, so I think they may have resolved this issue in the latest versions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The features that I like the most are the visibility and the firewall, which is very good."

"It is a hundred percent scalable product since its functionalities are good...It is a very stable product."

"The configuration is simple and the reports can be automated."

"The solution is very stable."

"The technical support for the solution is very helpful."

"The fact that they are autonomous and can function even without access to the management panel is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"It's scalable. You don't have to configure an access point. Literally, if I needed a new one, I just take it right out of the box, go plug it into our network. It finds our Mojo network, and then it talks to the other access points that are close to it, and then it literally adopts the policies, and meshes itself in our network."

"The most important feature is ease of use. We can simply take an access point and plug it in, then it is automatically configured for us."

More Mojo Networks pros

"We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi."

"This product is easy to use."

"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."

"The initial setup is not complicated."

"Omada Access Points are very good in terms of wired technologies and wired connectivity."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to deploy and reliable."

"The performance and availability of Omada Access Points have met our business needs, particularly in improving network control and facilitating direct access for developers to branch services."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"Compared to other OEMs, Mojo Networks or Arista faces a little bit of coverage issues. So, if we put the same dBm, the power of the other OEMs indicates much more extensive coverage compared to Mojo or Arista."

"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."

"The user interface needs improvement. It could be a little bit more user-friendly."

"The RF signalling and data analytics parts should be improved."

"Further expanding the API and access to even more diagnostics, as I have found a few limitations when I am dealing with them right now."

"The product's initial setup phase and configuration are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"They could use more additional application security and network security features. They could add on to the WiFi as a selling point. It would be nice to be able to say to the WiFi users, "We will protect you against viruses and malware, so you don't have to purchase that.""

"The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."

More Mojo Networks cons

"Upgrading the hardware capabilities to newer versions like Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 7 would be a helpful improvement."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"Aruba has better scaling capabilities."

"There is room for wider improvements and additional features to enhance managing capabilities."

"It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable."

"TP-Link Auranet EAP is not very efficient, they need to improve it."

"We have some issues with stability. It is not so fast. That is the main problem."

"The technical support could be improved."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In Australian dollars, we buy it for five years at $1,200."

"I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Of every solution we looked at, every wireless solution, Mojo was a minimum of six figures cheaper. Minimum. Most of them were double, which again is unheard of. Not only do you get all the feature benefits, like everything is there, everything just works, but at the same time, it was a no-brainer, because of the cost. It's almost like you hit the lottery."

"We have a term that is renewed every three years."

"The pricing was a good value and substantially less than some of the other products that we looked at. In some cases, with some of the big names, this product was even close to half the price."

"Pricing includes the planning tools, management, security, analytics, and advanced guest WiFi capabilities. It's always better to buy the longest term available for the best ROI. However, device will continue to function without valid cloud license."

"The price of the solution is too high for our country."

"They have been a great price competitor against some of the other big brands, like Meraki, especially for cloud-based WiFi. However, Meraki has been more expensive. They beat Meraki on features for the WiFi, which makes them a better choice even if the price is the same."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."

"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."

"Its benefit is that it is cost effective."

"The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it."

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"TP-Link is a good price. They have a good price. But technology-wise, it has to be better."

"The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs."

"TP-Link provides solutions that are more cost-effective than other well-known brands."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Marketing Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mojo Networks?

I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. People are not used to cloud-based Wi-Fi solutions. When it comes to cloud-based Wi-Fi sol...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mojo Networks?

The product's initial setup phase and configuration are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required. Those who are not familiar with the product might not be able to set it up p...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mojo Networks?

Most of our company's clients use the product in enterprise settings. In terms of the security features, I feel the firewall is present in the product and it works pretty well for enterprise-sized ...

See all answers

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiWLM vs Mojo Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Mojo Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 15% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 7% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 7% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 7% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

March 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

March 2026

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

Mojo is revolutionizing WiFi through the power of the cloud and open standards. We liberate networks from proprietary hardware and utilize the full power of the cloud to deliver cognitive WiFi: a self-driving network that makes things remarkably simple and reliable at massive scale. Mojo WiFi is not just secure itself but also secures your wired network and IT assets from wireless attacks. Mojo Network’s innovations provide superior WiFi experience, effortless troubleshooting and empowers IT with better user experiences, more options, and more velocity, all at much lower costs.

Arista

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks vs. Omada Access Points

March 2026

Free Report: Mojo Networks vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Mojo Networks vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mojo Networks vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.