Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
NetIQ Access Manager Logo

Top 10 NetIQ Access Manager Alternatives

Vendor: OpenText
4.0 out of 5
396 followers
Start review

Top NetIQ Access Manager Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to NetIQ Access Manager based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, and Auth0. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

OpenText Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
NetIQ Access Manager Logo
Microsoft Entra ID
4.3 out of 5
NetIQ Access Manager Logo
Microsoft Entra ID
4.3 out of 5
NetIQ Access Manager offers robust security options and integration, drawing buyers focused on competitive pricing and solid ROI. In comparison, Microsoft Entra ID's cloud-native features and extensive third-party app support are attractive despite higher costs, thanks to better integration capabilities and feature richness.
Download Microsoft Entra ID vs. NetIQ Access Manager Report
NetIQ Access Manager's setup costs are higher compared to Microsoft Entra ID, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
NetIQ Access Manager's setup costs are higher compared to Microsoft Entra ID, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
NetIQ Access Manager Logo
NetIQ Access Manager Logo
Okta Workforce Identity
4.3 out of 5
NetIQ Access Manager stands out for its competitive pricing and solid support, making it appealing for those seeking cost-efficiency and comprehensive security features. In comparison, Okta Workforce Identity offers a broader feature set, including adaptive multi-factor authentication, app integrations, and a smoother deployment process.
Download NetIQ Access Manager vs. Okta Workforce Identity Report
NetIQ Access Manager involves a higher initial setup cost, while Okta Workforce Identity offers a more budget-friendly implementation. The cost difference significantly affects the decision for businesses seeking cost-effective solutions without compromising functionality.
View comparison
Pricing
NetIQ Access Manager involves a higher initial setup cost, while Okta Workforce Identity offers a more budget-friendly implementation. The cost difference significantly affects the decision for businesses seeking cost-effective solutions without compromising functionality.
NetIQ Access Manager Logo
Auth0
4.2 out of 5
NetIQ Access Manager Logo
Auth0
4.2 out of 5
NetIQ Access Manager integrates well with legacy systems and offers high configurability. In comparison, Auth0 excels with social logins, multifactor authentication, and comprehensive documentation. NetIQ Access Manager can improve setup and analytics, while Auth0 needs better customer support and pricing clarity.
Download Auth0 vs. NetIQ Access Manager Report
NetIQ Access Manager has a high setup cost compared to Auth0, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. NetIQ's higher price may be attributed to its extensive enterprise features, whereas Auth0 provides a cost-effective solution for smaller businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
NetIQ Access Manager has a high setup cost compared to Auth0, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. NetIQ's higher price may be attributed to its extensive enterprise features, whereas Auth0 provides a cost-effective solution for smaller businesses.
NetIQ Access Manager Logo
NetIQ Access Manager Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
4.1 out of 5
NetIQ Access Manager is valued for ease of use, integration, and performance. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager is noted for its versatility and scalability. NetIQ Access Manager offers competitive pricing and ROI, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager delivers higher long-term value despite higher costs.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. NetIQ Access Manager Report
NetIQ Access Manager's setup costs are generally seen as lower, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) often has higher initial expenditures. F5 BIG-IP APM may offer more robust features, justifying the higher setup cost according to some reviews.
View comparison
Pricing
NetIQ Access Manager's setup costs are generally seen as lower, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) often has higher initial expenditures. F5 BIG-IP APM may offer more robust features, justifying the higher setup cost according to some reviews.
NetIQ Access Manager Logo
NetIQ Access Manager Logo
Symantec Siteminder
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder offers comprehensive security features, while NetIQ Access Manager excels in integration capabilities. In comparison, NetIQ Access Manager provides competitive pricing and ease of deployment. Symantec Siteminder's robust security protocols come with high setup costs, offering solid ROI.
Download NetIQ Access Manager vs. Symantec Siteminder Report
Symantec Siteminder has a higher setup cost compared to NetIQ Access Manager, which offers a more affordable initial implementation. Symantec Siteminder's pricing is aimed at larger enterprises, while NetIQ Access Manager caters to smaller budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Siteminder has a higher setup cost compared to NetIQ Access Manager, which offers a more affordable initial implementation. Symantec Siteminder's pricing is aimed at larger enterprises, while NetIQ Access Manager caters to smaller budgets.

Related categories

Web Access Management
Access Management
Single Sign-On (SSO)