Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Reviews

The most valuable feature of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is security. It has better security than other solutions, such as Symantec.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response could improve some issues and add new security files.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for approximately two years.

The stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is good.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is scalable.

We have approximately 220 people using this solution in my company.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response has good support.

I have used previously used Symantec. However, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response has better usability than Symantec. We choose  Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response because it fits the needs of our company more.

The implementation of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response was simple. It took approximately 15 days to complete across the company.

We have not seen a return on investment at this point.

The price of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is in the middle range compared to competitors. The pricing model is based on the users using the solutions. The cost for us is approximately 2200 Algerian dinars. The price of the solution could be reduced.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response an eight out of ten.

I mainly use Kaspersky EDR for BIOS protection.

EDR's most valuable feature is its basic protection from malware and viruses.

Kaspersky EDR lacks protection from recent ransomware. Because of this, we're looking into switching from EDR to another security solution.

I've been using Kaspersky EDR for two to three years.

EDR is stable.

EDR is scalable.

The initial setup was easy - I would rate the ease as four out of five.

The license for EDR costs about 1,000 pesos per user. I would rate the pricing as four out of five.

I would rate Kaspersky EDR as eight out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for our servers. It's for security.

We enjoy the solution as, when we are online we are secure. It's easy to use and not too heavy. It doesn't slow down any machines at all. 

The product is quite stable.

It's scalable enough for us.

The product is straightforward to set up. 

There could be more secure.

The prices can go down a little bit.

I've used the solution for quite some time. It might have been six years at this point. 

It's a stable product. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

We find the product to be scalable. You can expand it if you need to.

We have five people using it in our organization. 

We've never contacted technical support. We've never had an issue. It works the way we need it to and we've never had a problem.

We started with Kaspersky. We didn't use a different solution previously.

The initial setup was straightforward. We are a tech company and therefore we found it pretty simple. Even a layman, however, can do the installation. It's not complex or difficult. We deployed it with our engineers. 

We handled the setup ourselves. We didn't need the help of any consultants or integrators. 

We'd like the pricing to be lower. It can get a bit pricey.

We pay for an annual license.

As a cloud solution, we're always on the latest version. We update it automatically on the cloud.

I'd recommend the solution to others. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. There's room for improvement, however, we've largely been happy with it. 

We use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for the protection of our system from the internet, firewall, malware, and viruses.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is an effective protection solution.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is very heavy on the system resources. It uses a lot of memory and the system can become slow.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for approximately two years.

The stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is good.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is a scalable solution.

We do not plan to increase usage.

I have not used technical support. The solution is simple to use, they provide the tools that we need. However, the support is readily available if I need them.

The installation of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response was simple and fast. It only takes approximately seven minutes.

I did the implementation myself.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response a nine out of ten.

The tool helps us to protect from hacking, malware, phishing, etc.

I like the tool’s response to malware and trojans.

The product should release more frequent updates. The tool needs to improve its scalability as well.

I have been using the solution for three to four years.

The solution is stable and I would rate it a nine out of ten.

The solution is scalable and I would rate it an eight out of ten. My company has around 500 users for the solution. We plan to increase the number of users. In the next two to three years, the number of users will be doubled.

I didn’t encounter any issues hence haven’t contacted tech support yet.

The tool’s setup is straightforward. The setup gets completed within a day.

We did the solution’s deployment in-house.

We have seen ROI with the solution’s use.

The solution’s pricing is okay.

I would rate the overall solution a nine out of ten. One IT administrator is enough to manage the solution. You need to regularly update the solution. If you don’t update regularly, then you will have more chances of encountering security threats. You need to also refrain from using unknown software.

We use this solution mainly for protection, but we also have another solution we use for this.

The content filtering options are good.

It consumes many system resources, and there should be more EDR details.

We have been using this solution for one year, and we are using the new version. It is deployed on-premises.

The solution is stable. Regarding detection, sometimes it consumes a lot of system resources.

It is scalable. We have not scaled it yet, but our customers use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response, and they have not had any issues scaling.

We have not needed technical support. Instead, we deal with our cases and use Google to solve our problems.

We prefer CrowdStrike to Kaspersky.

It is not easy to set up. I believe the cloud version is easier to implement. We only deployed it on three computers, which didn't take much time. It was a bit of a struggle.

It is cheap compared to CrowdStrike. It costs $20 per user.

I rate this solution a seven out of ten. Regarding advice, Kaspersky should work with a signature-less solution only because it's better and does not consume too many system resources. They should not use indicators because some new next-generation antivirus vendors are currently not using IOCs. Instead, they use IOA, which is better. In addition, Kaspersky could be GDPR compliant.

I'm the head of our IT department. 

I like that Kaspersky provides us with web and DNS protection over https.

Everything is automatic on Kaspersky but it would be great if they could add a feature for examining suspicious files. I'd like the solution to offer additional protection. 

I've been using this solution for one year. 

The solution is stable, we haven't had any problems. 

In our organization, each department has its own antivirus so scalability is not relevant to us. We only have four users in our department. 

I haven't needed to contact technical support. 

I previously used Avast. I switched to Kaspersky because it seemed to work more quickly detecting suspicious files without affecting our work. 

The initial setup is straightforward. We carried out the deployment in-house and it took about a week. We have a manager and a tech person dealing with the solution. We're in a small network environment and we don't need much. 

The solution is free for now. 

I rate this solution 10 out of 10. 

I primarily use Endpoint for protection against viruses.

The most valuable feature is Endpoint's management.

The main problem with Endpoint is that Kaspersky is a Russian company, and my clients prefer not to use it.

I've been using this solution for ten years.

Endpoint is stable.

Kaspersky's technical support is good.

The initial setup is easy, taking no more than a week.

Endpoint's pricing is good, especially compared to expensive solutions like Sophos.

Endpoint is a good technical solution because it provides granular control over devices. I would give it a rating of eight out of ten.