OpenText Project and Portfolio Management and Planview Daptiv compete in the project and portfolio management category. OpenText PPM holds an advantage with its comprehensive features, including what-if analysis and real-time visibility, while Planview Daptiv is praised for its customizable project boards and ease of use.
Features: OpenText PPM impresses with advanced functionalities such as real-time visibility and detailed financial tracking. It provides seamless integrations with external tools like Jira and Microsoft Project, enhancing project management capabilities. Additionally, OpenText PPM offers a comprehensive program management module for better portfolio oversight. Planview Daptiv stands out with its user-friendly project boards, which enable teams to organize tasks visually. It also features highly customizable dashboard views that adapt to different project requirements, making it easier for managers to track progress. Moreover, its flexible pricing model allows organizations to choose plans that fit their budget.
Room for Improvement: OpenText PPM could benefit from improved reporting capabilities and greater resource management flexibility. Users have noted limitations with the mobile user interface and inconsistencies between modules. On the other hand, Planview Daptiv should enhance its project and capacity planning tools and offer more robust reporting features, as current capabilities are perceived to be lacking. Despite advancements, OpenText PPM agile functions may not completely align with some client needs, indicating room for enhancing user experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText PPM is primarily an on-premises solution, requiring considerable initial setup, while Planview Daptiv offers cloud deployment options for easier installation. OpenText's customer support receives mixed reviews; some users experience efficient service, whereas others face delays. Conversely, Planview Daptiv is commended for consistently responsive customer and technical support.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText PPM's pricing is considered high, with complex licensing and support expenses that may not suit smaller companies. Planview Daptiv offers a more transparent, flexible pricing structure, providing cost-effective options and volume discounts. Users highlight Planview Daptiv's appealing pricing model, which aids budget-conscious organizations. ROI for both solutions depends on organizations effectively leveraging their comprehensive features and integrations.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Project and Portfolio Management | 5.7% |
| Planview Daptiv | 3.1% |
| Other | 91.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides resource planning, project delivery, and governance with an intuitive interface, seamless integrations, and powerful modules for effective project lifecycle management.
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management delivers comprehensive portfolio and project management, aligning with business strategies and objectives. The platform features seamless integrations with essential tools like Microsoft Project and Jira, offering powerful modules such as time, demand, and resource management. It enhances decision-making with real-time data visibility, workflow automation, scenario comparison, and customizable dashboards. While offering extensive financial management and the ability to model processes, areas for enhancement include user interface, reporting, resource management, and integration with cloud services. Users also aim for improvements in security and mobile capabilities, alongside upgrades in database support and API usage, seeking a reduction in coding dependency for a better experience.
What are the key features of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?Industries leverage OpenText Project and Portfolio Management for resource planning and project governance. Organizations deploy modules like Demand, Time, and Resource Management to integrate financials and forecast workloads. The platform aids in project management, demand consolidation, and value-based delivery, facilitating investment management, capacity planning, and workflow optimization. Customization aligns with specific needs, supporting project control, defect tracking, and comprehensive reporting. Clients utilize the system for resourcing requirements and staffing profiles, ensuring effective project lifecycle management tailored to industry demands.
Planview Daptiv offers robust project management capabilities with a focus on resource allocation, capacity planning, and collaboration.
Planview Daptiv is known for its excellent reporting, flexibility, and no-code functionalities. It includes beneficial portfolio views and comprehensive dashboards while integrating with IBM Cognos for enhanced analytics. The platform's timekeeping feature efficiently records billable hours, and its project boards and task management add significant value. However, improvements are needed in areas like expense management and resource allocation. Some users encounter complex and outdated features. Enhanced security measures, better integrations with tools like ITFM, and improved analytics would boost its utility.
What are the standout features of Planview Daptiv?Organizations use Planview Daptiv in IT and construction projects, multi-project oversight, and comprehensive tracking. Consultancy firms employ it for PSA activities, aiding in the implementation process. It supports new project management offices post-merger for technical tasks, similar to Jira.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
