No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Pipefy vs Temporal comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.5
Pipefy boosts team efficiency through automation, reducing manual tasks, saving time and money, and optimizing workflows in the commercial sector.
Sentiment score
6.0
Temporal's cost-effectiveness reduces maintenance costs, essential for high-reliability needs, automating processes and saving time and expenses.
With the entire service being constantly evaluated and with us having a trace of all this operational side, we are able to measure the quality of the service, how much each of the employees worked.
Head de Operações
In terms of money and time saved, Pipefy is a great time saver overall, reflecting in analysts handling additional projects beyond ticket management.
Finance Analyst at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The Kanban model makes it very technological, leading to increased productivity compared to something done manually, such as sending quotations by email.
Analista de Compras Junior at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The ROI is apparent in terms of business case automation; previously, a bunch of people filled in data in NetSuite or managed stocks between warehouses and Amazon, but now everything is automated, saving time.
Founder & CEO at Lanzar
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
4.7
Pipefy's customer service is efficient and responsive, though some users face delays and prefer easier contact options.
Sentiment score
6.7
Temporal service excels through active forums and Slack, despite time zone delays; users praise its responsive support.
I would rate customer support on a scale from one to ten as ten.
Analista de Negócios at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Whenever I needed support, and there were many times I needed it, they were extremely attentive and quick in their service.
PMO Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
This is cumbersome, and I find direct customer service with Pipefy to be lacking.
Finance Analyst at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
5.9
Pipefy excels in scalability, handling growth efficiently and reliably, while offering user-friendly customization to improve processes for all sizes.
Sentiment score
7.1
Temporal excels in scalability, managing numerous workflows while requiring robust infrastructure like Cassandra and Kubernetes for optimal performance.
Pipefy's scalability handles the volume of requests very well, and when new demands arise, it does not freeze or lag.
Analista de Compras Junior at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
It is a proportional increase in output without a proportional increase in headcount.
Field Office Coordinator at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Since we can track the whole process, its scalability is very good because we can analyze the entire macro.
Head de Operações
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Pipefy is generally stable and reliable, with occasional downtime and good security, making it a dependable choice.
Sentiment score
6.7
Users find Temporal stable with minor SDK challenges, suggesting better documentation and diagnostics for enhanced stability perceptions.
I don't remember any moment when something had an error or when something froze my operation.
Unknown at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
They always notify about any maintenance and also inform what the progress is when there is a problem.
PMO Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
I would rate its stability at approximately 80 percent reliability with 20 percent downtime.
Analista de monitoramento at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Pipefy needs better support, pricing flexibility, enhanced integrations, improved mobile app, and refined workflows for user satisfaction.
Improving Temporal's user-friendliness, documentation, visualization, features, and support would enhance usability for beginners and non-technical users.
I believe this part could be improved because this kind of error should not happen while someone is using Pipefy.
Analista de Compras Junior at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Sometimes the person who is buying this platform is not going to use all these functions. So there could be smaller, intermediate plans so you can use Pipefy up to a specific point, and then you would have lower costs.
Head de Operações
Pipefy should alert users when they are creating conflicting rules.
business analyst at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers consider Pipefy's pricing high yet favorable, appreciating its value, comprehensive packages, and competitive billing system.
Temporal provides cost-effective, flexible pricing with open-source tools, offering savings over competitors, especially for self-hosted deployments.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been cost-effective.
Software Firmware Engineer at Kohler Company
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing is that it was expensive.
Head de Operações
I also didn't have access to the prices, but I know that we had several users and, given what the platform delivers, it was a fair price.
Analista de Negócios at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Valuable Features

Pipefy enhances productivity and workflow visibility with automation, AI optimization, intuitive interface, and low-code flexibility for easy customization.
Temporal streamlines workflow management with robust automation, fault tolerance, language integration, and easy deployment via Kubernetes and Docker Compose.
A specific outcome since using Pipefy is that we have reduced lead time significantly.
Lean 6 Sigma Consultant at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees
In my opinion, some of the best features Pipefy offers are workflow customizations with low-code configuration, automation of repetitive tasks and approvals, an easy-to-use and intuitive interface, visibility and tracking across teams and processes, integration capabilities with other tools, centralized process management, notifications, and SLA tracking.
Sre at Atlas Technologies
Pipefy has had a positive impact on my organization by helping the collections team convert invoices that were overdue into paid invoices and, consequently, cash for the company.
Software Developer at a legal firm with 1-10 employees
The deployment process is quite straightforward as it provides both Kubernetes and Docker Compose versions, allowing us to run it in ECS containers.
Founder & CEO at Lanzar
 

Categories and Ranking

Pipefy
Ranking in Process Automation
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.3
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Agentic Automation (7th), AI Agent Builders (10th)
Temporal
Ranking in Process Automation
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Pipefy is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temporal is 3.3%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Pipefy0.5%
Temporal3.3%
Other96.2%
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Tamires dos Santos Andrade - PeerSpot reviewer
PMO Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Workflow automation has transformed portfolio control and centralizes cross‑department requests
Something I would like to see improved in Pipefy is the dashboards. They are good, but they are a little limited. This point is important, and I would also like to see a bit more clarity in the use of AI tokens. Pipefy already offers connection and artificial intelligence tools that help you with your forms and make the process much more intuitive, but it is still a bit obscure regarding consumption, how that consumption occurs, and how to build this in a way that is relatively economical. Another important thing is related to cost. Pipefy's license cost is a high cost compared to other players in the market, but so far it has been worth it. Another thing I would suggest is if they had a white-label option where we could put a bit more of the company's identity. Pipefy already is white label, but the customization options are a little more limited. Turning that into a more attractive page would be nice for some companies so that we can incorporate it into our portals.
MP
Founder & CEO at Lanzar
Automation streamlines operations and improves time and cost efficiency
My overall experience with Temporal is rated between 8 to 9, mainly due to a learning curve that only senior developers can navigate effectively, which makes it a bit challenging for junior developers. We don't have any instances of on-premise, so I cannot comment on that because we are a first company, with all services deployed on cloud infrastructure. Most of the integration is through RPC or APIs, ensuring all our systems are in cohesion. We do state persistence to a Postgres instance, and we have modified it to our use case with better indexing. And for fault tolerance, we built a queue and an alerting mechanism that notifies us if any workflows fail after specific failure points so we can act upon it. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Temporal an 8.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
20%
Outsourcing Company
16%
Construction Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Pipefy?
Something I would like to see improved in Pipefy is the dashboards. They are good, but they are a little limited. This point is important, and I would also like to see a bit more clarity in the use...
What is your primary use case for Pipefy?
My main use case for Pipefy is managing my project portfolio, and I have also used it for other functionalities, mainly in the treasury area for receiving invoices and for tracking requests. I have...
What advice do you have for others considering Pipefy?
On a scale from one to ten, I rate Pipefy a nine. I think it is a very complete tool and very easy to use, which is why I give it a nine rather than a ten. It does not require great instruction, so...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Temporal?
In terms of pricing, Camunda is indeed costlier than Temporal. The cloud deployment costs differ, and while Camunda 7 can be cheaper due to its integrated setup, comparing latest versions between T...
What needs improvement with Temporal?
The only area for improvement in Temporal is the UI. I know it is a non-UI first product, but comparing Camunda versus Temporal UI, there is a difference. Moreover, n8n, being a no-code platform, i...
What is your primary use case for Temporal?
The main purposes for using Temporal are automation flows, especially financial automations and supply chain automations. Our company name is SR, we are a digital-first CPG brand making company, ma...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Accenture 2. Coca-Cola 3. Santander 4. IBM 5. Unilever 6. Siemens 7. Johnson & Johnson 8. Deloitte 9. PwC 10. Nestle 11. General Electric 12. Microsoft 13. Oracle 14. Amazon 15. Facebook 16. Google 17. Apple 18. Uber 19. Airbnb 20. Netflix 21. Adobe 22. Salesforce 23. Cisco 24. Intel 25. HP 26. Samsung 27. Sony 28. Toyota 29. Volkswagen 30. BMW 31. Mercedes-Benz 32. Audi
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Pipefy vs. Temporal and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.