Kaspersky is useful for detecting zero-day attacks. It's signature-based and we get regular updates from the cloud.
Senior IT Security Engineer at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
It's useful for detecting zero-day attacks but challenging to implement and integrate
Pros and Cons
- "Kaspersky is easy to use, and it performs well."
- "Installing Kaspersky is complex. It requires more work from system admins and takes almost one week to deploy, including integration and mapping with other solutions. You also have to configure Kaspersky EDR sandboxing then set up permissions for various teams and customers."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
Kaspersky is easy to use, and it performs well.
What needs improvement?
I'd like to see more seamless integration with the cloud and other products as well as improvements to Kaspersky's sandboxing features.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been working with Kaspersky EDR for a few years now.
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert
September 2025
Learn what your peers think about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2025.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Kaspersky is stable and scalable.
How are customer service and support?
Kaspersky support is good.
How was the initial setup?
Installing Kaspersky is complex. It requires more work from system admins and takes almost one week to deploy, including integration and mapping with other solutions. You also have to configure Kaspersky EDR sandboxing then set up permissions for various teams and customers.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Kaspersky is licensed on a yearly basis.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Kaspersky EDR seven out of ten. I usually recommended other solutions because Kaspersky is more difficult to implement. I only deploy it when the customer requires Kaspersky. But Kaspersky requires more labor from the technical team to install and implement.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: September 2025
Product Categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
IBM Security QRadar
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
WatchGuard Firebox
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
Intercept X Endpoint
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What is the biggest difference between EPP and EDR products?
- What is the difference between EDR and traditional antivirus?
- What is your recommendation for a 5-star EDR with low resource consumption for a financial services company?
- Which is the best EDR for a logistics company with 500-1000 employees?
- What is the best EDR or XDR product for a company with 9000 employees?
- What to choose: an endpoint antivirus, an EDR solution or both?
- Do we need to use both EDR and Antivirus (AV) solutions for better protection of IT assets?
- How does EternalBlue work?
- What are the best on-premise Endpoint Security solutions for a Tech Services company with 10,000 employees?
- Which is better for Endpoint Security: EDR or XDR solutions?
