Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Reviews

I use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for security protection for our endpoints for the users.

There is a problem with the solution, it came from Russia and we are looking for a replacement.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for approximately two years.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is a stable solution.

I have found Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response not to be scalable.

We have approximately 700 users using the solution. We do not have plans to increase usage. We are looking to switch solutions.

We were using Panda Antivirus previously.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response's initial installation were straightforward. To installation of the solution on the end-users systems takes 10 minutes. However, from the console, it is a little more time, approximately two days to configure.

We only needed one person for the implementation and support of the solution. We had some support hours from the vendor if needed.

We were on a three-year license to use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. The price could be better.

I would not recommend this solution to others. We are moving to different solutions.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response an eight out of ten.

The solution is great for customers who would like to secure their endpoints and provide protection for users. It's based on the RFP response, actually, our customer reference.

The simplicity is great

It's a very light product. 

We've found the solution to be stable.

It's scalable and easy to expand.

The installation process is very simple. 

Symantec is a better option. Kaspersky needs to strengthen its standing in the market.

It would be ideal if they could make it even easier to use.

I've been using the solution for maybe five years at this point. 

The stability of the product is great. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

You can scale the solution if you need to. It's not difficult. 

We have 15 users on the solution currently.

I've never directly contacted technical support. I cannot speak to how helpful they would be.

We sometimes deal with Symantec or FireEye, depending on the requirements. 

The solution is easy to set up. It's not a difficult process. That said, I didn't do the installation myself and therefore cannot speak on how long the deployment took. 

Our engineers handled the installation process. 

We pay a monthly licensing fee. 

I would recommend the solution to others. It's been good so far. 

I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten.

This solution is used for network security.

The most valuable feature is endpoint protection.

The solution can improve by providing automatic fixing of vulnerabilities and reducing the resources used in the server component and endpoint agent. They are very bulky and use a lot of CPU, memory, and hard drive resources.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for approximately six years.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is stable.

I have found this solution not to be scalable.

Our clients that are using this solution are small-sized businesses.

The technical support for this solution is not good. They do not have the availability of resources.

The installation is very easy.

The price of the solution could be reduced.

Those wanting to implement this solution have to understand that fine-tuning and adjusting their policy plan has to be a regular activity.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response a seven out of ten.

We use Kaspersky for our cash machines, 200 of which we have around the country. We use it to control the USB ports so nobody can use them without authorization from the owner. 

Currently, we implementing a new use case concerning our response when we get an alert.

In the past year, many banks have seen cases of ATM looting. We wanted to prevent that, which is why we implemented Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. We are a bank and we haven't had any issues like the orders. Kaspersky helped us a lot. It helped up prevent unauthorized USB port usage. 

I would like to integrate Kaspersky with my Log Collector SIEM. Right now that's not possible. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response could also introduce a way to make working in teams more accessible. At the same time, it would be interesting to see them explore artificial intelligence solutions. 

I have been using this solution for two years. 

My impression of the stability of this solution is good. We have not had any issues with stability. 

We have not had any performance issues and our board really likes the solution. Our facility and technical support teams use this solution as they manage the cash machines. 

I think they are good and we haven't had any problems with them. We haven't had any critical issues that would have required us to call the US technical support of US; we have only been in touch with local technical support.

We previously used Sophos, Crowdstrike, and Microsoft Defender. The most important reason we transitioned to Kaspersky is the agent that is installed in the end points on the cash machine. The Kaspersky agent is really soft. With the others, we noticed that their agents would stop, so that made a big difference.

We used three or four people to deploy and maintain the solution. 

Our current monthly costs are $1,000. 

You have to be really informed about the process of using this tool before deploying. With our use case with the cash machines, for example, implementing the white list could have been really hard work for us if we had not had previous experience with it.

We are a solution provider and Kaspersky EDR is one of the products that we implement for our customers as part of their overall security.

This is a feature-rich product.

There should be options in the UI to better assist with troubleshooting problems that occur during deployment.

I would like to see a more simplified view of the configuration options.

The technical support team should respond in a more timely manner.

I have two years of experience with this product.

I have not experienced any bugs or glitches while using it.

The technical support is good. I would say that it is not bad and not excellent, but something in between. I have only opened one case with them and it took a long time for them to respond.

I am currently trying to compare Kaspersky with a similar solution by Carbon Black.

In summary, I think that Kaspersky is a good product to use.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

We use the solution to monitor 200-300 equipment. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers centralized monitoring where we can monitor everything from a single point. I also like its security and network traffic features. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert needs to include a traffic interface. 

I have been working with the solution for eight years. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is very stable. 

My company has 200 users for the product. I rate its scalability an eight out of ten. 

The tool's customer support is good. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert's installation was easy. 

I rate the product a ten out of ten. 

We primarily use the solution for security.

Overall, the solution is okay.

We have a central console and from there you can monitor all workstations via an agent. The agent is installed on workstations and servers and after that, the agent can contact the central server from which we can see all of the information. We can see if the antivirus has been updated, if the solution has been detecting anything, or if there are any issues, for example. 

The pricing is very good. It's quite cheap. It might be one of the least expensive. 

It does not cover all of our security issues. It's not a complete security solution. We'd like something like CrowdStrike Falcon. We'd like the same features as CrowdStike. If they can have even better features than CrowdStrike in the future, it would be better.

The solution lacks EDR features.

The solution is cheaper than other products. However, it's not as complete. 

We are looking to evaluate CrowdStrike. We understand that that solution covers more features.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's a good product, however, it does not cover enough for us. We need something more expansive.

It's an antivirus solution that we use on-premises with cloud-sync.

The issue with Kaspersky EDR is the sandbox. I'd like to have the ability to manage it on the cloud as well.

I've been using it for two years.

It is stable.

It's scalable, but it requires additional servers. We have about 10,000 users.

Technical support from Kaspersky is okay.

The installation of the physical servers is very simple, but the software is not that simple. It takes about one or two days for the virtual environment.

We have yearly licensing costs, and they are not cheap.

I would recommend Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response and rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten.