OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs QualiWare X comparison

OpenText and QualiWare are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. OpenText is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.3, while QualiWare is ranked #48. OpenText holds a 1.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to QualiWare’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of QualiWare users who would recommend it.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Read 17 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews

1,815 Views
1,742 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QualiWare X

Read 3 QualiWare X reviews

1,523 Views
899 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

QualiWare X

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and QualiWare X compete in enterprise content management and business modeling. QualiWare X may have the upper hand with a superior feature set that justifies a higher investment.

Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint is known for its seamless integration with Microsoft ecosystems, robust document management, and effective version control. QualiWare X provides enterprise architecture modeling, process optimization, and risk management, valuable for organizations focused on strategic analysis and planning.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers a straightforward deployment, particularly smooth for organizations within Microsoft environments, bolstered by dependable customer service. QualiWare X provides a more customizable deployment that caters to diverse organizational needs, though it might be complex, requiring technical expertise.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint is a cost-effective option with competitive ROI, ideal for businesses leveraging Microsoft investments. QualiWare X has a higher initial setup cost, but it offers significant ROI potential, especially for enterprises utilizing its comprehensive modeling and optimization tools.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. QualiWare X Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. QualiWare X

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QualiWare X

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

48th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 1.2%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QualiWare X is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText 360 for SharePoint	1.2%
QualiWare X	0.8%
Other	98.0%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Sasikumar Balachandran

Senior BI Lead at Cognizant

Enhancing user experience and data management with effective central repository capabilities

The area of improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint is that sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently. In future updates, I would want to see widgets available in OpenText 360 for SharePoint to interact with third-party tools. For example, when creating a dashboard, having the ability to embed these directly into SharePoint would be beneficial. Currently, I have to use hyperlinks to access other tools such as Tableau or ClickView. If it were possible to merge everything and bring all information from multiple teams (Cognos, ClickView, AWS) into SharePoint as a centralized place, it would be really helpful. That is what I envision for the integrator part.

Read full review

Gavin Bérubé

Enterprise Architect at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees

Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive

We use the solution as a reference for architecture so that we can connect business data applications. The tool helps us to know how these applications should be built. We use it mainly as reference material. I like the solution's traceability. The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."

"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."

"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."

"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."

"OpenText 360 for SharePoint integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Teams, allowing me to monitor and manage projects and task issues using mobile devices."

"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."

"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."

"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros

"I like the solution's traceability."

"Enterprise architecture and a positive sense of understanding soon reached everyone."

"It is stable and easy to use."

Cons

"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."

"In the future, I would like to see new features in SharePoint for improved project tracking processes."

"For SharePoint, the user-friendliness needs to be improved. It is not as simple to use as GitHub, which has a very straightforward interface."

"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex."

"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."

"The user interface could definitely be improved."

"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."

"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons

"In the previous version, the web interface was unstable."

"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."

"I was not so satisfied with arrows in this program."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has a reasonable price."

"SharePoint uses a subscription model."

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."

"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."

"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

"On-premises version is expensive"

"The solution has a very complex pricing model."

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Government

23%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Regarding the licensing setup cost and price overall, the licensing costs are reasonable. As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft par...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

For SharePoint, the user-friendliness needs to be improved. It is not as simple to use as GitHub, which has a very straightforward interface. I would prefer it to become more minimalistic like GitH...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

CMW Tracker vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

Bizagi vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

Agiloft Workflow and BPM vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

IBM BPM vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QualiWare X

Compared 9% of the time

ARIS BPA vs QualiWare X

Compared 8% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs QualiWare X

Compared 6% of the time

ARIS Cloud vs QualiWare X

Compared 6% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs QualiWare X

Compared 5% of the time

More QualiWare X Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

April 2026

Download OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

April 2026

Download QualiWare X product report

Also Known As

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360

No data available

Overview

OpenText 360 for SharePoint enhances collaboration and document management by offering seamless integration with Microsoft Teams, strong file compatibility, and customizable workflows, supporting real-time access and automation.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint provides an efficient platform for document management and workflow automation through features like metadata retrieval and version control. It offers integration with Microsoft Teams and SAP APIs, enhancing collaboration across industries. While users face challenges with licensing complexity and Office 365 integration, OpenText 360 plays a critical role in digitalizing documents and managing workflows. Despite its strong capabilities, improvements in pricing flexibility and support services are needed to elevate user experience.

What are the key features of OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Customization: Offers flexible workflows and approval processes.
Integration: Seamless with Microsoft Teams and SAP APIs.
File Compatibility: Supports diverse file formats effortlessly.
Collaboration: Real-time document management and access.
Metadata Retrieval: Enhances document indexing and search.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Improved document management and workflow automation.
Security: Robust document retention and audit trail features.
Flexibility: Customizable workflows tailored to business needs.
Scalability: Supports high-volume document processing.
Automation: Simplified invoicing and operations through SAP APIs.

In industries like legal and utilities, OpenText 360 for SharePoint is implemented for its document management capabilities. It integrates with tools like Microsoft Teams to enable efficient workflows and digitalization processes, supporting enterprise document indexing and advanced search functions across sectors.

OpenText

QualiWare X is a comprehensive enterprise architecture management tool that assists organizations in improving alignment between business processes and IT infrastructure, enabling efficient decision-making and strategic planning.

Designed for enterprises seeking streamlined operations, QualiWare X provides robust modeling and analysis capabilities. Its architecture management facilitates real-time collaboration, ensuring stakeholders have access to vital information for effective planning. The adaptability of its platform allows organizations to optimize processes and resources effectively.

What are the most valuable features of QualiWare X?

Enterprise Architecture Modeling: Facilitates strategic alignment of business processes with IT architecture.
Collaboration Tools: Enables stakeholders to collaborate efficiently in real-time.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides tailored views for different organizational roles.
Risk Management: Identifies potential risks and mitigates them proactively.
Compliance Management: Ensures adherence to standards and regulations.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Enhanced Decision-Making: Improves strategic planning and efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Optimizes resources, reducing operational expenses.
Agility and Flexibility: Supports rapid adaptation to business changes.
Improved Communication: Streamlines stakeholder engagement and understanding.

In specific industries like finance, QualiWare X can streamline compliance processes, while in manufacturing, it optimizes production workflows and resource allocation, enabling these sectors to enhance their operational effectiveness.

QualiWare

Sample Customers

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)

Emiliambiente, OLI, Galletti, Hiref, Bugatti, Argelli, Culligan Italiana, Sal, Stefal Cablaggi, BrainBee Automotive, Varvel, Campagnola, Favini, G.F., Gruppo ROLD

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. QualiWare X

April 2026

Free Report: OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. QualiWare X

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. QualiWare X and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. QualiWare X report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.