OpenText Software Delivery Management Reviews

Name: OpenText Software Delivery Management
Brand: OpenText
Rating: 4.1 (41 reviews)

4.1 out of 5

41 reviews
92% willing to recommend

What is OpenText Software Delivery Management?

OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.

Get the OpenText Software Delivery Management Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Software Delivery Management, GitLab, Microsoft Azure DevOps and more!

OpenText Software Delivery Management is the #7 ranked solution in top Application Lifecycle Management Suites and top Enterprise Agile Planning Tools. PeerSpot users give OpenText Software Delivery Management an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. OpenText Software Delivery Management is most commonly compared to GitLab: OpenText Software Delivery Management vs GitLab. OpenText Software Delivery Management is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 73% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 25% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Software Delivery Management

June 2025

Get the report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Featured OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews

GeorgNauerz

Managing Partner at Georg Nauerz Consulting

I think the area of release management in the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the connection between releases and scrum teams needs improvement, as it could be optimized owing to its linkages, making it very uncomfortable as soon as you have strong teams or scrum teams that work with different items over several releases. In future product releases, the solution needs to focus a bit more on the metric part. The product's dashboard is a metric for productivity and process control.

Read full review

Raghunathan Govindarajapuram

Principal at Infosys

The number of individuals participating in the deployment process varies. Our company provides testing services, employs 34,000 individuals, and many of our clients utilize Micro Focus ALM Octane. This implies that many people use this tool, after considering 34,000 end-users from our company's end who are using Micro Focus ALM Octane. For deployment, the number of required tech engineers depends on the size of the project. For installation, one or two people may suffice. However, for usage, there will be many others who need to use it. The tool itself does not require any maintenance. However, it may require customization based on the specific needs of each customer. Workflows may need to be customized to meet the unique requirements of each customer. It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Vindy Yonathan

Assistant QA Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

I have familiarity with Micro Focus ALM Octane because I'm currently using it. I'm using the latest version of the solution. As it's only been a month since Micro Focus ALM Octane was implemented, only three people use it within my company, in particular, administrators and engineers. For the deployment and maintenance of Micro Focus ALM Octane, one experienced person is sufficient. My company has plans to expand Micro Focus ALM Octane usage. I'm still not sure if I'd recommend Micro Focus ALM Octane to others because I'm still exploring it. I'm rating Micro Focus ALM Octane as seven out of ten because other products have better integration with open-source solutions versus Micro Focus ALM Octane. I'm a customer of Micro Focus ALM Octane.

Read full review

OpenText Software Delivery Management mindshare

Product category:

As of July 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category stands at 6.0%, up from 5.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites	Jul 14, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Jul 14, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Jira	Jul 14, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Microsoft Azure DevOps	Jul 14, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM)	Jul 14, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
GitLab	4.2	N/A	97%	85 interviews Add to research
Microsoft Azure DevOps	4.1	15.4%	95%	133 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

OpenText Software Delivery Management is valued for its Agile methodologies, seamless browser compatibility, integration with DevOps tools, and comprehensive features like backlog, pipeline, and traceability. Users appreciate the ease of customization, intuitive user interface, and robust reporting capabilities. It supports Waterfall and Agile development and offers strong CI/CD integration, enhancing project visibility and management. Its flexibility in handling complex projects, integrating existing tools, and facilitating collaboration further enhances its appeal.

"The ability to generate audit evidence with a single click saves ten days of work for ten people, enabling them to focus on other tasks."
"It is a very scalable solution."
"The integration capability of ALM Octane was very straightforward. We had a supporting team, and they provided us with detailed documentation."

Room for Improvement

OpenText Software Delivery Management faces challenges in project setup complexity, integration with tools like JIRA, and an unintuitive requirements management module. Licensing issues and limited dashboard functionalities hinder user experience. Reporting capabilities need enhancement for better usability. Users request improvements in automated testing visibility, workspace management, and synchronization tools. Additional features like mobile testing options, FedRAMP certification, and enhanced security management are desired, along with more customization in filtering and widgets.

"There is room for improvement in OpenText ALM Octane's flexibility. While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs."
"The tool's price is high, making it an area where improvement is high."
"Promoting it more could help a lot of projects."

ROI

Octane significantly enhances cost efficiency by automating processes like project creation and user management, reducing server usage, and streamlining tool integration. Users experience faster testing cycles and lower testing costs. Predictive analytics and automation promise substantial long-term returns, despite some challenges during the transition from earlier tools. Quantifiable benefits include savings from license costs and improved team productivity. While specific returns vary, the overall consensus is that Octane offers a significant financial advantage.

Pricing

OpenText Software Delivery Management is often perceived as expensive, especially compared to open-source alternatives. However, it offers a compelling set of features and flexibility with its licensing model, which can help mitigate high initial costs. While some organizations find the pricing comparable to other enterprise tools, others note that high costs are justified by its comprehensive functionality, flexibility, and ability to integrate broadly. Choosing this tool depends greatly on specific enterprise needs and the potential for license sharing or volume discounts.

"The tool's price is extremely high."
"The product is highly priced compared to other tools."
"I would say that it is an affordable product. There is an annual service fee, which is one of the additional payments to be made apart from the standard licensing costs attached to the solution."

Popular Use Cases

OpenText Software Delivery Management is utilized for Agile project management, test management, and application lifecycle management. It integrates requirements, backlog, defect, and test lifecycle into a cohesive system. It supports Behavior-Driven Development, test automation, and integrates with tools like Jenkins and TestCafe. Organizations use it for Agile and Waterfall projects, ensuring traceability and quality management. It's employed across various domains, including SAP and Teamcenter, facilitating efficient test planning and execution, especially in large-scale software migrations and integrations.

Service and Support

OpenText Software Delivery Management offers responsive support, engaging with customers at multiple levels, including R&D. Users appreciate direct communication and quick resolutions. Despite occasional delays with certain features and follow-up, many value interactions with knowledgeable teams. While some report slow escalation, others enjoy premium assistance and adaptability to custom needs. Enhanced online help and engagement have surprised some users pleasantly. Suggestions include improving flexibility and coordination among support teams for seamless service delivery.

Deployment

Many found OpenText Software Delivery Management setup straightforward, especially those transitioning from Micro Focus ALM. However, complexity arose when integrating additional components like ElasticSearch. SaaS users generally had an easier experience, requiring minimal input. On-prem deployments varied, with some needing extensive configuration and integration efforts, particularly in complex environments. Installation time ranged from hours to months depending on the organization's familiarity with the tools, infrastructure, and requirements. Technical knowledge was consistently highlighted as necessary.

Scalability

OpenText Software Delivery Management is highly scalable, with users expressing confidence based on prior experiences. While some note potential licensing hurdles, scalability itself is praised. Many report smooth transitioning from previous systems and note that additional hardware can address performance needs. The system effectively handles a range of users and projects, with several users preparing for further expansion.

Stability

OpenText Software Delivery Management demonstrates strong stability, frequently releasing updates with minimal issues. Users appreciate its reliability, even during regular updates, and commend its solid performance. Occasional minor challenges like user interface adjustments and integration hiccups occur but are resolved quickly. Performance remains consistent for small teams, though some anticipate testing with larger groups. Micro Focus's proactive support enhances user confidence. Many rate stability high, with frequent updates bolstering its robust reputation.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our OpenText Software Delivery Management Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers

By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Educational Organization

Retailer

Healthcare Company

Insurance Company

University

Media Company

Comms Service Provider

Energy/Utilities Company

Construction Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Performing Arts

Pharma/Biotech Company

Non Profit

Legal Firm

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Hospitality Company

Transportation Company

Outsourcing Company

Recruiting/Hr Firm

Consumer Goods Company

Compare OpenText Software Delivery Management with alternative products

Learn more about OpenText Software Delivery Management

Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.

What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?

Versatile across browsers with consistent performance.
Seamless CI/CD integration for smooth development processes.
Intuitive interface aiding in efficiency and ease of use.
Comprehensive backlog management ensures organized prioritization.
Automated testing aligns with Agile and DevOps principles.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Software Delivery Management?

Enhanced traceability from inception to delivery.
Improved project management efficiency through streamlined processes.
Robust reporting capabilities offering detailed insights.
Increased flexibility in customization enabling tailored experiences.
Predictive analytics for better decision-making.

OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.

OpenText Software Delivery Management was previously known as Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane.