Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Reviews

It's an antivirus solution for us.

It keeps us running very smoothly because there are no outages due to viruses. I think we have a very good security posture, and this product has helped us to get there.

We have also seen an increase in staff productivity because we manage the entire solution with just one person. Five years ago we needed a team of at least ten people.

The ease of deployment is one of its most valuable features.

I would like to see a data-loss prevention module. We need that in our organization.

There is also room for improvement in next-gen attacks protection.

The stability is very good. We have a centralized way in which we can see that the product is running.

We have about 3,000 endpoints, and we haven't had any problems with scalability.

We work with a partner. We have been working with them for about five years and it's very good. We haven't had any problems.

We went with this solution because they have a really huge investment in artificial intelligence; not only in attack signatures but also behaviors.

The initial setup was very straightforward. It was only a matter of sending it to the console and it took care of the job for us.

We deployed it ourselves.

On a yearly basis, it's about $50,000. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.

We are currently evaluating next-gen antivirus because of the new attacks that are happening. The shortlist is Silence, Carbon Black, and CrowdStrike.

Focus on the productivity gains that you will have. We don't have a lot of security experts in the company. We are a very small team, so we need to be very productive with the products that we have.

I would rate this product at nine out of ten. It has a lot of the capabilities that we need.

Main anti-virus, approximately 4000 endpoints.

No damage to the endpoints for more than two years.

Simple and cheap protection.

Include AI.

There is nothing valuable about this product.

Recently, we had a malware attack and considered looking at other cloud solutions because of this breach. 

One to three years.

The scalability is perfect. It has an LDAP view.

The tech support is OK.

We looked at Symantec.

We use this solution daily. It provides us with 99% of antivirus precautionary care and prevention of email threats.

We use several Trend Micro solutions. We use Trend Micro OfficeScan, DDM and DDI. We are also using IMSVA and WSVA for email security and web security. After deploying OfficeScan, we have found more detections of possible virus attacks.

The DDAN and the sandboxing features are very good and accurate.

I am expecting an Apple featured IDLP solution with OfficeScan, where we have only IDLP. Also, the ADR functionality in our OfficeScan solution would be a nice addition. Genrally, the ADR solutions are the only failed ends of the solutions we have found with Trend Micro.

Three to five years.

Tech support needs improvement. We raised certain cases regarding a lag in terms of a solution, and the response time was slow. 

We previously used McAfee and Symantec. 

It was initially straightforward. It took multiple phases. 

Pricing and licensing are competitive with other solutions on the market.

The primary use case is endpoint protection. It has been performing okay.

It needs a consolidated manager as there are too many parts to currently manage it. The ability to manage the solution needs improvement because it just does not seem like it is quite everything we need it to be.

Stability is okay.

I have not used the technical support.

I previously used Sophos, which is a much better product with centralized management (in my opinion).

I was not involved in the initial setup.

We evaluated McAfee and Sophos.

• McAfee: They have a SIM that we already had in place.
• Sophos: It definitely had the ability to be flexible and integrate with the rest of our equipment.

Do not believe the marketing hype. Talk with implementers of the product. Replace the solution with Sophos.

Most important criteria when selecting a vendor: functionality, price, and skill.

Below are the reasons why our company chose Officescan: - The server part is easy to install, just follow the wizard and you are done. - You can monitor all of your machines using a user-friendly web console. - It also displays computers that do not have any anti-virus installed. - You can install officescan on any windows and mac OS. - For mass installation, you can use a login script, group policy and the web console. - You can even create a standalone executable for remote computers. - If the client fails to get the update from the local server, clients automatically gets the update from the Trend cloud server.

- I don't like the firewall feature, it adds itself to the NIC card of the machine and when you try to remove it, the client loses internet capability. You will need to uninstall the program to get the internet working again. - It does not work for Linux OS

We tested it out first using our test environment and it worked great during installation, client update, monitoring and removal process. The best part is that it protects windows servers, windows workstations and Mac OSx.

It's quite a good solution for protecting the endpoint.

All the features are quite good. Many features that this solution has, competitors lack. The feature I think is quite good is data loss prevention.

I think that this product needs to improve the data loss prevention port.

I have been using this solution for one year.

We are using the SaaS version, but there's on-prem available as well.

Overall, I would rate this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

I have multiple enterprise customers in India, and I am working with multiple regions, like Asia, Indonesia, and Singapore. Many customers are using this endpoint solution. It is widely used by customers.

Apex One has multiple features and use cases including internet protection, web reputation, URL filtering, firewalls, and anti-malware functioning. There's virtual patching and it can help us to prevent exploitation attacks. They can help you to patch vulnerabilities on the machines.

The solution has helped our organization by protecting our endpoints from malware and web threats. It also helps us to block ports and provides features like IPS. IPS has multiple signatures and rules which can help us to patch vulnerabilities. 

It is available on our OS platform and will automatically scan our machines daily or weekly. It also provides an EDR option. With EDR, we have DLP and application control as well, so we have lots of features that we can use to protect our endpoints from ransomware and phishing attacks.

The solution is good for patch management and protecting against vulnerabilities. It's great for protecting endpoints. 

It is easy to set up the solution.

Technical support is helpful.

It's quite stable and reliable.

We can scale the product.

There are some limitations, including around URL filtering. Sometimes HTTPS sites are not blocked properly. The proper display of the page is not properly working. We're putting in a feature request and hopefully, it will be resolved next quarter.

Feature-wise, pretty much all features we need are present. 

I've been using the solution for more than two years. 

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

I'd rate the stability eight out of ten.

The solution is scalable. We can expand our licensing or hardware if we need to grow.

I'd rate the scalability ten out of ten.

We can raise a ticket with support and usually get a response within eight hours. There's a bit of a time difference. They are good. We find them helpful and responsive. 

Positive

The initial setup is very, very straightforward. It is available under two offerings. One is on-premise, where we have to install the server and database. The other is the cloud. In the cloud, we have to just create our account, and we can just start using it.

The cloud option is very easy, and there is no need to maintain the server and no need to install anything. It will just create an account, and we can start using it within ten minutes. At the same time, the on-premise will take two or three of us to deploy it. We have to create three servers and then database services, and we have to install the application over that. It will take some time. Both are straightforward. They have created a guide for installation. If we follow the guide properly, we can get it installed properly.

There isn't a lot of maintenance needed for the cloud solution. If we choose an on-prem deployment, we will have to maintain the server and database. We also have patching from time to time, which we also have to test. On the cloud, the backend team handles any necessary maintenance.

We're partners. 

I'm working with the latest version of the solution. 

I'd recommend cloud deployment as it is so fast to set up and easier to maintain.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.