Zapier Reviews

We use Zapier to connect AirTable to other apps that live on Zapier's platform, like QuickBooks, Google Drive, and Google Docs. We also use Zapier for automated document creation utilizing webhooks, pulling in data from a WordPress site or form software into AirTable. When consulting a client and trying to connect different apps, I often utilize Zapier if it can't be done through AirTable's automation.

Webhooks are the most valuable feature of Zapier.

After mapping them out, and they'd worked for a while, I've had Zapier fail. I set up a very complex app with AirTable, Zapier, and Asana. For generating tasks in Asana based on the template, they changed all the actions with Asana, which no longer made that possible.

I have been using Zapier for four years.

I rate Zapier an eight out of ten for stability. For the most part, Zapier is stable. However, it has downtime like any other cloud-based software.

Zapier is a scalable solution. You can buy as many Zaps as you need and utilize as many tasks as you need.

Zapier’s initial setup is straightforward.

Since Zapier is a tool, it does not need a deployment. It's a tool that can be created in two minutes.

There are products cheaper than Zapier. You can start with a free plan and get limited access. The least expensive plan is $24 a month, and you can go all the way to $800 a month if you're a huge company using many tasks.

Zapier is deployed on the cloud. I would recommend Zapier to other users.

Overall, I rate Zapier an eight out of ten.

Zapier is a really good tool for connecting multiple different platforms and data sources. For example, with Quickbase, I can easily integrate data from other sources like AWS or task-tracking platforms such as ClickUp or Asana. It's very very similar to QuickDesk's pipeline feature but offers more depth. Another example would be integrating with apps like Airtable, Salesforce, or Hub. Zapier has connections for all of these platforms, making it easy to connect and move data. It's essentially a tool for automating tasks.

Zapier has allowed me to integrate between two different platforms a lot quicker than if I had to manually write APIs or Webhooks.

I'm open to using it when there's a use case for it. If something can be handled with QuickDesk pipelines, I would prefer to use that because the client is typically already paying for Quickbase, which includes pipelines. However, if there's a situation where Zapier is better suited, such as having a built-in integration that pipelines don't offer, I would consider using Zapier. Currently, I don't have any specific plans in mind.

The most valuable feature is the wide variety of built-in integrations it offers. In my experience, I haven't come across anything else that provides such a diverse range of connections.

I would like to see them improve the Quickbase integration. Currently, it only allows triggering actions when records are added, but it would be more useful if we could also trigger actions when records are modified or deleted. It would be helpful if these features were there. 

I started using Zapier probably four and a half to five years ago. However, I haven't been using it as heavily. I used it a lot in the beginning, and then I recently started using it again a few months ago. So, I feel pretty confident in using that tool. I am using the latest version.

I would rate it around nine. It's very stable.

I would say it's probably an eight.

I have spoken to thecustomer service and support team about a few technical matters. I would say their technical support is very good.

The initial setup is straightforward. It's essentially a low-code platform for making API and web calls.

In my experience, it provides a good return on investment.

It's very affordable, especially for companies.

I would say that there are certainly other software options available for Zapier, and I would encourage you to explore each one to consider what you're trying to integrate. However, Zapier is a really good tool and worth looking into.

Overall, I would give it a nine.

We're using Zapier to connect third parties.

What's most valuable in Zapier is its simplicity, seamlessness, and smooth plug-in, so you won't need to build code for every action. I'm not a developer, but I can use Zapier, though I've learned from developers how to connect, so it's easier for me to use Zapier.

The solution fits the needs of enterprise-level solutions. My company is more of a small to medium enterprise, and Zapier fits its needs.

The best feature of Zapier is that every third party you could think of is there. It's a cheap place to know all the third parties in the market. webMethods has a similar feature, but it's not as easy as Zapier.

Marketing-wise, Zapier is also better than webMethods. When you Google, you can find Zapier immediately.

Zapier is also great for beginners or people starting to learn about integration and eCommerce, while webMethods is more for integration experts or enterprise-level integrations. Zapier is novice-friendly.

A development background is necessary when using Zapier, so it's an area for improvement. To use Zapier, you need to learn more about IT architecture. It's easier to use for people who spend time learning about productivity and know more about data.

Zapier needs more YouTube or video tutorials or more training for people. That would help a lot. In particular, Zapier should have documentation for every connector. Zapier did a great job talking about connectivity, but it needs more documentation on how you can connect ManyChat with PostgreSQL, for example. 

Its documentation needs to be more detailed and visual. Sometimes people want to watch rather than listen or read guidelines.

More integration with third-party software would be great in terms of what I want in Zapier in the future.

I'd rate Zapier as ten out of ten.

I'm a customer of Zapier.

I've used Zapier for nearly two or three years.

Zapier is a very stable solution, but the problem with it is if your credit card lacks funds, the Zapier team will downgrade your subscription, which impacts your service's stability. I've faced this situation before, and I remember how a lot of data was misplaced, and I had to recover the data, which took a very long time manually.

I tried to make a recovery by batch, but because the license was downgraded, it impacted the number of data. For example, on the free version, you can have up to five hundred data; imagine if you've done thirty thousand data. If your card payment doesn't go through during renewal, Zapier will downgrade your data to five hundred, and the service will stop completely.

Zapier is a very scalable solution.

I have yet to contact the Zapier technical support team.

I didn't use a different solution apart from Zapier because it had many connectors, which I liked, so I didn't look for other solutions.

Setting up Zapier didn't take me long because I had the help of a developer. I would have found the process difficult if I had done it all by myself. After the setup, whenever I encounter an issue with Zapier, I know how to solve it without going back to the developer.

We're still in the trial period for Zapier, connecting with third parties, but if we continue to use Zapier, we could have a great ROI.

Zapier is a paid service. Its license renews monthly, and Zapier will downgrade your subscription to the free version when your credit card doesn't have funds. That significantly impacts your service because everything halts completely.

Zapier doesn't have any hidden costs. You'll see all pricing information on the website so that you won't be surprised at the end of the month.

Only two people use Zapier within my company.

One specialist handles the deployment and maintenance of Zapier.

How extensively you use Zapier depends on the volume of registrations. For example, suppose you have a high volume of registrations and a high volume of usage. In that case, it's better to use webMethods or IBM API Connect because Zapier is more for the number of tasks or times you perform the task, so Zapier could become expensive if you have many visitors and many actions happening inside your application or website. My company's volume is lower because my team has been in the trial phase for two years. Still, after the trial, the volume of sales and visitors increase could become high, meaning the usage of Zapier would be higher.

My advice to anyone planning to use Zapier in the future is to go through the same journey I've been where I sat with a developer to understand how things work because you won't find many YouTube guidelines on Zapier.

We use Zapier for integrating multiple applications.

Zapier’s most valuable feature is its ability to interconnect applications or devices.

At the moment, they allow a limited number of apps. I look forward to getting more apps for each package.

We have been using Zapier for three and a half years. At present, we are using the latest version.

I rate the platform’s stability a nine out of ten.

I rate the product’s scalability a nine out of ten. We have four to five administrators and 50 users for Zapier.

The deployment time depends on the tools used for the workflow process. It takes approximately a day to complete.

Zapier is worth the investment.

The product is reasonably priced. We purchase its yearly license.

I rate Zapier a nine out of ten. I advise others to use the product for a seamless experience. They can connect many applications without coding.

I use Zapier for the lead generation process. 

We can connect Zapier with Zoho CRM for lead generation. I like the tool's drag and drop feature. 

The solution does not work properly when we apply filters and we get errors. 

I would rate Zapier's scalability an eight out of ten. 

The tool's setup is easy. 

Zapier's price is good. 

I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

The product's most valuable feature is automation. We do not have to deal with any functionality. Another efficient feature is looping. It doesn't incur additional costs for extra steps and requires no coding.

One notable concern is the time-out resources assigned to automation when running. It could support various languages along with Python.

We have been using Zapier for five years.

It is a stable platform. However, when automation fails, they could provide information about the reasons for failure. We have run automated tests again in debug mode with the same data. I rate the stability a seven out of ten.

I rate the platform's scalability a five out of ten.

It is an easy-to-deploy product with free trials available.

The users are willing to work around issues and assist with replacements related to custom firmware and existing software. It demonstrates a proactive and problem-solving mindset. The users prefer integration rather than retraining or retracing to maintain a seamless workflow. However, it is expensive. 

Automating this process through Zapier eliminated the need for repetitive copying and pasting, freeing valuable time for more meaningful and strategic activities. The integration with Python has helped with efficient visual-based data manipulation.

I rate it a seven out of ten.

We use Zapier to integrate Salesforce with other tools that we use within our organization. 

Zapier is user friendly and makes it easy to integrate different tools. It has a drag and drop functionality which makes it easy to connect environments. 

The user interface for Zapier could be improved. It also takes some time to sync the data between different environments. 

I have used this solution for one year. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution.

The initial setup is straightforward. 

We consulted a third party to implement this solution. 

This is a very good solution and I would recommend using it for integrations. There are other similar tools which have the same functionality but I have not used those so I would recommend Zapier. 

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

We primarily use the solution for a Google Sheets integration.

Its integration capabilities and the kind of automation it provides to the user are fantastic. It has integration with lots and lots of tools. 

The solution is very stable.

Scalability is achievable. 

The solution is a SaaS and does not require a complex setup.

The pricing of the solution is quite expensive. 

I've been using the solution since I've been in this company - for maybe two years. It's my understanding we were using it before 2016.

The stability is great. There are no bugs or glitches. it's reliable. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution scales well. A company can expand it if it needs to. 

Since you can integrate most of your tasks, the scalability is there. You don't have to manually do it yourself. Zapier does it for you. There are immense possibilities to scale your business through Zapier.

In our organization, maybe around six to seven people have access to this product.

We might increase usage, although right now, that is not the plan. 

I cannot say whether we have contacted technical support or not. So far, we haven't been in any situations where we feel difficulties or complexities. While we might have contacted them as an organization, I personally have never needed to. Therefore I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are. 

Before Zapier I don't know if we uses a different cloud data integration solution or not.

It's a SaaS product. We don't have to install it on any device.

There is no technical team needed for the installation as there is no such installation required.

The cost of the solution is high. It's a bit costly as compared to Tableau or other solutions that are available in the market.

I've seen situations where there are individual users and they prefer to keep it on a monthly basis, however, our organization uses it under a yearly subscription. Companies, based upon the users, can increase or decrease the users as per their requirements.

There's a tool called Tableau that is similar.

I would highly recommend Zapier to people - especially if they want to scale their business or they want to automate most of their tasks. Zapier is highly recommendable.

I'd rate them at a nine out of ten overall.