UiPath Platform Reviews

We have IT solutions that are oriented to service our call center because we are a contact center company. For example, we have a CTI (Computer Telephony Integration) solution to help manage our phone calls. It is something that we developed in house. We are developing a UiPath (the company that acquired ProcessGold) solution using RPA robots to improve our processes. So, that is our main use for the ProcessGold solution.

We use the UiPath product in order to reuse processes that we manage better and use the time of our agents more efficiently. When we established a connection with a client by phone, our agents spend a long time talking with the client and are also responsible for doing some back-end tasks. In order to reduce back-end tasks, we use RPA robots to reduce the time you need to spend on follow-up calls. For example, after a second call with the same client, you may need to fill in a form or a CRM entry. If we can simplify this task of filling out a form where we insert all the information automatically the robot saves that time. That is the main idea and the reason we use these robots.

What I like the most about this solution is that it is easy to develop and easy to train everyone how to use it. So, that means you can train more people in a short period of time and the time of training is reduced. That's the main characteristic of this tool that may have put it ahead of other choices for us. 

If I were to talk about the improvements, I think that reducing the cost would be the first thing on my list. The dashboards for statistics would be great if they were more complete and more easy to integrate. If I could also see all the statistics on a mobile phone with a special mobile application and manage all the bots, this would be helpful.

I think that they must continue to integrate more digital intelligence tools in order to increase the capabilities the product provides for the users of their solutions. I know that they provide some of these tools, but they must continue researching and improving them.

We have been using this solution for about one year.

At this moment, the stability is good. 

In some cases, we have developed some unique bots. At points, we needed to increase the number of bots. The scalability is fine. The number of people using the product for development is between three or four people in our company.

The initial set up was straightforward for this solution.

We have an internal team that makes deployments of all the programs and all of the bots.

This product is similar to Automation Anywhere and BluePrism. They are all similar and they are the leaders in the market for RPA at this moment. The ease of use of the UiPath product was attractive.

My advice for others who are looking into this product is that they have to pay attention to integrate the solution completely, taking into account all your needs and the users in your company. I mean this in the sense that you need to integrate all your applications and to know the profile of all the people who will be involved. You need to know the team you will work with and be able to unify responsibilities for the bots and the people. I think that's the most important thing to know.

On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate UiPath a nine. My opinion is that it is a good tool in order to automate all the processes in our contact center. It works to reduce the time for every phone call and makes us more productive for every phone call. 

The solutions or test cases where we have used UiPath are:

1. Formatting different types of files (.csv, .dat, and .xls) to .txt
2. Reconciling data between different applications
3. The direct-debit application process

We deployed the solution inside a virtual machine in Cloud.

The organizations where we have implemented the UiPath solution have seen reduction and savings in time and FTEs. Processors were able to focus on other tasks and have the robot work on mundane and repetitive tasks.

The most recent organization is happy with the output and is planning to have other processes automated.

The most valuable features of UiPath are the drag and drop activities.

Since UiPath offers eLearning it makes it useful for developers to learn the basic activities used in automating processes.

UiPath also offers documentation and forums that help developers during debugging.

The product should be made more friendly to non-programming users, as some functions require a background in VB.NET.

UiPath should also add activities for the Excel application like formatting Excel columns and rows.

We have been using UiPath for ten months.

The workflow was able to handle the exceptions gracefully. The solution followed the ReFrameWork template of UiPath.

The solution is scalable as we are able to reuse the workflow.

We have not reached out to customer service during the implementation.

From the start, we used UiPath in automating processes.

Installation of Studio is straightforward but the Orchestrator, we don't have visibility as the client's IT team performed the installation.

The implementation was performed by the in-house team.

We don't have visibility on the ROI, just feedback from the client to say they have seen reduction and savings in time and FTEs.

We did not evaluate other options prior to implementing UiPath. It was decided and chosen by the organization and recommended by the Business Analyst.

We have created a workflow that is dynamic and reusable.

Overall, UiPath Studio is easy to use and navigate.

We use UiPath for building business cases for customers and internally building RPA competency within my department. Our organization is just starting to implement RPA. As a business consultant, UiPath is our chosen solution for RPA implementation. 

UiPath has made it very easy to create business cases to showcase to executives the functionality and benefits of RPA. UiPath was instrumental in my initial business case, as they came in and executed the proof of concept. That was a huge help and my customer was very pleased.

I find the community most valuable as it allows you to find your solutions and people to help you.

I like being able to save components to reuse for other processes and not having to start from scratch each time.

I appreciate the simplicity of the interface as I am learning to be a developer.

I would say a better layout or interface between the Studio and Orchestrator tools would be nice.

I have been using UiPath for five months.

We did not use another solution prior to UiPath.

I'd advise others to consider sharing the costs after ensuring they understand their expectations for utilizing the capacity of the robots. Share the cost if you forecast not utilizing the entire capacity.

We did not evaluate other options before choosing UiPath.

There is already a new release and I am pleased so far. I think UiPath has done a great job making resources and tools available as well as providing opportunities for learning directly from their company and in the same quality as their employees.

My primary use case is data scraping and entry for an insurance firm.

This solution has gives us shortened customer service time. It is easy to use and a lively community is always ready to help resolve an issue.

The most valuable features are PDF, Excel automation, and web scraping.

The Try-Catch feature is awesome.

The emailing and integration with self-service BI systems are areas that need improvement.

I have been using UiPath for eight months.

Our primary use is RPA in insurance.

This solution has given us the fast automation of processes.

The most valuable features of this solution are that it is powerful and easy to use.

The operations need to be improved.

I have been using this solution for two years.

We use this solution for our business purposes. We use it from the back end all the way to the front end. That's where we are looking to use this, although we haven't fully implemented it yet. We are exploring more processes to use it for.

Mainly, this solution has reduced the need for manual intervention. That's the main thing. It has saved us time. We can now increase our ROI.

We run a few automations in a virtual environment, but not all of them. I've been using some other automation tools, like QTP/UFT.

I would rate the ease of use of the platform for automating our company's processes as four out of five.

Its intuitiveness is great. This solution is very user-friendly. There is almost no need to have programming knowledge.

The solution has helped us eliminate human errors, by about 40%. It also saves us time.

The solution is fairly stable. I would rate it as four of five for stability.

So far, we have almost 50 people in our organization involved in our automation program.

The initial setup was in between simple and complex. As even my colleague was fairly new at that time, he came across a few challenges. However, he could overcome them and now I'm in three of the processes that are in products.

It took about three months from the time we purchased a UiPath license until our first robot was in production.

We used a consultant. I would rate them as four out of five.

We have definitely seen a performance benefit. Now that it is in the production processes, we are able to see ROI, in terms of saving time on repetitive tasks and the manual effort saved. That's our return on investment.

I would rate this solution as eight out of ten because it has saved us a lot of manual intervention, as well as time and money. We may have not yet explored the full horizon of what this solution can do for us.

I use Studio, Orchestrator, attended and unattended robots.

My primary use for this solution is back-office automation in a banking environment.

We run automations in a virtual environment, both for development and production. The robots are implemented in a development environment first, which is connected to Citrix. Once the process automation is finalized, including deployment and UAT has passed, we move the same file from the development Orchestrator to the production Orchestrator in the production environment. Production is also in Citrix.

With respect to how easy it is to automate our company's processes, on a scale of one to five, I would rate this solution a three. We have legacy Oracle applications and I'm finding it difficult to find selectors for the older, legacy systems.

On a scale of one to five, judging how beneficial it is, I would rate the training a four. Some of the lessons are really easy, whereas others are more difficult, but you need to finish everything, otherwise you cannot go further. This is what I didn't like about it.

It took approximately one month to implement our first robot. Prior to purchasing the license, we implemented our PoC using the Community Edition. That took three weeks. After that, my company bought the license and it took about a week to put into production.

With respect to saving time, we save a lot of manual hours by using automation. I would estimate that we save eighty hours per month, on average.

In some of our processes, it took an hour to run them and the resource used to have to watch them manually. They are now automated and running in unattended mode, and the resource is finding other activities to do. There are more than one hundred of these types of processes.

In terms of eliminating human errors, I would say that we have a ninety-five percent reduction in our rate of errors.

The most valuable features are the scheduler, queues, and activities. The activities are there for applications like Excel, Word, and Outlook.

More Excel activities should be included. We do have basic Excel activities, but we don't have ones to do things like add colors or formulas. For these types of operations, we always use custom objects and have to write custom code or pay for them.

With respect to the stability, on a scale from one to five, I would rate this solution a four.

My automation is one hundred percent working in my dev environment; however, the same package is not working with one hundred percent success in the production environment. It's a ninety-eight percent success rate, because sometimes there is a network issue, like slowness, and it's breaking my automation.

We have eleven people working in our automation group including process architects, developers, and testers.

I would rate our experience with technical support a five out of five. Whenever I needed help on the infrastructure, or with development, they immediately responded and tried to solve the problem. In cases where it was not solvable, they would jump on a call and look at through our code to help us out.

Prior to using this solution, we used both Blue Prism and Automation Anywhere.

When it comes to deciding the suitability for automation and the choice of vendor, we consider the results of the process mining. We evaluate how many hours and how much money will be saved. We also consider how frequently the automation will be run, such as quarterly, monthly, or even daily.

One of our clients did not like the support from Blue Prism, which is why we jumped onto UiPath and implemented it.

The initial setup of this solution is complex. We began immediately with a setup for high availability, but somehow we messed it up. We did not have the proper documentation and ended up getting help from UiPath.

They helped us, but overall, I would say that it is not straightforward.

We implemented this solution in-house with support from UiPath.

We have not yet seen ROI from this solution.

The licensing fees for this solution are $8,000 USD annually.

Everybody says that this solution is easy to implement, but I do not find it that easy. It may be true for very simple processes, but not for more complex ones. For that, we need to have some kind of development and analytical skills. 

That said, from a code developer's point of view, I haven't found any difficulties with this solution. My advice for anybody who is considering this type of solution is to try UiPath.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We use Studio, attended robots, and Orchestrator.

Our primary use case is automating support services for accounts payable and accounts receivable. We are still implementing and our robots are not live in a production environment yet. For the time being, we are using attended robots but we are looking into unattended robots as well.

We run automations in a virtual environment using VMware, and the implementation was straightforward. It was easy to set up.

With respect to how easy it is to automate our company's processes, on a scale of one to five, I would rate this solution a four. You don't need any programming skills to be able to leverage the tools. We have used other tools such as Blue Prism and Automation Anywhere, and this solution was easier than those.

On a scale of one to five, judging how beneficial it is, I would rate the training a five. It is very simple and can be easily demonstrated.

From the point that we purchased our UiPath license until we had our first robot was approximately six months. 

In terms of eliminating human errors, this is the expectation once our robots are live in production.

Once our robots are live, we expect to see a fifty percent reduction in time for certain tasks. It will save thousands of hours.

We leverage all of the components in this solution.

The most valuable feature is Studio, which is a very powerful tool.

I am looking forward to new cognitive and artificial intelligence capabilities.

I would like to see voice recognition and better OCR capabilities. Today, we have to leverage other tools for this, so we are hoping that UiPath matures in this area.

This product is very stable, but we have some issues with security.

We have about five people working on automation in our organization.

We have a CSM and they are awesome. On a scale of one to five, I would rate our support from the CSM a five.

Before using this solution, we used to leverage our internal tools.

The initial setup of this application was straightforward. It was easy, and like other applications that use a Windows installer.

We used an integrator to assist us with deployment. I would rate them a three out of five.

We have not seen any ROI because our bots are not yet live. However, we have done a calculation and expect fifty percent savings in time.

The licensing fees for this solution are approximately $100,000 USD annually.

Before choosing this solution we evaluated Blue Prism and Automation Anywhere. UiPath seemed to be the easiest one to implement.

Blue Prism seemed to be too technical for some of our business users, while Automation Anywhere did not have attractive pricing.

This is definitely a solution that I would recommend. From my experience, this is a technology that is easy to leverage among users that do not have a technical background.

This is a good solution, but there are still gaps and the product could be more mature. The OCR capabilities definitely need to be improved.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.