Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) Reviews

I work for a consulting company that contracts with an organization to provide operation center services. We use Splunk ITSI as one of our key centralized monitoring tools for the organization. Our goal is to collect data from both the organization's centralized database, Spine, and their cloud platforms, such as AWS and Azure, and send it to Splunk for monitoring. Splunk then creates reports, alerts, and dashboards that we use to visualize the data and make the most of it.

ITSI has many benefits, but its visualization for monitoring is particularly great. We have been able to identify notable events that have occurred, track them back through history, and see what data is available for a long period of time. One of the best reasons we use ITSI is because of its indexing system. We can collect data from various sources in different formats and then operate on that data, even though we have different data from AWS and Azure. Splunk does a good job of ensuring that the data is compatible with different reporting methods.

Splunk ITSI has helped us streamline our incident management process. We have a custom configuration that outputs some alerts to Slack and others to email. We package only alerts and episodes, and when an alert is triggered, an email is sent and a ServiceNow incident is raised. This has significantly streamlined our analysis process.

Splunk ITSI helped reduce our mean time to detect by ten percent.

Splunk ITSI is similar to Splunk Cloud, but it includes some additional features that are specifically useful for IT service management.

We still get the standard package with ITSI, including alerts, reports, and dashboards. However, ITSI also includes a feature called alerts and episodes, which is similar to an ITSM tool. This feature allows us to bring our searches to life and create service trees that focus on business context.

For example, if we create multiple services, we can arrange them in a tree structure. ITSI then uses a traffic light system to indicate the health of each service and its dependencies. This allows us to see the overall health of our IT environment at a glance.

ITSI also includes a powerful KPI system that allows us to create complex saved searches that power multiple different areas of our dashboard. This is very useful for tracking key performance indicators and identifying potential problems early on.

Finally, ITSI includes a feature called a glass table. This feature allows us to create visually appealing dashboards that display our KPIs and other data in a clear and concise way.

One issue we have with Splunk Cloud is that the service team is sometimes not very helpful. This is because the team is outsourced, and they often cannot provide us with the information we need. This is a major complaint of mine, and it is unacceptable given the large amount of money we pay for the service. Splunk Cloud outsources its support team, and the people who are supposed to be helping us are not very knowledgeable. They often give us unhelpful or incorrect answers.

The UI needs improvement. With real-time monitoring, we can have a service structure, but we cannot easily adjust the graphical interface. For example, if we have a long name or a 2005 feature, we cannot easily move it slightly to the right on the web page. This can be a real pain.

Our large-scale system is noisy, making it difficult to pinpoint the exact cause. This is a trade-off for using Splunk as a central monitoring tool, as we cannot give everyone access to everyone else's AWS environment. We are investigating ways to reduce the noise, but I am not sure if it is a specific ITSI problem.

Quality-of-life features have room for improvement. The search function and other features are fine, but there are a few UI changes I would make. For example, I would like to be able to extend the graphical user interface so that we can see the full name by moving the window around. It is currently difficult to work with. 

We can create a correlation search, but when we save the page, it redirects us to the search system. We should be able to save the page and stay on the page, which is a bit annoying.

We have a lookup file, but it doesn't work very well. In fact, it doesn't work at all. I hope Splunk fixes this at some point. When we make a change, it completely wipes out the change. It also says to type in the search bar, click on what we need, and if we make a slight adjustment, it will completely wipe out the search bar and we have to start over. This is very annoying.

I have been using Splunk ITSI for two years.

Splunk ITSI is stable. Resilience is essential for our organization. We need it to be active all the time. It is incredibly important because some of our services are platinum-level. If anything goes wrong, we want to know about it instantly. It is very important that ITSI is stable and works as expected, which it does. We have not had too many problems where things have gone wrong. Most likely, these problems have been configuration issues, rather than our availability going down and us being unable to access Splunk. Splunk is up all the time and rarely goes down.

Splunk ITSI is scalable, and scaling is a primary feature of cloud products. With an enterprise license, we can scale as much as we need. However, scalability also depends on our hardware. If we purchase good hardware to run Splunk on, we should be able to scale easily by creating shared clusters, index clusters, and other types of clusters, and pairing them together.

Splunk's technical support is not very good. They outsource their support, and the outsourced support team is not very knowledgeable. I believe that in-house technical support would be better.

The organization was using Splunk Enterprise which is similar to ITSI.

Splunk ITSI is expensive. We pay for the package once the sales team has priced all of our data and other relevant factors. We don't incur any further costs if we pay for a package. On its own, Splunk ITSI can be quite expensive, which is what scares many customers away. If a customer has the budget to use Splunk ITSI, then it is an excellent choice. It is one of those products where we may need to start weighing up different solutions. Splunk was recently sold to Cisco, and it could become the centralized monitoring tool for the organization for x, y, and z. I believe that our package is one of the lowest priced in the UK, even though we are squeezing as much value as possible out of the service. I would say that we should prioritize longevity over making an extra million pounds or so because that will come with time. However, I don't think that everyone sees it that way.

I would rate Splunk ITSI eight out of ten.

The visibility is good, but the issue we are interested in is split into different factions in some parts. Currently, we are not using ITSI to its full potential. The organization is enterprise-scale, which is huge. It is therefore very difficult to implement some of the ITSI best practices because we have so many different areas, each doing things differently. Standardization is difficult to achieve because everything is so massive. We could better use ITSI to its full capacity, but that is on us. However, I think it would work much better if it were a bit smaller in scale.

Cost is definitely a concern. Splunk can be quite expensive, especially if we are tied into a contract. However, it offers more features and capabilities than other solutions. I don't have a lot of experience with Splunk, but the way it aggregates data is very good. It can also parse and strap data, and search and operate on the data that is sent in. This is also very good. I suggest cleaning up the data before sending it to Splunk. This will make it easier to get real-time monitoring of the data needed. We pay for ingestion and storage, so it makes sense to only send in the data that we need. Splunk is a very good tool to use for building and operating real-time analytics dashboards. It has very good visualization, data separation, and real-time analytics capabilities. It can also create very complex queries that can do a lot.

We have over 50 users spread across the organization, and we implement around 100 or more services. Each service may have a tech lead in x and y and an architect in z. Therefore, Splunk ITSI reaches out to many different people in those departments.

Splunk Cloud takes care of all the maintenance. We simply open a case and they implement any new version as needed.

Splunk ITSI is a service intelligence platform that monitors services, availability, endpoints, and interactions within an environment. My experience with ITSI focuses on web application APIs. I installed and configured it for a telecommunications company to monitor web application API services, troubleshoot downtimes, and mitigate failures. ITSI offers a comprehensive view of the environment, enabling top-to-bottom visibility into services, endpoints, and performance. It provides correlation analysis, deep dives, and episode reviews, leveraging AI and machine learning algorithms to detect signals, predict issues, and prepare engineers for potential problems.

Splunk ITSI's dynamic and highly beneficial end-to-end visibility allows us to gain comprehensive and clear visibility once we configure our settings, services, and entities.

Splunk ITSI's machine learning and AI capabilities are powerful tools that help prevent incidents before they occur. As an engineer, I appreciate the ability to visualize potential future scenarios within my environment. This predictive forecasting feature provides valuable insights into our environment and services.

Due to its complex functionalities, Splunk ITSI requires significant learning. Proper training is essential to understand how these features operate effectively. While the benefits were not immediate, they became apparent over time as we configured, implemented, and utilized the various functionalities. It took several months before the full value of Splunk ITSI was realized.

For incident management and incident response, ITSI assists us by enabling us to create numerous knowledge objects as Splunk users. Whenever an issue arises, these objects can be centered around our services or entities, such as reminders, emails, or notables. Consequently, ITSI significantly aids our management and incident response efforts.

Splunk ITSI effectively reduces the volume of incidents by providing predictive capabilities, enhancing environmental visibility, and facilitating efficient troubleshooting. This deep-dive approach minimizes the occurrence of noisy alerts and consequently lowers the overall incident rate.

It helps reduce alert noise by allowing users to review and group notables. Through the episode review functionality, analysts can examine fired alerts, assign them to specific investigators or analysts, and group them to minimize the occurrence of noisy alerts.

Splunk ITSI has been instrumental in reducing the mean time to detect. While I have other tools as an engineer, ITSI, in conjunction with Splunk SOAR, offers preconfigured automation and quick responses that can further enhance our MTTD. ITSI provides the necessary visibility, and when integrated with SOAR, it aids in detecting and resolving issues more efficiently. These tools work seamlessly together, streamlining our incident response process and improving operational efficiency. Combined, our MTTD is under 30 seconds.

Splunk ITSI has helped reduce the mean time to resolve the issue because we can detect the incidents faster.

It is a valuable tool for cost savings. In a recent project involving web application APIs, ITSI's top-to-bottom visibility and machine learning capabilities enabled us to predict and prevent downtime, reducing losses significantly. By integrating ITSI with an automated tool like SOAR, we implemented automated responses that quickly resolved issues and minimized disruptions. This resulted in substantial savings, estimated to be between five and ten million dollars. Before ITSI, downtime in the web payment application APIs was frequent, leading to significant financial losses. ITSI's implementation has eliminated this issue and provided substantial cost benefits between five and ten million dollars.

Splunk ITSI offers a valuable visualization tree that allows us to map and analyze dependencies and co-dependency within our environment. We can quickly identify errors, failures, and cascading impacts from specific branches by inputting our services and entities into this diagram. I have found this feature particularly useful for clearly understanding my environment's dynamics. Additionally, ITSI's deep dive functionality enables detailed examination of service trends over time, providing valuable insights. Furthermore, its AI and machine learning capabilities, especially beneficial for users with relevant knowledge, offer powerful predictive and correlation analysis tools. Overall, ITSI's combination of visualization, deep dive, and AI and ML features makes it an indispensable tool for observability and understanding complex environments.

ITSI currently lacks the capability for automated response, mitigation, and remediation. To achieve this, it must be integrated with third-party applications. Adding these features to ITSI would significantly enhance its value. For example, the ability to define specific conditions and triggers for automated responses to alarms or incidents would enable proactive mitigation and detection. Incorporating automated response and detection functionalities into Splunk ITSI would make it a powerful tool for incident management.

I have been using Splunk ITSI for seven years.

Splunk, as a platform and software, typically operates smoothly without significant lag or crashes. When such issues arise, they are often attributed to insufficient memory or hard drive space allocated for the Splunk installation. These factors are primarily dependent on the project owners and company's available resources and hardware capabilities. However, it's important to note that the Splunk platform itself rarely encounters stability problems.

Splunk ITSI assists in optimizing resource allocation to align with demand. We can effectively manage our infrastructure by accurately predicting resource requirements based on factors such as the environment, project, and specific operations within our facility. Splunk ITSI's machine learning capabilities can also contribute to this predictive analysis or forecasting, further enhancing our ability to optimize resource utilization.

The technical support responded quickly and provided high-quality assistance. They paid close attention to our issue, conducted a remote diagnosis of our environment, and clearly explained the problem and recommended solutions. Their service was exceptional.

Positive

The initial deployment of Splunk ITSI is straightforward. Assuming all other configurations are in place, a full deployment can be completed in approximately 30 minutes. The exact duration depends on the complexity of the environment, including the number of indexers, search heads, and overall workload. For a single installation on a standalone computer with minimal infrastructure and support requirements, the deployment can be completed in just a few seconds.

The number of Splunk ITSI consultants required for a deployment depends on the project's size, architecture, and specific monitoring needs. A small, single-deployment project may only need one consultant. However, larger projects involving clusters of indexers or searchers, or those requiring constant monitoring, may necessitate more consultants. Such complex deployments might require two or three consultants to manage the entire environment effectively.

I would rate Splunk ITSI eight out of ten.

To anyone considering switching to Splunk, I highly recommend it. Splunk offers a wide range of applications, making it a versatile tool for various IT environments. Beyond ITSI, Splunk provides numerous tools and platforms that offer comprehensive insights into IT operations, security, and more. Whether dealing with payments, web application APIs, or any aspect of IT, Splunk can help. Splunk empowers you to gather, search, analyze, and visualize data to create knowledge objects and set endpoints. It enables you to secure, analyze, and query your IT environments, providing valuable insights. Splunk's powerful features, including AI and machine learning algorithms, help you detect issues, streamline alerts, and improve overall operations. Splunk's risk-based alerting and ITSI security features ensure data protection and compliance. It helps safeguard your data in transit, storage, and indexing, providing visibility into access and potential leaks. For compliance, vulnerability, and risk management, Splunk is a valuable asset. I strongly recommend installing Splunk for its ability to enhance IT operations, improve visibility, and ensure security. If observability is a priority, I also encourage exploring Splunk ITSI.

Splunk ITSI is available both in the cloud and on-premises.

For new users, consider hiring a Splunk consultant to provide initial guidance and training. The consultant can demonstrate key features, share best practices, and help you get started. Secondly, familiarize yourself with Splunk's extensive documentation, which is a valuable resource for learning and troubleshooting. It's essential for anyone involved in managing or using Splunk to stay updated on the latest information. Finally, having a consultant work directly with your team can accelerate the learning process. They can provide tailored training, assist with implementation, and ensure that your users are equipped to effectively utilize Splunk's capabilities.

In my recent projects, we have used ITSI to monitor the entire infrastructure using multiple features, such as service KPIs, aggregation policies, base searches, correlation searches, notable events, dashboards, blast tables, service analyzers, and drill-downs.

It helps in every respect, including performance, monitoring, or visualization of the important indicators. It improves the quality of service to the clients. It is crucial that the clients have no website failures because that means the loss of business. ITSI helps us track those issues. We've seen fewer environmental failures since we started using ITSI.

We saw immediate benefits from Splunk ITSI. For example, let's say you have a project for monitoring hybrid Linux servers running JBoss, SAP, and any server containing a client's critical data. It isn't easy to monitor each of these through the back end. 

Splunk ITSI shows you all the data on the screen and lets you visualize the data from various applications. We can see all the applications running on the server and issues with CPU or memory utilization. We have that data in Splunk and can immediately see the alerts triggered. If there are any failures in the environment, we can fix them in seconds. 

The solution has helped us streamline our incident management. We can monitor server KPIs, which trigger an alert if the server is impacted. We can track all the notable events and integrate ServiceNow with Splunk. ITSI is integrated with the ticketing tool, so when an alert triggers, it automatically creates a ticket on ServiceNow. 

ITSI has also reduced the alert volume. Before ITSI, we were unsure why an issue happened. We would see the alerts triggered in bulk and log them one by one for every server. ITSI gives you a feature that lets you drill down to find the precise issues on the server. 

It has a service KPI feature that allows you to monitor exceptions that may lead to server failure. For example, we might be in trouble if the value exceeds 10. We put five or eight values in the threshold field with a high criticality, so it triggers an alert whenever the count is breached. 

ITSI reduced our alert noise because it was very hard to monitor every aspect when we used search and reporting. After running the query, we needed more insights, and ITSI gave us a clearer picture of the incident. That helps you reduce issues.

Many use cases can be automated through ITSI because we previously built our reports manually.  After introducing ITSI, we sent all the data via the forwarders to Splunk. Once we have the data, we create and schedule all those queries and reports so that the management can see them without any IT involvement. It previously took us two or three hours daily to create all those reports, so automating reports saves almost 60 hours each month. We're automating 10 to 15 daily.

The most valuable feature of ITSI is the service KPIs. No other tool provides you with the same level of observability and enterprise security or the search and reporting applications. 

ITSI has everything. We can create searches, email alerts, and dashboards. It's the only application that offers the KPI concept where we can monitor different KPI parameters. We can configure the KPIs to trigger alerts when they breach a set threshold.

You can use the core concepts to optimize performance optimization. And you can create a lot of correlations and onboard the data from every project application. You can play with the data to create those KPI services and crash modes. It's possible to establish service health using the KPIs through the service analyzer. On a single screen, you have a lot of tiles showing you the service KPIs and high-level insights.  

When I started working on ITSI, there was some lag in releasing predictive analysis. Since then, there have been several updates, and we see that it works. We can predict any fluctuation in the data that might lead to failure. Using the historical data, we can set up the adaptive threshold. ITSI analyzes the historical data and sets an analysis for the future.

ITSI is an almost perfect tool, but there is room for improvement in a few features like the deep dive and multi-KPI alerts. We're using most of the features like service API, coding searches, and aggregation, but our team members hardly use multi-KPI and deep dive. We don't use the multi-KPI or deep dive because everything is available in the service KPI. I don't think this feature is necessary. 

People mostly use ITSI to monitor alerts. The most important features are within the service KPI. When we configure the alerts in service KPI, we don't need to do any deep dives because the client is more interested in the raw data, so we run the queries on the raw data instead of going into the deep dive. 

I have used Splunk ITSI for seven years.

I rate Splunk support nine out of 10. It is very helpful. Whether you are connected to priority one, two, or three depends on the issue and its impact. You can also get help from the Splunk community. If you create a P2 ticket, they will reach out to you within an hour and resolve the problem in eight hours. They have different SLAs. 

They might take one or two days to resolve issues. We need to upload the tags over the server to the portal. After that, they will start working on it. They have solved all the issues in the last four or five months within two to three days maximum.

Positive

We had Dynatrace. It was integrated to onboard the data and create correlation searches to monitor those parameters.

Setting up Splunk ITSI wasn't difficult. A few files needed to be placed over the indexers, and a few more needed to be placed over the license master. I didn't have any issues installing ITSI from scratch. It takes 15 to 20 minutes, depending on the project. It can be set up with one to three people. When service KPIs are installed, we need to validate them after the installation and upgrade ITSI. 

My friend works with OpenSearch. They are moving from Splunk to Cribl and OpenSearch. Splunk is pretty expensive, but it gives you a decent insight into the data. It is easy to learn, and ITSI has a great interface. You can run those queries and pass the data. I don't find any product attractive, and we need to put more thought into it. 

I rate Splunk ITSI nine out of 10. I have worked on multiple projects in the last seven years, and I've never found any product like ITSI. We can monitor everything through that. It's an excellent product.

Setting up and mapping the searches with the aggregation policies can be a little complex. Once you've mastered that, you can do anything with the ITSI. You can monitor the whole project infrastructure. You don't need any other tool to monitor and visualize the data. ITSI is enough.

It has enabled effective monitoring, allowing for a comprehensive view of the growing complexity within the IT infrastructure.

The enhancement to our organization stems from its ability to consistently run rules, actively identifying significant events. This involves an ongoing process of aggregating and configuring notable events into a coherent resource. Additionally, the container version automates website functionalities, including tasks like email reception, providing a heightened level of control.

It has proven highly effective in real-time monitoring of service assistance and KPIs. There has been a noticeable enhancement in automated event clustering. Additionally, the platform facilitates comprehensive analysis for proactive incident prevention.

The end-to-end visibility provided into our network environment is a potent tool for real-time monitoring. It significantly contributes to the monitoring and analysis of complex multi-cloud IT solutions, playing a pivotal role in ensuring efficiency.

Leveraging predictive analytics to proactively prevent incidents before they manifest empowers operations to establish effective management and automation of information related to business processes.

It aids in minimizing alert noise, proving highly effective in incident management. Furthermore, it facilitates root cause analysis.

The most valuable aspect lies in its utilization of predictive analytics to anticipate and prevent incidents within a window of twenty to thirty minutes. It promptly raises a red flag, signaling an effective early warning system.

The resilience it provides is invaluable. It ensures continuous application of rules, specifically for identifying notable events, and utilizes revision policies to configure hardware solutions into edge servers. This is essential for my operations to seamlessly proceed.

It would be advantageous to enhance the dashboard by incorporating sections for monitoring, service health, and a filter for the KPIs.

I have been using it for one year.

It provides good scalability. Approximately, a hundred users use it effectively.

I would rate the customer service and support eight out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup was straightforward.

The installation involves developing a strategy to comprehend the essential services for proper monitoring. Additionally, it entails determining the specific type of intelligent alerts, clusters, and dashboards needed for effective planning. It was done in-house by one individual.

The implementation of this solution quickly demonstrated its value.
It resulted in a time reduction of six hours through its implementation.

It contributed to a six-hour reduction in the meantime to detect incidents.

It assisted in decreasing the mean time to resolve by four hours.

Choosing IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) over other vendors is a superior option now, as it operates on a data platform capable of efficiently collecting and managing large volumes of machine-generated data. It would greatly support the utilization of proper predictive analytics due to the capability to preemptively prevent incidents ten to twenty minutes in advance. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

I worked on multiple projects using Splunk ITSI for log monitoring, including monitoring mobile data usage for a telecom company, working with an insurance company and a retail application, and monitoring payment applications for a bank.

The integration with Splunk ITSI allowed us to monitor and track issues through alerts. This integration also reduces the Mean Time to Identify as the team is quickly made aware of problems through the ITSM tool, and respective incidents are raised to the application team. Depending on the issue's type, we can prioritize the incident, even giving it a P1 priority. With this, the team is made aware, and since we track our issues in ServiceNow, related incidents can be deployed, which also helps reduce the Mean Time to Resolve. The application team then knows what actions to take.

Event management utilizes event correlation and event aggregation instead of generating numerous alerts that cause panic within the team because multiple areas might be affected by a single issue. This can be achieved through Splunk's native capabilities, like notable event aggregation policies and episode reviews for ITSM, or by utilizing third-party tools such as Netcool. By employing event management tools like Netcool and then sending aggregated incidents to ServiceNow or using ServiceNow's item model for implementation, the number of alerts is reduced, and the troubleshooting team receives relevant information instead of overloading. This approach helps mitigate panic and provides the team with the resources to effectively address issues.

End-to-end visibility for application monitoring in our use case required us to consider all involved components. We addressed this by creating hierarchical dashboards. This approach provided everyone, from business stakeholders to operations, with visibility into application health through relevant metrics. Business stakeholders, for instance, focus on high-level metrics like application health, user experience, revenue, and performance rather than technical details like CPU usage. Therefore, we tailored the dashboard hierarchy for different roles: business executives, operation leads, project managers, and operations staff. The operations dashboard provided end-to-end visibility by configuring all components of the application's functioning. Leveraging the familiar network architecture, we utilized the same topology to present metrics, creating a comfortable and easily understandable dashboard layout. By plotting all entities with their availability and performance metrics, we achieved comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

We have set up the environment correctly for the predictive analytics, and our metrics are flowing continuously. We have the required data, so we can configure at least 30 minutes of lead time to predict the metrics and their thresholds for potential impact. I can set this up, but I only had the opportunity to work on the project until anomaly detection. Predictive analytics was not a requirement, so I did not implement it. However, I understand it entirely and have explored and learned about it in their documentation.

For our telecom project, we focused on promotions as a use case. We aimed to identify the most popular promotions among users, especially during festivals and special occasions. Analyzing business metrics revealed that Promo Code 350 was the most frequently used, generating significant revenue. We presented these findings to the business team, showcasing how different promotions performed during various events. This information empowered them to design more effective offers and strategies, ultimately improving the customer experience. The business team appreciated our contribution, recognizing the value of data-driven insights in shaping their marketing efforts.

Splunk ITSI is a tool that helps our clients streamline their incident management. By integrating Splunk ITSI with ServiceNow and NetCool, we can reduce the burden of keeping up with the number of incidents and ensure they're updated.

Splunk ITSI helps reduce alert noise. We receive multiple alerts for each event when using any APM tool, Splunk, or log monitoring tool. Aggregating these alerts has always been helpful, and we've utilized Splunk's notable event aggregation policy to reduce alerting for each KPI to a single episode review.

Splunk ITSI reduces our mean time to detect.

Splunk ITSI is resilient and highly capable of tracking issues, provided the necessary logs are configured. With proper configurations, metric values are obtained, allowing us to monitor KPIs and quickly identify any adverse effects. In such cases, we can seamlessly delve into the logs to pinpoint the exact root cause of the issue.

I enjoy designing glass tables, hierarchy dashboards, and the preview for ITSI. I particularly like the preview feature because it provides a prompt experience for impact analysis. We can directly track which specific service is impacted and identify the underlying affected entity. Also, we can quickly view the affected metrics. Overall, the Glass table preview is the most valuable feature.

Currently, Glass tables in ITSI only display metrics related to KPIs. I proposed adding an option to show metrics related to entities. This would eliminate the need for custom SPL to achieve this functionality. Since KPIs already have an entity split feature, extending this capability to dashboards makes sense.

I have been using Splunk ITSI for five years.

I would rate the stability of Splunk ITSI nine out of ten.

Splunk ITSI is scalable. It offers clustering for search indexes, and we have the deployment service.

I previously used AppDynamics but switched to Splunk after learning about it and finding it more interesting.

The deployment is straightforward.

Splunk ITSI is expensive compared to other tools.

I would rate Splunk ITSI eight out of ten.

Other APM tools have limited features, so I recommend Splunk because it allows you to go beyond pre-built functionalities. With Splunk, you can create custom rules for application monitoring and tailor data visualization for enhanced visibility. Splunk's flexibility extends to designing personalized dashboards and metrics, providing a limitless monitoring experience.

Splunk ITSI requires maintenance for upgrades either annually or biennially.

Splunk is a comprehensive solution that offers log monitoring and the ITSI observability suite, eliminating the need for multiple tools and the associated complexities in maintenance and cross-team coordination. Splunk's flexibility allows for adopting features like APM as needed and seamlessly adding further monitoring capabilities in the future, such as user experience monitoring, synthetic monitoring, or additional log monitoring. This adaptability, along with Splunk's ability to correlate data across different monitoring areas, makes it an ideal unified platform for comprehensive monitoring and observability.

We use Splunk ITSI to collect the infrastructure metrics and visualize them.

Splunk ITSI provides end-to-end visibility into your IT environment. It displays key performance indicators for various services. If a KPI is red, indicating an issue, clicking on the corresponding service will take you to the server for further investigation. Splunk ITSI can also automatically trigger incidents for critical issues, allowing your support team to resolve them quickly.

It has significantly improved our incident management process. Previously, we relied solely on a service indicator that simply displayed the service status. If the indicator turned red, we would then manually create an incident report. Now, we've implemented static thresholds that automatically trigger incidents to be added to our queue. This is a major advantage.

Splunk ITSI has reduced our alert noise by 30 percent.

Since implementing Splunk ITSI, we've significantly reduced our mean time to detection. Previously, we relied on receiving incident reports, which caused delays.

Splunk ITSI has reduced our mean time to resolve.

We collect infrastructure metrics from various servers, including Windows Services. One particularly useful feature of Splunk ITSI is the ability to create custom services. This functionality makes it easy to identify specific functions that are malfunctioning or experiencing problems. With this information, we can quickly troubleshoot and fix the issues.

In Splunk ITSI, thresholds automatically trigger incidents when a service value falls below the threshold. This prevents us from automatically triggering alerts for situations where the service value is within the acceptable range. We've identified this as an issue with the ITSI product and are working with Splunk for guidance on how to implement the desired behavior.

While the overall Splunk documentation is detailed, the documentation for specific premium apps, like Splunk ITSI, is more brief.

The technical support has room for improvement.

I have been using Splunk ITSI for one year.

I would rate the stability of Splunk ITSI nine out of ten.

Splunk ITSI is a scalable solution, meaning it can handle increasing amounts of data and users as our needs grow.

We experience occasional delays in receiving solutions from Splunk technical support. Splunk's support for P3 cases seems inadequate, as they frequently switch support personnel. For instance, in a single P3 case, we had three different technical support representatives assigned. We were ultimately forced to escalate the issue to our account manager to get it resolved. In essence, we never receive complete support from a single point of contact; instead, the support team keeps changing, necessitating us to explain the problem from scratch each time.

Neutral

The initial deployment is a straightforward process. However, the time it takes can vary depending on whether we're installing for the first time or performing an upgrade. For a first-time installation, Splunk ITSI typically takes around 30 minutes. Upgrading an existing installation requires additional time to clean up previous configurations; this process usually takes about 40 minutes to complete.

Two people were involved in the deployment.

We are using Splunk Enterprise software. We contacted Splunk to demo ITSI, and we were impressed with its functionality and the included options. Therefore, we decided to try ITSI exclusively and did not evaluate any other vendors.

I would rate Splunk ITSI eight out of ten.

We're currently working on implementing adaptive thresholds. This functionality would analyze service trends over the past seven days automatically set thresholds and generate incidents based on that data. Successfully implementing this would be a significant achievement, but we're encountering some technical challenges. We've opened a support case with Splunk to address these issues, and we're hopeful for a resolution within the next few weeks.

We have around 150 people using Splunk ITSI.

Two people are responsible for the maintenance of Splunk ITSI in our organization.

I would rate the resilience of Splunk ITSI nine out of ten.

In my experience starting my career with Splunk, I haven't encountered any marketing tools that can quite compare. Splunk offers a comprehensive set of features and well-organized documentation. The detailed and clear documentation that Splunk provides is something I particularly appreciate.

I recommend Splunk ITSI.

We use the solution for event management, observability, application management, application performance management, anomaly detection, problem detection, and creating different rules for the anomalies for different events. It's application performance monitoring. The entire area of service is managed by ITSI, and offers automated detection and everything.

The root cause analysis is very helpful for us. 

There's one feature which is a prediction and detection feature that we have gone through. We are not thoroughly using it. However, for us, I would say that root cause analysis, problem detection, and anomaly detection are the most helpful features.

The end-to-end visibility of IT assigned to our network environment is great. The endpoint visibility is definitely helpful, and that is mainly for the application team. We can take a deep dive into the incident. In the everyday work that we do, we don't really use endpoint visibility since that is not required if we look at normal and general use cases. That said, when it comes to an incident during an outage, end-to-end visibility helps us deep dive or drill down to find out the root cause and how to make the platform better for the future.

The product has helped to streamline our incident management with end-to-end visibility. It helps in streamlining the incidents that are coming in. For example, for the authentication service that we have, users for certain regions are not able to authenticate completely. That likely means there's an issue with that region. That is an incident. In that case, I would look at endpoint visibility from the infrastructure to the end of the service call, including all the scans, tracing, and everything. Looking at it helps provide a resolution.

Our alert noise has been reduced.

Our main time to detect has been reduced as well. Previously, we used to take a lot of time getting to the root cause of what happened. We've been able to resolve this quicker, and our main time to detect has been drastically reduced. 

In addition, we've been able to reduce the time to resolve.

Predictive analytics, in terms of preventing incidents before they occur, still needs time to mature. I am not very, I would say, convinced of the prediction feature's capabilities.

It does not have a release comparison on the server comparison feature. For example, if you have an application, and you introduce a new feature, and you're going to deploy it, then the release comparisons should show automatically or generate a report to show the impact of the feature on the overall application. It should show what you can do to optimize it. 

I've used the solution for around five years.

The stability has been good. 

The solution is highly scalable and flexible. 

I've contacted support multiple times. Their service is average. They are not very quick. 

Neutral

I've used a few different solutions, like Dynatrace and Datadog. I've used Elasticsearch and Moogsoft as well.

Dynatrace is an overall package. I'd choose it over ITSI. Splunk is never a package. It does not provide application performance monitoring. Dynatrace is a full-fledged APM tool that includes infrastructure, APM, synthetic monitoring, and user monitoring alongside AI ops, which are very strong. It's a mature platform.

I was involved in the initial setup. It's a very straightforward process. Deploying the platform takes a couple of hours at a maximum. The configuration is more subjective in terms of how long it takes. For example, how many applications do you have? How many environments? We have three environments in the US, and with approvals, it took us around 20 days.

It's a SaaS solution and does not require maintenance. It's a one-click upgrade if you want to upgrade anything. 

Once you buy a license, Splunk is involved and can help with the deployment. They have three or four free consulting sessions initially. They are very involved in the pilot phase. post-pilot, you have regular support. 

The product is expensive. It's one of the most expensive options, although maybe not as expensive as Datadog.

We might be partners with Splunk. 

It's readily available. You don't have to wait very long to witness the benefits of the solution. 

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. 

If you are looking for an AI solution alongside APM, use a platform with everything in place. However, if you still want to go for a dedicated AIS platform, make sure it integrates with your existing logging and APM tools. However, my position is that it's better to use one platform for the entire opportunity.

We use Splunk ITSI for better CMDB management and control of all infrastructure devices.

We had many old devices and legacy systems, and architects used to configure them as they saw fit. To streamline and standardize our operations, we had to rely on Splunk. Splunk invented device discovery, which allowed us to learn what devices are on the network, what type they are, and how to classify them. Splunk ITSI has been very helpful to us.

We deployed Splunk ITSI on-premises, and it can also be deployed in the cloud.

Splunk ITSI helps the advisory board's cab team increase efficiency by instilling trust in systems over manual administrators. Splunk ITSI also provides a central source for the documentation of our application dependencies.

Splunk ITSI provides end-to-end visibility into our network environment, which reduces the manual effort required to capture configuration data and helps us identify weaknesses in our network.

Once we have implemented the CMDB to meet our requirements, Splunk ITSI's predictive analytics can identify any devices that will be affected by planned changes and provide us with that information. This will allow us to prioritize incidents based on their criticality and notify stakeholders accordingly.

Splunk ITSI has helped our organization in many ways. It has centralized all resources for administrators and service personnel. Architects can plan better using the environmental details provided by ITSI. The CAB team can provide approvals quickly because the information is easily accessible. Splunk ITSI is reliable, and its AI-driven predictive analytics help identify potential component or device failures.

Splunk ITSI streamlined our incident management by allowing Splunk administrators to easily see all incident details and cascade them down to relevant stakeholders and customers. This enabled us to inform the service desk team so they could better prepare responses to end-user queries. We can also easily identify and address infrastructure challenges affecting specific companies.

It helps reduce our alert noise by a minimum of ten percent and it can go significantly more. We categorize and close alerts directly through ServiceNow after integrating our account. This automated process frees up our admins' time to focus on more important tasks.

Splunk ITSI has reduced our MTTD by over ten percent. We can meet our SLAs with Splunk ITSI 99.8 percent of the time. It has also reduced our MTTR by five to ten percent each quarter. We can resolve almost 90 percent of our tickets.

With Splunk ITSI, we can optimize business processes and systems. ITSI provides a visual representation of complex tools and context, using color coding and other features to make it easy for anyone at the monitoring or service desk to use. This also enables proactive responses to trends and events, as events are already segregated based on how they have been mapped.

Splunk ITSI consumes a lot of CPU resources. I would like a more lightweight solution in terms of resource consumption.

The price has room for improvement.

I have been using Splunk ITSI for five years.

Splunk ITSI is stable.

Resilience is valuable because it functions perfectly, helping to reduce risk and assist our admins and architects.

Splunk ITSI is scalable.

We previously used our internal CMDB solution, which was not streamlined and depended on a few key architects. We wanted more control and better governance, so we switched to Splunk ITSI.

The difficulty level of the deployment depends on the knowledge of those doing the implementation. A person with moderate knowledge will require some time to do all the configurations.

Our deployment took around four to six weeks to complete.

I have seen ROI from Splunk ITSI of close to 30 percent at both my current and previous organizations. The returns have been presented to leadership.

The cost of the modules is a bit high for non-global companies, making it difficult for them to afford Splunk ITSI.

I would rate Splunk ITSI eight out of ten.

Splunk ITSI is the best application performance monitoring tool because it helps administrators do their jobs better, has more computing power, and allows staff to focus on governance and automation.

Organizations may benefit from considering a point monitoring system instead of Splunk ITSI, depending on their environment.

We achieved time to value with Splunk ITSI within the first four to six weeks of deployment.

Splunk ITSI is deployed across multiple departments in our organization and there are 20 users.

Maintenance is required for updates.

I recommend Splunk ITSI. The solution can discover all types of devices in our environment.

We are using the solution for correlation searches. We've integrated Splunk with ServiceNow. We're creating aggregation policies to trigger actions in ServiceNow. We use it with the ServiceNow add-on. When something happens in ServiceNow, it's correlated to ITSI as well. 

We can check to see if dependent services are aligned. The service analyzer allows us to see the health of the services. 

It's been very good for noise reduction. We have alerts that trigger visually and it helps us prioritize. We can create performance-related dashboards so teams will have a clear overview according to their unique requirements. 

The infrastructure monitoring is very useful. In our scenario, we can see the performance of logs across parameters like memory or security. We can analyze the data. We can create our own logic and alerts to send to the correlated teams to take care of incidents. 

The end-to-end visibility is very good. With the service analyzer, we're able to see if something goes down. It's inspecting the health of services. It's color-coded, so we can check to see if there are any serious issues. We can do deep dives if something is red. 

We use the predictive analytics on offer. We have some use cases in which we create forecasts around CPU and memory-related alerts. We can use it to predict costs based on the past 30 or 40 days. We're also trying to use this for anomaly detection. We can make good predictions on the basis of data and trends. As long as we have past data, we can use it to build some predictions for the future. We can use this to create and send predictive reports to our teams to help them take pre-emptive action.

It's helped us to right-size resources to match demand. 

The solution has helped us streamline our incident management. We've been able to increase efficiencies through automation.

We've been able to reduce incident volume. If a host is generating frequent tickets, for example, we're able to see it and work on it directly to help us reduce incident counts. 

We've been able to effectively reduce alert noise. We can create logic to create tickets. It will create one ticket per episode so that multiple tickets are not created for one single episode - and this helps us reduce noise. 

We can automate routine tasks. We're able to create alerts, reports, scheduled searches, et cetera. It's helping us to save time.

When we check the service analyzer, and we have custom inputs, there are issues. Sometimes our inputs are not taken or recognized. Alerts are not being automatically generated. Also, if someone comes and creates a maintenance window, we can't properly identify who created it. We have to create our own queries before we can identify anything. 

I've been using the solution for three years. 

The solution is very stable. 

The solution is scalable. Depending on your infrastructure, it can be a bit tricky. 

I haven't had to escalate any issues to technical support. 

We're using SolarWinds and Splunk in our current environment. 

I helped with the initial deployment. We have multiple servers sending data to Splunk. The process is straightforward. For the setup, we had three people involved in the process. 

It's not a difficult solution to maintain. 

The licensing is based on data ingestion. However, they do have multiple licensing options.

The pricing is reasonable. 

Splunk is good. It gives good customized options. Any logic or Python script we need to add, we have the freedom to do so. Most solutions aren't as customizable. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. I'd rate it eight out of ten. 

It monitors every level of infrastructure in our environment, including remote locations across the world.

Splunk ITSI has end-to-end visibility into the cloud-native environment. This is important but not as important because we are primarily on-prem in every aspect of our IT infrastructure. However, for things that we do have in the cloud, it is important that we have visibility there.

Splunk ITSI has helped reduce our mean time to resolve. We can see very quickly when things are down and where they are down. I have taken steps to reduce the time to identify and time to resolve with Splunk ITSI.

The unified platform helps consolidate networking, security, and IT observability tools. It forces certain groups to work together and more closely, as they should. It increases awareness of the current statuses of other environments, which is important.

Instant usability of gathered event metrics is available. We have metrics data from systems, and we can use that to instantly get system status and trends.

There should be entity conflict resolution, specifically regarding duplicate entities. There should be case sensitivity for various keys amongst entities, specifically host names. We need IT metrics-based indexes and more content packs. I know they are coming out with these features.

I have been using Splunk ITSI for two years.

Its stability is great.

It is handling well what it is supposed to handle for some parts of our setup, and with the new version, it is only going to get better.

I have never used their support. Community is the first place I go.

I started with the company two years ago. They had it long before that.

I would rate Splunk ITSI an eight out of ten. It is pretty good, but there are some inflexibilities with the analyzer that can be annoying.