CA Asset Portfolio Management integrates with Service Desk, automates asset discovery, and offers centralized inventory, enhancing cost control and license compliance while reducing audit costs and risks for organizations managing assets across multiple locations.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| CA Asset Portfolio Management | 2.5% |
| ServiceNow | 12.9% |
| Freshservice | 5.4% |
| Other | 79.2% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | IT Asset Management | May 8, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | May 8, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | CA Asset Portfolio Management vs ServiceNow | May 8, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | CA Asset Portfolio Management vs Lansweeper | May 8, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | CA Asset Portfolio Management vs Qualys VMDR | May 8, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ServiceNow | 4.3 | 12.9% | 92% | 228 interviewsAdd to research |
| Qualys VMDR | 4.2 | 2.6% | 94% | 96 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 24 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
CA Asset Portfolio Management is designed to simplify asset tracking, enhance decision-making for new purchases, and ensure precise lifecycle tracking. It provides significant value by reconciling inventory with licenses and producing compliance reports, making it ideal for organizations operating in decentralized environments. Users can consolidate information efficiently by integrating it with their CMDBs. While it performs strongly, there is room for improvement in integration with HR and other systems, initial comprehension, financial reporting, and cloud cost management. Enhanced mobile management and batch information uploading are also desired, along with a unified inventory and compliance system.
What are the key features?In industries like IT and cloud management, CA Asset Portfolio Management is utilized for tracking software purchases versus installations, ensuring efficient lifecycle asset management, and supporting compliance efforts. It is integrated into CMDBs to consolidate resources and manage decentralized environments. Users pair it with tools like Client Automation and CA SAM for effective hardware and software discovery, making it a robust choice for asset management.
CA Asset Portfolio Management was previously known as CA IT Asset Manager, CA Asset Manager, ITAM, IT Asset Manager, CA SAM, CA Software Asset Manager, Asset Portfolio Management, Asset Portfolio Manager.
First Horizon National Corporation, Logicalis, Racing and Wagering Western Australia
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise systems management team lead | 4.5 | I value CA APM's Service Desk integration. It's stable and scalable, but I find batch uploading large data slow and complex compared to Micro Focus. I recommend it, rating it nine out of ten. |
| System Architect ITSM application at Michigan State University | 3.5 | I use CA Asset Management for centralized asset data, improving hardware visibility and depreciation insights. While powerful and stable, it needs mobile device management and a modern app; its UI is also dated and convoluted. |
| Software Asset Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | I use this for discovery and compliance, finding it reduces costs and audit risk. However, the interface between solutions is difficult, and support for CA SAM is problematic. Despite these issues, I recommend it. |
| VP Purcimilor Operations | 5.0 | I use CA Asset Management to ensure software compliance, track end-of-life, and optimize licenses, replacing a complex manual process. While catalog updates and initial setup require effort, its stability, scalability, and CA's responsive support are valuable. |
| ITSM Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | My solution is great for ITSM and asset lifecycle tracking, with strong stability. I desire more audit control, better reporting, software EOL data, and lower cost, though support can be slow. |
| IT Governance Manager at a financial services firm | 3.5 | I find this an easy-to-use, stable product that integrates well, offering good control. While it needs stronger reporting and more CA Client Automation integration, I recommend it. |
| SVP Of IT Services at State Employees Credit Union | 4.0 | I'm very satisfied with this solution's ability to mitigate licensing risks and automate processes, despite its complex initial setup. We're still in early implementation but have already seen significant value and responsive support. |
| Systems Admin at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I find this product invaluable for tracking assets across my large organization, aiding compliance and scalability. Recent customer service and streamlined upgrades are good. I wish for a feature to share best practices among users. |
