OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv comparison

OpenText and Planview are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. OpenText is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.7, while Planview is ranked #14. OpenText holds a 3.7% mindshare in PPM, compared to Planview’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Planview users who would recommend it.

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Read 27 OpenText Project and Portfolio Management reviews

1,555 Views
762 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

Read 12 Planview Daptiv reviews

1,148 Views
528 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Planview Daptiv

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management and Planview Daptiv compete in the project management software category. Planview Daptiv has the upper hand for providing strong customer support and flexible pricing options.

Features: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management includes trusted data for decision-making, real-time visibility into projects, and robust workflow automation. Planview Daptiv offers comprehensive task management tools, customizable views, and effective reporting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: OpenText needs improvements in resource management and reporting, along with better cloud service integration and automation. Planview Daptiv requires enhancements in project and capacity planning and could benefit from a more intuitive interface and improved reporting capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText is primarily an on-premises solution with varied customer service experiences, often reliant on integration partners. Planview Daptiv provides cloud deployment options and strong customer support, noted for prompt technical assistance and clear communication.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText has high initial licensing costs, potentially appealing to larger organizations but expensive for smaller ones, with pricing based on user numbers. Planview Daptiv offers a flexible pricing model, including volume discounts, and is generally cost-effective with affordable annual licensing.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,789 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planview Daptiv

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is 3.7%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview Daptiv is 3.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management	3.7%
Planview Daptiv	3.1%
Other	93.2%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Useful for resource and financial management but needs to change Oracle database

The solution helps with tech management. It has a work plan similar to Microsoft Project for tracking progress anywhere. It can synchronize with Microsoft Projects for updating and rebooting tasks. They can also assign tasks to team members who can update progress using timesheets without a sheet. It includes a Project dashboard for managing multiple projects simultaneously and program management for overseeing groups of projects. It offers various data metrics. It has project entities for controlling risks, issues, and protections. It can calculate costs based on resource tasks and compare actual and planned costs. The tool has features for scenario comparison, allowing us to optimize scenarios based on various factors. Additionally, we can manually optimize by managing resource availability, creating staffing profiles, and making payments to optimize in any situation.

Read full review

reviewer2068344

Director of Operations at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Useful project management capabilities, beneficial dashboards, but project planning could improve

The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance. In a future release, it would be beneficial to have a undo button.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) has a very strong workflow engine."

"Project management, time and resource management, demand management, and workflow automation are the most critical and important modules that can make the PPM usage successful."

"Has a powerful workflow engine that allows creation of workflow complexities and processes."

"It's a very detailed tool. As far as an enterprise is concerned, it gives you the flexibility to manage everything: portfolios, projects, finances, proposals, resources, and time... It takes care of even the minor details that need to be captured. The project management functionality is configured really well within the tool. That stands out."

"The most valuable feature is resource planning or resource management."

"Able to manage multimillion projects and resources more effectively."

"The solution helps with tech management. It has a work plan similar to Microsoft Project for tracking progress anywhere. It can synchronize with Microsoft Projects for updating and rebooting tasks. They can also assign tasks to team members who can update progress using timesheets without a sheet."

"There are so many different pieces of functionality, and we use almost every single piece from deployment to demand, project, resource, and time management."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management pros

"Consequently, it is the single point of truth for both our project managers and our senior leadership."

"Reporting of IT capacity available for first time, time sheets available for first time."

"It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project management features of the application to be particularly valuable, such as project boards, reporting, and the ability to customize views. Additionally, task management and project scheduling were also highly utilized. However, capacity planning was not used as much as the others, as there was a lack of support from executives to invest in training and implementing it due to a lack of processes in place. The project planning features, dashboard, and reporting capabilities were considered the most valuable."

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

"I like the reporting engine, IBM Cognos, especially the analytics. That's a good tool. It's quite strong on the ideation and capacity-planning side, which is a huge plus."

"Daptiv templates give you a world of possibilities, no matter the PMI maturity level the company has."

"Changepoint allowed us to model resource request/assignment workflow in our large PS organization."

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

More Planview Daptiv pros

Cons

"User interface continues to be poor. The product does not have a similar view in the different modules, e.g., staffing vs financial management, it looks like you are working with a different product and it is not easy to use or intuitive."

"Sometimes features in PPM don't work as expected, or our users request a new feature. Typically, our partner vendor can deploy those changes. But there have been a few instances when we had to raise it with Micro Focus because it's beyond the ability of our partner vendor. When we raise the issue with Micro Focus, it sometimes takes time because it needs support from other customers using PPM, not just our bank. It goes through a voting system. Other customers need to vote for the feature. The features that get the most votes will possibly be added."

"Program Management can be more functional to provide better program management."

"The user interface is very, very old and is missing some functions, such as, for example, re-do, follow, and share functions."

"Currently, HPE PPM does not allow “Project” approval, but only simple “Demand Request” approval (mobility)."

"The solution can sometimes be a little inflexible and a bit caustic."

"We constantly put in requests for some of the things we need. One of those is being able to export just our standard request type to PDF."

"Features such as the chargeback mechanism as well as managing various partners and cloud service providers needs to be improved."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management cons

"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions i.e. to Infor ERP, Confluence, ..."

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"I would say there is too much work that has to go into the configuration up front and for the first 6 months to 1 year after, which costs time, money, and resources, and it is not a very advanced tool and seems interface-wise to be behind the times."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current."

"Limited unless you purchase additional support hours."

"The user interface is quirky and does not always conform to the expected Microsoft UI standards."

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"The previous solution that we were using was Projector PSA; it was overall a superior product."

More Planview Daptiv cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"HPE PPM SaaS model is comprehensive, however, the base fee component has customer resistance to its recurring setup,"

"There is an additional cost for product support"

"A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized company. The license is based on the number of users."

"We have an annual license, and it is fairly priced in comparison to that of other solutions."

"Support and license management are two hurdles for us. Every time we purchase new licenses, it has taken us half a year to implement those."

"It is SaaS without a base fee."

"Now, we also received an increase in the support license prices, without any advanced notice. At this point, switching to unify all our licensing under HPE and customer support has been poor."

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Marketing Services Firm

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?

Hi, @Cheryl Joseph Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management solution could be a good candidate, see my review on this product, or if you may need more information to drop me a message. You can...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

The price of this solution is reasonable. It is not overly expensive and provides a fair value for the features offered.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation. Additionally, strategic portfolio management and investment management s...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Project Server vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 10% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 6% of the time

Sciforma vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 6% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 6% of the time

Bubble Innovator vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Competitors

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 8% of the time

Jira vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 7% of the time

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 6% of the time

ITM Platform vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 6% of the time

monday.com vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 5% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

March 2026

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management report

Download OpenText Project and Portfolio Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv

March 2026

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM), HPE Project and Portfolio Management PPM

No data available

Overview

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides resource planning, project delivery, and governance with an intuitive interface, seamless integrations, and powerful modules for effective project lifecycle management.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management delivers comprehensive portfolio and project management, aligning with business strategies and objectives. The platform features seamless integrations with essential tools like Microsoft Project and Jira, offering powerful modules such as time, demand, and resource management. It enhances decision-making with real-time data visibility, workflow automation, scenario comparison, and customizable dashboards. While offering extensive financial management and the ability to model processes, areas for enhancement include user interface, reporting, resource management, and integration with cloud services. Users also aim for improvements in security and mobile capabilities, alongside upgrades in database support and API usage, seeking a reduction in coding dependency for a better experience.

What are the key features of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

Intuitive interface: Provides a user-friendly design that simplifies navigation and operation.
Seamless integrations: Compatible with Microsoft Project and Jira, enhancing workflow efficiency.
Powerful modules: Includes time, demand, and resource management for effective control.
Real-time data visibility: Ensures accurate and timely insights for decision-making.
Customizable dashboards: Supports personalized views for improved project monitoring.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Flexibility: Enables modeling of various processes to fit specific business needs.
Comprehensive management: Aligns projects with business strategies.
Workflow automation: Reduces manual efforts, increasing efficiency.
Scenario comparison: Assists in evaluating different project outcomes.
Cost management: Provides extensive financial tools for better budgeting.

Industries leverage OpenText Project and Portfolio Management for resource planning and project governance. Organizations deploy modules like Demand, Time, and Resource Management to integrate financials and forecast workloads. The platform aids in project management, demand consolidation, and value-based delivery, facilitating investment management, capacity planning, and workflow optimization. Customization aligns with specific needs, supporting project control, defect tracking, and comprehensive reporting. Clients utilize the system for resourcing requirements and staffing profiles, ensuring effective project lifecycle management tailored to industry demands.

OpenText

Daptiv by Changepoint is an industry-leading Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) solution that helps businesses connect strategy to execution. Plan and monitor your portfolios from a top-down perspective to ensure you’re investing in the right projects to align with the overarching goals of your business.

Planview

Sample Customers

Bank Simpanan Nasional, Smart Communications, Aareon AG

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv

March 2026

Free Report: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.