OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv comparison

OpenText and Planview are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. OpenText is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.7, while Planview is ranked #14. OpenText holds a 5.7% mindshare in PPM, compared to Planview’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Planview users who would recommend it.

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Read 27 OpenText Project and Portfolio Management reviews

3,020 Views
1,691 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

Read 12 Planview Daptiv reviews

2,123 Views
934 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Planview Daptiv

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management and Planview Daptiv compete in the project and portfolio management category. OpenText PPM holds an advantage with its comprehensive features, including what-if analysis and real-time visibility, while Planview Daptiv is praised for its customizable project boards and ease of use.

Features: OpenText PPM impresses with advanced functionalities such as real-time visibility and detailed financial tracking. It provides seamless integrations with external tools like Jira and Microsoft Project, enhancing project management capabilities. Additionally, OpenText PPM offers a comprehensive program management module for better portfolio oversight. Planview Daptiv stands out with its user-friendly project boards, which enable teams to organize tasks visually. It also features highly customizable dashboard views that adapt to different project requirements, making it easier for managers to track progress. Moreover, its flexible pricing model allows organizations to choose plans that fit their budget.

Room for Improvement: OpenText PPM could benefit from improved reporting capabilities and greater resource management flexibility. Users have noted limitations with the mobile user interface and inconsistencies between modules. On the other hand, Planview Daptiv should enhance its project and capacity planning tools and offer more robust reporting features, as current capabilities are perceived to be lacking. Despite advancements, OpenText PPM agile functions may not completely align with some client needs, indicating room for enhancing user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText PPM is primarily an on-premises solution, requiring considerable initial setup, while Planview Daptiv offers cloud deployment options for easier installation. OpenText's customer support receives mixed reviews; some users experience efficient service, whereas others face delays. Conversely, Planview Daptiv is commended for consistently responsive customer and technical support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText PPM's pricing is considered high, with complex licensing and support expenses that may not suit smaller companies. Planview Daptiv offers a more transparent, flexible pricing structure, providing cost-effective options and volume discounts. Users highlight Planview Daptiv's appealing pricing model, which aids budget-conscious organizations. ROI for both solutions depends on organizations effectively leveraging their comprehensive features and integrations.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planview Daptiv

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is 5.7%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview Daptiv is 3.2%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management	5.7%
Planview Daptiv	3.2%
Other	91.1%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1905414

PPM SaaS Application Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Gives management a cohesive place for tracking business strategies and goals, but cosmetic aspects need work

I like the ease of customization from an admin perspective. I'm really excited about some of the things that are coming in version 10.0.3 as far as what admins are able to do. I also really like how the program portfolio and project management roll up into each other. That's going to be a really good feature for our organization because we have a lot of things that are related, and it's nice to have things under one umbrella where we can go back to them. I also like the fact that it's not very difficult to integrate with other applications, as long as you have the right people with the right skill sets on board. I have seen us integrate with a couple of other cloud solutions and that was done fairly quickly. It's the ease of use and the ability to customize PPM that really work in our favor. Another useful aspect is that the solution gives us a single place where teams can track and measure progress towards their goals. That it is very important from an upper management perspective. Part of the reason that they're using the application is to have a cohesive place for tracking business strategies and organizational goals, and to only implement projects that line up with them.

Read full review

reviewer2068344

Director of Operations at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Useful project management capabilities, beneficial dashboards, but project planning could improve

The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance. In a future release, it would be beneficial to have a undo button.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) has a very strong workflow engine."

"Has a powerful workflow engine that allows creation of workflow complexities and processes."

"Customer service and technical support are excellent and great at helping us when needed."

"Demand, Dashboard, and Reporting are the most powerful modules for our customers."

"There are lots of project management tools that do a good job, but not so many that can manage portfolios and the bigger planning picture."

"Micro Focus PPM is flexible and easy to use. It's simple to customize and configure workflows."

"Overall, they have a very strong workflow management capability. That's a very strong feature because then you can model any process easily. Whether it is a demand management process, a pipeline management process, or your project delivery methodology, it is much easier because of their workflow management capability."

"Able to manage multimillion projects and resources more effectively."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management pros

"Consequently, it is the single point of truth for both our project managers and our senior leadership."

"The most valuable features are resource allocation and capacity planning."

"Daptiv templates give you a world of possibilities, no matter the PMI maturity level the company has."

"Reporting of IT capacity available for first time, time sheets available for first time."

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

"Changepoint allowed us to model resource request/assignment workflow in our large PS organization."

"The powerful collaboration is definitely the most valuable and the fact that you can adjust flexibility to almost any methodology, and the easy creation of complete new functionalities without programming code."

"The experience with Changepoint has been great considering that most organizations won't use 90% of the application's features."

More Planview Daptiv pros

Cons

"Budget management could be provided."

"We constantly put in requests for some of the things we need. One of those is being able to export just our standard request type to PDF."

"Better user interface. Usability in terms of better UX."

"Micro Focus PPM should be less dependent on coding. It could also benefit from some updates to the software architecture. These have been on the roadmap for years now, but they haven't been released."

"OpenText Project and Portfolio Management should move their database from Oracle."

"We had a couple of issues with stability or performance degradation about a year ago, around the time of the initial rollout. Since then, we've only had two unexpected outages that were quickly resolved."

"I would also like to see improvement in PPM's reporting and alerts. PPM has reporting capabilities, including HTML reports and portlets. But a majority of clients will build their own reporting platforms, or they will use external reporting platforms like Tableau and QlikView."

"I was not involved in the initial setup. I know that the project involved a lot of consulting that took a long time."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management cons

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current."

"Limited unless you purchase additional support hours."

"Accessing some functions is a bit obscure and requires some knowledge of how the product works, but the upgrade from v2012 to 2014 improved that situation and I expect the upcoming upgrade to 2017 to further streamline operations."

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"Expense management, simulation scenarios, and budget control could be great and useful features to include."

"The previous solution that we were using was Projector PSA; it was overall a superior product."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current. Some aren't useful at all. There's an overall lack of coherence within the solution. It can make the execution difficult. Many features can easily be eliminated and it would help streamline the solution. They should get rid of 80% of the features and then really focus on the leftover 20% to make it a really great product."

More Planview Daptiv cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"HPE PPM SaaS model is comprehensive, however, the base fee component has customer resistance to its recurring setup,"

"A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized company. The license is based on the number of users."

"Now, we also received an increase in the support license prices, without any advanced notice. At this point, switching to unify all our licensing under HPE and customer support has been poor."

"We have an annual license, and it is fairly priced in comparison to that of other solutions."

"It is SaaS without a base fee."

"There is an additional cost for product support"

"Support and license management are two hurdles for us. Every time we purchase new licenses, it has taken us half a year to implement those."

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

12%

University

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?

Hi, @Cheryl Joseph Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management solution could be a good candidate, see my review on this product, or if you may need more information to drop me a message. You can...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

The price of this solution is reasonable. It is not overly expensive and provides a fair value for the features offered.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation. Additionally, strategic portfolio management and investment management s...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Project Server vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 8% of the time

Sciforma vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 8% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 8% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 7% of the time

Planisware vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Competitors

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 9% of the time

Jira vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 8% of the time

Wrike vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 7% of the time

ITM Platform vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 3% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

June 2026

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management report

Download OpenText Project and Portfolio Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv

June 2026

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM), HPE Project and Portfolio Management PPM

No data available

Overview

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides resource planning, project delivery, and governance with an intuitive interface, seamless integrations, and powerful modules for effective project lifecycle management.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management delivers comprehensive portfolio and project management, aligning with business strategies and objectives. The platform features seamless integrations with essential tools like Microsoft Project and Jira, offering powerful modules such as time, demand, and resource management. It enhances decision-making with real-time data visibility, workflow automation, scenario comparison, and customizable dashboards. While offering extensive financial management and the ability to model processes, areas for enhancement include user interface, reporting, resource management, and integration with cloud services. Users also aim for improvements in security and mobile capabilities, alongside upgrades in database support and API usage, seeking a reduction in coding dependency for a better experience.

What are the key features of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

Intuitive interface: Provides a user-friendly design that simplifies navigation and operation.
Seamless integrations: Compatible with Microsoft Project and Jira, enhancing workflow efficiency.
Powerful modules: Includes time, demand, and resource management for effective control.
Real-time data visibility: Ensures accurate and timely insights for decision-making.
Customizable dashboards: Supports personalized views for improved project monitoring.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Flexibility: Enables modeling of various processes to fit specific business needs.
Comprehensive management: Aligns projects with business strategies.
Workflow automation: Reduces manual efforts, increasing efficiency.
Scenario comparison: Assists in evaluating different project outcomes.
Cost management: Provides extensive financial tools for better budgeting.

Industries leverage OpenText Project and Portfolio Management for resource planning and project governance. Organizations deploy modules like Demand, Time, and Resource Management to integrate financials and forecast workloads. The platform aids in project management, demand consolidation, and value-based delivery, facilitating investment management, capacity planning, and workflow optimization. Customization aligns with specific needs, supporting project control, defect tracking, and comprehensive reporting. Clients utilize the system for resourcing requirements and staffing profiles, ensuring effective project lifecycle management tailored to industry demands.

OpenText

Planview Daptiv offers robust project management capabilities with a focus on resource allocation, capacity planning, and collaboration.

Planview Daptiv is known for its excellent reporting, flexibility, and no-code functionalities. It includes beneficial portfolio views and comprehensive dashboards while integrating with IBM Cognos for enhanced analytics. The platform's timekeeping feature efficiently records billable hours, and its project boards and task management add significant value. However, improvements are needed in areas like expense management and resource allocation. Some users encounter complex and outdated features. Enhanced security measures, better integrations with tools like ITFM, and improved analytics would boost its utility.

What are the standout features of Planview Daptiv?

Resource Allocation: Efficiently manage and allocate resources across projects.
Capacity Planning: Support project planning and execution with effective capacity planning tools.
Collaboration: Enhance team collaboration through powerful integrated tools.
Reporting: Utilize excellent reporting capabilities for comprehensive insights.
No-code Functionality: Easily create features without special coding skills.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Improved Project Oversight: Centralize project management across multiple scenarios.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined timekeeping and task management processes.
Enhanced Analytics: Benefit from advanced analytics with IBM Cognos integration.
Optimized Resource Use: Make informed decisions with resource allocation and capacity planning.

Organizations use Planview Daptiv in IT and construction projects, multi-project oversight, and comprehensive tracking. Consultancy firms employ it for PSA activities, aiding in the implementation process. It supports new project management offices post-merger for technical tasks, similar to Jira.

Planview

Sample Customers

Bank Simpanan Nasional, Smart Communications, Aareon AG

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv

June 2026

Free Report: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.