Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Testim?

Get the report
Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Featured Testim reviews

Testim mindshare

Product category:
As of March 2026, the mindshare of Testim in the Functional Testing Tools category stands at 2.8%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Testim2.8%
Tricentis Tosca12.0%
BrowserStack6.8%
Other78.4%
Functional Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on Testim reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryFunctional Testing ToolsMar 24, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 24, 2026Download
ComparisonTestim vs Tricentis ToscaMar 24, 2026Download
ComparisonTestim vs BrowserStackMar 24, 2026Download
ComparisonTestim vs Worksoft CertifyMar 24, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Tricentis Tosca4.112.0%96%113 interviewsAdd to research
OpenText Functional Testing4.06.2%87%98 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business143
Midsize Enterprise66
Large Enterprise268
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
6%
Retailer
6%
Educational Organization
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Construction Company
4%
University
3%
Government
3%
Media Company
3%
Consumer Goods Company
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Legal Firm
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
 
Testim Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Director - Quality Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees4.5I lead quality engineering, requiring extensive application testing. Manual methods were cumbersome, prompting a shift to automation. Testim's smart locator eased script development and maintenance, though faster scripting and enhanced API features would improve test suite creation.
Senior Consultant at Eviden France4.5I use Testim for automating testing scripts in a corporate bank's product development. Its record and playback feature allows easy automation without extensive coding. Unlike Selenium, Testim simplifies the process, making it ideal for beginners. No improvements are needed.
Director at Xceedance4.5Our company uses Testim as a policy administrator system for insurance, specifically to automate test cases for customer implementations. It efficiently runs and stores multiple test cases, though improvements are needed in documentation and scalability. We deploy via Microsoft Azure.
System Analyst - Quality Assurance at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5We use Testim for test cases, and its most valuable feature is the recently added AI functionality. However, it occasionally suffers from stability issues, particularly after running multiple tests, affecting its consistency and reliability. We haven't considered other solutions.
Associate Director, UX at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees4.5We use Testim for application and integration testing, finding it easy to use with valuable features like session recording and visual error notifications. While it boosts productivity and justifies its cost, branch management and some system notifications could improve.
Director Test Services at a tech services company with 201-500 employees5.0No summary available
Senior Test Analyst at Colgate5.0No summary available
Test Lead at Mpart3.5We use Testim for automation testing to manage Java scripts efficiently. Its simplicity in recording and playback is valuable. However, improvements are needed in pricing, visual testing, and PDF handling, requiring third-party tools for screenshots and PDF validation.