Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Sprinto vs Vanta comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Sprinto
Ranking in Compliance Management
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
AI Security (16th), AI Legal & Compliance (7th)
Vanta
Ranking in Compliance Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Compliance Consulting (1st), Data Governance (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Compliance Management category, the mindshare of Sprinto is 2.4%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Vanta is 7.6%, down from 13.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Compliance Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Vanta7.6%
Sprinto2.4%
Other90.0%
Compliance Management
 

Featured Reviews

PG
Cybersecurity Analyst at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Compliance workflows have become faster and audit renewals are completed with strong MFA support
Sprinto offers several valuable features. It provides very good authentication capabilities, and the support team consistently supports us with any requirements we have. They support us anytime we send emails, and any doubts we have are addressed through weekly scheduled calls. They support us from the beginning to the end of the process, and the support team is excellent. For example, in GCP, when a user enables MFA but it does not display in their system due to configuration issues, we send an email and the support team immediately connects with us to resolve the issue. After that resolution, we have not faced that issue until now, so they support us very well. Sprinto has positively impacted our organization because we have completed the ISO and SOC 2 renewal for the fourth time and are continuing with the same tool for an extended period. Specific outcomes and metrics related to ISO and SOC 2 renewals show that Sprinto provides a fast process with excellent support. When we have time, we resolve issues quickly, and they also help us by providing tips to complete ISO and SOC 2 renewals. Sprinto is a very good tool with no need for improvements.
reviewer2585640 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Compliance workflows have become organized and automation supports ongoing healthcare audits
There are always tons of rooms for improvement for Vanta. I kind of exaggerated a little bit about the policy control. I don't really love the way they handle the revision management of that feature. If I'm on V1 of the policy document and I make some changes to it, then I get rid of V1 and then I re-upload V2. It's not that it keeps a running history of each of the different revisions. A little bit of an issue with that, but workable. I don't really have any negative complaint right now that would be worthwhile expressing. It's just that there's a lot of features. The UI is not super intuitive, but now that I've worked with it for a couple of years, I know how to navigate and get around. Initially, it was a little bit of a struggle understanding how these things would all work.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Sprinto is a very good tool with no need for improvements."
"The best features Sprinto offers are that it saves time and manual effort, reduces audit preparation stress, and a lot of manual work during audits, which improves our visibility and compliance status and enhances our security."
"The most valuable feature of Vanta would be the time savings from the automation and the continuous compliance monitoring once set up."
"Vanta has positively impacted my organization by streamlining the whole HITRUST R2 assessment process."
"The most valuable feature of Vanta is its prebuilt control frameworks."
"They integrate into New Relic as a performance monitoring tool."
"Vanta provides a necessary repository that any compliance expert will look at and recognize right away."
"It helps us track the compliance of the components listed in our partner's directory. We can also check if the password manager, XML, and three log policies have been properly implemented on the desktop."
"After implementing those changes with Vanta, we tracked specific outcomes and metrics and improved compliance scores, which we can see in Vanta."
"Vanta has positively impacted my organization by streamlining the whole HITRUST R2 assessment process."
 

Cons

"There is one area for improvement. We have different tools for DPDP and other certifications related to auditing that we cannot configure in Sprinto."
"It could be more user-friendly."
"There is a delay with customer support and they are unsure of the answers we need."
"Currently, Vanta's user access review module is still in development, and we've been giving them continuous feedback to help them improve that."
"They have an AI generator for the system description for SOC 2, however, the outline is a little sketchy."
"Some of the tool's automated tests do not work the way it should."
"There are connection problems about 50% of the time because of the automated evidence collection."
"I would tell others looking into using Vanta to use it for HITRUST E1 and I1 assessments, as the R2 assessments are still a work in progress."
"Failed tests for device CVEs seem to be cumulative, meaning I have to clear all CVEs before the test will pass, which makes it difficult to resolve the test before the next round of CVEs are published."
"Scalability could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Vanta is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compliance Management solutions are best for your needs.
884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Non Profit
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
9%
University
8%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise1
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Sprinto?
Sprinto is primarily for auditing, security, and compliance, so I don't have much to add on how it can be improved. It could be more user-friendly. It is user-friendly, but not that much. For a non...
What is your primary use case for Sprinto?
Sprinto is mainly used in our company to manage security compliance and audit readiness, automating policy tracking so it was installed on everyone's laptop to ensure we follow policy and automate ...
What advice do you have for others considering Sprinto?
For noticeable improvements with Sprinto, I don't have much to add because it is for security policies specifically. Sprinto deserves a rating of seven out of ten because what it does is very good ...
What do you like most about Vanta?
The most valuable feature of Vanta is its prebuilt control frameworks.
What needs improvement with Vanta?
Failed tests for device CVEs seem to be cumulative, meaning I have to clear all CVEs before the test will pass, which makes it difficult to resolve the test before the next round of CVEs are publis...
What is your primary use case for Vanta?
My use case involves SOC 2 and ISO 27001 compliance.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Care Directives, Shortcut , Nayya, Heizenrader, Treasury Prime
Find out what your peers are saying about Wiz, SentinelOne, Vanta and others in Compliance Management. Updated: March 2026.
884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.