OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Worksoft Certify comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Worksoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.0, while Worksoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5. OpenText holds a 2.0% mindshare in FT, compared to Worksoft’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Worksoft users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

4,306 Views
3,273 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Worksoft Certify

Read 89 Worksoft Certify reviews

9,547 Views
7,447 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

Worksoft Certify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Worksoft Certify and OpenText Functional Testing Lab are both leaders in the automated testing market. Worksoft Certify shows strength in pricing and support, while OpenText stands out for its extensive feature set.

Features: Worksoft Certify excels in regression testing, codeless automation, and intuitive design which simplifies the testing process for non-developers. OpenText Functional Testing Lab supports wide platform compatibility, integrates seamlessly with DevOps toolchains, and offers comprehensive capabilities for mobile and web testing.

Room for Improvement: Worksoft Certify could enhance integration with third-party tools, improve its mobile testing capabilities, and expand its feature set for more complex testing scenarios. OpenText could benefit from reducing initial setup costs, simplifying its user interface for new users, and improving its pricing flexibility to appeal to smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Worksoft Certify offers straightforward deployment backed by solid customer support, making it convenient for organizations to implement. OpenText adopts a cloud-based model providing scalability and flexibility, with strong support teams assisting in deployment and ongoing operations.

Pricing and ROI: Worksoft Certify is viewed as cost-effective with a high ROI due to lower setup costs. Although OpenText requires a higher initial investment, the extensive feature set and platform coverage justify its cost through robust ROI in long-term use scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Worksoft Certify Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Worksoft Certify

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (4th)

Worksoft Certify

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (3rd), Test Automation Tools (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 2.9%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Worksoft Certify	2.9%
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	2.0%
Other	95.1%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Muddisetty Arun Kumar

WorkSoft Certified Automation Engineer at Qualesce

Automation has delivered strong ROI with AI-driven test prioritization and parallel reporting

The best feature of Worksoft Certify is the automatic report generation. Unlike traditional tools like Selenium or Java-based frameworks where reporting often requires custom coding, Certify handles this natively. We are currently utilizing the 14.5 version, which has modernized these capabilities, though we frequently manage backward compatibility for clients still running on the 12.x version series.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Using the existing enterprise tools, like UFT, or even if you want to go open source, you can use them and it's a real user-functional performance, we are able to achieve that."

"In general, in my opinion, Mobile Center is a good product that allows us to do everything we need to automate application testing for mobile."

"The ideas and possibilities that this tool has are incredibly useful."

"This is a solution that's easy to use and it also gives us the possibility to use real devices connected either on the Mobile Center server or on our own computers and it works with both iOS and Android devices."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"This helped my prior organization immensely due to the ability to remotely manipulate devices, even by offshore vendors."

"The pricing is great."

"The product is easy to use."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"Overall, my experience with Worksoft Certify has been very positive, particularly in the context of SAP automation."

"We found that Worksoft is easier to use because our business experts can do the tests. We didn't have to have IT experts."

"Before Worksoft Certify, we needed almost two weeks or more of regression testing to move our changes from regression to production, and after the implementation of Worksoft Certify, we went from two weeks and 200 man-hours to three days of testing, saving more than 10,000 euros and increasing our scope, test coverage, and reducing issues."

"The most valuable feature is its time saving, because once development is complete, the short time that it takes to execute a test is invaluable and saves a number of dollars and man-hours."

"Worksoft Certify helps in reducing regression cycle time because manual testing takes substantial time and can lead to errors, and with Worksoft Certify, it will definitely help reduce resources as time and ROI will also increase."

"We were able to use Worksoft to automate all of the actions that we would have to take after an SAP refresh. This way we do the refresh, then that night or right afterwards, we run the Worksoft script and it resets all of our testing users. This sets them up with the right access, the right approvals, and just sets up everything on the back-end so we can do our scripts the next night."

"Worksoft developed a tool to support ERP testing. All prebuilt functions are good at steering the application when the test is executed."

"If you are working on SAP automation with Certify, then it’s the best tool to work with."

More Worksoft Certify pros

Cons

"OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web could benefit from implementing a low-code, no-code solution that aids in quick automation code preparation."

"However, in some cases we discovered some issues for HPE support regarding the latest enhancements; the delivery time for these enhancements is not as fast as we would like."

"Because of connection errors, we've haven't yet been able to set it up properly at my company."

"Deployment was an issue. Each time we set it up and deployed, it failed and we had to relaunch it again."

"I think the biggest issues that I've seen, and this is a personal view of mine, is that most of the HPE products have a common look and feel to them."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"It's very new to HP. They need to go beyond the HP world."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"The level of technical support depends on the engineer who comes to the call. I'm not really happy with it."

"The definitions for the objects need to be automated. They need to be recognized automatically by Worksoft Certify instead of changing them back and forth manually. This is also something that Worksoft is currently working on."

"Capture 2.0 is not as useful when you get into more mature automation."

"Based on my colleagues' feedback, there are still some minor issues concerning continuous testing, particularly related to the timeout feature."

"Web UI testing was difficult in the beginning, as we had a homegrown product, and we had to do the proper object naming."

"With one of our applications where we do check-in, Worksoft is not able to identify the Java-based application. We raised the ticket, but we were unable to resolve this using Worksoft."

"We're really hopeful for the mobile testing in Worksoft Certify going forward."

"Testing of web based applications can be really cumbersome at times."

More Worksoft Certify cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product could be more affordable."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"This solution is expensive."

"The typical range that we see is between 50 to 90 percent improvement in speed capabilities. Another aspect comes with the depth that they're able to test. It increases their capabilities overall to test at a broader level."

"This solution has enabled us to automate in order to tremendously save time. Only first time when you are recording and creating the script will you spend some time with it, the rest of the time, you are just executing."

"Worksoft has paid for itself fives times over."

"The price is in line with everyone else's in the market. They are not cheaper nor more expensive than anyone else who was in our RFP."

"The initial upfront cost in terms of licenses, plus all the money that we spent developing tests, has proven it's worth. Now, we can do a regression test suite in ten days as opposed to sixteen weeks."

"We no longer need ten people sitting and manually testing something. We can just have one person running the entire regression automation testing suite, and this has saved us dollars."

"The tool is not really good at all because you need to purchase some additional tools."

More Worksoft Certify pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

17%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	73

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Worksoft Certify?

I am not certain about the pricing of Worksoft Certify. What I heard from my peers is that it is costly, and clients will be investing more money in this software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Worksoft Certify?

Based on my experience working in Worksoft Certify and this web application, there are several things that do not work as expected in Worksoft.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 12% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 5% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 4% of the time

Qualibrate vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 4% of the time

More Worksoft Certify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

October 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Buyer's Guide

Worksoft Certify

October 2026

Download Worksoft Certify product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Worksoft Certify offers codeless automation for efficient test scripting by non-programmers. It integrates with SAP, supports multiple interfaces, and ensures seamless end-to-end testing, facilitating time savings and streamlined operations.

Worksoft Certify stands out for its unique codeless automation capabilities, enabling users without programming skills to easily create automated test scripts. Its Capture feature effortlessly records user actions, accelerating test development. Integration with SAP systems and support across various interfaces make it highly versatile. The tool's architecture allows for easy script maintenance and decouples scripts from data, speeding up testing processes while minimizing manual effort. Although it's known for excellence in automating SAP applications, there is room for improvement in areas like web and mobile integration, UI enhancements, and support responsiveness.

What are the key features of Worksoft Certify?

Codeless Automation: Enables easy script creation without coding skills.
Capture Feature: Records actions for rapid test development.
SAP Integration: Ensures seamless operation within SAP environments.
Interface Support: Enhances versatility across multiple platforms.
End-to-End Testing: Facilitates comprehensive testing cycles.

What are the benefits and ROI to consider?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces testing time.
Reduced Manual Intervention: Minimizes errors and enhances efficiency.
Supporting Transformations: Aids large-scale SAP and cloud transformations.
Scalability: Handles large datasets with stability and reliability.
Maintenance: Decoupled scripts ensure easy updates and management.

In industries relying on SAP and ERP systems, Worksoft Certify serves as a valuable tool for automating regression and integration testing. Organizations benefit from reduced manual testing effort and faster project delivery times. It's extensively utilized in sectors requiring large-scale SAP deployment and cloud application integration, making it integral in streamlining business operations.

Worksoft

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Worksoft Certify

September 2026

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Worksoft Certify

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Worksoft Certify report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.