Trello Reviews

The primary use case is to manage tickets. Whenever they create any kind of ticket, they send again our task, I simply resolve them and move it to the resolved section.

I have found the most valuable feature is that it is very simple and clear to use. They can send a video and I can go view the video, check the images and I am ready to manage the ticket with clarity. I really enjoy the drag-and-drop feature.

I would appreciate seeing how much time spend on each specific ticket.

I have been working with Trello for the past ten to eleven months.

Stability is not an issue with Trello and you can have peace of mind when using the solution.

We are currently using the open-source option.

I would say to them to go and just simply use that system. If they have options to use other project management as well, then I recommend them to use Trello because, for the first time, this thing will be very simple and easy to use. If they have any other tool, there will be some difficulties and they may get rid of it and they said there, "Oh, no. We are not doing any kind of project management tools." So if they use Trello, they will be happy with the end result. I would rate Trello a nine on a scale of one to ten.

I use the solution for agile project management. I use Trello to list all the tickets that the development team needs to resolve.

You can list all tickets that the development team needs to develop. Once they finish, they can pass the ticket to the next list for testing. Once the ticket is tested, they can pass it to deployment. Once the item is deployed, they can close this ticket.

It helps to manage the life cycle of a ticket or of the requirements in development. You list it. You capture it. You schedule it. For each requirement, you try to ensure that it passed all stages of development, testing, deployment, and closing.

The solution is great for project management. It helps us track the progress of work and tickets. 

It is very easy to deploy the solution.

I have found the solution to be stable.

In general, it works very well. 

It is not a scalable product.

There are no features that are lacking. We're pretty happy with its functionality.

They could offer more integration with other tools - especially those that test some requirements in tickets.

I've been using the solution for three years. 

It is a stable solution. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It is reliable. 

The product does not scale. 

We have 15 people in the company that use it right now. We do not plan to increase usage at this point. 

I've never dealt with technical support. I don't know how helpful they are. 

I've used Microsoft Project in the past.

The product is straightforward to implement. It's not complex at all. You can deploy it in less than a day. 

I work for the development team, so I did not deploy it personally. There was another team member that handled the process. I just use it. 

Since it is so easy to deploy, anyone can do it. 

The licensing covers all of the functionalities of the product. It has everything your team needs. 

I'm an end-user.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I use the solution to track simple projects. Trello is also useful whenever I intend to make presentations to stakeholders. It has some inbuilt features that make presentations easier and with much better pictorial elements.

Trello is quite easy to learn. The features that are available in the current version are enough to do your basic documentation and management.

Trello's workflow is very calculated.

I would like to see improvement in onboarding back-office team members.

I use Trello occasionally.

Trello is stable. There are occasional patch updates that do not disrupt any saved work.

Trello is scalable as its features can be extended to accommodate small to larger projects.

The customer service team always responded to me whenever I had any need for them and they get the issues quickly resolved.

Positive

I use Jira to track complex projects.

The implementation of Trello is easier compared to Microsoft Visio but complex when compared to Jira. Trello has more features than Visio. The complexity of the system increases with the increase in features.

I used Trello in-house.

The solution pricing is okay. The pricing is subscription-based and depends on the features that you need. If you need more features then you will need to pay more. You can use the basic features to lead your project management.

Yes, I did. I tried Microsoft Visio which is also good but there are some unique differences.

I would rate Trello a nine out of ten. When you are a beginner, there will be difficulty in using such complex solutions. Later, you can decide what you are going to do with the solution. For some of the new solutions, the physicalization is divided due to the new available features.

My advice to anyone from business analysis, IT management, and project management is to use Trello first. It is because if you start using Jira first, you will encounter issues. Therefore, it is good to move from Visio to Trello and then to Jira. You can get in touch with business intelligence with Trello.
I have not encountered any technical issues with the solution. Support was available whenever I didn’t know how to proceed. This support gave me direction on what to do next. It is a rare thing for a solution to not give any headaches to the person using it.

I used Trello for a project where we had to do marketing for a customer.

The solution is very user-friendly, where you have everything you need.

Trello was a little complicated initially because we didn't know how to use it, create a product backlog, or define the work items. The solution could be made easier for new users.

I used the solution for two months.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten for stability.

Around six users were using the solution in our project.

The solution's initial setup was easy, and it took around one hour.

We didn't need to pay for the solution.

Trello was deployed on the cloud for us. The solution integrates with other services. I would recommend Trello to other users. The solution benefited our project greatly because our Trello bot was very organized.

Overall, I rate the solution ten out of ten.

We use UiPath to automate bill generation each month for our clients.

While UiPath offers an RF framework, our organization has developed a custom five-stage framework as our internal standard. To utilize this framework, we implemented specific processes to populate the queue with the necessary values. We then process the data sequentially, debugging and finalizing each operation before moving on to the next. Notably, we ensure all transaction features and exceptions are documented beforehand for comprehensive recording.

The UiPath user community is helpful when we are developing any backend operations.

Over the past two years, UiPath has helped us reduce costs by automating previously manual tasks. This has increased our clients' willingness to embrace automation for their standard manual processes. In the event of an automation issue, we can easily raise a ticket through another user interface to have it resolved.

UiPath has helped reduce our on-premises footprint.

UiPath helps speed up digital transformation in the back end.

If the developers write the code correctly, UiPath helps reduce human error by 60 percent.

All the features are valuable but the data extraction is extremely helpful for automation.

Unstructured data cannot be directly used; it needs to be structured first.

The recording session works well, but introducing dynamic control can cause glitches and loss of control. To address this, we need to manually extract elements from all test boxes and ensure the dynamic code is executed within them for proper functionality.

I have been using UiPath for four years.

The versions of UiPath that we have used are stable.

We can scale UiPath to meet our needs.

The technical support is good.

Positive

Our previous automation solution proved to be less effective. UiPath, on the other hand, has demonstrated a 95 percent increase in efficiency for our needs.

Initially, the deployment may be complex, but it will become straightforward once we get the hang of it. The deployment doesn't take much time.

Our positive return on investment with UiPath has led us to consolidate all our automation efforts on their platform.

UiPath is cost-efficient.

I would rate UiPath ten out of ten.

Our clients are SMBs.

Maintenance is only required when there are changes or updates made.

I recommend UiPath because it is user-friendly and widely preferred.

Trello's most valuable feature is its visuals. You can customize your board with covers and pictures. There are no restrictions in workflow columns as in Jira. It is a powerful solution to organize work. Jira is process-oriented and restrictive. 

Trello has become complex over the years. 

I have been working with the product for five to six years. 

The tool is stable. 

I rate Trello's scalability a six out of ten. My company has 100 users. 

The tool's response is not on time. It is the last resort after the forums and documentation. At times, their reply is something that we already know. 

The tool's deployment is simple. 

I rate Trello an eight out of ten. 

My company uses Trello for project management to create dashboards and workspaces.

The most valuable features of the solution are that it is easy to use and flexible while offering the ease of use of drag-and-drop functionality for each task.

The dashboards and flexibility to adjust the timeline view for each task are areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement.

I have been using Trello for three months.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten since they need to improve the flexibility to make changes to the timeline view and dashboard.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven or eight out of ten.

Around 600 to 700 employees in my company use Trello.

I prefer to use Jira instead of Trello. With Trello, our company can't see the plans in the timeline view.

The initial setup of Trello is not complex.

The solution can be deployed in five hours or a day.

I installed the product, so it was an in-house process without any training.

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

We have software engineers working in a distributed format, handling outsourcing projects, and we create tasks in Trello. We use Trello to manage projects, though most of our projects are not very big.

I like the user interface's graphics and the general features and functionalities. Similarly, I like the automation side of things because it provides updates and notifications. Trello is a valuable solution.

The solution could be priced cheaper.

I have been using Trello for the past three years, and I'm using the latest version.

I rate the stability as a ten out of ten.

The solution is scalable. We have eight users. We will increase usage if we need to.

The initial setup was straightforward. It took less than ten minutes to deploy the solution. The process is quite simple. It's a straightforward and user-friendly experience. Since most of our project managers and product managers were already familiar with setting up the solution, the initial setup was not a big deal for us.

We implemented it through our in-house team.

The pricing starts from around $6 per license for a subscription, and there might be higher subscriptions available, possibly around $12 per month. Overall, I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.

Most of our projects on Trello are not very big, so we are reconsidering it.

When setting up Trello, you need to create an account, and after confirmation, you can start using the free version to explore the features. While the free version may have some limitations, you can easily upgrade to the paid version if you require additional features.

Everyone should get a subscription since it's a good solution. Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

We use the solution to set up tasks and monitor their status.

We have employees in New York, India, and London. There was a lot of mismanagement of tasks earlier. With the help of the product, everyone knows the status of all the tasks. 

During the production rollout, we can ensure that everything is rolled out in the production at the same time. We can also conduct team meetings with the help of the product to align the team’s efforts.

The demos and POCs in the product are quite good for onboarding. There is a huge community to help us with the issues we face while using the product. The online forums and blogs are fantastic.

The product does not allow the linking of tasks. We cannot link tasks that are dependent on each other. There is no field to indicate the budget allocated and consumed for a particular task. The meeting should have recording facilities.

I have been using the solution for two years.

I rate the stability of the solution a ten out of ten. We did not face any problems in the last two years.

The solution is highly scalable. Around 20 to 22 people use the product in the organization. We might plan to increase the number of users in the future.

We never had to reach out to technical support because we got help from the online community whenever we were stuck.

Previously, we used Microsoft Project. We switched to Trello because Microsoft Project had a lot of rigidity, and we faced a lot of issues related to cost and deployment.

The initial setup is quite easy. I rate the ease of setup a nine out of ten.

The deployment was done in-house. Most of the people and resources are comfortable with the product. We need two to three people to deploy the product.

I rate the pricing a five out of ten. The solution should lower its prices. We pay $10 per user per month for the product.

I am using the latest version of the solution. The solution is cloud-based. Trello is used globally. I would strongly recommend Trello to others. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

We use this solution for user calls and to issue alerts. Currently only three of us are using this solution but we are planning to increase usage in the future. 

The usability of this solution is its most valuable feature. It offers a great flow of creating a business rule that allows you to just add identifiers and qualifiers. 

It would be great if there was a tour for new users to explain how this solution works. Using this solution for the first time can feel complicated. 

This solution could also be improved by removing the contradiction that seems to exist in the options of filters that can be used.

I have been using Trello for a few months. 

This is a stable solution. 

We have not needed to contact their customer support team as we use their online help centre and it has provided us with sufficient assistance. 

The pricing for this solution is reasonable. 

I would advise others to use this solution because it offers a lot of flexibility. 

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.