Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NTT-AT WinActor vs UiPath Platform comparison

NTT DATA and UiPath are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. NTT DATA is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0, while UiPath is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5. NTT DATA holds a 0.7% mindshare in RPA, compared to UiPath’s 12.9% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of NTT DATA users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of UiPath users who would recommend it.
NTT-AT WinActor
Read 2 NTT-AT WinActor reviews
  • 574 Views
  • 551 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
UiPath Platform
Read 913 UiPath Platform reviews
  • 26,806 Views
  • 24,930 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

UiPath Platform and NTT-AT WinActor compete in the automation solutions category. UiPath Platform may have an advantage due to its superior integration capabilities, providing seamless compatibility with various systems, while NTT-AT WinActor offers comprehensive features for complex tasks.

Features: UiPath Platform offers advanced automation capabilities with AI-driven processes, scalability, and a vast ecosystem of integrations. NTT-AT WinActor caters to intricate workflows and offers precision in niche applications with strong feature sets.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: UiPath Platform offers both cloud-based and on-premises deployment options, providing flexibility and speed with responsive customer support. NTT-AT WinActor is primarily on-premises, with concise deployment models and consistent support, offering detailed guidance.

Pricing and ROI: UiPath Platform provides competitive SaaS subscription pricing models, delivering ROI through reduced operational costs and increased efficiency. NTT-AT WinActor has transparent pricing structures emphasizing cost efficiency in high-automation settings, where its extensive features justify the investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed NTT-AT WinActor vs. UiPath Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
NTT-AT WinActor vs. UiPath Platform
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NTT-AT WinActor
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
28th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Platform
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
913
Ranking in other categories
Agentic Automation (2nd), AI-Agent Builders (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (1st), AI Finance & Accounting (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of NTT-AT WinActor is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Platform is 12.9%, down from 24.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
UiPath Platform12.9%
NTT-AT WinActor0.7%
Other86.4%
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1170825 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer1170825
IT Planning Assistant Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Frees up employee time but can't run when computer system is locked
Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks. It would be better if, when we have scheduled a scenario, it would log into the system automatically.
Read full review
reviewer2761431 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2761431
Manager Rpa at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Significantly reduces manual effort and improves team workflows through automated ticketing
We've used Agent Builder, IXP, and Maestro for orchestration. We have created context-grounded searches or chatbots using context grounding, and we also use context grounding within an Agentic flow where a bot or agent reads ServiceNow tickets to determine whether it has been assigned to the right work group. If it has not been assigned correctly due to human error, it automatically reassigns it to the right group. I would assess Agentic AI's ability to extract data points as effective. We created an agent for the purpose of extracting data, though not in a document. We created what we call an email conversation agent that engages with a customer, vendor, or someone in an email conversation with a set goal of extracting specific data points for an action to be performed subsequently. The one automation we have deployed in production involves the agent interacting with team members to collect data points and create a ServiceNow ticket. We appreciate almost all features of UiPath Platform, with one of the most successful ones being the use of Coms Mining. Most of the new features related to AI have all been good, and we use Agentic. We have already created a few agents and have started to use Maestro for a few flows, though we are not yet there to orchestrate an end-to-end workflow. We have good ROI from the automations we have developed with UiPath Platform, which far exceeds the investment in the platform. It has saved us tens of thousands of hours in manual effort, making the team members happy to pursue other things of value.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This software is very smart - it can decide from a picture if we like that condition, and then the robot will do that action."
"The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well."
"The functionality where you can quickly convert your code from Studio X to Studio is really nice."
"The biggest advantage of UiPath is its user-friendly environment."
"Ease of use and speed of development are the most valuable features."
"UiPath has helped to make all of the internal business processes lighter, enabling my company to save costs in time and speed for all of them."
"The RE framework is a valuable feature because it offers the possibility of working with a large amount of data without the need to transmit all the information."
"The most valuable thing is the whole automation suite that helps develop automation processes. In the future, we might further explore Communications Mining and Process Mining."
"The time to market with the features of UiPath Platform, to be able to quickly spin up a POC and then put that in production within weeks to months versus sometimes years is significant. It is a much quicker process."
"We've automated pricing changes for several thousand vendors, saving over 20,000 hours, which has allowed us to avoid hiring temporary associates."
More UiPath Platform pros
 

Cons

"Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks."
"The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data."
"The setting up of the cloud was a little bit confusing for us. We expected someone to walk us through that process and we just did it ourselves and weren't sure if we were doing it right."
"The only problem is the cost. It was more accessible initially, and we could have more resources with the same license. Now, the license is different, and we need a license for each tool that we have, so it is not very accessible to have all of the tools for installation."
"We are new to the tool. Currently, we do not have any cons. There is still a lot left for us to explore. We have heard of a lot of features at the conference today, and we will certainly build upon that. As we are exploring, some of the improvements could be in the pipeline within Automation Hub and insights, but so far, we have had a great experience with UiPath."
"My thoughts on UiPath Platform's user community suggest that a lot of content seems outdated and old now that gets referenced."
"Governance has room for improvement but that's more of a cultural thing. It depends on your company. We have the reference architecture that we have in place, but it's easy for someone to say, "Okay, I need to make an adjustment here outside of that reference architecture." Because it's so easy for them to do that, they leave the company now that a non-compliant bot is out there running a production process, we need to be able to rank that in. There needs to be footwork that we have to do as an organization for my team as opposed to a true problem with the platform."
"Now that UiPath is moving towards BPMN as part of agentic orchestration on Maestro, there is a need to make it easier for newcomers in the BPMN space to understand the components of a BPMN workflow. More awareness is needed since even technically inclined individuals are not very familiar with BPMN."
"One of the issues is with the acquisition of new types of software and new companies. It's important to introduce process documentation and make sure that it's not just making it look like UiPath products, but making it feel and act like one to us. They need to make sure it's embedded and the integration is seamless. They should just keep improving how easy it is to use. I think it's very good already, but there's always room for improvement."
"The area that has room for improvement in UiPath Platform is the price."
More UiPath Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay yearly for the agent who runs the processes, plus an additional fee for maintenance costs."
"The pricing and licensing are okay. It's quite affordable."
"Unattended bots are more valuable than attended bots."
"When it comes to back office licenses, why can't we have parallel processors running on one back office license? I understand the commercial aspect, but when you have servers and a node locked license, you should be able to use the license from different instances."
"We find the yearly licensing cost affordable, and the UiPath pricing team is very accommodating to us. They allowed us to pay in installments during the integration phase. The friendly pricing is one of the main reasons we chose the solution."
"The main complaint I receive about UiPath is the pricing."
"The licensing model could be improved. UiPath charges more if you increase the number of components. It should be included within the premium licensing. We have 100 percent end-to-end automation for some of our processes. However, we're limited by the licensing from fully automating all of them. We can't use all the features."
"This solution is priced less compared with other products."
"I find the pricing to be reasonable, especially when compared to other offerings in the same market."
More UiPath Platform pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Marketing Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business249
Midsize Enterprise143
Large Enterprise669
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NTT-AT WinActor?
The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well.
See all answers
What needs improvement with NTT-AT WinActor?
The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering NTT-AT WinActor?
For the repeat tasks, we have two options. The first option is to use the scanner to set up the scheduler. Alternatively, we can use another method where we set up the task or schedule on the manag...
See all answers
Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries
I can only speak to UiPath since that is the only RPA solution that I have used. I know that there are specific packages that you can integrate into your project that is specifically made to work w...
See all answers
RPA that Bots can run without centralized control?
Yes, Attended Bots which can run without centralized control Module. RPA Tools like Automation Anywhere, uiPath ,Power Automation they do support this.
See all answers
How do I choose between UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate?
Microsoft‌ ‌Power‌ ‌Automate‌ ‌is‌ ‌intuitive‌ ‌and‌ ‌easy‌ ‌to‌ ‌integrate‌ ‌and‌ ‌use.‌ ‌I‌ ‌like‌ ‌that‌ ‌there‌ ‌is‌ ‌no‌ ‌coding‌ ‌experience‌ ‌necessary,‌ ‌and‌ ‌appreciate‌ ‌the‌ ‌automated‌...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Power Automate vs NTT-AT WinActor Logo
Microsoft Power Automate vs NTT-AT WinActor
Compared 16% of the time
Nintex RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor Logo
Nintex RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor
Compared 16% of the time
TIS RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor Logo
TIS RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor
Compared 13% of the time
Pega Robotic Process Automation vs NTT-AT WinActor Logo
Pega Robotic Process Automation vs NTT-AT WinActor
Compared 12% of the time
Syntel SyntBots vs NTT-AT WinActor Logo
Syntel SyntBots vs NTT-AT WinActor
Compared 12% of the time
More NTT-AT WinActor Competitors
Microsoft Power Automate vs UiPath Platform Logo
Microsoft Power Automate vs UiPath Platform
Compared 13% of the time
Automation Anywhere vs UiPath Platform Logo
Automation Anywhere vs UiPath Platform
Compared 10% of the time
Blue Prism vs UiPath Platform Logo
Blue Prism vs UiPath Platform
Compared 7% of the time
ServiceNow Automation Engine vs UiPath Platform Logo
ServiceNow Automation Engine vs UiPath Platform
Compared 5% of the time
Pega Robotic Process Automation vs UiPath Platform Logo
Pega Robotic Process Automation vs UiPath Platform
Compared 5% of the time
More UiPath Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
January 2026
NTT-AT WinActor reportDownload NTT-AT WinActor product report
Buyer's Guide
UiPath Platform
January 2026
UiPath Platform reportDownload UiPath Platform product report
 

Also Known As

NTT WinActor, WinActor, NTT-AT Robotic Process Automation Software, NTT-AT RPA
UiPath Maestro, UiPath Apps, UiPath Agent Builder
 

Overview

NTT-AT RPA accurately reproduces workflows - from simple form processing to sophisticated tasks - to streamline work.

NTT DATA

UiPath Platform is appreciated for its user-friendly interface and extensive automation capabilities, offering seamless integration with diverse applications. Its intuitive drag-and-drop functionality enables users to design efficient workflows with minimal technical expertise.

UiPath Platform delivers a robust set of features that enhance automation and productivity. With components like Orchestrator, task management is optimized, facilitating better scalability. Users benefit from advanced AI and document understanding tools, boosting data handling accuracy and reducing errors. Despite its strengths, UiPath faces challenges with upgrading processes, AI enhancements, and user documentation. Integration and selector sensitivity issues, along with support and licensing complexities, highlight areas for potential improvement. Users request smoother deployment, error handling, and migration processes. Enhanced support for RHEL/Ubuntu, LINQ, and Lambda and improved real-time insights, automation recording, and scheduling are desired. Streamlining the experience for non-technical users with simplified workflows remains a priority.

What are the key features of UiPath Platform?

  • Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Allows users to design workflows easily without extensive technical skills.
  • Orchestrator: Enhances task management and enables scalable automation.
  • AI and Document Understanding: Improves data accuracy and minimizes errors.
  • System Integration: Offers seamless integration with SAP, CRM, Oracle, and more.
  • Active Community and Training: UiPath Academy provides resources for skill development.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

  • Increased Efficiency: Reduction in manual workloads through automation of repetitive tasks.
  • Improved Accuracy: Enhanced data handling capabilities reduce errors.
  • Productivity Boost: Supports both attended and unattended automations to streamline operations.
  • Scalability: Ability to handle growing automation demands efficiently.
  • Integration Benefits: Easy integration with enterprise systems for streamlined operations.

UiPath Platform is widely implemented across sectors such as finance, healthcare, insurance, HR, IT, and supply chain to automate repetitive business tasks. Common uses include automating data entry, invoice processing, document management, report generation, and customer service operations. Organizations value the platform's ability to integrate seamlessly with systems like SAP, CRM, and Oracle, allowing for enhanced efficiency and accuracy in processing both structured and unstructured data.

UiPath
 

Sample Customers

Exeo Tech Corporation
1. Accenture 2. Deloitte 3. PwC 4. IBM 5. Capgemini 6. KPMG 7. Ernst & Young 8. Infosys 9. Cognizant 10. Wipro 11. Tata Consultancy Services 12. HCL Technologies 13. Genpact 14. Tech Mahindra 15. DXC Technology 16. Atos 17. NTT Data 18. CGI 19. L&T Infotech 20. Hexaware Technologies 21. Mindtree 22. Mphasis 23. Virtusa 24. Syntel 25. Zensar Technologies 26. WNS Global Services 27. Hexaware Technologies 28. Larsen & Toubro Infotech 29. Persistent Systems 30. QuEST Global 31. Sonata Software 32. Zensar Technologies
Buyer's Guide
NTT-AT WinActor vs. UiPath Platform
December 2025
Free Report: NTT-AT WinActor vs. UiPath Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about NTT-AT WinActor vs. UiPath Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our NTT-AT WinActor vs. UiPath Platform report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.