Ping Identity Platform vs RSA SecurID comparison

Ping Identity and RSA are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Ping Identity is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while RSA is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.0. Ping Identity holds a 4.0% mindshare in AS, compared to RSA’s 6.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ping Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of RSA users who would recommend it.

Ping Identity Platform

Read 29 Ping Identity Platform reviews

5,579 Views
2,008 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

RSA SecurID

Read 9 RSA SecurID reviews

3,195 Views
2,844 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

RSA SecurID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ping Identity Platform and RSA SecurID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Authentication Systems solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Ping Identity Platform vs. RSA SecurID Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform vs. RSA SecurID

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Authentication Systems

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (3rd), Data Governance (8th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (5th), Access Management (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (2nd), Directory Servers (1st)

RSA SecurID

Ranking in Authentication Systems

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 4.0%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA SecurID is 6.4%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

MAHESHKUMAR7

Cyber Security Engineer at TECHMINDZ DIGITAL CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED

Offers multi-factor authentication and application support side of PingFederate but application only supports specific protocols

A lot of teams work with technical support, but I work with it for user issues only. You might need support with things like application swaps, application names, and application URLs. I didn't know where to find those in Ping Identity, so I contacted technical support for those issues. The support team is very clever and active. They provide end-to-end support once an issue is created. I have worked with most of the support team. I also work with the support team because I work with the operations team. I provide 24/7 support to production and non-production environments. I coordinate with application and network teams to troubleshoot critical tickets and issues related to Ping Identity solutions.

Read full review

Chandan Tripathi

Identity and Access Management Principal at Mobily

Useful for making logins more secure by using multifactor authentication but extremely expensive

There is room for improvement in a few areas. Firstly, it lacks support for OIDC and OS capabilities, making it less versatile for integrating various applications. Secondly, there are some limitations in the number of supported applications. Lastly, it doesn't offer an agent-based or reverse-proxy-based approach to integration, which could enhance its flexibility.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The only feature we were looking for in PingID was SSO integration with our existing web app."

"It is a scalable solution."

"I like the self-service feature. The 502 and UBP systems are also excellent. PingID's ability to authenticate with SSH, RDP, and Windows login is pretty handy. It covers the entire spectrum of use."

"I find the auto-discovery feature the most valuable. It helps us automate a lot of things using a single password across applications."

"We use the product to run different reports."

"The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in."

"From a security perspective, I highly value the product's biometric authentication methods such as FIDO, FaceID, YubiKey, and the mobile app."

"It offers robust features and customization options that justify the cost."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

"I think it is really good when it comes to the hard token side of things."

"It is a scalable solution."

"I would say that the two-factor authentication and the ease of installation and configuration are the most valuable features of this solution."

"The most valuable features of RSA SecurID Access are push notifications, multifactor authentication, and ease of integration and deployment."

"One of the most valuable feature is the ID soft token and hard token."

Cons

"PingID would benefit from a better user interface for integration."

"They could enhance the product's device tracking for better zero-trust security would be beneficial. Currently, it tracks IPs well but lacks detailed device information, which is crucial from a security standpoint."

"PingID should put a little more effort into making a pretty self-explanatory deck about their tech features and the services they offer."

"Sometimes, there are issues with its stability."

"Currently, the main integration is SAML-based, but other integration methodologies need to be supported."

"The product's community has certain shortcomings that require improvement."

"PingID classifies the type of environment into internal and external, which is an area for improvement because you need to take additional steps to trust internal and external users."

"PingFederate's UI could be streamlined. They have recently made several improvements, but it's still too complex. It's a common complaint. The configuration should be simplified because the learning curve is too steep."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

"It doesn't offer an agent-based or reverse-proxy-based approach to integration, which could enhance its flexibility."

"Sometimes, we encounter issues with other applications that are not compatible with RSA SecurID Access and require expert troubleshooting. At those times, we need additional support from an implementation perspective. This is an area where Oracle can improve as there is no substitute for reliable and efficient support."

"There are different compliances across the globe; RSA SecurID Access could be more complaint-based."

"The interface needs to improve a lot. It should be easier to manage and navigate."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

"RSA SecurID Access is expensive."

"I think the price of this solution is reasonable compared to YubiKey and Duo given that it offers the same similar features."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

14%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingID?

The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?

The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingID?

The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.

See all answers

What do you like most about RSA SecurID Access?

The most valuable features of RSA SecurID Access are push notifications, multifactor authentication, and ease of integration and deployment.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RSA SecurID Access?

RSA SecurID Access is quite expensive. I would rate it a ten out of ten in terms of costliness.

See all answers

What needs improvement with RSA SecurID Access?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 18% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 7% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Yubico YubiKey vs RSA SecurID

Compared 57% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs RSA SecurID

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Duo vs RSA SecurID

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA SecurID

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs RSA SecurID

Compared 3% of the time

More RSA SecurID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

August 2025

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

July 2025

Download RSA SecurID product report

Also Known As

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

RSA SecurID Access, RSA Access Manager

Overview

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

The RSA SecurID Suite combines the separate disciplines of access management and authentication with identity governance and user lifecycle management into one comprehensive suite. It goes way beyond the capabilities of traditional identity and access management systems by using risk analytics to provide identity and access assurance. This helps organizations solve two fundamental challenges:

Verifying that their users are who they say they are.
Providing their users with the right level of access.

RSA

Sample Customers

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Milliman, Geisinger Health System, Advanced Micro Devices

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform vs. RSA SecurID

July 2025

Free Report: Ping Identity Platform vs. RSA SecurID

Find out what your peers are saying about Ping Identity Platform vs. RSA SecurID and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ping Identity Platform vs. RSA SecurID report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.