Ubiquiti Wireless Reviews

We use the tool internally and for client portfolios.

We had a client with a power plant. Different wireless devices from various brands caused problems. We fixed it using the Ubiquiti Wireless UDM controller and installed 75 access points and antennas.

The tool's most valuable feature is SD-WAN. It is easy to use and manage. In terms of reliability, we don't get many tickets or a service request after the installation. It's like installing and forgetting the device. In one railway construction project where we installed Ubiquiti three years ago, we've only received two inquiries since then. We provide remote support.

The solution has very good product lines. However, it feels like some models overlap. For example, a new model is announced after three months, and another new model is announced shortly after. So, the release cycle feels too short, and some features overlap. Overall, the products are very good and reliable.

I have been using the product for five years.

I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten.

Combining internal users within our organization and clients in our existing managed service, we have approximately 3,000-3,500 users using Ubiquiti Wireless. I rate its scalability a nine out of ten.

I rated technical support as an eight out of ten because we rarely need to call them. Instead, we usually email the community or local distributors for support, and they assist us. However, in terms of implementation, we don't rely on technical support.

I used Aruba, Meraki, D-Link, and Cisco before Ubiquiti Wireless. We chose to switch from Cisco, Aruba, and Meraki to Ubiquiti Wireless mainly because most clients prefer cost-effective solutions. While brands like Aruba and Cisco are expensive. Ubiquiti is a US brand.

Our organization handles Ubiquiti Wireless maintenance and troubleshooting internally. We also provide managed services for some clients, managing all the day-to-day transactions and monitoring their wireless networks. We have about eight wireless engineers responsible for all technical aspects, including deployment and maintenance of Ubiquiti Wireless and other technical tasks.

The tool doesn't have any licensing costs.

We don't solely rely on built-in firewall features for enterprise-level security. Instead, we often use another brand or third-party firewall the client prefers as the primary defense. For clients with less sensitive data transactions or those running via the cloud, we trust the firewall features of Ubiquiti's UDM Pro.

I rate the solution overall as a nine out of ten. There's always room for improvement, and we anticipate future developments and innovations.

The platform has a valuable console providing a centralized hub for device management, enabling users to log in and access devices effortlessly. The users gain visibility into the velocity of networking to each user. However, the standout feature lies in its ability to seamlessly manage multiple access points from a single interface.

The product or service could be improved by providing round-the-clock support directly from the company. A contract solution with 24/7 support would greatly benefit users, especially in critical situations requiring immediate assistance. It would enable users to address issues promptly and ensure uninterrupted network operation. It is important for small companies like ours, where we may need more expertise to troubleshoot problems independently.

We have been using Ubiquiti Wireless for a year.

The platform is stable. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

The platform is easy to scale.

We previously used Tableau. However, we encountered challenges integrating various access points into the same networking environment.

The initial setup is simple. However, it depends on the number of shipments per month. In our scenario, with ten shipments per month, the setup took around four hours. This time frame includes finding all the necessary information on websites, considering our need for prior experience with this equipment. Despite this, we completed the setup within the allotted time frame of four hours.

I rate the process a nine out of ten.

The platform offers a one-time purchase cost. It has competitive pricing.

Ubiquiti wireless proves especially helpful in scenarios requiring mobility. Transitioning from wired to wireless connectivity facilitates flexibility for users previously tethered to Ethernet cables connected to switches.

The platform is very simple to set up and provides a lot of information in the network. It is suitable for small companies. I rate it an eight out of ten.

Our primary use case for this solution is for access points for internet services for our clients and the devices they have on them.

I would say that the user experience is pretty good in this solution as well as the roaming solution part of it.

I would like to see this solution have any kind of captive portal on the tool or user accounting tool. This would be quite useful for companies.

I have been using this solution for about two years.

My impression of the stability of this solution is that it's really good as we don't have any issues with it.

My impression is that this solution is scalable. There are about 400 users of this solution in our company.

My impression is that the initial setup process is straightforward. It took about one week to complete the deployment. I think there is one person involved in the deployment and maintenance of this solution.

Our IT management team did the deployment.

I would recommend this solution to other people as it's a good solution. I would also advise them that if they have voice services and they want to have it connected everywhere in their building, this tool is for them as it's quite good on roaming and has a good quality for voice and pictures in live streams.

I would rate this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

Some of our customers have a user base as high as 250.

Ubiquiti devices are centrally managed, and you can log into the access points via SSH. If the GUI isn't working for some reason, you can intervene via SSH.

It's difficult to get Ubiquiti hardware in Germany, which poses a problem because I urgently need some routers and other devices that we cannot acquire right now. 

Ubiquiti is also slow to adopt new technologies. We are transitioning to Wi-Fi 6, and there aren't many products. They have mostly Wi-Fi 5 products, but there are only two Wi-Fi 6 products. It's okay for places we have already equipped, but it's a bit hard for new places.

Their gateway is good for people who lack an IT background and need to rely on a GUI. For example, they have a special gateway for that product group within the wireless devices. However, I find it to be restrictive. It's a dedicated gateway from the wireless to the internet. While the approach is clever, it would be helpful if it were more like their Edge devices.

The product group known as Edge has two GUIs: one for the people without a technical background and another for advanced users. You can also use the command line interface. These devices don't have that approach. You only have the GUI. While the GUI has broad functionality, it still lacks the flexibility IT professionals need.

I have been using Ubiquiti for six or seven years.

We haven't had any problems. You even can handle a large number of access point users. You get good quality for the price. 

Scalability is one reason we use Ubiquiti. It's easy to scale up because of the centralized administration approach. 

Ubiquiti has excellent internet forums, but there's hardly any support. You can email them, and they will respond quickly but you might not get the solution you need. However, it's relatively easy to get quick information about an issue because the open-source community supports Ubiquiti very well.

The problem with their call centers is that they sometimes even don't know what they're talking about, and they are costly. You go to the internet if you have an issue, and you'll usually get your answer. Cisco has service plans that you don't get with Ubiquiti, but you pay a fair price for the hardware. 

I've worked with Cisco. Cisco products always have issues you need to patch, and it's an old brand. Cisco can do everything, but you'll need to spend lots of money educating your staff. Anyone who can use Linux can handle Ubiquiti. While Cisco solutions are powerful, you need a Cisco-certified expert, and these guys are very expensive. You need to hire them or train your staff. Either way, it costs you a lot of money For me, Ubiquiti is the product of choice because of the flexibility it provides us.

Setting up Ubiquity Wireless is simple, and when something doesn't work, you can intervene via SSH. 

I rate Ubiquiti eight out of 10 for affordability. The hardware prices are the easy part. However, the costs of maintaining and operating the infrastructure can be expensive. 

By comparison, Netgear isn't as flexible as Ubiquiti. I can automate Ubiquiti on a large infrastructure because Ubiquiti devices run on Linux. I can write a Linux script that is executed on the devices, and quickly automate it. This is also possible with Cisco, but not Netgear. Netgear devices are common, but I always call them hobby devices. If you're just an ambitious hobby user, these devices are fine, but they are not for professionals.

I rate Ubiquiti Wireless seven out of 10. These devices are suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises. If you use the Edge line of products, you need to understand protocols or networks, architectures, etc. They're perfect because you can almost do everything with Cisco products for a much better price with a significantly lower learning curve.

I use the solution in my company for our different clients who use Ubiquiti Wireless, considering that it is a fairly reliable tool. The tool provides a yearly subscription for a service. The product has a web interface on which you can log in, ensuring that it is always available while allowing you to see what is going on in your environment. You can control the features of the tool. You can use the tool for mapping or building features and to check various access points. With the product in place, you can look at the access points of more than 200 devices, and it can also handle more devices as it allows users to add other access points. With Ubiquiti Wireless, the actual range for the access point is fairly good. The product has features like controller migrations.

The most valuable features of the solution from a networking perspective stem from its ability to allow users to customize the various access points, and since our company is able to push in the updates in the tool, we can get better management capabilities and connectivity. Ubiquiti Wireless allows you to see the ports and the power consumed. When Ubiquiti Wireless is used in conjunction with switches, you can stay on the same web interface and manage the switches and access points by using the same credentials. Basically, the tool allows you to manage the whole network through a single web interface. You can give permissions or use SSH on devices and be able to use the command line to do various things, including updating the access points or resetting their statuses. The tool provides a web interface and command line facilities.

The product lacks to offer reliability to users. From an improvement perspective, the product needs to be made more reliable. The tool should also offer better support and warranties. The tool only provides a standard warranty, which gets very annoying. I have had experiences where the users of the tool keep receiving updates continuously, and you can have the latest firmware pushed into the solution, which may cause a problem. You can't opt to go for an RMA process or get any support on the tool because it doesn't offer any support after twelve months of purchase.

The latest stuff provided by the product is not as reliable as the older ones provided by the solution.

The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required.

The solution's technical support needs to be improved so that users can communicate with faster or more responsive support personnel with knowledgeable technical team members and get customer-friendly support. You can only get support for the product within the first twelve months of purchase, after which you won't get any support.

I have been using Ubiquiti Wireless for eight years.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a four or five out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Around 2,000 to 3,000 people in my company use the product.

The product is extensively used in my company. My company plans to increase the use of the product.

I rate the technical support a four out of ten.

Neutral

I have experience with Cisco. I started to use Ubiquiti Wireless because of its web interface.

The product's initial setup phase is fairly straightforward, but it all depends on how much of a complex infrastructure you have. In general, the setup process is straightforward. If a user wants to have some advanced stuff during the product's setup phase, the process can get a lot complicated.

With the controller part, the product's user can manage the devices on the cloud.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

The time required to take care of the product's setup phase depends on how a user wants to deal with the setup process. For a simple connection, a straightforward setup process is required. For managing the complex stuff, the setup process can get complicated.

I took care of the product's installation phase.

There aren't any license costs attached to the product.

I evaluated products from Cisco and Meraki against Ubiquiti Wireless.

Speaking about the indoor or outdoor environments where the tool is deployed, I would say that I have deployed it across offices, hotels, warehouses, and mobile shops.

I wouldn't recommend the product to those who plan to use it.

In the past, I would have rated the product an eight out of ten. Presently, I rate the overall product a four out of ten.

The platform provides a straightforward network management process. It is a cost-effective solution offering freeware for all the components.

The technical support services need improvement. 

We have been using Ubiquiti Wireless for three years.

It is a stable product.

It is a highly scalable platform. I rate it a nine out of ten.

The technical support services could be faster.

Neutral

We used HP Aruba, Ruckus, and Cisco before. We decided to opt for Ubiquiti Wireless as we signed a distribution agreement with Ubiquiti. Secondly, we found their product range to be extremely well-priced while maintaining high-quality standards.

As per the technicians' feedback, the installation is straightforward. We have a team of three engineers for the product maintenance.

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten. There are no additional expenses apart from the standard licenses.

The most recent project involved implementing a Ubiquiti Wireless solution for a large factory. The project encompassed deploying approximately 35 access points throughout the factory premises, including the offices. It provides high reliability and performance. I rate it a nine out of ten.

The solution has a user-friendly interface. It has many essential features, including encryption. 

The solution's stability and setup process could be better. Also, there could be a LAN controller feature similar to Ruckus in Ubiquiti's next release.

We have been using the solution for two years.

The solution is stable. Although, we encounter stability issues in crowded areas.

The solution is suitable for small and medium businesses. We have 20-25 users in our organization.

I refer to support documentation in the case of queries for the solution. It is good and helpful.

The solution's initial setup could be more straightforward. It takes half an hour to complete tests and finish the process after installation.

The solution's price is reasonable for a basic device.

Compared with the solution, Ruckus has a lot of software and tools for wireless functionality. It also has a LAN controller feature which is not available in Ubiquiti. I prefer using Ruckus or Cisco products while working for large companies.

I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Ubiquiti wireless is quite good for us, especially in terms of price and functionality. We often provide maintenance services to companies for their internal land areas, and we rent or sell access points to them for Wi-Fi access. Additionally, we provide support for their internal network, which is why we use Ubiquiti access points.

We mostly use Ubiquiti solutions due to their affordable price. We sell to a lot of small businesses that only require basic Wi-Fi functionality in their offices or shops, and they don't need many features or management options. So we opt for Ubiquiti products. 

As for bigger projects and larger clients, we let them choose, and they sometimes go for products from vendors like Aruba. However, bigger companies usually make their own choice, and we are able to provide some vendors but not point them toward a specific system.

Three years ago, we were only selling Ubiquiti access points to small companies that needed only one access point.

They had issues with having more than one access point at the time. However, in the past year, we have been selling more and more Ubiquiti access points because those issues have been resolved, and we can now provide more than one access point. It is due to management improvements or some features currently working together correctly in the office.

Therefore, the most valuable feature is more access points. In the past, getting access points delivered and purchased was quite difficult. One of the options was to use Ubiquiti, which was much easier to obtain than Aruba, which took longer to get access points.

We use a program that creates heat maps for our customers. I'm not sure if Ubiquiti has some features like that, but sometimes we only have a floor plan of the office and need to determine how many access points and which models to propose to the customer. In such cases, we use those programs from other vendors.

We provide managed services, rent out the equipment and take care of the internal network support. Central monitoring is the main functionality that should be included in the product we offer to bigger customers. It could improve the quality of implementation, help in integration, and provide better metrics.

I've been working with Ubiquiti wireless for about two years now.

We have not had many problems with our existing customers who use it extensively.

Currently, Ubiquiti has no issues with scalability, so there are no problems in scaling that network and the conference off.

We haven't had any problems with deployment.

Our team is experienced in networking. Most of our customers already have existing cloud solutions and products with us. Sometimes we know about their network and switches and provide Internet for them, so it's quite easy.

It's just configuring the access point, sometimes at our or the customer's office, and then mounting them under the ceiling or wherever the company wants them.

Our team does the hard work of mounting the access points. We haven't heard of any problems with deployment.

Ubiquiti is one of the cheaper options among its competitors. The company usually does not have much product information when it chooses the vendor. And others choose the solutions, like HP and others, because these solutions have a stronger brand in the market.

Whereas, we have compared with the other providers in our market. And for small businesses, the first option is to choose less expensive products. So, of course, the biggest products we're selling are because of the low price.

We had some issues a few years ago. That's why we were selling only to those customers who needed only one access point, such as small shops or offices with ten people. Now, we don't have any problems. 

We need to provide one vendor access point, and we have some issues with customers with another vendor, like Ruckus. We used to work a lot with Ruckus vendor access points, but we're buying fewer now because they have bad delivery times. If we want to buy a new one and have many customers who now have Ruckus, we have difficulties getting a new one or changing it. We are thinking about changing all the office access points to Ubiquiti.

Currently, I see the best value for price in the market regarding Ubiquiti wireless. Also, the delivery time is quite good, and we haven't had any problems. We are using a few models like Long Range, Pro, Wi-Fi 6, NeoGen, and J2028, and they have everything that small and medium businesses need. So, I would recommend this solution to other people.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. We are happy with the solution and increasing its usage.

We primarily use the solution for wireless connectivity. It's for mobile management. It can manage my switches and everything via mobile. 

It is very user-friendly.

The solution is very straightforward in comparison to other solutions. It's quite quick to deploy.

The solution is stable.

It is scalable. 

It offers very good pricing. 

We'd like the solution to be more stable and have fewer firmware upgrades. More features should be available straight out of the box. It could be less complex and offer more simple principles.

I've been using the solution for a year and a half.

It's very stable. It is reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is good. 

My understanding is the solution can scale. 

We have four or five people using the solution. It's just for home usage. 

I've never needed the help of technical support. I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are. 

We do not use any other solutions at this time.

It is quite straightforward to set up the solution. It is not overly complex. The deployment was fast and took less than a day.

The setup can be done in-house. There was no need to have any integrators or consultants involved. 

The pricing is quite low and very affordable. I'm not sure of the exact cost.

I did not attempt to evaluate other options before beginning to use the solution. 

We have a mixed environment. The APIs are obviously on-prem, and all the management is in the cloud.

I'm using the latest version of the solution. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. 

If you want a low-cost option, if you don't have the budget, I'd advise you go for Ubiquiti.

I would rate the solution eight out of ten.

We have approximately 60 branches and they all use access points, and they are controlled by one software controller in our headquarters. We use it only for normal Wi-Fi and guests.

The most valuable feature of Ubiquiti Wireless is the ease of configuration.

We have an issue with Ubiquiti Wireless every three to five months for one of the access points.

I have been using Ubiquiti Wireless for approximately seven years.

The stability of Ubiquiti Wireless could improve. We have found there is too much fluctuation in the Wi-Fi and after two to three years you can notice the performance degradation.

Ubiquiti Wireless is scalable. However, the number of access points should be determined. 

When using Aruba ClearPass we discovered the controller is not talking to Aruba ClearPass, but every access point can communicate with the Aruba ClearPass. That means every access point is working alone but the controller only pushes the configuration to all access points. It is not really an access point controller.

We have approximately 1,200 people using the solution.

Ubiquiti Wireless does not have support directly, such as Cisco and Aruba do, you have to rely on community support. However, they do sell support for enterprise companies.

I have used Aruba previously.

The initial setup of Ubiquiti Wireless is easy and the implementation can take up to several hours.

The price of Ubiquiti Wireless is affordable, we pay approximately $100 and $150 per access point.

I would recommend this solution is best suited for small and medium businesses. Small businesses I would classify as 200 to 400 people using the solution. Aruba is a better solution.

I rate Ubiquiti Wireless a five out of ten.